Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-10-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> On 19 Oct 2016, at 13:36, Eduard Moraru wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> >>> On 12 Oct 2016, at 12:34, Eduard Moraru wrote: >>> >>> Another idea would be to use the extension page`s

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-10-19 Thread Eduard Moraru
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > On 12 Oct 2016, at 12:34, Eduard Moraru wrote: > > > > Another idea would be to use the extension page`s release notes as the > main > > place where to write changes and then, in the XE RN,

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-10-17 Thread Vincent Massol
> On 12 Oct 2016, at 12:34, Eduard Moraru wrote: > > Another idea would be to use the extension page`s release notes as the main > place where to write changes and then, in the XE RN, aggregate the RN of > all the bundled extensions. This would cover both contrib and core

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-10-12 Thread Eduard Moraru
Another idea would be to use the extension page`s release notes as the main place where to write changes and then, in the XE RN, aggregate the RN of all the bundled extensions. This would cover both contrib and core extensions and would also make the extension page much nicer, since right now you

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> On 19 Sep 2016, at 15:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: > > We could have an "Extensions" section in the RN of XE where we could > display noticeable functionalities. So that's your 1) variant. > > My problem is that we have this discrepancy between RN and

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-19 Thread Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
We could have an "Extensions" section in the RN of XE where we could display noticeable functionalities. So that's your 1) variant. My problem is that we have this discrepancy between RN and Documentation. So this means we would duplicate content to RN and Documentation, instead of reusing it.

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-19 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
+1 for 1) Thanks, Marius On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > We now include a few contrib apps in XE. However, when someone checks the > RN for XE, for example http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ > ReleaseNotesXWiki83M2 all

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-14 Thread Guillaume Delhumeau
+1 for 1) too 2016-09-13 18:26 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne : > +1 for 1) > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Vincent Massol > wrote: > > Hi devs, > > > > We now include a few contrib apps in XE. However, when someone checks > the RN for XE, for

Re: [xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-13 Thread Thomas Mortagne
+1 for 1) On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > We now include a few contrib apps in XE. However, when someone checks the RN > for XE, for example > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki83M2 all > they see is

[xwiki-devs] Release notes strategy for included contrib extensions

2016-09-13 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi devs, We now include a few contrib apps in XE. However, when someone checks the RN for XE, for example http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotesXWiki83M2 all they see is this: “The following dependencies have been upgraded: * Tour Application 1.0.4” It doesn’t say if