Re: Important Announcement: Freenet naming change

Hi Ian, I'm surprised. I'm not sure what to say, or what reaction you and the rest of the board expected. This is another demonstration of a complete disconnect between the board of FPI, and the community around Freenet. After giving up initial plans to name Locutus "Freenet 2" in the face of

Re: Remaining reviews needed to release Freenet 1495

Agreed! A decade ago when IPv6 stacks were liable to be buggy, it was understandable, but by now enabling it by default seems more than reasonable. On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 9:42 AM, s7r wrote: > Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> We’re getting ever closer to release. I merged the

Re: Please test the new Windows Installer

In my testing, it successfully detects Java 8u333, which is what java.com offers for Windows. - Steve On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:10 AM, DC* wrote: > Hey, > > I'll do my best to test the windows installer today. I'll report finders > over IRC. > > Best regards > > On 2022-06-13 20:59, Dr. Arne

Re: New test-release for 1493, with new testing key

--- Original Message --- On Saturday, April 2nd, 2022 at 7:09 PM, Dr. Arne Bab. wrote: ... > -- Draft for Announcement -- > > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1493 is now available. [overview] I'd suggest removing "[overview]". When I wrote the template I intended it as a placeholder, not a

Re: Linux installer as jar?

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, June 27, 2020 10:05 PM, DC* wrote: > On 2019-04-13 21:47, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > > My impulse would be to decide which distros we want to officially > > support, and provide packages for them. Perhaps Arch, Debian, and > >

Re: [WEBCHAT/IRC] Accessibility for noobs and devs who don't want to authnticate

My concern would be that although at any given time there may not be a spam campaign that we notice, it would require keeping a close eye on IRC lest it be flooded when no one with the power to stop it is around. I know when we enabled the option to require registration, Freenode was having a

Numbered List of Freenet Project Ideas

Hi there. Wall of text incoming. Here are some projects which I think would take Freenet in some interesting directions: Capabilities / APIs --- 1. Introduce a restricted plugin API: nextgens has had this idea for a while - only give plugins a plugin API object instead of a

Re: Partial restructuring of Freenet's code

Thanks for writing this! Your approaches seem reasonable to me. Yes, mocking time will be helpful. It’s not clear to me how many places that will be of use, or whether mocking would still be viable in integration tests instead of just unit tests, but it’s definitely a good tool to have. Do you

Re: Linux installer as jar?

My impulse would be to decide which distros we want to officially support, and provide packages for them. Perhaps Arch, Debian, and Ubuntu? Both installers for Linux applications and compiling Java to native code strike me as odd approaches that go against the grain of usual software

Re: Question regarding automatic IP detection

I agree that does look for all the world like a missing negation in the opennet case. Nice find! What looks like the previous implementation of that decision which that commit replaces (in detectPrimaryIPAddress) appears to have no such distinction, but looks questionable itself as well due to

Re: Freenet's Hackathon (second edition)

Translating is primarily thorough https://www.transifex.com/otf/freenet/ and we have scripts to pull the changes into the repos before deploying. Typed on a mobile keyboard On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, wrote: > I'm sorry, but I've tried a fork of freenet for adding hackathon >

Re: final final test release of 1481

I haven't tested beyond running the build that was originally tagged 1481, (so c4b1caa16819937bc7c368f74e7deea16cc9b263 I think?) and have no reasons to suggest the release be further delayed. I was able to verify the build on an updated Debian Jessie VM, and set up doing the same with a

Re: Freenet's Hackathon (second edition)

doing >> so and getting an opportunity to do a hackathon would be a great way >> to get involved. I could probably do November 17th >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:11 AM Steve Dougherty >> wrote: >> >>> I’d be interested - I’m free the weekend of November 17th,

Re: Freenet's Hackathon (second edition)

I’d be interested - I’m free the weekend of November 17th, as well as weekends in December. - Steve Typed on a mobile keyboard On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 4:01 PM, DC* wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I've been looking around the issue tracker and found many stalled > projects and initiatives. I'm

Re: final test release of 1481

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, October 18, 2018 7:55 PM, DC* wrote: > Seems auto-update key works flawlessly. Attached relevant logs. Hooray! I was able to verify this build on my Debian Jessie box: ``` steve@debian:~/local_freenet/fred$ cat /etc/debian_version 8.11

Re: 1481 release preparation back on track

Thank you! Looking forward to the release! ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 6, 2018 10:35 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > ​​ > > Hi, > > I finally got the SunEC breakage in Java 7u181 fixed,[1] > > so the release is moving forward again. > > I also added some of the recent

Re: Freenet 0.7.5 build 1480 is now available.

