Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote: Hello, For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on this topic at DevDays-CA:

Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
11.01.2013, 11:57, Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de: On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:02:17 -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote:  I think this is out of the scope of Qt. I  do not see that many uses  case for normal Qt applications.  I am not surprised that some developers would feel this way, and I  

Re: [Development] QML and QAbstractListModel

2013-01-11 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
On Jan 10, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hi all! I'd like to make C++ models more usable from QML; in the net there are several blog posts illustrating how to achieve that, but IMHO it would be better if at least some of these handy features were

Re: [Development] Platform Content Selection

2013-01-11 Thread Attila Csipa
On 10-Jan-13 17:26, Alan Alpert wrote: The Qt heritage so far was, to maximize portability level, to test for features - something sadly currenly NOT possible in an easy way in QML. The Qt heritage so far was desktop, where cross-device compatibility meant make sure it'll still work in

Re: [Development] Playground: Crypto module

2013-01-11 Thread Ruslan Nigmatullin
QMessageAuthenticationCode is ready: https://codereview.qt-project.org/44512 11.01.2013, 02:51, Richard Moore r...@kde.org: On 10 January 2013 22:32, Ruslan Nigmatullin euroeles...@yandex.ru wrote:  11.01.2013, 00:55, Richard Moore r...@kde.org:  On 10 January 2013 20:48, Ruslan Nigmatullin

Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Glen Mabey
On Jan 11, 2013, at 1:56 AM, Uwe Rathmann wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:02:17 -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote: I think this is out of the scope of Qt. I do not see that many uses case for normal Qt applications. I am not surprised that some developers would feel this way, and I think I

[Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Shaw Andy
As I was investigating a different problem I came across a bigger issue regarding ICU on Windows. The problem is that when ICU is linked against on Windows it links against the same copy of the library even if it is building for release which causes a problem with C runtime libraries on

Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Glen Mabey
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote: On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote: Hello, For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on this topic at DevDays-CA:

[Development] Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android

2013-01-11 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
Hi, As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand when a Qt app is deployed to an Android device. This tool is called Ministro. We need

Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Uwe Rathmann
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:19:19 -0600, Glen Mabey wrote: Something I was missing several times is a 2D container. Qt has objects organized in rows and columns ( QTable, QImage ... ) - so IMHO it is related to Qt. But I would expect to find a class with an API comparable to QVector. Yes, if

Re: [Development] submitting a multi-dimensional container class for Qt: QNDArray

2013-01-11 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 01/11/2013 02:41 PM, Glen Mabey wrote: On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote: On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote: Hello, For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a non-destabilising bug-fix?

2013-01-11 Thread Olivier Goffart
Hi, We should finish this discussion and document the conclusion in http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines ... Marc Mutz wrote: Ok, trying to summarise, I understand it this way: 1. release-critical fixes are submitted and merged to 'stable' now, 'release' later, when it

[Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Felipe Crochik
I have to assume this subject has been discussed before in other lists but since the android port it is a hot topic on this list right now I thought it was worth starting again. I deployed a test application using the necessitas project and while I was impressed on how nice the development

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Felipe Crochik qt-proj...@b2-4ac.comwrote: I have to assume this subject has been discussed before in other lists but since the android port it is a hot topic on this list right now I thought it was worth starting again. I think it is a good idea to reiterate

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Felipe Crochik
Mainly my suggestion is to avoid the step of having to have ministro installed. I appreciate that including the qt libraries with every app is not the best approach (especially if we need different sets for the different android versions/devices). I would like for each application to include some

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
On 01/11/2013 03:36 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: Are there plans to change this flow? I have to assume there were good reasons to do like this but without actually looking into the code it seems that would make more sense to combine the ministro code with the java wrapper generated for each

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Felipe Crochik
With my very limited experience on the subject I have to say that the current flow is probably good enough for controlled distribution but pretty bad for mass market apps. Having the application download the libraries after being downloaded is bad enough for the average user but figuring out the

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
On 01/11/2013 04:23 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: With my very limited experience on the subject I have to say that the current flow is probably good enough for controlled distribution but pretty bad for mass market apps. Having the application download the libraries after being downloaded is

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com wrote: This suggestion is definitely something we'll investigate. I haven't looked into the Ministro code yet, so I don't know if it's technically possible, but as far as I've understood from

[Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

2013-01-11 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi all, Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show cases of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser. It serves as a show-case for QtWebKit's C++ API and the Qt widgets

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2013 13.32.35, Shaw Andy wrote: Unfortunately this is what is happening now if ICU is linked in, ICU will always use the release version so if Qt is built in debug mode then it will end up mixing the C runtime libraries. Either way I feel that this needs to

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a non-destabilising bug-fix?

