On Friday 16 Dec 2011 06:26:11 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> > > I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
> > > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 23:40:58 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Arne,
>
> > 5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
>
> The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
> primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
The
Hi all,
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:40 +0100, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Arne,
>
> > 5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
>
> The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
> primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck
Hi Arne,
> 5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
Greetings,
David
--
David ?Bombe? Roden
-- next part
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 23:40:58 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Arne,
5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
The immediate
On Friday 16 Dec 2011 06:26:11 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> > I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
> > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails.
> > Do we have a build
Hi Arne,
5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
Greetings,
David
--
David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net
Hi all,
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:40 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Arne,
5. After you did multiple test-jars that way, ask Toad to integrate it
The whole point is to create a process in which toad is NOT involved as the
primary force because he is kind of the bottleneck here.
I
On 14/12/11 18:15, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
>> Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
>
> I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
> WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails. Do we have a build
>
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> > Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
>
> I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
> WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails. Do we
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails. Do we have a
On 14/12/11 18:15, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails. Do we have a build
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO
INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails.
Do we have a build
Hi Matthew,
> Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails. Do we have a build
environment on remote hardware or do we simply build on
On Tuesday 13 Dec 2011 20:10:32 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
> > even if "too busy, sorry" - would be appreciated.
>
> I would love to hear some details about what is planned to happen when, too,
> because
On Tuesday 13 Dec 2011 20:10:32 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Steve,
Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
even if too busy, sorry - would be appreciated.
I would love to hear some details about what is planned to happen when, too,
because so far
Hi Matthew,
Ummm, I was expecting you to create a tree and make a test build?
I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO INFORMATION
WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails. Do we have a build
environment on remote hardware or do we simply build on
Hi Steve,
> Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
> even if "too busy, sorry" - would be appreciated.
I would love to hear some details about what is planned to happen when, too,
because so far nothing seems to have happened, at least nothing that I have
been
Hi Steve,
Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
even if too busy, sorry - would be appreciated.
I would love to hear some details about what is planned to happen when, too,
because so far nothing seems to have happened, at least nothing that I have
been
Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
even if "too busy, sorry" - would be appreciated.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Juiceman wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ?Bombe? Roden <
> bombe at pterodactylus.net> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Hi Matthew,
Has there been any progress towards implementing this? A status report -
even if too busy, sorry - would be appreciated.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden
bo...@pterodactylus.net wrote:
**
Hi
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> **
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> > Also we could have many "streams" of test builds, by different
> developers,
>
> > and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being
>
> > officially endorsed, but the users still be able to use
Hi Matthew,
> Also we could have many "streams" of test builds, by different developers,
> and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being
> officially endorsed, but the users still be able to use the update.sh
> / update.cmd conveniently.
That would require quite some
On Saturday 05 Nov 2011 20:35:00 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> > 1. The most valuable thing is probably not actually releasing builds. It's
> > collecting patches and initial code review, integration into a tree (maybe
> > master, maybe not), and *POSTING A TEST BUILD AND GETTING
On Saturday 05 Nov 2011 20:35:00 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hi Matthew,
1. The most valuable thing is probably not actually releasing builds. It's
collecting patches and initial code review, integration into a tree (maybe
master, maybe not), and *POSTING A TEST BUILD AND GETTING PEOPLE TO
Hi Matthew,
Also we could have many streams of test builds, by different developers,
and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being
officially endorsed, but the users still be able to use the update.sh
name / update.cmd name conveniently.
That would require quite some
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net
wrote:
**
Hi Matthew,
Also we could have many streams of test builds, by different
developers,
and thus let them release whatever they want to without it being
officially endorsed, but the users still be
Hi Matthew,
> 1. The most valuable thing is probably not actually releasing builds. It's
> collecting patches and initial code review, integration into a tree (maybe
> master, maybe not), and *POSTING A TEST BUILD AND GETTING PEOPLE TO TEST
> IT*.
Right. The only difference between release
Okay, my additional thoughts since last time first:
1. The most valuable thing is probably not actually releasing builds. It's
collecting patches and initial code review, integration into a tree (maybe
master, maybe not), and *POSTING A TEST BUILD AND GETTING PEOPLE TO TEST IT*.
This can be
Hi Matthew,
1. The most valuable thing is probably not actually releasing builds. It's
collecting patches and initial code review, integration into a tree (maybe
master, maybe not), and *POSTING A TEST BUILD AND GETTING PEOPLE TO TEST
IT*.
Right. The only difference between release builds
On Thursday 03 Nov 2011 18:35:19 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> Hey, everybody.
>
> You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study and
> that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile, people are
> still submitting pull requests on GitHub and patches on
I think that makes sense David, Matthew?
Ian.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote:
> **
>
> Hey, everybody.
>
> You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study
> and that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile, people
> are
I think that makes sense David, Matthew?
Ian.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net
wrote:
**
Hey, everybody.
You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study
and that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile,
On Thursday 03 Nov 2011 18:35:19 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote:
Hey, everybody.
You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study and
that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile, people are
still submitting pull requests on GitHub and patches on FMS
Hi Matthew,
The other side of this is not having lots of builds close together improves
stability and therefore performance.
The only thing causing disruptions are changes in routing and inter-node
communication but those builds will generally not talk to older nodes anyway,
right?
Your
Hey, everybody.
You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study and
that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile, people are
still submitting pull requests on GitHub and patches on FMS (and probably
Freetalk, too).
The combination of these two facts
Hey, everybody.
You all know that toad is currently very busy with his university study and
that he has very little time to take care of Freenet. Meanwhile, people are
still submitting pull requests on GitHub and patches on FMS (and probably
Freetalk, too).
The combination of these two facts
38 matches
Mail list logo
