dear,
I have a problem with llvm 2.9 build fail
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3505349name=build.log
but if i rebuild llvm from src.rpm build success
I have some other D library to add but until i have this problem i can't
do more
Thanks for any help
kind regards
--
devel
Dear,
I search to know for which reason th build fail through koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4131995
I have try to build with mock:
wget
http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm
mock -r fedora-17-x86_64 rebuild
Le mercredi 13 juin 2012 à 19:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:45 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
Suppose I cut a package last year:
swift3-1.0.0-878c23.tag.xz
Then I build an RPM:
openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.0.0-878c23-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
Today I run
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that
we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that
we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for
Le mercredi 15 août 2012 à 12:53 -0400, Paul Whalen a écrit :
Good day all,
This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Aug
15th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
PDT: 1pm
MDT: 2pm
CDT:
Dear,
Mine review request list grow without get at anytime a review, i am
looking a reviewer to push these packages into fedora. Thanks for your
help:
- Bug 813842 - Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia
library
- Bug 847794 - Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
Apple move step by step to LLVM and stop to use gcc. The latest apple
IDE (Xcode) will not ship gcc but llvm.
https://developer.apple.com/technologies/tools/whats-new.html
It will be great to know if llvm is ready to do same for several
important linux package.
--
devel mailing list
Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Apart from RC2-final, the other changes are:
...
- enabling multilib parallel installation
ldc =
Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Apart from RC2-final, the other changes are:
...
- enabling multilib parallel installation
ldc =
On 26 August 2011 19:50, Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net wrote:
On 08/26/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
3. cp-dev seems to not only use Black Box to bootstrap, but it also
seems to use Black Box sources as a part of itself. I have not yet
investigated whether this is true and, if
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:18:31 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Which is in essence the problem you are seeing here Jonathan, after
my bluez update, your bluetooth dongle is actually being out into
HCI mode, so that it can for example also be used to sync with your
phone, use
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:50:53 +0200
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Jonathan, can you give bluez-4.96-3.fc17 a spin? It should fix your
mouse + keyboard issue.
Will do, but not before the weekend - I forgot to bring the desktop
system to LPC :)
Thanks for addressing this,
jon
Hi,
Weirdly I am seeing that mock (1.1.18 on a rhel 6 machine) is now
deleting the logs if a package rebuilds successfully. The logs are not
deleted if the package fails to complete building. I've looked at the
man page and can't see any option to keep the logs. What am I missing?
TIA,
Jonathan
hello,
I works all days on D Programming Feature.
* ldc package is done
* but not tango, link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
This package need a review i need help for finish this.
Thanks for any help
best regards
--
Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com
--
devel
documentation that's ridiculously large.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 15:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Please note that I'm not saying don't package documentation that's
ridiculously large, but rather, don't package automatically generated
documentation that's ridiculously large
generation/resolution?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 06:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yaah -- so if it's useful documentation, then I'd be against creating a rule
that bans it. The next question would be whether it's useful or not
Public vs
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:46 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:03:46 +0300
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 06:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yaah -- so if it's useful documentation
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:04 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
As I said in the bug report, I don't think building docs client side
is the right way to go at all. In the general case this would require
end users to install extra tools to build the docs, and defeats the
purpose of a package
On 8 August 2010 09:28, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
Scintilla is already bundled in with other apps in Fedora,
unfortunately. For example, geany
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:25 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan drgeo
Orphan drgeo-doc
Taken.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
?id=860352
I'll take it.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, presto won't be able to apply the deltarpm and will
fall back to downloading the full packages.
On the other hand, I'm not sure how many people care about deltarpms for
their containers.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel
or not,
but how hard would it be to just have the N release and updates
repositories enabled at the same time as the Rawhide repository?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 10:13 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 05:04:40PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Not necessarily commenting on whether this whole idea is good or not,
but how hard would it be to just have the N release and updates
repositories enabled at the same
with firewalld - i.e. will it
simply be a case of disabling activation of firewalld?
Is there any mechanism within firewalld for playing nicely with other
products that generate iptables rules?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
anyway, so I'm probably biased.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Lennart,
I would like to remove finger from the list. It is still very much in use. I
use it many times daily. I realize my use case is multiuser and server systems
- not of interest to Fedora - but the overhead is little, so I would be
grateful if it remained.
Jon.
--
Sent from my iPad
Hey Lukas,
I think the other (well meaning) responses haven't yet addressed your original
question. For the record, for ARM development boards, we (Fedora ARM) ship
prebuilt disk images suitable and intended for dd'ing onto a storage card for
convenient installation. Other targets support
Hi everyone,
Thank you very much to those who attended FUDCon in Lawrence, KS this past
weekend, in person, online via the streams, on IRC, or otherwise. It was great
to see everyone. We in the ARM team had a great time (at least, I know I did)
and I was pleased to see more mainstream Fedora
Forwarding for the broader audience. Note that this is subject to further
discussion. Please feel welcomed to join and participate in arm@ with regard to
this, and the many other pieces related to FUDCon. Additionally, thank you very
much to everyone who attended (physically, virtually, or in
to
texlive-collection-latexextra package) as it will fix a lot of packages
that currently will fail to build.
