On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Craig Foster wrote:
> Have you guys played with Vmware Workstation? It'll free up many
> machines and you can copy the final install (including settings) over
> another botched session in about 2 minutes tops :) I still keep a couple
> of machines around for things like SCSI
Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> /sbin/e-smith/db configuration setprop $i status disabled
Don't forget Jay's e-smith-service-control-1.1.0-04.noarch.rpm:
Description :
e-smith module to create a panel for enabling/disabling services
available here:
ftp://ftp.e-smith.com/pub/e-smith
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:34:20PM +0800, Craig Foster wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Damien Curtain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:32 PM
> > To: Gordon Rowell; Charlie Brady; Devinfo
> > Subject: Re: [e-smith-
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:34:20PM +0800, Craig Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..]
> Have you guys played with Vmware Workstation? It'll free up many
> machines and you can copy the final install (including settings) over
> another botched session in about 2 minutes tops :) I still keep a co
> -Original Message-
> From: Damien Curtain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:32 PM
> To: Gordon Rowell; Charlie Brady; Devinfo
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:03:57AM +1000, Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > [...]
> > On a 4.1.x I see ~65 actions, ~35 events, over 150 actions on 5.5,
> > ~50 events on 5.5. Give or take a few for contribs/my own p
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:03:57AM +1000, Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> On a 4.1.x I see ~65 actions, ~35 events, over 150 actions on 5.5,
> ~50 events on 5.5. Give or take a few for contribs/my own patches.
And we are looking at methods to streamline that in the future. One
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:30:27AM -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Damien Curtain wrote:
>
> > > But I'm curious here -- what bits do you consider resource hogs?
> >
> > imp, mysql, pptp
>
> All optional.
>
> for i in imp php mysql pptp
> do
> /sbin/e-smith/db configurati
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:24:44PM +1000, Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:36:01PM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56:13AM +1000, Damien Curtain wrote:
> > > It's getting harder to run SME on these machines, as its become overly
> >
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Damien Curtain wrote:
> > But I'm curious here -- what bits do you consider resource hogs?
>
> imp, mysql, pptp
All optional.
for i in imp php mysql pptp
do
/sbin/e-smith/db configuration setprop $i status disabled
done
/sbin/e-smith/signal-event post-upgrade
/sbin/e-smi
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:36:01PM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56:13AM +1000, Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> > Not an old piece of junk but definatley I know of many places that
> > recycle older hardware for linux gateways/firewalls etc, these a
rtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ed sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Baker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
> I highly doubt this is the norm. Unless a person is just playing around
> with SME at home, I have a hard time believing that the average
> "customer" would setup a server on just any ole piece of junk computer
> that is lying around.
It might not
Ed,
> Today's high tech scrounging was interesting.
> have an HP server case with a GA-586dx dual cpu( but only have one cpu for
> it< any extra 233 intel mmx chips surplus out there?>) motherboard in it and
With that vintage of pentium chip, you can't just throw any old P233mmx
in your dual c
.
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ed sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Baker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [e-
d sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Baker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
> >From: "Greg Zartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &g
>From: "Greg Zartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What would your explaination be to your boss?... Well, you see, I was
> playing around, experimenting really, with this old machine that we had.
> I figured if I could make it through the install routine, we'd be good to
> go. Everything seemed t
>From: "Greg Zartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What would your explaination be to your boss?... Well, you see, I was
> playing around, experimenting really, with this old machine that we had.
> I figured if I could make it through the install routine, we'd be good to
> go. Everything seemed t
d.
+61 (0)2 62624080 (ph)
+86 1368 3268117 (mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Flanagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Greg Baker'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:57 AM
S
in" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "e-smith developers list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
>
>
> > Good point about the P90;) A small investment in moderately decent
> > h
"ed sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Greg Baker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
>
> > tonight's experi
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 16:09, Greg Zartman wrote:
>
> > tonight's experiment was an emachine 333k unit. uses amd k6 has 8 gig
>
> Yes, but this isn't the BUSINESS norm (at least when one talks to folks
Well, two schools that I have set up SME machines for just did
not have the budget for anyth
> tonight's experiment was an emachine 333k unit. uses amd k6 has 8 gig
Yes, but this isn't the BUSINESS norm (at least when one talks to folks
in this forum and the other e-smith forms). I agree, it's fun to
experiment and see what works and what doesn't at home with your spare
parts. Sure
> Good point about the P90;) A small investment in moderately decent
> hardware upfront may remove alot of problems, unfortunately I can't
> stick to this and still stuff around with isa scsi adapters too often...
Agreed. I was mostly joking with my previous comment...
I don't think an small
> -Original Message-
> From: ed sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> note though on any of these MFH 2002 systems we do not have mail
> enabled
> yet!
For around a month I had my home SME mail server running on a 486DX4 133MHz
machine. If it wasn't for the fact that I wanted to enalbl
PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
> > Sorta. Most of the customers I've seen so far don't go and shell out
> > on any new hardware. They just use whatever junk is lying around which
>
>
> I highly doubt this is the norm. Unless a
sday, July 09, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
> > Sorta. Most of the customers I've seen so far don't go and shell out
> > on any new hardware. They just use whatever junk is lying around which
>
>
> I highly doubt this i
I think it is more common than you might think. Almost all of the
e-smith servers that I service, the customer downloaded and burned the
disk. I helped them set it up on an old computer - something that is
not fast enough for a work station anymore.
Greg J. Zartman wrote:
>> Sorta. Most
evin
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
>
>
> On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 00:15, Richard Ford wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:56:13AM +1000, Damien Curtain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not an old piece of junk but definatley I know of many places that
> recycle older hardware for linux gateways/firewalls etc, these are not
> for profit groups though.
No argument from me there. :-)
> It's
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:26:46PM -0700, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
>
> > Sorta. Most of the customers I've seen so far don't go and shell out
> > on any new hardware. They just use whatever junk is lying around which
>
>
> I highly doubt this is the norm. Unless a person is just playing arou
> Sorta. Most of the customers I've seen so far don't go and shell out
> on any new hardware. They just use whatever junk is lying around which
I highly doubt this is the norm. Unless a person is just playing around
with SME at home, I have a hard time believing that the average
"customer
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 00:15, Richard Ford wrote:
> High availability for SME's? Is this not seriously missing the mark on the
> intended market segment? This is a 2x increase in costs where most SME's to
> start with are hard pressed to pay for SCSI hardware raid and SCSI DAT/ETC
> backup, ECC ra
---
From: "Greg Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 8:38 PM
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Some wish-list ideas for version 6.0
> I could post this on the wish-list forum, but I thought it was more
> developer orientated. Now that I
I could post this on the wish-list forum, but I thought it was more
developer orientated. Now that I've got a 5.5 system up and running,
I thought I'd throw in a few things that could easily go into 6.0 that
would make it a bit easier for me (and hopefully others) to make some
contribs:
1) Expec
35 matches
Mail list logo
