On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:08 PM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
My bad. This is now Trac #7170
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
All of the information in this ticket comes from email exchanged with
dcbw and dwmw2 when I
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
My bad. This is now Trac #7170
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
All of the information in this ticket comes from email exchanged with
dcbw and dwmw2 when I first discovered it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51 AM:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
currently. If we want to name one method a disaster, we would have
to choose the userspace tool, since it will brick many of your active
C. Scott Ananian-3 wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpc-update#USB_upgrade
This will not work if the OS is not bootable and no alt-os image is on the
disk.
C. Scott Ananian-3 wrote:
Finally, 8.2 will have better backup/restore functionality, so the
real solution then will be
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:37 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 10:12:31 AM:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware
and:
echo boot2_image_name
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:18 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:08 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
My bad. This is now Trac #7170
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
All of the information in this ticket comes from
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
echo boot2_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
echo firmware_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_fw
So why are we doing this with the driver, and not the
There has been some questions about what hardware Uruguay is using
for school servers.
They are placing a second tender right now, but the first batch of
servers were:
(An IBM x3105)
1.6 - 1.8 GHz AMD processor
2 GB RAM
160 GB disk (two drives, in RAID 1)
three NICs (one WAN, and two LAN)
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:37 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
The userspace tool is extremely awkward to use (since it requires the
driver modules to be unloaded which in turn makes the identification
of devices on the XO even more difficult)
I believe there's a way for libusb to unbind the
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
So why are we doing this with the driver, and not the userspace update
tool? Marvell keeps wanting to do firmware update in the driver, and we
(David and I at least) keep saying no. If there are issues that prevent
the userspace firmware
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:34 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
echo boot2_image_name
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:34 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
currently. If we want to name one method a disaster, we would have
to choose the userspace tool, since it will brick many of your active
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
echo boot2_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
echo firmware_image_name
I second this request for off-internet solutions.
I am currently cooperating with a Bolivian Ministry of Education project
for community/school centers which depends largely on blogging and such
tools, so I am following this thread closely for concepts / ideas /
solutions that would be
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:44 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
Please check comment on:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Active_Antenna_Reprogramming#User_Space_Method
Where am I looking? The 'has failed twice' claim? That's hardly a decent
bug report. Put a coherent report in trac, and we'll look at it.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:44 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
Please check comment on:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Active_Antenna_Reprogramming#User_Space_Method
Where am I looking? The 'has failed twice' claim? That's hardly
Hi,
A couple of my XOs are reporting what look like FS error messages on
boot:
[91.463670] JFFS2 notice: (664) check_node_data: wrong data CRC in
data node at 0x1ec215f0: read 0x3e7c7e03, calculated 0xf7e1d50c
...
is this a known problem?
Should I raise a ticket for it, and where is
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:35 AM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:34 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
currently. If we want to name one method a disaster, we would have
to
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpc-update#USB_upgrade
You can also boot from the ext2 build on an SD card as a recovery mechanism.
Finally, 8.2 will have better backup/restore functionality, so the
real solution then will be reflash+restore.
Please don't use the autoreinstallation key. It has past
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:28 AM, ffm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C. Scott Ananian-3 wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpc-update#USB_upgrade
This will not work if the OS is not bootable and no alt-os image is on the
disk.
We should continue to try very hard not to let the OS become
unbootable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 10:12:31 AM:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware
and:
echo boot2_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
echo firmware_image_name
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:35 AM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:34 -0300, Ricardo Carrano wrote:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
currently. If we want to name one method a disaster, we would have
to
My bad. This is now Trac #7170
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
All of the information in this ticket comes from email exchanged with
dcbw and dwmw2 when I first discovered it.
wad
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:49 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:44 -0300, Ricardo Carrano
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:03 -0400, John Watlington wrote:
My bad. This is now Trac #7170
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7170
All of the information in this ticket comes from email exchanged with
dcbw and dwmw2 when I first discovered it.
Didn't we fix that months ago by increasing the
Hi Yama and Wad,
Give us a blog hosting app. and an API. EduBlog adds a one click HTML
front end with an option for teachers to approve posts. The blog can be
hosted anywhere routable from XS (e.g. on XS itself), no internet
needed.
