On 23/01/14 00:32, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 22:50:49, Robin Burchell wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose Approver rights for Valerio on messaging framework.
Justification: Valerio has worked on ( with) QMF for a long time, on
Ok, let’s keep it as an add-on for now. I’m happy with that solution as well.
When it comes to the QML API, I do agree with Simon that having compatibility
with the standard JS web sockets API is important so people can re-use code.
But that doesn’t have to exclude a more declarative QML API.
, at 08:54, Knoll Lars
lars.kn...@digia.commailto:lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But it's a
sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any numbers on how
this changes the size of Qt Network?
The binary release library
+1 for the playground module.
Cheers,
Lars
On 17/01/14 14:21, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently worked on a few small classes that wrap native TTS frameworks
(for
now SAPI5 on Windows, the Cocoa API on Mac, speech-dispatcher on Linux
and the
native Android
From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But it's a
sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any numbers on how
this changes the size of Qt Network?
Peter and Rich, and comments from your side?
Cheers,
Lars
On 16/01/14 19:41, Steve Gold
Yes, I was about to write a mail about it. We don't currently officially
have maintainers for platforms, but they exist in reality, and I'd like to
make them explicit.
So if nobody disagrees, I'll add them to the list next week.
Cheers,
Lars
On 10/01/14 18:22, David Faure david.fa...@kdab.com
Hi,
I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver
rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI
infrastructure, and even though many of their contributions are not as
directly visible (and often aren’t visible in gerrit), they are highly
Hi,
I'd like to continue on filling gaps in our maintainer list and thus want
to propose Simon Hausmann as the new maintainer for QtQml. Guess I don't
need to say a whole lot more about the nomination... ;-)
Cheers,
Lars
___
Development mailing list
On 02.01.14 08:42, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
On Thursday 2. January 2014 09.34.21 Konstantin Ritt wrote:
1. In cpp, we typically use enums for numeric constants. In Qt coding
style, enums are in CamelCase.
2. Just a wasting of time. Simply use generated documentation
On 25.12.13 23:03, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 17:45:13, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
return bswap_32(source);
So was 'register' reintroduced or not fully removed, or something else?
Something else. bswap_32 is a macro.
I’m
-project.org
[development-bounces+martin.smith=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of
Laszlo Papp [lp...@kde.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:15 PM
To: Knoll Lars
Cc: Pasion Jerome; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Documentation maintainer
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:43
Hi everybody,
Now that we have Qt 5.2 out, I’ve taken some time to go through the
Maintainer list on our wiki (http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers)
trying to clean it up and remove outdated information. I’ve especially
updated the list of modules that we have and removed everybody listed as a
Hi,
the first maintainer I’d like to nominate is Yoann Lopes for multimedia.
Yoann has been taking care of multimedia for the last year, and done lots
of work on the different backends.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:yoann.lopes%2540digia.com,p,0028
cb2200011062
Cheers,
Lars
Hi,
I’d like to nominate Paul Tvete as the formal maintainer of the QPA
architecture. He’s the original architect behind it anyway, and I don’t
think there are many people out there who know it better :)
Cheers,
Lars
___
Development mailing list
Hi,
I’d also like to nominate Topi Reiniö as the overall maintainer of our
documentation. Topi has been doing an excellent job in handling and
improving our documentation over the last year, and is IMO the best
candidate we have for the job.
Cheers,
Lars
Another +1.
Lars
On 13/12/13 23:51, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2013, Jocelyn Turcotte wrote:
Hello,
Michael has been working for Nokia since 2008 and joined the QtWebKit
team
in 2011, which he then followed in Digia. He has since then been
On 11/12/13 10:03, Simon Hausmann simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change
cases 2
and 3:
2bis) distro builds Qt once with -no-sse2 flags
= all libs
I think this is ok for the headers, but I don’t think we’d be doing
ourselves a favor if we tried to use these warnings for .cpp files.
Lars
On 07.12.13 20:45, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sábado, 7 de dezembro de 2013 13:36:35, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
Hi everybody,
Now that 5.2 is getting close to being released, I think it’s time to have
a look at a time schedule for 5.3. I’d like 5.3 to be less feature
oriented then 5.2 has been, and more focused on stability and performance.
At the same time I would like to adjust our release schedules, so
On 03.12.13 03:02, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 15:00:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I'd like to propose the following:
- Qt 5.1 deprecates the old atomic code and their platforms
- Qt 5.2 *removes* the code that doesn't get updated
On 30/11/13 15:22, Gladhorn Frederik
frederik.gladh...@digia.commailto:frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote:
On Friday 29. November 2013 21.19.33 Hausmann Simon wrote:
Once scenario I'm worried about is when a less active module (say qtscript)
has a regression test failure due to a change in
On 27/11/13 10:09, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172
Hi all.
