Re: review swap: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting

-rpms/chromaprint-0.5-2.fc15.src.rpm I can do it. Here is mine for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754698 -- Nikos Roussos about http://autoverse.net/ | linkedinhttp://gr.linkedin.com/in/comzeradd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Please reply to the list with any requests for ownership changes, and I'll complete them on a first-come, first-served basis. I can take this: openclipart -- Open Clip Art Library fas: comzeradd -- devel mailing list

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

I would also like to take this one: skyviewer -- Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files (but just the Fedora branches) FAS: comzeradd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications. Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind. We should lead here like we do in other areas. +1 I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200: Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01: Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result into this old mother type

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 13:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: I disagree with that. Fedora releases had some small regression introduced via updates from time but is is *very* usable as a stable operating system. I disagree. It's usable by the kind of people who use Fedora. Who like shiny

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 09:37 -0200, Henrique Junior wrote: The guys behind openSUSE created a good approach with Tumbleweed. By adding this repo users can opt-in to the (semi)rolling model. Tumbleweed is more like a pool where updated, stable, non

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: Simon Lukasik isim...@fedoraproject.org writes: Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months. There were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I am not sure if something like the following has been ever discussed:

Re: forked library

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 20:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: Hi, I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version though depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since the idjc upstream

Fosdem Cross-Distro devroom

Just an update about Fosdem. The dealing for talk submissions at the Cross Distro Devroom got extended until the end of the year [1]. I have already submitted a talk [2], but I think it's the only Fedora related. So anyone interested on doing a presentation, now it's the time to propose it

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

I see no real reason to change our default desktop. Even if we consider Gnome 3 as a research (which I don't), Fedora is known to adopt innovative technologies. -- Nikos Roussos comzeradd @ freenode.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:10 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: On Monday, January 28, 2013, Nikos Roussos wrote: On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:53 +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the traditional desktop interfaces

GPT

I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting partitions, but it creates an msdos partition table instead of gpt. Is something changed on the default anaconda configuration since

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting partitions

Re: GPT

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad models having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an extreme action if all lenovo models

Re: GPT

On Apr 23, 2012 1:12 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I already have a GPT partition (from my previous installation), but Anaconda complains that my boot partition should be of type msdos. The only way to proceed seems

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Some feedback from a succefull installation of F17 TC4 on a Macbook Air 13 (Model number A1369). Unfortunately the TC5 didn't boot. For TC4 we had to change label grub option to LIVE in order to boot. Is this a typo? Anaconda worked just fine and installation was completed succefully. Only thing

twolame - legal

I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on

Re: twolame - legal

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:47 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free

Review Swap

I'd like a review about sparkleshare package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293 Does somebody like to swap reviews? Thanks in advance -- Nikos Roussos about http://autoverse.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Review Swap

Hi Pavel, Ok :-) On Feb 5, 2012 8:16 PM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote: Hello, Nikos. I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote: I'd like a review about sparkleshare package: https

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Chris Evich cev...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/29/2012 07:46 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Emanuel Rietveldcodehot...@gmail.com** wrote: On 02/29/2012 01:15 PM, drago01 wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Neal

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

Here is a weird example of how Fedora currenty handles some permission procedures. I created a standard user account (no admin rights) and I'm trying to install a package. When I press apply I'm prompted to enter a password. Since I have no admin rights I would expect to be asked for the root

/usr/share/applications weird error on koji

-- Nikos Roussos http://autoverse.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: /usr/share/applications weird error on koji

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/19/2012 02:32 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.comwrote: On 03/19/2012 12:50 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build a package. It's

Re: The official way to upgrade F18 to F19

Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)? I would do some test.. Thanks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F Is there any plan currently for

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote: On 25.01.2014 17:35, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 11:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Debian, who has a similar stance on non-free Software, does a way better job in that area than Fedora does. Well, not really - they don't

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:47 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 02/12/2014 04:31 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads advertisements from the web and shows them to users? I think allowed is probably the wrong term to use here. Fedora

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a non-profit one? (I'm not stating my opinion here, just trying

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 18:25:48 +0200, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the users location, without any collection of personal data (except of course from checking the location of his

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On February 13, 2014 6:04:01 PM EET, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: Question (2) Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show advertisements in Firefox? Sub-question (2b): Why do we care about

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:23 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : The New Tab feature

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 17:39 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit : On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : The New Tab feature will provide quick access to popular sites

Re: The Forgotten F: A Tale of Fedora's Foundations

On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 08:36 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: The language in this Foundation is sometimes dangerously unclear. For example, it pretty much explicitly forbids the use of non-free components in the creation of Fedora (sorry, folks: you can't use Photoshop to create your package

Re: The Forgotten F: A Tale of Fedora's Foundations

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:46 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: - Original Message - From: Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org There is also a third group, somewhere in between, who believe that's ok to ship Free Software that connects and interops with proprietary services

Re: future contributions and package updates jmarrero

Hi Joseph, On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:22 -0400, Joseph Marrero wrote: Hello, My FAS is : jmarrero I can not update any of my packages for the time being, will know If I can continue contributing in about a month. I can pass the ownership to who ever wants to maintain the packages I currently

