wave-d is a library for reading and writing WAV format
(range-based).
https://github.com/p0nce/wave-d
---
y4m-d is a library for reading and writing Y4M files.
https://github.com/p0nce/wave-d
Y4M is one of the simplest uncompressed video format, it's
designed to
There was a typo error: https://github.com/p0nce/y4m-d
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 18:46:51 UTC, ponce wrote:
y4m-d is a library for reading and writing Y4M files.
https://github.com/p0nce/wave-d
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 18:48:33 UTC, ponce wrote:
There was a typo error: https://github.com/p0nce/y4m-d
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 18:46:51 UTC, ponce wrote:
y4m-d is a library for reading and writing Y4M files.
https://github.com/p0nce/wave-d
I checked out y4m-d when it went up on
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 23:57:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
First off, I expect std to be put in core.stdcpp.std, and
then imported. So this issue would only happen if 3rd party A
and 4th party B each imported 5th party C. Yeah, it'll happen,
and it'll still work, as the import system
Let's say that we have a struct `A` that contains some template
function named `fn` template-parameterized on its argument types:
struct A {
...
void fn(A)(auto ref A a) { ... }
...
}
I cannot get a handle on `fn` as an alias when searching for
overloads of the string fn in `A` via
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 06:22:34 UTC, Atash wrote:
Let's say that we have a struct `A` that contains some template
function named `fn` template-parameterized on its argument
types:
struct A {
...
void fn(A)(auto ref A a) { ... }
...
}
I cannot get a handle on `fn` as an alias when
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 22:31:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Paulo Pinto:
Pascal expatriates like myself won't consider indexes from 1 a
design mistake. :)
What's the good of having all arrays always start from index 1
(this is different from Ada, where you can choose the indexing
range and
On 4/28/2014 11:06 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 23:57:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
First off, I expect std to be put in core.stdcpp.std, and then imported. So
this issue would only happen if 3rd party A and 4th party B each
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, it'll happen if they use the same vector library an
#include the same
vector3D and independently specify their own binding? But if
they cooperate
and use the same binding, then you are ok? That makes no sense.
I simply don't
On 4/29/2014 12:10 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, it'll happen if they use the same vector library an #include the same
vector3D and independently specify their own binding? But if they
Basically, Ola, if you could write a piece of sample D code that you feel will
not work, please do so.
On 4/28/2014 7:02 PM, bearophile wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
VB6 let you choose your starting index, too. It was rarely useful and
constantly made array-handling code a pain in the ass. Of course, VB
made pretty much everything a PITA...(I used to work at a VB6 house.
*shudder*)
(As far as I
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 23:02:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I think it could be a good idea to add something intermediate
to D: optional strong typing for array indexing. I'd like to
write a DIP on this someday (note that this does not mean I am
suggesting D array indexes to optionally start
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 01:21:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:36:59 UTC, Radu wrote:
Every time I read anything related to STUN/TURN, it becomes
obvious that these technologies were designed by some
committee. Metric tons of technical jargon and
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 08:21:04 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 23:02:03 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I think it could be a good idea to add something intermediate
to D: optional strong typing for array indexing. I'd like to
write a DIP on this someday (note that this does
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 07:50:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Basically, Ola, if you could write a piece of sample D code
that you feel will not work, please do so.
But I did?
framework1.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
Hi,erveryone,
type Tuple!(int,int,int,string) can write[],but can't read[];
module main;
import std.stdio,std.typecons,std.conv;
void main(string[] argv)
{
alias Tuple!(int,int,string) tuple2;
alias Tuple!(int,int,string)[10] tupleS2;
void bbx(tupleS2 x)
{
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:23:03 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,erveryone,
[...]
xy2[1][0]=100; // can write
[...]
writeln(xy2[0][i]); // can't read
[...]
If I'm right, index should be a compile-time value.
Andrea Fontana:
If I'm right, index should be a compile-time value.
Right. Because tuples in general don't contain N values of the
same type (as in your case), so the compiler has to know
statically the index to compute their position efficiently.
Further similar questions are better
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:38:45 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:23:03 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,erveryone,
[...]
xy2[1][0]=100; // can write
[...]
writeln(xy2[0][i]); // can't read
[...]
