On 06/03/2015 01:28 PM, Paul wrote:
Ooops, this is what I meant to post:
struct CoOrd
{
int x, y;
}
CoOrd[][NumPaths]pathList;
I append values like so...
pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is one of the
paths and you are
I'm a little puzzled by the fact that typesafe variadic functions
may be declared to take an associative array, but there seems to
be no way of calling the function to take advantage of this.
ie. foo is a valid function when declared as:
void foo(int[string] bar...)
{
import
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:33:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is one
of the paths and you are adding a coordinate to it:
Urgh, *that* is how I was confusing myself, the rest of the code
'looks right'.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14642
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e555b562d733e23bc632c12917505e680b10
fix Issue 14642 - ICE in
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14646
--- Comment #1 from timon.g...@gmx.ch ---
Forum discussion:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kmvlhvzfxtocnsxqi...@forum.dlang.org?page=4#post-mklmbc:242bem:241:40digitalmars.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14646
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86_64 |All
OS|Linux
On 06/03/2015 03:47 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/2/15 5:53 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Indeed, but I think this facility is undocumented. Maybe it should be
exposed via the standard library?
A good idea, please bugzilla so we don't forget. -- Andrei
On 06/03/2015 05:43 AM, bitwise wrote:
Why can't const ref accept rvalues?
const being too restrictive doesn't seem like a real reason, because
although its undesirable for some cases, doesn't mean it can't be useful
in a _lot_ of other cases.
Its a real reason unless you endorse patchwork
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14646
Issue ID: 14646
Summary: Add a documented way to invoke postblit
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On 06/02/2015 11:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah, auto ref for templates is great. We only need to add auto ref for
non-templates with the semantics like ref, except (a) accepts rvalues
on the caller side, (b) does not allow escaping the ref from the function.
What if one wants those
Looks promising so far. I will create separate issues in actual
repo for desired improvements.
If this DIP will be accepted, please make it work for !shared
as well. I don't know whether any of you has experienced though,
in some cases, cast() doesn't remove shared attribute at all, and
I need to write half the screen, name of same class again.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14647
Issue ID: 14647
Summary: std.random like 3015 heisenbug with FreeBSD_32
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14647
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std.random like 3015|std.random line 3015
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14648
Issue ID: 14648
Summary: DIP25's return attribute breaks safety checks
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
URL: https://gist.github.com/Hackerpilot/d665a0d5c80ddc1634
On 6/3/15 2:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Regardless, I think that attribute(boolean expression) is the clear
winner, because it's for more flexible.
Yes please. -- Andrei
On 6/2/2015 4:08 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'll wear responsibility for this, but std.simd is proving really hard
for me to finish.
I think in order to get something in there to start with, I need to
reduce the scope to the simplest bits, get them in, then build
outwards.
It's fairly
Is there a way other than exceptions for a called function to
force the caller to return?
Specifically, I know the return type of the caller(its always
bool) and under certain circumstances I would like the caller to
just give up and return false if the called function fails. With
as little
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:29:35 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I am working on dip which will try to addressed negation of
attributes issue.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP79
You need to iron out what happens with attributes like
@safe/@trusted/@system or public/protected/package/private.
Simply
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14578
--- Comment #11 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org ---
(In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #10)
I finally reproduced with 2.067 and 2.067.1, it's definitely Linux specific.
However, this is fixed in the HEAD version (at least using
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 19:09:52 UTC, Mint wrote:
I'm a little puzzled by the fact that typesafe variadic
functions may be declared to take an associative array, but
there seems to be no way of calling the function to take
advantage of this.
ie. foo is a valid function when declared as:
On 6/2/2015 5:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Well, I discussed that with clang people a while ago and here are how they do it
and their measurement :
You go though character and look for a '/'. When you hit one, you check if the
character before it is a *, and if so, you have the end of the comment.
This code needs to be disallowed under DIP25 (or whatever the
final DIP will be), of course.
But should work with return ref instead.
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:06:32 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:22:07 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:02:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Thanks to DIP 25 I think it's time to review this again. I
would implement it (if no one else wants to do it), but
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:31:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:22:07 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:02:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Thanks to DIP 25 I think it's time to review this again. I
would implement it (if no one else wants to do it),
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:50:53 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project
that took 10 minutes to compile (hello boost::spirit). It is
impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:09:09 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:57:38 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I forgot to mention, in terms of this statement I made:
I can't remember right now what the reasoning was for 'const
ref' not to take
rvalues in the first place. I think it
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Dicebot wrote in message news:odfsgqcftykjkztsg...@forum.dlang.org...
