Re: [Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

Den 05.04.2017 17:18, skrev Laszlo Agocs: Hi, To clarify, would a qt-labs repo work? As I understand the code still needs maturization. It can eventually be graduated to a proper Qt module later on. (this also means the repo would not be CI controlled for now, but I suspect that’s fine)

Re: [Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:20:52PM +, Simon Hausmann wrote: >qt-labs sounds like a good fit to me, too. > given that the final destination is qt/, that's what should be done now. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

Hi, qt-labs sounds like a good fit to me, too. And having a repo under there under CI control is no problem at all. Simon On 5. Apr 2017, at 17:18, Laszlo Agocs > wrote: Hi, To clarify, would a qt-labs repo work? As I understand the code still

Re: [Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

Hi, To clarify, would a qt-labs repo work? As I understand the code still needs maturization. It can eventually be graduated to a proper Qt module later on. (this also means the repo would not be CI controlled for now, but I suspect that’s fine) It is a bit unfortunate that the platform

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

05.04.2017, 17:46, "Oswald Buddenhagen" : > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:02:32PM +, Morten Sørvig wrote: >>  On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen >> wrote: >>  > also, a plan for splitting up qtbase wouldn't be entirely off the >>  >

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:02:32PM +, Morten Sørvig wrote: > On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > also, a plan for splitting up qtbase wouldn't be entirely off the > > mark. untangling tests and examples would be the major effort here. > > No, we

Re: [Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

When i klick on this I camoe to a login page of gitlab. When trying to register I get 1 error prohibited this user from being saved: Email domain is not authorized for sign-up   I tried that with gmx.de and siemens.com   Regards, Gunnar Roth Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. April 2017 um

[Development] New repository for WebGL Streaming QPA plugin

Hi all! I have been working on a QPA plugin to send the GLES2.0 calls from a host computer over the network to a WebGL capable browser. Now it's approaching a state in which it could be usable. For this, we'll need a new public repository. Having a public and controlled repository could help

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

On 6 April 2017 at 00:02, Morten Sørvig wrote: > > >> On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:24:15AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote: >>> So, should this get its own module, and if so, can widgets depend on >>>

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

> On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:24:15AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote: >> So, should this get its own module, and if so, can widgets depend on >> it? >> > an own module just for that seems over the top - i don't think

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:24:15AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote: > So, should this get its own module, and if so, can widgets depend on > it? > an own module just for that seems over the top - i don't think we want to end up with 100 micro-libraries. however, splitting up qtcore has been raised

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

> On 5 Apr 2017, at 11:24, Mitch Curtis wrote: > > I'd like to remove the undo framework's dependency on widgets. There's a bug > report for this here: > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-40040 > > My plan is mentioned in the commit message of the following change:

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Tokarev [mailto:annu...@yandex.ru] > Sent: Wednesday, 5 April 2017 11:29 AM > To: Mitch Curtis ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets > > > > 05.04.2017, 12:24,

Re: [Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

05.04.2017, 12:24, "Mitch Curtis" : > I'd like to remove the undo framework's dependency on widgets. There's a bug > report for this here: > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-40040 > > My plan is mentioned in the commit message of the following change: > >

[Development] Moving Qt's undo framework out of Qt Widgets

I'd like to remove the undo framework's dependency on widgets. There's a bug report for this here: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-40040 My plan is mentioned in the commit message of the following change: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/190704/ To summarise: - Introduce QGuiUndo*

Re: [Development] Nominating Katja Marttila for Approver status

+1 from me. Andy Development på vegne av Samuli Piippo skrev følgende den 05.04.2017, 09.07: Hi, I'd like to nominate Katja Marttila for Approver status. Katja has been working among other

Re: [Development] Nominating Katja Marttila for Approver status

+1 -Jani From: Development on behalf of Samuli Piippo Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 10:07 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Katja Marttila

[Development] Nominating Katja Marttila for Approver status

Hi, I'd like to nominate Katja Marttila for Approver status. Katja has been working among other things as the maintainer for Qt Installer Framework for a while now. Her gerrit dashboard: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Katja+Marttila%22+status:+merged,n,z -samuli