IIRC the bundled installer is still 32-bit. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:11 PM, wrote: > On Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:02:15 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1480 is now available. [overview] > > - Ship new Windows

Freenet on Embedded Systems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, A few years ago Allan (comradekingu) had an idea about selling small pre-configured Freenet systems. While I think we're still probably underresourced to support such an undertaking, I did have ideas about what one might look like.

FPI joining Battle for the Net?

Are we interested in joining the net neutrality protest on July 12th? https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/ - Steve

Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

I don't think anyone is proposing that new developers get push access or bypass review by existing developers. We're all in agreement that it would not be acceptable. Matthew's question of how to avoid long review delays doesn't have a great answer; I can't think of anything beyond keeping the

Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

Original Message Subject: Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal Local Time: May 8, 2017 1:09 PM UTC Time: May 8, 2017 5:09 PM From: free...@nullvoid.me To: devl@freenetproject.org Can you provide the minimum identification requirements to be able to get a bug bounty from FPI? If you

Re: manifest files and forwarding

Original Message On May 3, 2017, 3:16 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide < arne_...@web.de> wrote: Stefanie Roos writes: > Thanks. > > Sorry, bit late in answering I documented an easier to implement version of your idea as note in

Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

, 2017, 4:53 AM Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> wrote: Hi everyone, To my understanding, at least currently xor does not want FPI to pay him for his work. Some developers on FMS have proposed bug bounties - say, $1000 - for completing a task like "fix Windows tray / instal

Re: DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

perspective that would add to the risk and may be a disincentive to try. On Sat, May 6, 2017, 4:53 AM Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> wrote: Hi everyone, To my understanding, at least currently xor does not want FPI to pay him for his work. Some developers on FMS have proposed bug bounties

DDG Tasks Bug Bounty Proposal

Hi everyone, To my understanding, at least currently xor does not want FPI to pay him for his work. Some developers on FMS have proposed bug bounties - say, $1000 - for completing a task like "fix Windows tray / installer to work with 64-bit Java." This would be in a "first to get reviewed and

Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try

Sorry; I managed to send this message before I was done with it. Original Message Subject: Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try Local Time: May 1, 2017 7:43 PM UTC Time: May 1, 2017 11:43 PM From: st...@asksteved.com To: Discussion of development issues

Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try

I'm not confident in my answers; I will provide guesses where I have them. For better results you'll either have to hope someone more knowledgeable than I answers you, or read the source code. https://github.com/freenet/fred Original Message Subject: Questions on Freenet -

Re: Questions on Freenet - Second Try

Original Message Subject: Questions on Freenet - Second Try Local Time: April 25, 2017 8:14 AM UTC Time: April 25, 2017 12:14 PM From: philipp.spei...@uni-ulm.de To: Support Devl@freenetproject.org Hello Unfortunately, my previously transmitted

Re: manifest files and forwarding

New information on the law enforcement attack is now public record: https://www.reddit.com/r/Freenet/comments/66f0n3/missouri_law_enforcements_freenet_attack_now/ Original Message Subject: Re: manifest files and forwarding Local Time: April 12, 2017 11:48 PM UTC Time: April 13,

Re: Tried to deploy a change to the site

I see the change on the website now; it just took a while. If I'm reading these timestamps correctly, and I'm not sure that I am, it looks there were five minutes before it started the build. The build then took 4 minutes 11 seconds. I do not have information to speak to whether there were

Re: manifest files and forwarding

Sorry for the top reply; my mobile email client's capabilities are lacking. Yes. This category of attack is a thing. It sounds similar to a (flawed) law enforcement attack described in a paper dated 2013 that leaked a while back:

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available

Original Message Subject: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available Local Time: March 1, 2017 7:29 PM UTC Time: March 2, 2017 12:29 AM From: arne_...@web.de To: Discussion of development issues Freenet 0.7.5 build 1476 is now available.