Is there any reason to not allow argument to be any expression and reject
non-string ones at semantic phase?
The original reason is that trying to reference manifest constants etc from
that context resulted in forward
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 20:51:36 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 08:23:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
Curious to know if anyone here uses Premake, or cares...?
would care more if it had ninja support, ninja is vastly
superior to makefiles when using a meta buildtool system.
Consider http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/fork/ae75176d7d3f.
It's a bit roundabout but in brief it instantiates a template with a
nested function. The nested function, in turn, uses a parameter in its
environment. By the canon, that function needs to create a closure with
dynamically-allocated
On 2015-06-02 22:02, Atila Neves wrote:
So does cerealed, in one of two ways, postBlit being the _much_ better one:
I forgot to mention that Orange also supports pre and post
actions/callbacks [1].
[1] https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/orange/blob/master/tests/Events.d
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-06-02 23:00, Atila Neves wrote:
Largest I've found so far is Phobos (90k SLOC according to dscanner),
which I have to write a build description for. I really want to get some
memory and speed stats and compare the current state of affairs with
using Ninja on it. _Especially_ when it
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project
that took 10 minutes to compile (hello boost::spirit). It is
impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by design. Any time
it seems so you either aren't comparing same thing
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:36:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
chromebooks weren't even really usable until the latter half of
2013/start of 2014 when Acer/HP/Dell/Toshiba/etc all got on
board and it stopped being just Samsung making them. 2% is huge
for less than 2 years. That was the chromebook
On 3 June 2015 at 06:51, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 08:23:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
Curious to know if anyone here uses Premake, or cares...?
would care more if it had ninja support, ninja is vastly superior to
makefiles when using a
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 10:07:41 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote
I don't see an argument against `scope ref` in DIP36, quite the
opposite...
I know I was one of the authors. But it was rejected.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 09:53:36 UTC, Namespace wrote:
This code needs to be disallowed under DIP25 (or whatever the
final DIP will be), of course.
But should work with return ref instead.
It can even be allowed with an extension to DIP25:
struct Sprite {
private Texture* _tex;
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14642
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 |All
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 09:27:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:48:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:44:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Stream?! I had to search for it, only found the HP Stream
model, running a full Windows 8.1 OS, not a
On 08/05/2015 15:03, Chris wrote:
The funny thing is that people keep complaining about the lack of tools
for D, and when a tool is built into the language they say That tool
shouldn't be part of the language. Yet, if it were omitted, people
would say Why doesn't D have this tool built in?.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:30:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-20 15:28, Atila Neves wrote:
Original library: http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207
* Would it be possible to make the should functions more
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:42:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-20 15:28, Atila Neves wrote:
Original library: http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207
No Cucumber tests? This is what you're up against [1] ;). I
Ooooh okay, I'm starting to get it. I think this last question
should clear it up for me: When a string is made, how is the
struct Slice handled? What does ptr get assigned?
sure what you mean. A theoretical compiler doesn't matter; what
actual compilers do does.
Of course it does, it defines how far you can go in a concurrent
build process before hitting an unsurpassable bottle-neck.
(not that I personally care, as I find both C++ and D compilers
to be fast
On 2015-06-02 10:54, ketmar wrote:
that was the thing i once proposed. see, we have a powerful scripting
language inside DMD: D! yet we never used all it's power to do something
really exciting -- like, for example, preparing command lines for
external package fetching tool and parsing the
There are lots of features in D, that C++ does not have, that
will make separate compilation and partial
evaluation/incomplete types difficult. So C++ is faster than D
by design, even when the compiler isn't.
I've tried to parse that last sentence a few times and I'm not
sure what you mean.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:06:39 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
it can get even better if you properly modularize your projects
instead of having 1-2 files that build slow, which causes a lot
of waiting.
Yes, sure. You can probably get the same build speeds as with C
if you organize your code in
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:35:43 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
ah yes, those famous fast C build times.
Excuse me while I go take half an hour to build GDB.
Heh... It is possible to write very fast C compilers with high
concurrency in builds, if there is a market for it, but most
people want
On 2015-06-03 09:53, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Both Tango [1] and DWT [2] are large projects. They are mostly using D1
features, not so much templates and similar stuff. It could be
interesting as well.