I find this one: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35002
I cannot remember any other related to 5.2 RC1 installer fonts. Do you
see this is blocking RC1?
I have to agree with Thiago. I tried the install on a retina mac book/10.9
two weeks ago, and the installer looked extremely ugly. It simply doesn¹t
make for a good first impression.
Cheers,
Lars
On 26.11.13 16:22, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro
On 20/11/13 21:05, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:53:56PM +, Andrew Wooster wrote:
Currently there is at least one API that is specific to BlackBerry
that provides a wrapper for PPS
that would be used in plugins supplied for Qt Location,
On 16.11.13 00:26, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@kdab.com
wrote:
[...]
Quoting your latest post:
I can understand that you'd like to have the same script engine
evaluate
both types of script, but since the decision was
Yes, once the patch is in 5.x and it affects 4.8 as well, it¹s usually ok
to back port.
Cheers,
Lars
On 18.11.13 11:06, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to ask again whether I could backport some performance
improvements
in QTextLayout/QTextEngine from Qt5 to Qt4.
Most
On 18.11.13 11:49, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
On Monday 18 November 2013 10:11:40 Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, once the patch is in 5.x and it affects 4.8 as well, it¹s usually
ok
to back port.
I ask b/c back then Eskil wrote:
Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt Sep 5, 2012
Patch Set 4
On 14.11.13 13:50, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:52:27AM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
On 13.11.13 13:38, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
or to put is a bit concisely, the proposal is to simply pay attention
On 13/11/13 18:49, Sean Harmer sean.har...@kdab.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 12:46:46 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
Hi all,
We have agreed in release team that Antti Kokko (irc: ankokko) will
monitor
all approved changes in release branch and stage all clear ones (fixes
for
P1 P0
On 13.11.13 13:38, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
moin,
in
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-June/011610.html
thiago proposed that all changes pushed for release need to come with a
task-number footer.
the proposal met moderate approval.
little
+1 to moving the plugins to qtimageformats. That¹s what we have the module
for.
And I don¹t think moving ICNS is an issue neither, as long as we have a
configure test in qtimageformats to detect whether we can compile the
plugin.
Cheers,
Lars
On 06/11/13 11:27, Saether Jan-Arve
Looks ok as well.
Cheers,
Lars
On 05/11/13 01:07, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Pastebin URL (expires in 24 hours):
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/51638/61143313
---
diff --git a/src/quick/designer/designersupport.h
b/src/quick/designer/designersupport.h
index
Module looks ok. Some comment inline:
On 05/11/13 01:07, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Pastebin URL (expires in 24 hours):
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/51637/13836114
templatetypename T
QObject *qmlAttachedPropertiesObject(const QObject *obj, bool create =
true)
{
diff
On 05/11/13 21:58, André Pönitz
andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:49:45PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
As some of you may know, Shane has a new job and therefore has a
lot
less time to spend on QtNetwork. He, Peter and I have discussed how
we should
On 04/11/13 17:25, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Moore
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 1:32 PM
To:
Hi John,
as far as I know there¹s nobody doing any work on it right now.
Cheers,
Lars
On 02/11/13 14:10, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone is working on color management support in Qt
5? I know there was some thought about it before 5.0 and vague
suggestions about
Before going to a binary format, I’d first like to check whether we can further
speed up the parsing. I’ve done some work in that area in spring, but I know
there was still quite some room to improve it.
Cheers,
Lars
From: Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.commailto:f35f22...@gmail.com
Date:
On 25.10.13 09:57, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sexta-feira, 25 de outubro de 2013 07:49:47, Koehne Kai wrote:
I think we should have only:
+ Reference Platforms
+ Supported Platforms
+ Platforms Reportedly Working
Makes sense to me.
Yes, that sounds actually good.
On 24/10/13 16:51, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:39 PM
To:
On 22.10.13 09:24, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 07:01:22, Knoll Lars wrote:
There are two major versions of libudev in use in major distros:
libudev.so.0
and libudev.so.1. The new one has been in use for about a year, so we
can
expect
That's basically how it looks. I'm happy to accept all patches that are
required upstream (after review of course), but the authors (ie.
Canonical) will have to submit them here.