If I'm right, index should be a compile-time value.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:23:03 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,erveryone,
type Tuple!(int,int,int,string) can write[],but can't read[];
module main;
import std.stdio,std.typecons,std.conv;
void main(string[] argv)
{
alias Tuple!(int,int,string) tuple2;
alias
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 08:42:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 01:21:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:36:59 UTC, Radu wrote:
Every time I read anything related to STUN/TURN, it becomes
obvious that these technologies were designed by some
-
import std.traits;
import std.stdio;
void handler(C)(C callback)
{
callback(John);
}
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = hunter2)
{
writefln(The password is: '%s', pass);
};
handler(safeCallback);
someOtherFunc();
}
void
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:45:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Libraries.
not part of the language (unless you count the standard
library. I don't see anything particularly special about
python's standard library).
Hmm… I think that for Python, Ruby and Perl, the libraries and
the ecosystems
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:51:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:45:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Libraries.
not part of the language (unless you count the standard
library. I don't see anything particularly special about
python's standard library).
Hmm… I
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:04:38 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
My bet is that D users will be able to produce the same sort of
quick-fix libraries. The newsgroups are dominated by
systems-type people and there is a serious emphasis on
super-low-cost abstractions, but in my opinion D is a more
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 18:07 +, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
What features does python, as a language (syntactical preferences
aside), actually have to recommend it over D (assuming drepl* or
similar became full-featured)? This is definitely not a
rhetorical question, it
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 10:51 +, via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I used the wrong term, I meant list comprehensions. The most
important feature in Python for me. I find it very powerful in
combination with tuples, lists and dicts.
Don't forget dictionary comprehensions and set comprehensions.
On 2014-04-28 21:06, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4/28/2014 2:00 PM, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I believe Steven expects things to work this way:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
foo.func(); // Calls bar.func (or
Through Reddit I've found a nice blog post, Using Static
Analysis And Clang To Find Heartbleed:
http://blog.trailofbits.com/2014/04/27/using-static-analysis-and-clang-to-find-heartbleed/
The part about the range analysis is nice:
Ranges of symbol values:
conj_$2{int} : { [-2147483648, -2],
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:00:11 -0400, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-04-28 20:50, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4/28/2014 7:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Consider this code:
module foo;
void func() {}
module bar;
extern(C)
John Colvin:
Any reason why this needs language support? I haven't tried it,
but I can't see why it can't be trivially done in a library.
I don't yet know the answer. I have to think more about the
topic, and to try to implement something in library code. And
then I can judge (a bit) if the
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:56:18 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
No, he means that WormNAT2 is written in D1 and doesn't used
Vibe.d
Vibe.d is D2 only.
Thanks for the clarification :). It seems my English is a bit
rusty.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:31:11 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Don't forget dictionary comprehensions and set comprehensions.
Yes, I use dict comprehensions a lot too. I have never used set
comprehensions.
And definitely don't forget generator expressions.
Actually, I
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:28:07 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Principally there are a large number of users and installation
and there
is a wealth of support for different user bases from sys admins
to
quants. Python is a relatively small language that is easy to
learn.
Though, here size of data_array is known at compile time, so the
analyzer is sure that it can complain without risk of a false
positive. In real code knowing the size of array is not that easy.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 13:05:34 UTC, Chris wrote:
As opposed to the fascist intransigence of the Python
interpreter with its ridiculous indent-mania. Maybe you are
only referring to static vs. dynamic typing. Be it a compiler
or an interpreter, they are all inherently stubborn and fond
I started using D2 about a year ago. Now all projects make to D2
along with the GUI QtE (Qt bindings own production).
http://qte.ucoz.ru/index/screenshots/0-6
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I
don't know how to persuade him! How can D be used to greatly
assist an HTML5/JavaScript web developer? I decided to go here to
get some good answers. How can D be used to
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 19:34:38 UTC, Kapps wrote:
D can actually do a rather good job of runtime reflection. I
made a runtime reflection module
(https://shardsoft.com/stash/projects/SHARD/repos/shardtools/browse/source/ShardTools/Reflection.d
/
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 22:31:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
What's the good of having all arrays always start from index 1
(this is different from Ada, where you can choose the indexing
range and type)?
I'd say, for a math-oriented language starting position 1 is more
meaningful than
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:53:48 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
I'd say, for a math-oriented language starting position 1 is
more meaningful than starting offset 0, the latter is an idiom
for system programming language, the former better corresponds
to mathematical formalism.