[1] https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2
[2] https://github.com/d-widget-toolkit/dwt
Number
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:47:04 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
Dan Olson go...@comcast.net writes:
Meant Is there a way? to do such a thing with templates.
I don't think there is a way to turn symbols into strings without
a table or #preprocessing. In C++ I would personally have used a
table
On 2015-06-02 16:52, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Actually, I don't. dmd *.d generally works fine.
I if it works for you, great. It doesn't work for me. And that shell
globbing doesn't work on Windows.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:14:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Any takers? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644 --
Andrei
Wait, didn't you just give a talk about how generic programming
must go? ;)
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:44:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Stream?! I had to search for it, only found the HP Stream
model, running a full Windows 8.1 OS, not a browser pretending
to be an OS.
--
Paulo
Yes, and that full Windows 8.1 OS makes it run 2-3x slower than
equivalent hardware
Am Wed, 3 Jun 2015 09:08:52 +1000
schrieb Manu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
As an aside, I need a test environment for each compiler, targetting
x86, x64 and arm at least, where I can submit some code, and have it
run the unittests on a matrix of appropriate targets. (ideally
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:43:09 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I can't remember right now what the reasoning was for 'const
ref' not to take
rvalues in the first place. I think it was that you could
escape the reference,
but this isn't true anymore with DIP25 right?
The one to ask is Andrei. I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
bb.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bb.t...@gmx.com
--- Comment #4 from
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:40:14 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:36:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:41:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 22:38:47 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
They're insanely popular, especially in educational
On 2015-06-03 01:08, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It's fairly large to cover everything I think is important, and
there's a few tools missing still; I can't finish without some way to
know the SIMD flags fed to the compiler from the command line (some
standard versions?), and it's also
Dan Olson go...@comcast.net writes:
Stringify - here I want to rapidly prototype code with syscalls that
need return values checked, and get nice output when they fails. My C++
template skills are weak and was unable to come up with an equivalent
replacement. Is this a way?
Meant Is there a
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:34:22 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:36:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
chromebooks weren't even really usable until the latter half
of 2013/start of 2014 when Acer/HP/Dell/Toshiba/etc all got on
board and it stopped being just Samsung making them.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by design.
Any time it seems so you either aren't comparing same thing or
get misinformed. Or do straightforward separate compilation.
There are lots of features in D, that C++ does not
On 2015-06-02 23:37, extrawurst wrote:
I remember the linter did not chew my config files either months ago,
maybe it is not in-sync with the rest of the platform.. german wertarbeit
Yeah, I remember testing the linter just when the D support was
announced, it didn't work back then.
--
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:00:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-02 22:02, Atila Neves wrote:
So does cerealed, in one of two ways, postBlit being the
_much_ better one:
I forgot to mention that Orange also supports pre and post
actions/callbacks [1].
[1]
On 2015-04-20 15:28, Atila Neves wrote:
Original library: http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207
* Would it be possible to make the should functions more composeable.
Instead of a.shouldEqual(b) something like
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:38:09 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:34:22 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:36:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
chromebooks weren't even really usable until the latter half
of 2013/start of 2014 when Acer/HP/Dell/Toshiba/etc all
On 2015-06-02 16:42:40 +, sigod said:
Hi everyone. Please vote for D to be added to https://DevDocs.io:
https://trello.com/c/bCgqhZ4s/123-d
About DevDocs (copy-pasted from index page):
```
For OSX users I can recommend: https://kapeli.com/dash
No D documentaiton (yet) but could be
On 2015-06-02 17:01, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Related to this, does anyone happen to recall why rdmd uses dmd -v to
get dependencies instead of dmd -deps? IIRC, it used to use -deps back
at one time.
I would assumed it uses -v because it existed before -deps? I guess
-deps was explicitly
On 6/2/2015 11:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Consider http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/fork/ae75176d7d3f.
It's a bit roundabout but in brief it instantiates a template with a nested
function. The nested function, in turn, uses a parameter in its environment. By
the canon, that function needs to create
On 02/06/15 21:56, weaselcat wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 15:40:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My original statement was obviously exaggerated, I would not put up
with days-long compile times, I'd find another way to do development.