What do folks think?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
beyond the last page 57.
make: *** [final] Error 1
I can't fathom whether this is a ghostscript bug or not? Should
ghostscript not be finding the relevant TeX fonts?
Cheers,
Jonathan
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4899913name=build.log
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 25 January 2013 15:24, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't fathom whether this is a ghostscript bug or not? Should
ghostscript not be finding the relevant TeX fonts?
Can ghostscript read
of that. But, I also think we could probably be a bit
more pragmatic with the tex(latex) virtual provide.
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
pull in
texlive-collection-latexrecommended and
texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
tex(latex-extra) which would pull in texlive-collection-latexextra and
texlive-collection-fontsextra
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi Jaroslav,
I would like to raise a caution about implementing this change. Several other
non-Linux systems are able to handle a variety of hardware changes after
installation, and still boot afterwards. I think it would be unfortunate if,
after changing hardware, it were not possible to boot
yet in a position to drop xdvik.
Comments? If you use xdvik because other viewers don't give some
particular functionality, it would be helpful if you stated what that
functionality is.
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 28 January 2010 10:38, Richard Zidlicky r...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com:
I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
those kinds of tools that just
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:44 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Is there some reason we don't have a iwl5150-firmware package? Or
that /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode isn't included in
iwl5000-firmware?
Just asking because I was helping someone on #fedora get their Intel
5150ABN working
On 29 January 2010 14:16, Maxim Burgerhout ma...@wzzrd.com wrote:
What if we link the lspci and lsusb as static binaries? That would allow
us not to break the filesystem architecture and have usable tools.
You'd still miss pci.ids without /usr, so that would have to move too.
Only place
On 02/05/2010 03:27 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Jonathan is actually talking about xerces-c rather htan xerces-j.
Yes, this affects xerces-c and xerces-c-devel, for F-13.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in the
buildroot. For this particular package, it's merely a cosmetic issue,
but I thought I'd raise it here in case it breaks other things.
Build log can be seen here:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/emacs-common-muse/3.20/2.fc12/data/logs/noarch/build.log
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
On 15 February 2010 17:38, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 18:08:37 +0100,
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 15/02/2010 17:37, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
I saw that there is a change in the way git push works in 1.7.
Currently I only do simple things
or linking or something. I'd file a bug report but
I am not sure where the problem lies exactly. Any pointers?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 6 March 2010 17:00, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
While we are at it, here is another great update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
* New version introduced in F11.
* Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
On 9 March 2010 21:54, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-03-09)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 20:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
attempt at
curing the symptoms, it does nothing to solve the true problem.
So until we get faster Internet, forget about us? You're awfully quick
to write off a huge part of the world so that Fedora can match *your*
vision for it.
Thanks for the party, I'll see myself out.
Jonathan
On 19 March 2010 23:52, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
That is a security hole. Since /tmp knows no further access control an
evil user can just create dirs there for each and every single user on
the system. Those directories will then be owned by him, and all other
users will
Hi thanks Christopher and 80. Your message made me very happy. I am back
from vacation i will do soon process to be co-maintene :-)
Thanks a lot
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Le mardi 03 septembre 2013 à 00:30 +0800, Christopher Meng a écrit :
Sure. Just apply.
BTW looking at d homepage I found ldc has plan to move to llvm, and
version is bumped. Maybe we need an epoch and restart working on it?
ldc use already llvm each fedora release i do a feature request
, look me up.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
generated.
I'm not sure where to go from here. Any ideas on how to track this
down?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
need to change the Makefile to adjust for this, or just
the spec. Some advice would be greatly appreciated.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 12:22 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I now seem to be running into some problems building deltarpm for
Rawhide and it seems to be tied into this. See
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
Hello.
I'm open for himself planet.fedorapeople.org not so long before. Even
try add there my own blog.
But I'm wondering how I can filter records which I read via RSS by
language!?
I want read only
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:50 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
16.01.2011 16:21, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
Hello.
I'm open for himself planet.fedorapeople.org not so long
://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147881.html)
Deltarpm FTBS at the moment due to Python 3 changes. I dunno if Jonathan
is available to handle it but a provenpackager can fix it up easily by
temporarily disabling the python3 package (which is broken at anyway, see
http
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:53 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I am available and on it. Didn't realize that it was affecting the
buildroot. Will get it fixed ASAP.
Ah, I've just pushed this build which simply disables
actually work at the
moment, re
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147920.html
Panu, I will happily take you up on your offer to look at that whenever
you have time.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel
hi community,
I stop support valide package, now i programm in D and do some package
for D programming.
If someone would like take it:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/valide
feel free
thanks for all
--
jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
Hi,
I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
so how i could package this ?
can i add druntime in same package as LDC2 ?
--
jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 22:10 +0100, Haïkel Guémar a écrit :
Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
Hi,
I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
so
it is widely used (do we have anything like
popcon?)