2013-01-11 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On 11 January 2013 15:21, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote: c. Critical fixes (P1/P0): security, crashes or data corruption. Aren't important fixes (such as security fixes) good candidates for the release branch instead of stable? -- Giuseppe D'Angelo

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Preparing Qt 5.0.1 release

2013-01-11 Thread Sergio Ahumada
On 01/11/2013 04:51 PM, shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: Hi, All the repos part of the Qt 5.0.1 release were merged yesterday from stable-release as announced. So changes for 5.0.1 need to be pushed to 'refs/for/release' with a Task-number tag in the commit message pointing to a P0/P1 task

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

2013-01-11 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 01/11/2013 04:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote: So I got in touch with them and they're willing to contribute the code to the Qt project. I'm therefore seeking approval from the Qt project to importing Snowshoe into Gerrit, with [...] I like the idea, but I'm a bit concerned about the future

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

2013-01-11 Thread Alexis Menard
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Alberto Mardegan ma...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 01/11/2013 04:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote: So I got in touch with them and they're willing to contribute the code to the Qt project. I'm therefore seeking approval from the Qt project to importing

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread John Layt
On Friday 11 Jan 2013 13:32:35 Shaw Andy wrote: Since ICU doesn't provide the debug version of the libraries in their binary packages then this means that either the user has to build them themselves (which means modifying the target as well since the output for debug and release defaults to

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
11.01.2013, 20:29, John Layt jl...@kde.org: On Friday 11 Jan 2013 13:32:35 Shaw Andy wrote:  Since ICU doesn't provide the debug version of the libraries in their binary  packages then this means that either the user has to build them themselves  (which means modifying the target as well

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread BogDan
Hi,   I have write a few mails on this matter at android-qt mailing list. Here https://groups.google.com/group/android-qt/msg/854062a719092224  you can find my reasons why I believe that Ministro is the best solution for  Android deployment. I'll do a summary of them:  - the most important is

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a non-destabilising bug-fix?

2013-01-11 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:53:25PM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: On 11 January 2013 15:21, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote: c. Critical fixes (P1/P0): security, crashes or data corruption. Aren't important fixes (such as security fixes) good candidates for the release branch

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Felipe Crochik
BogDan: Thank you for all your work and this explanation! I was afraid that, at least part of, the reasoning for Ministro was the create/control a shared location :( Do you have any ideas of how we could continue with shared libraries (not per app) but avoid having to install ministro manually ?

Re: [Development] Android port - Why do we need Ministro?

2013-01-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:52 PM, BogDan bog_dan...@yahoo.com wrote: I'll do a summary of them: - the most important is that qt libs are very big (Qt4 libs are +40Mb for one platform and most probably Qt5 will be more than that), if you want to target two platforms (armv5 and armv7) you

Re: [Development] Importing Snowshoe QML browser to the Qt project

2013-01-11 Thread Mark
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: Hi all, Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize show cases of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice demos in the source code, including a pretty

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Shaw Andy
On sexta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2013 13.32.35, Shaw Andy wrote: Unfortunately this is what is happening now if ICU is linked in, ICU will always use the release version so if Qt is built in debug mode then it will end up mixing the C runtime libraries. Either way I feel that this

Re: [Development] Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android

2013-01-11 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
Hi, As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand when a Qt app is deployed to an Android device. This tool is called Ministro.

Re: [Development] Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android

2013-01-11 Thread Alan Alpert
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Bache-Wiig Jens jens.bache-w...@digia.com wrote: Hi, As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Shaw Andy
[...] Microsoft in the past has also said that you should keep the -MD(d)/-MT(d) setting consistent so it is the same across all libraries and applications, [...] Which is cool, if you can manage it. But it's far from what happens in the real world. In the real world you have

Re: [Development] Proposal: Adding a repository in Qt Project for the Ministro tool, needed by Qt for Android

2013-01-11 Thread Samu Voutilainen
On Friday 11 January 2013 15:01:57 Alan Alpert wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Bache-Wiig Jens jens.bache-w...@digia.com wrote: Hi, As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose Android

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-11 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2013, 23:07:25 schrieb Shaw Andy: [...] Microsoft in the past has also said that you should keep the -MD(d)/-MT(d) setting consistent so it is the same across all libraries and applications, [...] Which is cool, if you can manage it. But it's far

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-11 Thread Denis Shienkov
A cross platform compatible API for the serial port is a useful thing, but is there a good reason for limiting it to Qt applications ? Why do you think that this is a limitation? This is just a separate, cross-platform implementation of the serial port, taking into account the Qt-specific, and

[Development] QT5.0 does not create VC2010 Projects

2013-01-11 Thread Mumtaz Ahmad
Is it known issue that QT5.0 does not create VC2010 Projects? Thanks ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development