An argument for
On 2014-04-29 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an HTML5/JavaScript
web developer? I decided to go here to get some
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me
really, really miss the high productivity and ease of use D
offers. (And, of course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster
out of the box than hello world served by Rails, zero effort in
optimization. And rake test, just shoot me,
On 4/29/2014 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an HTML5/JavaScript
web developer? I decided to go here to get some
On 04/29/2014 01:34 PM, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Building on this knowledge:
module foo;
void func();
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import foo;
import bar;
void main()
{
// Seems like it's ambiguous between foo.func and bar.foo.func.
On 04/29/2014 02:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
That is what the DIP says:
Declarations in the namespace can be accessed without qualification in
the enclosing scope if there is no ambiguity. Ambiguity issues can be
resolved by adding the namespace qualifier
Which then proceeds to show
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster out of the box than
hello world served by Rails, zero effort in
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:47:28 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/29/2014 02:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
That is what the DIP says:
Declarations in the namespace can be accessed without qualification in
the enclosing scope if there is no ambiguity. Ambiguity issues can be
On 04/29/2014 05:52 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am not familiar with the rules.
Perhaps you can just outline for me:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
foo.func(); // works?
}
If this works, then we have a problem.
It does work.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:17:10 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know
how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:03:02 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/29/2014 05:52 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am not familiar with the rules.
Perhaps you can just outline for me:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:51:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
For closures for arrays and dicts.
I don't understand
I used the wrong term, I meant list comprehensions. The most
important feature in Python for me. I find it very powerful in
combination with tuples, lists and dicts.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:38:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = hunter2)
{
writefln(The password is: '%s', pass);
};
I'm sorry, but can you explain how this lets an attacker learn
anything
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:55:11AM -0400, Etienne via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D runs
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:52:04 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Instead of the ugly and bug-prone mess of read(fd, size,
sizeof(int)); I have used something nicer. tryRead!uint
tries to read an uint, and returns a Nullable!uint. The Maybe
is a function currently missing in Phobos
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:55:13 UTC, Etienne wrote:
That's funny b/c most people say RoR made them love web
development.
That's probably because they went into it with very little
experience with the alternatives. I was spoiled by my web.d and
friends, as well as knowing how to use a
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452 brought up a
matter I'd forgotten - struct fields that are immutable and have
initializer are deprecated.
Why?
Andrei
This is a compiler bug.
When template parameter C is deduced from the call handler(safeCallback),
the default argument `= hunter2 should be stripped from the deduced
function pointer type.
Then, the call callback(John); in handler template function body should
fail to compile always, because
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:01:44 UTC, logicchains wrote:
As someone who only occasionally uses D and Python, I just
wanted to add as a datapoint that I find the D compilers an
order of magnitude more agreeable than the Python interpreter.
The thought that anybody could actually enjoy
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:09:01 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452 brought up a
matter I'd forgotten - struct fields that are immutable and have
initializer are deprecated.
Why?
I
In future release, non-static const or immutable field will be made an
instance field.
struct S
{
immutable int x = 1;
}
static assert(S.sizeof == int.sizeof); // will succeed in the future
So current implicit static behavior is now deprecated.
Related:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 17:11:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:09:01 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452
brought up a matter I'd forgotten - struct fields
On 4/29/2014 11:55 AM, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster out of the box than
hello
On 4/29/14, 10:18 AM, Kenji Hara via Digitalmars-d wrote:
In future release, non-static const or immutable field will be made an
instance field.
struct S
{
immutable int x = 1;
}
static assert(S.sizeof == int.sizeof); // will succeed in the future
So current implicit static behavior is
Am 29.04.2014 19:45, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
On 4/29/2014 11:55 AM, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D
Steven Schveighoffer:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:46:11 -0400, bearophile
What do you think are the reasons I suggested the enhancement
for?
To make people write code the way you like? :)
Honestly, it's like you require someone to call a function like:
T foo(T)(T t){return t;}
Just so you can
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:08:59 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:46:11 -0400, bearophile
What do you think are the reasons I suggested the enhancement for?
To make people write code the way you like? :)
Honestly, it's like you
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:55:11 -0400
Etienne via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
That's funny b/c most people say RoR made them love web development.
If the D community could organize itself the same way RoR is around
web dev, I doubt any other web scripting language could
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:41:17 +
James via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
just show him vibe.d. it's what node.js wants to be, but failed. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2014-04-29 17:27, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers.
I'm curious to why you think D is more productive and easier to use.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 20:04 +0200, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I was already doing RoR back in 1999, but it was with our own in-house
TCL Apache/IIS module in a Portuguese startup, far far away from Silicon
Valley and loosely based in AOL Server concepts.
