On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Kendall Bennett wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new
work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86
tree. I don't find this to be a significant burden.
Sure, I don't do actual
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new
work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86
tree. I don't find this to be a significant burden.
Sure, I don't do actual development in that tree either.
Hello all,
Previously I erronously sent this to the list (and strangely this post
which was sent immediately afterwards appears to been filtered out):
From: Kendall Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally have you considered building Cygwin/X with the new SFU 3.5 tools
fom Microsoft? It includes native ports of GCC to Windows, which may be
better than Cygwin performance wise. I don't know however if the SFU SDK
will allow you access to Windows
Kendall Bennett wrote:
Clearly the future of XFree86 is very murky right now, as many developers
have left to work on other projects such as freedesktop.org, and now with
the core team disbanded it is unclear exactly how companies such as
SciTech or vendors such as ATI, Via, SiS etc who do not
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:58:53AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally have you considered building Cygwin/X with the new SFU 3.5 tools
fom Microsoft? It includes native ports of GCC to Windows, which may be
better than Cygwin performance wise. I don't
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Clearly the future of XFree86 is very murky right now, as many developers
have left to work on other projects such as freedesktop.org, and now with
the core team disbanded it is unclear exactly how companies such as
SciTech or
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Clearly the future of XFree86 is very murky right now, as many developers
have left to work on other projects such as freedesktop.org, and now with
the core team disbanded it is unclear exactly how companies
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:56:37PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:53:40AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Clearly the future of XFree86 is very murky right now, as many developers
have left to work on other projects such as freedesktop.org, and
For that reason we are considering the option of opening up
our existing Perforce server (which already has a mirror of XFree86 code
in it) to public development.
i don't understand this. is your perforce server just a ditto of the
xfree86 cvs?
or does it do more? there's lots of copies
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it sounds like you think this is a good idea, can I get CVS commit
access to complete this work?
Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new
work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86
tree. I don't find
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
What is the latest status on Cygwin/XFree86? I want to start working on a
port of X to Windows, and figured I would start with Cygwin/X to see how
that works. I really want to build this with Open Watcom, not GCC, but I
don't
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
[...], and I am in discussions
with some of the other members of the community about starting a new
project to take over where the XFree86 team appears to be stuck. If you
are interested let
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
[...], and I am in discussions
with some of the other members of the community about starting a new
project to take over where the XFree86 team
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 04:18:29PM +, Martin Spott wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
[...], and I am in discussions
with some of the other members of the community about starting a new
project to take over where the
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
[...], and I am in discussions
with some of the other members of the community about starting a new
project to take over where
16 matches
Mail list logo