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

to continue participating to mean that users would be expected to migrate their own issues. Original Message On Feb 21, 2017, 11:38 AM, Ian Clarke wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 9:51 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: Ian, the thing I find frustrating with your

Re: [freenet-dev] 5 weeks till our SSL certificate expires

like Florent is keen on migrating everything to AWS (except for what's on Github), if so it might be nice to have the cert through AWS too (and AWS has good multi-user functionality). Ian. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 9:31 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: Original Message

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

wrote: On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 01:24:50 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: > We're at the point where I would repeat myself. For reasons already stated, > I'd like to continue using Mantis. I am willing to pay the hosting costs. > There are more than directly financial costs in migrating

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

We're at the point where I would repeat myself. For reasons already stated, I'd like to continue using Mantis. I am willing to pay the hosting costs. There are more than directly financial costs in migrating to a new platform. Original Message On Feb 21, 2017, 1:05 PM,

Re: [freenet-dev] preserving the links to the wiki

Ian, the thing I find frustrating with your approach is that we'd regularly be moving to something new based on what's literally trending. I'd be much happier with paying for Mantis hosting than spending effort, breaking links, forcing users to mess with accounts if they still want to work on

Re: [freenet-dev] Website Redesign Pre-pre-alpha

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017, 6:39 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Dan Roberts writes: > > I've hosted the current state of the redesign here for now: > > https://ademan-laptop.github.io/freenet-website-redesign-pelican/ > > Wow, looks good. > It sure does!

Re: [freenet-dev] Status of web redesign?

Thanks for the update! On Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 5:34 PM Dan Roberts wrote: > Unfortunately I didn't find much time between work and three different sets > of family, but I believe I can carve out time this weekend. I expect a very > low key new years. I have a prospective

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On 08/12/2016 04:00 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 14:28 +, Ian Clarke wrote: >> Why don't you set a date since you're the one that would do it? > > > I have created https://github.com/freenet/wiki/wiki ... and will remove > the old wikis as soon as we deploy the new

Re: [freenet-dev] About the project

On 08/11/2016 12:01 PM, Dan Roberts wrote: > All else being equal, I'm all for cutting costs, but things don't appear > equal. Migrating the wiki to Github could be a massive undertaking. I > participated in exactly this migration with the Namecoin project and it was > a royal pain. Github's

Re: [freenet-dev] 99designs contest is up

The page mentions Tahrir in places; those should be "Freenet": "Designers from around the world are submitting creative designs for tahrir in web page design - gold." "How tahrir started their web page design journey" On Sat, Aug 13, 2016, 12:02 PM Ian Clarke wrote: >

Re: [freenet-dev] Porting website FAQ to the wiki

I'm interested in implementing a site that works with https://pontoon.mozilla.org/ so we can still offer translators a way to translate in-place, but the site can remain functional without JavaScript. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, 8:24 AM Ian Clarke wrote: > We need to think about

Re: [freenet-dev] Design brief for new website

Why are we doing this? This mailing list has been a toxic environment full of anger, hurt, and mockery. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, 8:10 AM Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 1:40 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote: > > > The last paragraph positively

Re: [freenet-dev] Banner must be removed from website NOW

On 07/13/2016 06:04 PM, Ryan Matthews wrote: > This has been brought to my attention and I would like to get more > information about what exactly you are looking for. > I currently work, and sit, right next to Steve D at work which would make > moving the process forward quicker if he can have

Re: [freenet-dev] Planning process Step #3

On 05/26/2016 08:16 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > Many people have now contributed to the list of tasks, thank you all for > your > contributions. > If you have not yet contributed, please do-so in the next day or two, after > which I will curate the tasks and transfer them into a suitable form for >

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

On 05/26/2016 10:02 AM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 6:55 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: > I can understand if you're upset that Arne does not agree with you, but > I don't understand what you're doing here. Do you expect that if you > > berate Arne he w

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

On 05/25/2016 08:49 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: >> >> Core technical reasons: >> >> - It excludes those of our users who assume (not unreasonably) that >> Google might de-anonymize them. >> > > Is there any technical

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1473 released

ll explanation Fix code sample Sadao (1): fcp: fix zero-length binary blob download Steve Dougherty (21): DatabaseKey: simplify return condition HMAC_legacy: remove trailing whitespace README: add Travis build status crypt/DSA: fix specifying extra argument

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre2

for opennet ack when not path folding (locally) Reduce to 3 pings/blocks Use ping or bwlimit, whichever is larger. Logging Argh (logging) Use real-time bulk transfer time But add the ping time to the delay time, as both matter Steve Dougherty (8): Remove

