Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Alexander Blasche > wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Development [mailto:development- >> bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jake Petroules > >>> That's why I still think we should proceed as I

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2016 07:15:31 PST Alexander Blasche wrote: >> The big problem is that there are still plenty of 32bit users because they >> truly use 32bit platforms or 3rdparty software

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2016 07:15:31 PST Alexander Blasche wrote: > The big problem is that there are still plenty of 32bit users because they > truly use 32bit platforms or 3rdparty software forces them to do so. Moving > to 64 bit excludes users without alternatives. 32 bit does not

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jake Petroules > > That's why I still think we should proceed as I proposed: Keep online > > offering > as it is but drop separate macos + android offline

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago > Macieira > Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 21:05 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 > > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On 30 Nov. 2016 04:04, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 20:17:23 PST Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > > Say what? Why not? > > > > I think he meant that you can't add new stuff .. say if you have a > > iOS-only offline installer, then you

Re: [Development] two questions about the build system of Qt

Thanks Thiago! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 12:14:55 PST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > 2. The target for .obj/qgrayraster.o in the Makefile in qtbase/src/gui > has > > > a dependency on

Re: [Development] two questions about the build system of Qt

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 12:14:55 PST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > 2. The target for .obj/qgrayraster.o in the Makefile in qtbase/src/gui has > > a dependency on .pch/Qt5Gui.gch/c, but we noticed that during the build, > > the .pch/Qt5Gui.gch/c++ file is also read. Is there a reason

Re: [Development] two questions about the build system of Qt

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 13:53:41 PST Cor-Paul Bezemer wrote: > 1. In the Makefile in qtbase/tests/auto/other/qaccessibilitylinux, the > target cache_adaptor.h has no dependencies on the header files (e.g. > Qtcore/QObject) that it uses. Hence, if those header files change, >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 18:49:51 PST Roland Winklmeier wrote: > > On 28 Nov 2016, at 16:40, Alexander Blasche > > wrote: > > > > Ok, let's summarize and restate the package list for Qt 5.9 based on the > > comments provided on this mail thread. The list

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 20:17:23 PST Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > Say what? Why not? > > I think he meant that you can't add new stuff .. say if you have a > iOS-only offline installer, then you can't use that maintenance tool to > install the android stuff .. you would need to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On 29.11.2016 16:55, Thiago Macieira wrote: On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 11:08:15 PST Jani Heikkinen wrote: With offline installer they cannot update new stuff by using maintenance tool Say what? Why not? I think he meant that you can't add new stuff .. say if you have a

[Development] two questions about the build system of Qt

Hi, I am a researcher in a team that is working on build systems and we are doing a case study on missing dependencies in the Qt 5.3.0 build system. I know that Qt 5.3.0 is an old version but the case study is part of a paper that has been under review for more than a year now. We found two

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> On 28 Nov 2016, at 16:40, Alexander Blasche wrote: > > Ok, let's summarize and restate the package list for Qt 5.9 based on the > comments provided on this mail thread. The list describes the delta to Qt 5.8 > packages: > > * MinGW remains 5.3 using 32 bit Since

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

Installing additional versions is broken and, more annoyingly (but I personally only have limited need for that) using the online installer behind a proxy is also broken (can't download meta). Beste Grüße / Best regards, Alexander Nassian > Am 29.11.2016 um 18:22 schrieb Jake Petroules

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:54 AM, Marco Piccolino > wrote: > > We just had a little discussion about this on QtMob > (http://slackin.qtmob.org) where everybody does iOS/Android, and most people > do it on a macOS host. > It looks like people tend to use the online

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 3:08 AM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > >>> >>> From: Development >>> on behalf of Thiago Macieira >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29,

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 11:08:15 PST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > With offline installer they cannot update new stuff by using maintenance > tool Say what? Why not? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

> On 29 Nov 2016, at 13:39, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > >> >> On 29 Nov 2016, at 09:07, Samuel Gaist wrote: >> >>> On 27 Nov 2016, at 20:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> >>> On domingo, 27 de novembro de 2016 20:22:25 PST

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

> On 28 Nov 2016, at 01:05, Aleix Pol wrote: > > This is very interesting! We've missed this in several occasions and > at the moment it's a bit of a stopper for some KDE applications to > flourish on some platforms (thinking of KDE Connect at the moment but > I'm sure that

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

> On 29 Nov 2016, at 09:07, Samuel Gaist wrote: > >> On 27 Nov 2016, at 20:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> >> On domingo, 27 de novembro de 2016 20:22:25 PST Samuel Gaist wrote: >>> Currently there’s macOS and iOS already working. >>> >>>

Re: [Development] [HEADS-UP] Updates to branching scheme

On 11/25/2016 03:40 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: i'm expecting a flurry of retargeting requests of changes from 5.6 and 5.7 to 5.8 now. I have a few changes targeting 5.6 which are waiting for review:

[Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.8' to '5.8.0' complete

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:50:04PM +, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > We have started branching from '5.8' to '5.8.0'. Please start using > '5.8.0' for new changes targeted to Qt 5.8.0 release. There should be > enough time to finalize ongoing changes in '5.8'; final downmerge will > happen Monday

Re: [Development] CI error: "creation of work items failed"

> On 29 Nov 2016, at 11:35, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > Hi, > > The bug was a file descriptor memory leak in coin, which was caused by a new > upstream version of the python sh module. We > didn't pin the version, so we "accidentally" got a new version that had the >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

>> >>From: Development >>on behalf of Thiago Macieira >>Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:33 AM >>To: development@qt-project.org >>Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 >>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

We just had a little discussion about this on QtMob ( http://slackin.qtmob.org) where everybody does iOS/Android, and most people do it on a macOS host. It looks like people tend to use the online installer. When it comes to the offline installers (which in our case are mainly used for checking

Re: [Development] Nominating Teemu Holappa for Approver and Maintainer status.

On 24.11.2016 15:00, Gatis Paeglis wrote: Hi, I'd like to nominate Teemu Holappa for the Approver status. He joined Digia (now The Qt Company) 3+ years ago as a Qt consultant. Teemu has contributed to meta-boot2qt and anything else that needs fixing to get Qt for Device Creation releases out

Re: [Development] Nominating Teemu Holappa for Approver and Maintainer status.

+1 from me. -Kalle From: Development > on behalf of Gatis Paeglis > Date: Thursday 24 November 2016 15:00 To:

Re: [Development] CI error: "creation of work items failed"

Hi, The bug was a file descriptor memory leak in coin, which was caused by a new upstream version of the python sh module. We didn't pin the version, so we "accidentally" got a new version that had the leak. I've reverted to a non-leaking sh version and am working on a test-case for an

Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official MinGW builds

29.11.2016, 13:19, "Kai Koehne" : >>  -Original Message- >>  From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- >>  project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev >>  Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:11 PM >>  To: development@qt-project.org >>  Subject:

Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official MinGW builds

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 3:11 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official >

Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official MinGW builds

29.11.2016, 13:02, "Konrad Rosenbaum" : > Hi, > > On Monday 28 November 2016 17:11:19 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>  Currently, MinGW builds in Coin use -system-zlib configuration. It happens >>  because MinGW is shipped with zlib headers and libz.a. However, linking zlib >>  to

Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official MinGW builds

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rosenbaum > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:03 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official

Re: [Development] Proposal: Use -qt-zlib configuration in official MinGW builds

Hi, On Monday 28 November 2016 17:11:19 Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Currently, MinGW builds in Coin use -system-zlib configuration. It happens > because MinGW is shipped with zlib headers and libz.a. However, linking zlib > to several Qt modules (at least, QtCore, QtGui, QtNetwork, and QtSvg) is

Re: [Development] CI error: "creation of work items failed"

Am 11/29/2016 um 09:54 AM schrieb Samuel Gaist: > >> On 29 Nov 2016, at 09:53, Marc Mutz wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm seeing >> >> Continuous Integration: Cancelled >> >> Creation of work items failed: The module (qt/qtbase) sha1 needs to be known >> if it is not part of

Re: [Development] CI error: "creation of work items failed"

> On 29 Nov 2016, at 09:53, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing > > Continuous Integration: Cancelled > > Creation of work items failed: The module (qt/qtbase) sha1 needs to be known > if it is not part of product (qt/qt5) > > Details:

[Development] CI error: "creation of work items failed"

Hi, I'm seeing Continuous Integration: Cancelled Creation of work items failed: The module (qt/qtbase) sha1 needs to be known if it is not part of product (qt/qt5) Details: http://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1480407444 errors on the CI for 5.8 recently (since

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 07:32:31 PST Jake Petroules wrote: > I have no idea what I'm getting when I download these packages. Why do we > maintain an inconsistency for macOS versus the other two host platforms? I > don't see why we can't simplify this process and have ONE platform

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

On terça-feira, 29 de novembro de 2016 09:07:47 PST Samuel Gaist wrote: > > On 27 Nov 2016, at 20:44, Thiago Macieira > > wrote:> > > On domingo, 27 de novembro de 2016 20:22:25 PST Samuel Gaist wrote: > >> Currently there’s macOS and iOS already working. > >> > >>

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

> On 28 Nov 2016, at 01:05, Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Samuel Gaist > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As requested by Thiago in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/166456/ I’d >> like to open a discussion about adding a new

Re: [Development] New library in qtbase

> On 27 Nov 2016, at 20:44, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On domingo, 27 de novembro de 2016 20:22:25 PST Samuel Gaist wrote: >> Currently there’s macOS and iOS already working. >> >> The plan is to add >> - Android >> - Linux through DBus >> - Win10 (there will be some