That's the idea, we'll see how it turns out :-)
I'll leave it
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:26 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:37 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 10:12:31 AM:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:30 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51 AM:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
currently. If we want to name one method a disaster, we would have
to choose
Martin Langhoff, our esteemed school-server architect asked us if we
could wake him up at 6:00 AM (in NZ) instead of 4:00 (AM). Can we
oblige?
Please note the new times:
4:00 PM EST, 2000 UTC.
I expect that we'll spend the bulk of our time discussing work toward
8.2.0, a.k.a. the August
2008/6/3 Bill Mccormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A couple of my XOs are reporting what look like FS error messages on boot:
[91.463670] JFFS2 notice: (664) check_node_data: wrong data CRC in data
node at 0x1ec215f0: read 0x3e7c7e03, calculated 0xf7e1d50c
...
is this a known problem?
According
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 12:13 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
2008/6/3 Bill Mccormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A couple of my XOs are reporting what look like FS error messages on boot:
[91.463670] JFFS2 notice: (664) check_node_data: wrong data CRC in data
node at 0x1ec215f0: read 0x3e7c7e03,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:07 PM, ffm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why were G1G1 machines shipped with firmware, kernel, and reflash locks
enabled? (see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developer_keys )
Theft is not a good reason, as they do not require activation leases.
It only seems to be a bother
Hi,
for those people who need to work on something closer than f7 to what
will ship in august (performance, xulrunner, X, etc), Blaketh gave
this tip on #sugar:
Blaketh unmadindu, you can also copy the olpc-blah from /etc/pam.d/
on a working f7 laptop to the f9 laptop, then olpc-dm will work.
1. Project name : Bundlemaker
2. Existing website, if any : http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Bundlemaker
3. One-line description : A shell script that takes an index page on
the web and pulls it, and all the pages it references, into a .xol
library bundle.
4. Longer description
I can't remember where the .rpm is for all the activities for late-model
(recent joyride), since the joyride
images no longer seem to contain any activities.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03.06.2008, at 18:33, ffm wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, C. Scott Ananian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Machines sent out via our developer program are always shipped out
unsecured.
Yet I've just recived two
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 12:09:11 PM:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:30 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51
AM:
A necessary rectification:
Firmware updates from the driver are the only method that works
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:26:21 AM:
It is not a matter of Python vs C.
The userspace tool is extremely awkward to use (since it requires the
driver modules to be unloaded which in turn makes the identification
of
How does it make the ID more difficult?
Cool! I would call this bookbinder if it were an activity.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Greg, Wad,
The people I'm working with apparently are familiar with Moodle rather
than Drupal, so that might be the way to go for methem in that sense
(funny, Aymara has a different form for the us me-and-them, different
from me-and-y'all, would be handy in this sentence), though I am very
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:49 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 01:20:11 PM:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:26:21 AM:
It is not a matter of
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:26:21 AM:
It is not a matter of Python vs C.
The userspace tool is extremely awkward to use (since it requires the
driver modules to be unloaded which in turn makes
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 01:20:11 PM:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:03 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:26:21 AM:
It is not a matter of Python vs C.
The userspace tool is extremely awkward to use (since
Mitch and my joint work seems to be making the rounds again, so I
thought I'd take the opportunity to quickly repost the relevant URL:
http://dev.laptop.org/~cscott/ul_warning.png
also:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Replacing_the_shutdown_screen
Enjoy!
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Langhoff, our esteemed school-server architect asked us if we
could wake him up at 6:00 AM (in NZ) instead of 4:00 (AM). Can we
oblige?
Please note the new times:
4:00 PM EST, 2000 UTC.