[freenet-dev] Testing release build 1473-pre1

MultiMessageCallback Add javadocs to MultiMessageCallback Assertion: Can't make() after arm() Give a code example in javadocs Better overall explanation Fix code sample Sadao (1): fcp: fix zero-length binary blob download Steve Dougherty (6): DatabaseKe

Re: [freenet-dev] freenetproject.org traffic: Pretty good

On 03/12/2016 12:40 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > hyazin...@emailn.de writes: > >> Have a look at this: https://www.similarweb.com/website/freenetproject.org >> Looks pretty good. It's new that China is in the TOP 5 of visitors splitted >> by origins... > > 200k visitors per month is

Re: [freenet-dev] monthly donations via salt on bountysource (need your opinion)

On 03/07/2016 05:50 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to revisit the discussion about monthly donations via salt on > bountysource. > > We have an account with currently one anonymous monthly supporter and > one non-anonymous supporter: >

Re: [freenet-dev] Problem with handling of Opennet Announce Requests

On 02/18/2016 09:06 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 18/02/16 13:43, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, 6:30 AM Martin Byrenheid < >> martin.byrenh...@tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while working with Freene

Re: [freenet-dev] Please help improve our GSoC project ideas page!

Sounds like a good plan! I'll take some time to contribute this weekend. Thank you for putting together and submitting the application! On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, 7:22 PM Arne Babenhauserheide < arne.babenhauserhe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I signed Freenet up for GSoC 2016. Now we need to

Re: [freenet-dev] Problem with handling of Opennet Announce Requests

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, 6:30 AM Martin Byrenheid < martin.byrenh...@tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Hi, > > while working with Freenet, I discovered that whenever a seed node > received an > OpennetAnnounceRequest-message for a target location X, it forwards the > request to another opennet peer node, but

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet Data

This is all the probe data I had collected since the transition to PostgreSQL as of December 12, 2015. The dumps were made with https://github.com/Thynix/pyProbe/blob/master/fnprobe/copy_to.py For details on the tables in question see the database schema section of the pyProbe readme:

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1471-pre3

On 01/03/2016 10:17 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: ... > - Due to node reference changes packets for setting up connections to > opennet seednodes are now larger. If you have low MTU (lower than > the typical 1500 bytes) this may prevent you from connecting to seed > nodes. My mista

Re: [freenet-dev] What blocks Freenet adoption?

I will respond in more detail from my desktop, but for now I can add a specific example: today I learned of someone who was curious to see what Freenet was about after talking about it. After installing it on their Windows 10 laptop, they opened Linkageddon and figuring to see what "more

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1471-pre3

g [3] https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-testing-build-1471-pre2-source.tar.bz2 https://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-testing-build-1471-pre2-source.tar.bz2.sig KeyUtils v5026: --- Bert Massop (1): Remove references to removed KeyListenerConstructionException

Re: [freenet-dev] Issues in BaseL10n and in BaseL10nTest in the current code

On 01/01/2016 03:33 PM, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > Hi there, > > After pulling the latest changes in the "next" branch of the Fred > project I found a few issues in BaseL10n and in BaseL10nTest. Please > take a look at my bug report that also includes a patch: > >

Re: [freenet-dev] New UPnP2 plugin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Maybe I shouldn't be surprised that people have focused on the relatively easy and relatively unimportant (in this stage of development) improvement of logging mechanism. Fred's System.out.println() usages are certainly not best practice, and at

[freenet-dev] Possible Active Pitch Black Attack

The network may be experiencing a pitch black attack, or maybe a Sybil variant on it? (Given the assumption that few people are using darknet; we should add a probe for security levels.) From talking on IRC, I am not alone in observing peer locations severely clustered around 0.00: Me:

Re: [freenet-dev] Possible Active Pitch Black Attack

On 12/04/2015 11:20 AM, Bert Massop wrote: > Also, the clusters all appear close to your respective node's locations, as > expected, and certainly not around 0.00 (which would be on the top or on > the extreme right of the circle plot, I'm not reading the code at the > moment). > > Again, I see

Re: [freenet-dev] Update FAQ entry

On 11/21/2015 11:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Q: Has anyone got into trouble for their anonymous activities while > running Freenet? A: US law enforcement can identify anonymous users of > Freenet[1] and Tor[2]. It is reasonable to assume that other governments > have access to the same