I'd vote for this one with the proviso that the API break is only done
for Rawhide. Having said that, I'll probably rebuild it locally for
Fedora 13 as that's what's deployed at our school.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description
duplication.
Why does it use group lego? Is there a daemon running?
Or should the console user have access to it?
FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
default. Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
play.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description
/proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes), we've had pretty much zero
trouble.
The best part is we no longer need LVM on those servers and we get the
benefit of painless snapshot generation (we tried LVM snapshots and they
were *slow*).
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 14:18 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 16:19 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I'm actually quite interested in btrfs especially for servers because
of it's features
For what
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote:
Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
someone else should take it on now?
Absolutely!
Actually, have you published you use to BFS the scripts anywhere?
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:18:54 +1000
Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
This is my fault, sorry. I updated the server but missed out on rebuilding
the drivers. And with one thing leading to another, Easter came, I forgot
about it and the above bug didn't show up on my radar until
On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:04:22 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
trying hard enough. But if it can remain this fundamentally broken for
weeks
On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
All we had here was a case where one tool didn't catch a breakage because
the other bit of the tools weren't complete enough yet. I don't think
that's sufficient cause to question rawhide's existence.
The breakage is fine,
on RAM
and/or have a fast mirror, remove it completely.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:12 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:51:48PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The problem is that yum-presto can be a bit of a memory hog (or, more
accurately, deltarpm is).
While it's true that *create*deltarpm needs quite some memory
On 30 May 2011 09:52, Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote:
I'm experimenting with a package that needs to have rsyslog write to a
named fifo pipe (so log data can be handed off from rsyslog to an
external program). As I see it the options are:
1) apologize to the user and tell them to
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 07:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
This should do it:
rsync -az
I brought this up previously in the context of the Fedora ARM bootstrap. It
will be one of topics in the writeup.
--
Sent from my phone - message formatted and/or shortened accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com]
Received: Wednesday, 20 Jul 2011,
Deltarpms seem to be missing
from /fedora/linux/development/17/*/os/drpms
They are there for Rawhide, so I'm guessing it's a mash
misconfiguration, but I don't have the necessary rights to check.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:58:50 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:55:11 +0300
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
Deltarpms seem to be missing
from /fedora/linux/development/17/*/os
hasn't been overwhelming. I am wondering if we
should go the route of a cmake28 package in epel.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I just sent the email below to the EPEL list, but am forwarding it here as well.
Cheers,
Jonathan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com
Date: 5 May 2012 16:59
Subject: Approving commit access for djvulibre
To: EPEL development
On 5 May 2012 22:48, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
[..snip..]
There's been a BZ asking the rhel maintainer to update to CMake 2.8 for a
while:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606892
On 8 May 2012 01:41, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no problems reviewing it but do we need to seek any higher
level approval?
I am not sure, but I don't think so - it meets the EPEL requirement of
not replacing a RHEL package. This is why I didn't add a virtual
provides for
See $subject. I'm assuming that this is because delta_dirs in the mash
config doesn't include the updates repository, just the GA repository.
Maybe this should be more clearly stated in
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/fedora-releases.txt,
Step 4 (Enable Updates)?
Jonathan
, but
it was waiting for the actual final repos to exist and be open. It
should get done on release day, but there's also a lot of other things
that need to get done then too. ;)
Anyhow, I will try and get it added into our release SOP so we don't do
this again.
Thanks much!
Jonathan
signature.asc
/frobozz/xyzzy
be a better location, given the general desire for libexec to disappear?
Also, why the need for the legacy-actions part of the path?
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 7 July 2012 10:34, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:55:19PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Removing: emacs-common-proofgeneral
coq requires xemacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq requires emacs-proofgeneral = 3.7.1-5.fc15
coq-emacs requires
be good to get it unbundled.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 16 July 2012 06:19, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote:
2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was
curious if anyone else has gone down this road.
[...]
Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions?
of it before it gets blocked?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 13:47 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Jonathan Dieter (jdie...@lesbg.com) said:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Package numptyphysics (fails to build)
I've updated
splitting out the Emacs file into a
subpackage resulted in a package with just one or two files. The
emacs-filesystem approach is a pragmatic way of dealing with reality,
and consistent with eg. vim, XEmacs etc.
Jonathan (author of said guidelines).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
3 empty directories only. Can you clarify?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
it.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:43 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
Il giorno ven, 02/03/2012 alle 14.41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto:
I've orphaned buoh and libsoup22 in all active branches of Fedora. Buoh
is a GTK online comics reader that I haven't used in forever and
libsoup22 is a compat
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
it.
Jonathan
And it appears that I can't commit my changes in git. I'm assuming it's
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
If a provenpackager could help me, please, I'd like to retire buoh in
master and f17 (if possible).
Done. All that's left for you to do is to file a rel-eng ticket to get
the package
the buildroot require deltarpm? Are deltarpms now being
generated during builds instead of at compose time?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
1 - 100 of 1124 matches
Mail list logo