Cheers,
Lars
On 10/14/13 9:44 PM, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
I agree very much with what Thiago
On 10/7/13 12:35 PM, David Boddie dav...@met.no wrote:
On Sun Oct 6 20:51:40 CEST 2013, Lars Knoll wrote:
The producer field in PDF is generally used for marking what has been
used
to produce the PDF. In Qt 5 this reads:
xprintf(\n/Producer );
printString(QString::fromLatin1(Qt
On 10/10/13 6:02 PM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Thursday 10 October 2013 08:22:44 BRM wrote:
I have personnally maintained a 400k+ SLOC codebase based on QT.
It made extensive use of Signals/Slots between objects. Even though I
was
pretty much the only developer working on
On 02.10.13 09:09, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 23:32:00 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2013 05:42:24, Knoll Lars wrote:
On 01.10.13 23:23, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On terça-feira, 1 de outubro de 2013 20
exception support in QtCore?
On Tuesday 01 October 2013 23:32:00 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 2 de outubro de 2013 05:42:24, Knoll Lars wrote:
On 01.10.13 23:23, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On terça-feira, 1 de outubro de 2013 20:00:56, Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes
Yes, signal/slot connections between user code should IMO still be able to
pass through exceptions. I am afraid removing that will break code that's
out there.
Cheers,
Lars
On 10/1/13 9:31 PM, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote:
Hmm question - certainly worth it for sjlj platforms
On 01.10.13 23:23, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 1 de outubro de 2013 20:00:56, Knoll Lars wrote:
Yes, signal/slot connections between user code should IMO still be able
to
pass through exceptions. I am afraid removing that will break code
that's
out
On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Qt Project guidelines say that all features that are relevant for the
reference platforms must be implemented in the reference platforms.
No. It has to be implemented on all reference platforms if the module is
an essential
On 9/30/13 7:48 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/9/30 Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com
On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Similarly for Bluetooth, which exists on all platforms. But since I don't
know
the QtBluetooth API, I don't know whether
and into the hands of people.
Feature freeze doesn't imply a full API freeze. We have the alpha/beta
period exactly for finding issues and fixing them. A missing signal is
something we can fix if required.
Cheers,
Lars
Konstantin
Regards,
Konstantin
2013/9/30 Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com
On 9
On 9/29/13 9:56 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
From the Minified javascript thread, I propose this policy:
The Qt Project will always supply in its own infrastructure the preferred
sources for modification for whatever we ship. Under the GPL and LGPL,
anyone
who receives
Jira should be fine as well now.
Congratulations Thorbjørn!
Cheers,
Lars
On 9/21/13 10:22 PM, Ahumada Sergio sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote:
gerrit done
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
From:
Congratulations Andrew!
On 19.09.13 12:48, Robin Burchell robin...@viroteck.net wrote:
And today marks weekday 15 since the proposal, with no negative
comments. I guess that means it's time to congratulate Andrew.
Can someone please grant the necessary JIRA/Gerrit rights?
Should be done now.
Hi,
As many of you know, we've been doing some research on a (chromium based)
new web engine for Qt during spring and summer. I wanted to let you know
that we've now come to the conclusion that we want to continue these
efforts in the future.
Please check
On 9/12/13 9:06 PM, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
Another QDateTime email. I'm still trying to get a fully working
reimplementation of QDateTime as well as the QTimeZone support in for
5.2, but
there's a couple of issues outstanding.
Storage format / Change of System Time Zone behaviour:
Full agreement with Konstantin. It's two weeks before the feature freeze and we
haven't seen any more then a draft. I am against any new classes going into Qt
essential modules that do not have direct and proven use cases.
Develop it in a playground project, show why it makes sense and once you
Ok, let's use QtWin for the namespace. For the module itself it makes IMO
to keep the 'Extras' in the name.
Cheers,
Lars
On 06.09.13 15:52, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.com wrote:
I agree, QtWin::foo looks much better. We can rename the QtMacExtras
namespace as well.
What about the module
On 9/5/13 8:02 AM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Wednesday 04 September 2013 20:09:38 Knoll Lars wrote:
You also can typedef QScopedPointer QUniquePointer; and deprecate the
former
name.
typedef's are usually not such a good idea, as forward declarations
won't
work the way
On 9/4/13 11:20 PM, Janusz Lewandowski le...@enves.pl wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 19:48:53 + Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote
So then there are basically two options:
1. We extend QScopedPointer and live with the fact that the name is not
perfect, as scoping can be broken explicitly
On 9/4/13 8:09 PM, Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote:
On 04.09.2013 17:54, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 4 de setembro de 2013 10:20:39, Peter Kümmel wrote:
What's that something else? Remember that QScopedPointer was created
to
simplify handling of exceptions (when we tried
On 9/3/13 6:30 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2013 11:42:04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
you did, however, make no effort to substantiate your position.
an argument against your interpretation is for example bisectability.
also, it's just
On 9/5/13 2:00 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 4 de setembro de 2013 22:37:55, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 4 September 2013 22:15, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com wrote:
When there is a
need for QUniquePointer in the future, it is added.