[…]
We already had
On 4/29/2014 2:01 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
framework1.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
extern(C++,graphics){ void g(vec4 …) … }
application1.d:
import
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are actually orthogonal
to the DIP.
Yes!
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Show him forum.dlang.org (written in D) and point out that
modern HTML5/JS sites are freaking horrid.
/admitted-curmudgeon
forum.dlang.org is written in HTML/JS too.
On 4/29/2014 9:13 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But what happens when you add another import that conflicts?
module foo;
void func() {}
module prog; // updated
import bar;
import foo;
void main(){
foo.func(); // now calls foo.func, and not bar.func as it originally did,
right?
}
So by
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 4/29/2014 9:13 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But what happens when you add another import that conflicts?
module foo;
void func() {}
module prog; // updated
import bar;
import foo;
void main(){
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:48:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd do your example as:
vec.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
framework1.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,graphics){ void g(vec4 …) … }
Yes, but that requires
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:48:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd do your example as:
vec.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
framework1.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
On 4/29/2014 1:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
With graphics::g(physics::f(…)) this would not have been an issue.
It does occur to me that two C++ symbols in the same namespace may be regarded
as the same by the lookup code. That may be a reasonable
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's its
anti-hijacking feature.
Try it and see!
I agree!
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 20:33:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Not really. It is reasonable to expect that when Framework1 and
Framework2 each import 4th party Vec, that they do it with an
import rather than inlining Vec's declarations.
Vectors are not the best example since one library
On 04/29/2014 10:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's its
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 03:09:32 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 17:53:18 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi all,
I am doing some updates to the C back end of my binding, and I
wanted to know what it would entail to be able to distribute
implib along with my CMake things.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:06:59 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm curious to why you think D is more productive and easier to
use.
A lot of things, mostly focusing around having the compiler to
help refactor with confidence (the importance of this really
can't be understated) and having
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrei
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrie
On 4/29/14, 12:49 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are actually
orthogonal
to the DIP.
Yes!
This is a biggie. KISS etc. -- Andrei
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 01:18:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is the new grammar?
LinkageAttribute:
'extern' '(' identifier '++'? (',' identifier)? ')'
You can also have N.M
I've updated the DIP page to include documentation of the change
to the language grammar.
Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrei
The name like walkLength was chosen (by you?), instead of a
more natural name like length (or even a nice, short, clean,
readable, handy and easer to write
On 4/29/2014 4:08 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
I've updated the DIP page to include documentation of the change to the language
grammar.
thanks!
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:38:07 -0400, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 04/29/2014 10:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:53:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
foreach(i; TypeTuple!(0,1,2))
{
writeln(xy2[0][i]);
}
}
Thank you,John Colvin,
It works very good.
Frank.
The unbelievable amount of time and energy that's been spent
discussing the smallest syntax, you would think that D would, at
the very least, have better looking function signatures, but it
doesn't.
auto zip(Ranges...)(Ranges ranges) if (Ranges.length
allSatisfy!(isInputRange, Ranges));
On 4/29/2014 9:38 PM, Narrator wrote:
fn map'r, B(self, f: |A|: 'r - B) - Map'r, A, B, Self
That looks like line noise.
On 4/29/2014 1:05 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The argument is roughly like this: if we accept that it would be a good
thing if there was a universal indentation/code formatting standard that
everyone followed (like gofmt for Go) then punctuation is redundant and
the remaining question is whether
On 4/29/2014 3:48 PM, JN wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Show him forum.dlang.org (written in D) and point out that modern
HTML5/JS sites are freaking horrid. /admitted-curmudgeon
forum.dlang.org is written in HTML/JS too.
Anything on the web
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 01:38:46 UTC, Narrator wrote:
The unbelievable amount of time and energy that's been spent
discussing the smallest syntax, you would think that D would,
at the very least, have better looking function signatures, but
it doesn't.
auto zip(Ranges...)(Ranges
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:41:19 UTC, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I
don't know how to persuade him! How can D be used to greatly
assist an HTML5/JavaScript web developer? I decided to
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 02:43:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
All I'm saying is, if you ever not want to write ajax code
again, Cmsed is your friend [1].
My web.d does some javascript generation too.
D:
import arsd.web;
class Foo : ApiProvider {
export int add(int a, int b) { return
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
