I think that the biggest advantage is that somebody using such a package
knows where to look. The javadocs become clearer. But I don't really
bother for this pakage.
If there is a problem and I need to dive in the code i'ts going to be
in the implementation anyway.
Guess I didn't read your
Below is the features list that I gathered sofar. The annotations are
quotes from the mailinglist, I'll condense these into uniform
descriptions later on.
Any more suggestions of features to add?
Regards, Rob
FEATURES LIST:
- generic workflow support
- a standardized and documented packaging
At 11:56 +0200 18-05-2005, Rob van Maris wrote:
Below is the features list that I gathered
sofar. The annotations are quotes from the
mailinglist, I'll condense these into uniform
descriptions later on.
Any more suggestions of features to add?
I would like to add, and that is maybe in line
Ernst Bunders wrote:
It has been mentioned lately that fascilities for creating more
'intelligent' clients for mmbase would require some kind of metadata
availability.
Some steps have been made to share mmbase config information across the
network, but perhaps these could be tuned and
This may partially be addressed by the field-types project; it is about
configuring more meta-data about fields and providing access and use of
that. That would. e.g. elimate the need for specifying those kind of
things again in your editor-implementation (like occurs now in
editwizard).
Michiel wrote:
I have no real clue how to communicate in some comprehensible way this
kind of information to the client, for javascript impelmentaiton of the
same or so.
This is where I figured the client-side XML would earn it's keep.
I figure that much of this stuff will for some time
Emile wrote:
Michiel wrote:
I have no real clue how to communicate in some comprehensible way this
kind of information to the client, for javascript impelmentaiton of the
same or so.
This is where I figured the client-side XML would earn it's keep.
I figure that much of this
I have not released it yet. Because:
- I have no time
- I'm lazy
- (Almost) nobody reacted or gave evidence of having tried out the RC.
Somebody pointed out however that the test-cases in 'tests' don't
succeed. That was actually known to me, but perhaps I can use it as a
threat:
- Perhaps I