I expect that we'll
C. Scott Ananian escribió:
Mitch and my joint work seems to be making the rounds again, so I
thought I'd take the opportunity to quickly repost the relevant URL:
http://dev.laptop.org/~cscott/ul_warning.png
I would like to suggest Spanish text arrangements:
* Niños hacen caca - OK
*
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 17:12 -0700, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
To update boot2, copy the boot2 and firmware images to /lib/firmware and:
echo boot2_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_boot2
echo firmware_image_name /sys/class/net/eth2/lbs_fw
So by this point the driver has already sent
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:09 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 12:09:11 PM:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:30 -0400, Michail Bletsas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 11:20:51
AM:
A necessary rectification:
I think perhaps I should clarify that:
a) the image is a joke, designed to be amusing
b) NOT intended for actual use on a deployed XO
c) the Spanish translations are in fact not literal translations
d) the Spanish, like the English, is not intended to be actually
helpful. Or safe.
There are
Agreed, Ed. The legalities of each country need to be determined and
met before we can include that country in a Give One Get One program.
Some of the things we need to understand are: Certifications,
language/keyboard requirements, messaging, non-profit status,
shipping, customs, support and
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/03/2008 01:50:59 PM:
That's a good suggestion.
From a practical perspective though, in XOs, the onboard interface is
always eth0 these days.
Yes, but I thought the discussion was more about active antenna updates,
where you may have more
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM, LASKE, Lionel (C2S) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Edward, Hi Kim,
Many thanks for your answer.
setxkbmap fr
Okay, I will try it. Of course, I need to stick some little stamps on each
key :-)
I don't know sources in Europe, but one of the best in the US for
From a practical perspective though, in XOs, the onboard interface is
always eth0 these days.
I don't have wireless - am using an USB-ethernet adapter instead.
Once upon a time, my G1G1 XO would set up its wired interface on
'eth0'. I normally run Joyride, and in the last couple of months
Dan Williams wrote:
that wasn't intended for my part. I'm happy to test this out and try to
get the userspace tool working again if given:
1) one or more active antenna modules to potentially brick
If you have a unit that you brick we can program a new chip and swap it
at 1cc. Assuming
On 30.05.2008 08:34, Albert Cahalan wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I think
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:28 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm happy to test this out and try to
get the userspace tool working again if given:
Last time I knew, the userspace tool _was_ working.
Although we'd stripped out the support from the kernel driver ages ago
and wrote libertas-flash.py,
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2009
Changes in build 2009 from build: 2005
Size delta: 0.00M
-squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc2
+squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc3
--- Changes for squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc3 from 3.10-3olpc2 ---
+ fix running under compositing WM
--
This mail was
1. Project name : olpc-netutils
2. Existing website, if any : None
3. One-line description : OLPC-specific user-land network software.
4. Longer description : Yani's collection of network status displays.
5. URLs of similar projects : Unknown.
6. Committer list
Please
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/faster/build2009
Changes in build 2009 from build: 2005
Size delta: 0.00M
-squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc2
+squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc3
--- Changes for squeak-vm 3.10-3olpc3 from 3.10-3olpc2 ---
+ fix running under compositing WM
--
This mail was
Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:01:58 -0400, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Project name : olpc-netutils
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/projects/olpc-netutils
Please follow instructions here for importing your project:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Importing_your_project
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:53 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:28 AM, ffm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C. Scott Ananian-3 wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olpc-update#USB_upgrade
This will not work if the OS is not bootable and no alt-os image
is on the
disk.
We should
John,
We experienced quite a large number of 'software broken' laptops when
we first starting shipping both in Uruguay and in the G1G1 program. I
thought one of the things Ivan did in Uruguay was to help them reflash
their laptops when they couldn't boot due to journal corruption or
other software
Why were G1G1 machines shipped with firmware, kernel, and reflash locks
enabled? (see http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developer_keys )
Theft is not a good reason, as they do not require activation leases.
It only seems to be a bother for people who want to help out with the OLPC
project.
-FFM
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:29 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Machines sent out via our developer program are always shipped out
unsecured.
Yet I've just recived two laptops via said program that had security
enabled.
-FFM
___
Devel
Hi,
That said, there's a separate bug in trac about X not starting when
the NAND flash is full. I'm not sure if that's what you're
referring to as not booting or not, but we should fix that, too.
Specifically, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7125.