Re: [freenet-dev] Update FAQ entry

On 11/24/2015 07:49 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 11/21/2015 11:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: ... >> Sorry I haven't posted a pull request; I'm nowhere near synchronized >> with the website updates... > > Opened as https://github.com/freenet/website/pull/30#issuecomment-15

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On 11/08/2015 09:38 PM, Ian wrote: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dan Roberts wrote: >> >> Since >> someone on reddit compared us to Tor, and seeing as Tor is also a very >> technical project that needs to explain itself to laypeople, perhaps >> we could take some lessons

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On 11/07/2015 09:36 AM, Ian wrote: ... > That sentence doesn't make any more sense than anything else you've > said. On 11/06/2015 06:59 PM, Ian wrote: ... > Yeah, that's about as convincing as your previous arguments, one of > which is almost certainly factually incorrect, and the other is >

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On 11/07/2015 06:47 PM, Ian wrote: > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:38 PM, xor wrote: >> >> Together with the idea "a darknet-thing should have a dark website to make >> users feel like they did find the darknet", I'd hope we can move on to >> working >> on other stuff for a

[freenet-dev] Things Before 1471 Release

Hi everyone, Here's my current understanding of the things Fred needs before 1471 will have -pre3 / is probably stable and feature-complete. If you're looking for something to do, doing one of these would be great! 1. When updating to a suggested version, plugins (especially ones necessary to

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

Noted. That sort of feedback would have been much more helpful back when the redesign was in testing. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, 4:36 PM Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > wrote: > > > This site

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

Nov 5, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Noted. That sort of feedback would have been much more helpful back when > >> the redesign was i

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

This site is already using Bootstrap. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, 4:07 PM Ian Clarke wrote: > Thanks Arne. What do other people think of this feedback? > > Is there someone who is really willing to take ownership of getting the > website into shape, perhaps using these pieces

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

On 11/05/2015 06:15 PM, xor wrote: > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 03:40:31 PM Ian wrote: >> Also, I think the current site is worse than the version during testing due >> to the placement of the donation bar, which it is clear is causing >> significant confusion. > > The main goal with the new

Re: [freenet-dev] A bold idea for discussion: "Freenet 2"

On 11/05/2015 04:35 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 03/11/15 18:00, Ian wrote: ... >> Thoughts? > IMHO general file storage is important. Even for revolutions! How much > of the supposed technical contribution to the Arab Spring was videos on > Youtube? > > I would like to see a prototype of

[freenet-dev] Links for Bob Ham

On 11/04/2015 07:02 AM, Bob Ham wrote: ... > That is extremely unhelpful. I've done my research, I've looked through > the website and the wiki and on Freenet and I've read some of the papers > linked on the website. I've not found anywhere a description of the > fundamental problems which Toad

Re: [freenet-dev] Links for Bob Ham

On 11/04/2015 07:41 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: ... > Did you see https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Research_challenges or the > section titled "Do we understand Freenet?" on toad's blog? > USK@yGvITGZzrY1vUZK-4AaYLgcjZ7ysRqNTMfdcO8gS-LY,-ab5bJVD3Lp-LXEQqBAhJpMKrKJ19RnNaZMIkusU

Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on website

We're aware of the excessive vertical space and are working on fixing it. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, 10:39 AM Michael Grube wrote: > Should the website maybe also mention Freenet's 501c3 status near the > donation bar? > On Nov 4, 2015 10:34 AM, "Ian Clarke"

Re: [freenet-dev] Request for comments: Change list+IRC policy to avoid full rewrite flamewars

On 11/04/2015 02:40 AM, xor wrote: > On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 08:38:06 PM Ian Clarke wrote: >> I don't think censorship is the answer :) ... > Also, there is the psychological effect of destroying the motivation of > everyone who reads those threads, including the volunteers. It certainly

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On 11/02/2015 08:02 AM, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 06:26 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: >>> On 11/02/2015 06:21 AM, Bob Ham wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 05:54 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: >>&g

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On 11/01/2015 09:47 AM, Bob Ham wrote: > On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 12:07 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> On Saturday, 31. October 2015 16:27:42 Bob Ham wrote: ... >> 4. incorrect assumption: There is no clear strategy about the >>documentation of the protocol. >> >> The current clear

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On 11/02/2015 06:26 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 11/02/2015 06:21 AM, Bob Ham wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 05:54 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: >>> one >>> may observe that we have not written up protocol documentation, making >>> that our current strate