Re: Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

On 09/27/2014 07:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: * python-oauth I can take this signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship applications to carry ads and report tracking data? If I search 'twitter' on Gnome Shell I'm prompted with twitter.com. So whatever decision we make for ads let's make sure we are consistent. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On November 15, 2014 5:51:28 PM EET, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 15:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: IMHO, we should consider dropping Firefox from Fedora entirely Showing ads does not make Firefox nonfree. The only reason we should completely remove Firefox

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel lars.sei...@gmail.com mailto:lars.sei...@gmail.com wrote: So

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

This doesn't seem relevant to this discussion, unless Fedora browsers are automatically, and without the user's explicit knowledge or permission, navigating to Google's search engine, which (AFAICT) they are not. Same happens with these tiles. No data is sent back to

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/17/2014 11:47 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 11:37 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: I don't consider my IP address a call to home. [...] Even Gnome checks my IP's location to fix my timezone. Not by default, you have to enable this explicitly. True, as you also have

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/17/2014 01:49 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Mustafa Muhammad mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click by tapping is off by default. Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG, but tapping is useful for us

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

I'm talking about the advertisement part. Some people seem to be bothered by this alone. Tiles feature indeed promotes some websites, but we already do that. No, actually we don't. We promote websites because we honestly think they're useful, not because we're paid to do so. That's

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 11:29 AM, Les Howell wrote: On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 15:50 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Things are not black and white there is a disable touchpad while typing option which would solve your problem while not making the impression that something is

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/18/2014 02:55 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 11:15 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: I'm talking about the advertisement part. Some people seem to be bothered by this alone. Tiles feature indeed promotes some websites, but we already do that. No, actually we don't. We

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On November 18, 2014 7:08:47 PM EET, Benjamin Kreuter ben.kreu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 15:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: This is a moral judgment, so it's irrelevant for making a policy decision (from Fedora's point of view). Money or not, we need a consistent policy

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/18/2014 07:21 PM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On November 18, 2014 7:08:47 PM EET, Benjamin Kreuter ben.kreu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 15:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: This is a moral judgment, so

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 11:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jiri Eischmann wrote: If you're talking about Workstation, then you should probably propose it to their working group on the desktop mailing list. The working groups are supposed to do such decisions now. If you're talking about one of other spins

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/19/2014 12:34 AM, Lars Seipel wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: No, actually we don't. We promote websites because we honestly think they're useful, not because we're paid to do so. That's irrelevant. Paid or not, promoting websites through tiles

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/23/2014 06:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/18/2014 08:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos comzer...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM

Re: Other download options

Speaking of F21 downloads, how is that the fedoraproject.org redirects to getfedora.org? Is this something permanent? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Is ARM productized?

Having some hard time to discover the ARM F21 image at the new website. Is the link somewhere and I completely missed it? I found the ARM images directly from the ftp http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Images/armhfp/ But as a general question is ARM productized? Would it

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

On 12/15/2014 10:14 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: There's also a good page about it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenH264 If h264 is not mandatory for Hello to operate, we could enable it by default by changing the loop:throttled option. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

Upon doing a yum upgrade, but rejecting the actual upgrade: [root@localhost cache]# du -sh * 94M dnf 446M PackageKit 137M yum Is it considered safe to uninstall yum on F21 and keep only dnf for cli package management? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1] Mozilla's official Firefox build will enforce addons to contain a Mozilla signature without any runtime option to disable the check.

firefox/vimeo

I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream. Do we disable something on our build that may be responsible for such behavior? Anyone else has the same problem? I even enabled h264 codec (although I

Re: firefox/vimeo

On 01/13/2015 03:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com Thanks for looking into this. I opened the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181719 On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos

Quick Review Request (owncloud-client)

Hi, I'd appreciate a quick* review on owncloud-client, so we can push the new version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202805 (*) It's an existing package that got renamed upstream, so it should fairly easy to be reviewed. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: Fedora Talk was based on Asterisk. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Asterisk Asterisk has lots of great features (voicemail, queues, etc) but it is mainly for voice, it emphasizes SIP and at the time it was

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On February 17, 2016 6:04:04 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Hughes wrote: >On 17 February 2016 at 15:51, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> The problem is that now the keystores are incompatible and it creates >> big confusion to the users when they see some key in gnupg-1 and

Re: Orphaning git-cola

On 05/05/2016 07:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I am hereby orphaning the git-cola package. (I will be pushing the buttons > in pkgdb right after sending this message.) I simply do not have the time to > keep up with the upstream releases of this package anymore. (It is already 3 >

Re: docker-compose & selinux

On 10/28/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > What AVC's are you seeing? Plenty of AVC messages in the form: type=AVC msg=audit(1477853452.023:1338): avc: denied { setattr } for pid=23456 comm="chown" name="app_model.MYD" dev="dm-0" ino=10879938

docker-compose & selinux

I use docker-compose extensively for local development. On F24 all I had to do to make it play well with selinux was something like this: sudo chcon -Rt svirt_sandbox_file_t project_folder After updating to F25 this doesn't work anymore. Did something changed on selinux policies (besides that