What do people think of the straw man
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:16:17PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 12:13 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
2008/6/3 Bill Mccormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A couple of my XOs are reporting what look like FS error messages on boot:
[91.463670] JFFS2 notice: (664)
chris wrote:
Hi,
That said, there's a separate bug in trac about X not starting when
the NAND flash is full. I'm not sure if that's what you're
referring to as not booting or not, but we should fix that, too.
Specifically, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7125.
What
Chris,
That said, there's a separate bug in trac about X not starting when
the NAND flash is full. I'm not sure if that's what you're
referring to as not booting or not, but we should fix that, too.
Specifically, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7125.
What do people think of the
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Robert Myers wrote:
Chris,
That said, there's a separate bug in trac about X not starting when
the NAND flash is full. I'm not sure if that's what you're
referring to as not booting or not, but we should fix that, too.
Specifically,
C. Scott Ananian-3 wrote:
We should continue to try very hard not to let the OS become
unbootable. If it is unbootable, something Very Wrong should have
occurred and there's no guarantee that mount the filesystem and copy
off /home will work either. Using a dev key and a rescue disk is
Friends,
Yani Galanis has pieced together a variety of source code and
dependencies at
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7171
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7172
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7174
archived in
http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-netutils
which I'd really like to be able
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 22:08 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:28 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm happy to test this out and try to
get the userspace tool working again if given:
Last time I knew, the userspace tool _was_ working.
Although we'd stripped out the
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the runtime firmware implements _all_ the
same boot commands that the boot2 firmware does, including UPDATE_BOOT2
(flash new boot2 to EEPROM), FW_BY_USB (execute uploaded firmware but do
Developer program laptops are shipped out as US/International
keyboards, English language, AK flag set, which means they do NOT need
activation. They are permanently activated in the manufacturing data.
The only thing they need to be a developer unit is a developer key.
One more reason to add to
Specifically, http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7125.
What do people think of the straw man in that ticket? Should we
implement it?
My comments are in the ticket; let's move the discussion there, where it
belongs.
John
___
Devel mailing
Great idea!
I have some scripts, thoughts, and code I might be interested with
contributing myself.
Is there a start to a list of tools, what they do, and maybe even a
'request/want' list ?
:)
-iXo
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Project name
I continue to be uncomfortable that we are sending out restricted /
locked-down machines without a clear need. The arguments made so far for
this are
1. Getting G1G1 people to test security steps
2. Protecting G1G1 donors from installing anything but signed builds
3. Showing a pretty boot
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:56 AM, Kim Quirk wrote:
thought one of the things Ivan did in Uruguay was to help them reflash
their laptops when they couldn't boot due to journal corruption
I gave them a patch that they were able to push out to the machines to
restore them to working order _without_
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:54:13PM -0700, Ixo X oxI wrote:
Great idea!
I have some scripts, thoughts, and code I might be interested with
contributing myself.
Then please show off your patches!
Is there a start to a list of tools, what they do, and maybe even a
'request/want' list ?
Shipping G1G1 machines with NAND reflash locks enabled makes little
sense to me. What good is protection against malicious reflash when any
attacker who can perform a reflash has physical access to the device and
has password-free root access in default configurations?
Instead, the justification
Thanks for the offers, but after more discussion with the Uruguay
team, their network architecture is different enough from that on the XS
(all their schools are a single DNS domain!) that the Identity Server
would not work.
They will be developing a simple solution that provides the
Hi John et all,
i've wikified this into
http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Scenario_taxonomyaction=editsection=5
maybe there is some better place in the wiki to do so.
Greg do you agree?. Can we organize this page better?, i'm thinking we
should put the specific hardware of all countries
It should go in the server documentation, not networking scenario
taxonomies.
They do not expect that the winner of the next tender will be IBM with
the same machines.
wad
On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
Hi John et all,
i've wikified this into
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Greg Smith (gregmsmi)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the sanity check, that's not it :-(
Well, I think it is pretty close :-) What you described is roughly
what I had read a few weeks (months?) ago. So I described an
additional step - an xo activity to blog, that you
83 matches
Mail list logo