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On 11/02/2015 06:21 AM, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 05:54 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> one >> may observe that we have not written up protocol documentation, making >> that our current strategy. > > I'm not sure what you mean; what are you referring to wi

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet debian package

Okay, that makes sense. Build 1471 will be a transition build to avoid feature creep, and we'll need a build of WoT that includes db4o for 1472. - Steve On Wed, Oct 28, 2015, 7:20 AM Ximin Luo wrote: > On 28/10/15 10:51, Florent Daigniere wrote: > > On Tue,

Re: [freenet-dev] Git push access

On 10/25/2015 07:31 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Hi, can I get git push access back on debian.git and contrib.git? I > have some updates to make. Added. > Also note the teams (as in Github Teams) are now useless since they > only provide permissions to *-staging, but those repos have all be > renamed

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet debian package

On 10/25/2015 09:02 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 25/10/15 10:22, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2015, 16:06:42 schrieb Matthew Toseland: >>> We could even get rid of db4o if we can bundle it with the >>> plugins that need it. >> Let’s not do anything which could break

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1471-pre2

ock are equals to the block pushed. it might have changed if there was a put() with overwrite=true. If it has changed, return 0, i.e. don't remove it CachingFreenetStore: error in equals, correct Steve Dougherty (29): themes: avoid styling headers as normal text l10n: remove unus

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 1471-pre1

On 08/29/2015 06:36 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 28/08/15 23:31, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> Freenet unstable testing prerelease 1471-pre1 is now available. ... > Did you resolve the problems with updating essential plugins? We can't > require a new version of an essential plugin

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet Hackathon?

cially > if Dec 12-13 works best for others. > > Cheers, > Dan > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > wrote: > > Does December 12th - 13th work for people? > > > > > > _

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet debian package

On 10/23/2015 02:54 AM, dean wrote: > On 10/23/15 13:50, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 06:09 PM, dean wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been hacking on the freenet debian package for a little while and >>> I think I have gotten i

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

. The initial use case is limited to darknet connections between hidden services. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, 10:39 AM Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > wrote: > > > > While it's true that we can't exactly &

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On 10/16/2015 11:13 AM, Ian wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, > wrote: ... >> I'm questioning if the overhead of designing and maintaining yet another >> anonymity protocol makes sense given Freenet's current situation. You can >> concentrate on

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet Hackathon?

Does December 12th - 13th work for people? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Behind the times

On 10/22/2015 10:58 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com> > wrote: ... >> I don't understand what you mean by this exactly. Reduce padding between >> sections and put the download button where? Up in the menu? >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet debian package

On 10/22/2015 06:09 PM, dean wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been hacking on the freenet debian package for a little while and > I think I have gotten it up to a usable stage. Id like some feedback if > someone would like to browse/test it please? Sure! I'm glad to hear you got this working again.

Re: [freenet-dev] Behind the times

On 10/22/2015 08:15 PM, Ian wrote: > Yay! > > I think it's a huge improvement. :D > One issue is there are a couple of places that could use a bit more > contrast, particularly the "SUMA Award" logo should probably be brighter. Brightened. > Another thing is that there is a lot of empty space

Re: [freenet-dev] Behind the times

The site is now live. On 10/05/2015 05:22 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > It's given in the prompt: both are "guest". > > > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015, 11:41 PM Ian <i...@locut.us> wrote: > > > What's the username/pwd for https://testing.freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet Hackathon?

On 10/20/2015 10:10 PM, Dan Roberts wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > Is anyone interested in a Freenet hackathon? I am! ... > Given the rather dire sounding "Project Status" thread, one > of the first threads I caught since I signed up for the ML, I think a > this might be useful to re-envigorate the

Re: [freenet-dev] Does anyone have rthist.png?

Yep, I think that's it. That page, and by extension that diagram, were for Freenet 0.5, so it's removed from the redesigned website. That makes the German article the outdated one. From mobile On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 2:35 AM xor wrote: > Was it this maybe? >

Re: [freenet-dev] Dependency management was Re: Behind the times

We already distribute runtime dependencies with Freenet; I don't think it would be reasonable to distribute things required only for development like JUnit / Hamcrest. From mobile On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 5:37 PM Arne Babenhauserheide @ web.de > wrote: Am Montag,

  1   2   3   4   5   >