Yay... Thanks so much!
Cheers,
Lars
On 8/26/13 3:28 PM, Blasche Alexander alexander.blas...@digia.com
wrote:
Hi,
All workflow changes have been applied. In addition, QTCREATOR and
various other smaller projects use the Qt project workflow and issue type
scheme now. There is no differences
Hi everybody,
this is just a friendly reminder on quality criteria we should pass for
new modules and new features that you'd like to have in the dev branch
(and thus 5.2).
Please make sure that all new functionality
- Compiles on all reference platforms
(If a module/feature is only for
On 20.08.13 03:54, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2013 08:06:19, Thiago Macieira wrote:
I'd agree that option (4) is the cleanest solution. Have you checked
how
much we'd need to change to implement it?
No, not yet.
I don't think it
Hi,
Catching up on this long thread finally. I am actually with Andre (and
others arguing similarly) here. The sanity bot is a good thing to have,
and it finds issues a lot more often then making mistakes.
Yes, there are a few things, where the bot can be wrong and for that we
can overrule it.
On 20.08.13 09:15, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 06:24:01, Knoll Lars wrote:
A slightly hacky solution might be to force inlining of inline methods
in
these files. With gcc, we could achieve that by defining inline to
__attribute__
in there:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTPLAYGROUND-31
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Knoll Lars
lars.kn...@digia.commailto:lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On 6/25/13 8:39 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.commailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 25 de junho de
The required time (and a bit more) has passed, so I think it's about time to
congratulate Björn to his new role as Maintainer for WEC7.
Congratulations!
Cheers,
Lars
On 17/04/2013, at 4:30 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 17 de abril de 2013 10.41.44,
Hi,
I've received some concerns about privacy regarding the IRC logs. The main
concern was about join/leave messages showing exact times as well as IP
addresses of the people joining and leaving. In addition, some people feel
uncomfortable that whatever they say on IRC basically stays around
On 4/26/13 3:00 AM, Anttila Janne janne.antt...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
As you probably are aware, there has been a long thread on interest
list about Qt dependency bloat. One of the most commented problems
has been Perl dependency, especially on Windows.
We have had similar feedback on
Hi Harri,
having the symbols clash is not a good idea in any case, so please go
ahead and rename one set. I'd go for changing the ones in Qt Quick 1.
Cheers,
Lars
On 4/23/13 1:04 PM, Harri Porten por...@froglogic.com wrote:
Hi!
Don't ask why but we ran into the known[1] segfault caused by
I wanted to take care of this today. Unfortunately the network in our office
was down the whole day. I'll try to get it all sorted tomorrow.
Cheers,
Lars
Sendt fra min BlackBerry 10-smarttelefon.
Fra: Thiago Macieira
Sendt: kl. 17:40 PM
Til: development@qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development]
On 4/9/13 6:29 PM, Ahumada Sergio sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote:
I don't think I'm a project maintainer on Gerrit or the bug tracker.
Is there anything I can do to move this process forward?
Only a Gerrit Admin can do that.
Gerrit Admins, please give John the rights as Maintainer. John,
Hi,
the Qt 5.1 Alpha just went out. See
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/08/qt-5-1-alpha-available/ for
details.
As agreed in the release team previously it's a source only release, and
basically reflects the status after merging from dev to stable.
The plan forward is now to create a beta
On 4/5/13 12:45 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser awag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Based on that and without an answer from Oswald which revision is
currently in preparation within the winrt branch, I'd suggest to go
for the latest
On 4/1/13 5:05 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On segunda-feira, 1 de abril de 2013 13.22.57, Tvete Paul wrote:
The missing feature, which was regrettably not picked up during the
Components API review, has been part of Qt from the very beginning. To
underline its
On 3/25/13 7:13 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have
dev/stable branches.
