costs for DDN into the future, then
rolling your own site might not be a great idea.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:07 AM, adamcl...@takingitglobal.org wrote:
Thanks for the responses to our idea of what to do with DDN :)
To clear somethings up:
-Tobias asked
, inc
3704 11th ave south
minneapolis, mn 55407
tabe...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:38:41 -0400
To: digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
From: taran.a.ramper...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
/me hums Drupal's theme at Tobias as well.
Tobias Eigen wrote:
Thanks Adam
---
From: tabe...@hotmail.com
To: digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:02 -0600
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
What I have not seen in this exchange is the cost for the system including:
a) the number of staff
Hello all and Tom,
Have been reading this stuff about future of DDN which essentially needed some
funding.
We which sites do not need funding. :)
Tom you mentioned about China. Just like to ask does anyone has contacts with
China in the education sector looking for solution for their rural
Let's simplify.
Ismael Peña-López wrote:
I'd second Andy's proposal to recruit some volunteers and let the list run
(smoothly) for a while.
i.
Forgive me. That was Andy's proposal when DDN left Benton, and there was
a sincere attempt to do that to some degree. It didn't work then, it
We see this often with our clients; technology shouldn't be
implemented for technology's sake. If people are comfortable with a
mailing list, then that's what they'll use, even if the client just
spent a hideous amount of money on their shiny new online
communications center that the
]
--- On Tue, 28/10/08, tom abeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: tom abeles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
Date: Tuesday, 28 October, 2008, 11:33 PM
Hi Cindy
First, on charging a ¨fee¨. Tax Deductable
As an e-mail conceived network DDN will live or die that way.
I would guess 95% of online communities forced to transition to a
web-centric environment die.
The only way Ning or any tool will work is if people can reply/start new
topics by e-mail and never have to visit the web site. Anything
I share your perspective, Tom. What would we get? That is what we're
supposed to be considering as well.
My thoughts are a common, centralized area owned by the community but
using all tools available externally.
There was a time when this list was a thriving cornucopia of ideas,
thoughts,
-empowered online communities is
golightly, used at http://groups.nten.org
If you are really concerned about costs for DDN into the future, then
rolling your own site might not be a great idea.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, George Roberts wrote:
I cannot see the reason for a wiki as a focus for DDN discussion. Maybe
that was not the intention. Wikis are for collaborative development of
documents.
Email is a much more accessible channel for discussion than web-based
services.
I
: Barbara COMBES [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 5:40 AM
Rather than use a wiki which can be clumsy, why not ry a
ning - separate
communities and multiple
DDN should use the open source GroupServer platform to host an
integrated e-mail/web forum/feeds experience!
We use it here: http://forums.e-democracy.org
More info: http://groupserver.org
In terms of crossing divides, we paid for a feature that allows for
super simple photo sharing that
://groups.nten.org
If you are really concerned about costs for DDN into the future, then
rolling your own site might not be a great idea.
Cheers,
Tobias
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the responses to our idea of what to do with DDN :)
To clear somethings up:
-Tobias
Good evening,
Somehow gmail delivered just now the e-mails after Taran Rampersad's.
Thanks for clarifying about payment.
And thanks for the explanation of why keep the present system for the
site. Just wondering: at first, the last posts of the mailing list
used to appear bottom-right of the
. And that is the individual´s responsibility.
thoughts?
tom
tom abeles
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:18:12 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitaldivide@digitaldivide.net
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
Wiki is a good idea ... but I still think mailing list is a lot more VISIBLE.
I have
To: The Digital Divide Network discussion group
Subject: Re: [DDN] The future of DDN
Hi All,
I am answering on the mailing-list (with Bcc to Adam Clare and Taran
Rampersad) rather than on the wiki because today I have a problem with
logging in at the wiki (1).
About:
...To make the site easier to manage
Sadly the wiki has been hacked by porn purveyors. It must be addressed
immediately. Who to contact?
I cannot see the reason for a wiki as a focus for DDN discussion.
Maybe that was not the intention. Wikis are for collaborative
development of documents.
Email is a much more accessible
Wiki is a good idea ... but I still think mailing list is a lot more VISIBLE. I
have clean forgotten about THE Future of DDN until this mail.
Yes. I agree DDN should look into methods of payment.
Perhaps some thoughts on the following two items?
1) there should be perhaps free memberships
Thanks for the responses to our idea of what to do with DDN :)
To clear somethings up:
-Tobias asked if the donation for membership is voluntary or not. We have
no intention of charging people to access DDN. What we do want to do is
identify people who are financial supporters of DDN. We don't
Hi All,
I am answering on the mailing-list (with Bcc to Adam Clare and Taran
Rampersad) rather than on the wiki because today I have a problem with
logging in at the wiki (1).
About:
...To make the site easier to manage we propose the removal of the
communities functionality and discussion
21 matches
Mail list logo