We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any
work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just
began
On 3/18/13 12:04 PM, Sean Harmer sean.har...@kdab.com wrote:
On Monday 18 March 2013 11:00:57 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
On 18.3.2013 12.42, Sean Harmer sean.har...@kdab.com wrote:
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:27:45 Shaw Andy wrote:
Making of Qt 5.1 minor release will soon start:
- Plan is
On 3/17/13 5:21 PM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Sunday 17 March 2013 08:13:21 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 17 de março de 2013 11.13.01, Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2013 10:09:24 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 10 de março de 2013 23.54.42, Sze Howe
On 3/14/13 1:00 PM, Jason McDonald macadd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Anttila Janne janne.antt...@digia.com
wrote:
Jason McDonald wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 12 de março de 2013 13.28.37,
On 3/18/13 4:58 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Thomas McGuire thomas.mcgu...@kdab.com
wrote:
QtSensors needs to be added to qt5.git, but couldn't yet, due to CI
failures.
See https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,48905.
+ QtSerialPort:
There's a QCollator class in Qt already to fix exactly that problem, the
plan is to make it public for Qt 5.1.
Cheers,
Lars
On 3/9/13 8:57 PM, Zeno Endemann zeno.endem...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've been playing around with different sorting methods and have noticed
that the naive way to sort a
On 2/28/13 5:01 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 28 de fevereiro de 2013 18.35.23, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
On 23 February 2013 00:16, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On sexta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2013 19.26.06, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com
wrote:
Alan has been very proactive and is probably the best person we have
for the job right now. So a +1 from my side.
But the declarative repo is pretty big
Congratulations Andreas!
I should have just fixed the permissions in Jira. Andreas, can you check
that you can now edit bugs etc.?
Thanks,
Lars
On 2/28/13 11:29 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Yes. See these for an examples:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTJIRA-195
In general, I think we need to have another look at Qt SystemInfo for 5.2,
and get this all sorted. The split between what's in Qt Core and what's in
system info is a bit arbitrary, and it would be good to get this sorted
and cleared.
Cheers,
Lars
On 3/1/13 11:28 PM, Thiago Macieira
On 2/21/13 4:59 PM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:54 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
i'll simply block the merge, and i don't even need to resort to my pet
process reasons for that.
Ok, we will delay the merge/rebase until Lars is back
Actually, I would like Qt Addons to live in a namespace, esp. for new
ones. The namespace name ought the be the same as the module's name. This
is really there to avoid name clashes with other parts of Qt. With a
namespace, you have all the freedom you want on how to name methods
inside.
On 2/15/13 11:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com
wrote:
Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
I've now
Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
I've now created the repository.
ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
Cheers,
Lars
On 2/14/13 9:23 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com
wrote:
Ah, I see.
I've only recently started
Hi everybody,
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a
bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for
this. First of all it'll reduce some of the integration pressure for the
Android ports as well as the Qt Quick Controls. Secondly, the
On 2/13/13 9:54 AM, Mülner, Helmut helmut.muel...@joanneum.at wrote:
[...]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
I'd also
like to add a few of the modules left out in 5.0 to the release. The
candidates
I can see so far are:
* Qt X11 Extras
* Qt Mac Extras
Hi,
I'm with Eskil here.
The fact that the original import doesn't have a reviewed-by line on it is
a bit unfortunate, but it doesn't validate rewriting things and breaking
links to Jira. These can be important later on to find out why something
was done the way it's done.
I'm not a fan of
On 2/13/13 10:08 AM, Friedemann Kleint friedemann.kle...@digia.com
wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-) .
Ok. Sergio can hopefully help with
On 2/13/13 10:58 AM, Shaw Andy andy.s...@digia.com wrote:
[snip]
* Friday 15. March: Feature freeze. Merge from dev to stable.
What will happen to Qt 5.0.x at this point, does it mean we do not plan
to do any further 5.0.x releases after Qt 5.1.0 is out in April? Or will
we have a 5.0 branch
On 2/6/13 4:33 PM, Mitch Curtis mitch.cur...@digia.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:52:29 PM Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
Hello all,
yesterday we did a bug triaging and fixing day here in the Digia Oslo
office. While everyone always looks at the bugs a little bit, it is
sometimes
On 2/5/13 4:06 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 11.19.39, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Note that Qt3 had a very good support for Arabic/Hebrew/Farse (RTL in
general). I still remember sitting with Lars back in 2003 in (crap
forgot
where in
On 2/5/13 1:21 PM, BogDan bog_dan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
[...]
- Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the
json style
parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering about it,
it seems
to add a new Json parser. Could it be replaced by the Json
Alan has been very proactive and is probably the best person we have for the
job right now. So a +1 from my side.
But the declarative repo is pretty big and very central to Qt moving forward.
So I believe we will need to split up responsibilities further in the longer
term. I would at the
301 - 400 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