But compile time is not as important to me as it is
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:57:38 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I forgot to mention, in terms of this statement I made:
I can't remember right now what the reasoning was for 'const
ref' not to take
rvalues in the first place. I think it was that you could
escape the reference,
but this isn't true
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project that
took 10 minutes to compile (hello boost::spirit). It is
impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by design. Any time
it seems so you either aren't comparing same thing or get
misinformed. Or do straightforward separate
Ola Fosheim Grøstad\ ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com writes:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 16:09:34 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
Timely! I and stack overflow struggled for a couple hours to find
an
equivalent C++ template for something that was straightforward with
a
couple macros.
…but without
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
dennis.m.ritc...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dennis.m.ritc...@mail.ru
---
On 3/06/2015 5:22 p.m., Kelet wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:47:00 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 3/06/2015 3:35 p.m., Kelet wrote:
For a small amount of software at work I'm able to use D. Most recently,
I used D vibe.d to communicate with a conveyor belt system for a
warehouse. I'd
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 06:00:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 20:51:36 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 08:23:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
Curious to know if anyone here uses Premake, or cares...?
would care more if it had ninja support, ninja is vastly
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com writes:
On 2015-06-01 18:38, Dan Olson wrote:
Yeah, we need to work on getting iOS support into LDC main offering. For
now there is a stumbling block (at least perceived by me) of requiring a
patched LLVM to support TLS on iOS.
How you tried contributing that
On 2015-04-20 15:28, Atila Neves wrote:
Original library: http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
PR: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3207
No Cucumber tests? This is what you're up against [1] ;). I think the
Cucumber tests in RSpec are a perfect example of how to
On 3 June 2015 at 17:50, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2015-06-03 01:08, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
It's fairly large to cover everything I think is important, and
there's a few tools missing still; I can't finish without some way to
know the SIMD
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:48:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:44:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Stream?! I had to search for it, only found the HP Stream
model, running a full Windows 8.1 OS, not a browser pretending
to be an OS.
--
Paulo
Yes, and that full
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 09:21:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by design.
Any time it seems so you either aren't comparing same thing or
get misinformed. Or do straightforward
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:25:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:06:39 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
it can get even better if you properly modularize your
projects instead of having 1-2 files that build slow, which
causes a lot of waiting.
Yes, sure. You can
On 6/3/15 3:50 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project that took
10 minutes to compile (hello boost::spirit). It is impossible for C++
to compile faster than D by design. Any time it seems so
On 6/3/15 10:19 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 14:08:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/3/15 3:50 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project that took
10 minutes to
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 14:08:33 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/3/15 3:50 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project
that took
10 minutes to compile (hello boost::spirit). It is
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:53:05 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 03:27:35 +, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:15:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 at 03:03:22 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
so is std.xml the exception? How many other parts of the
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:41:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-01 21:22, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
I noticed there hasn't been any activity on the Github repo
for 8
months. Why is that? Do you consider this a completely
finished
product, or are you held up by the PHobos review
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14642
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice, pull
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
--- Comment #7 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com ---
(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #6)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_programming#Templates_in_D
Thanks Vladimir!!
--
On 2015-06-03 09:26, Atila Neves wrote:
From the unit tests, that doesn't seem to do the same thing, but I
could be wrong.
No, it does not. But it can still be useful. Like if you want to do any
post processing after deserialization.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2091
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #4 from
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 12:15:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-03 09:26, Atila Neves wrote:
From the unit tests, that doesn't seem to do the same thing,
but I
could be wrong.
No, it does not. But it can still be useful. Like if you want
to do any post processing after
On 2015-06-03 09:43, Dan Olson wrote:
Not yet. I greedily work on puzzles I think I can solve..
But since you have patched LLVM you have already solved the issue ;)
On the other
hand, a Rust dev last year was able to use the iOS TLS patch to LLVM and
perhaps made some progress. Or found
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 10:40:14 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 08/05/2015 15:03, Chris wrote:
The funny thing is that people keep complaining about the lack
of tools
for D, and when a tool is built into the language they say
That tool
shouldn't be part of the language. Yet, if it were
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 10:37:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:50:53 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Project size is irrelevant here. I had 500 line C++ project
that took 10 minutes to compile (hello
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 12:20:29 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Yes really, specially when comparing with Turbo Pascal, Delphi,
Modula-2, Oberon and a few other languages not tied to UNIX
linker model.
Yeah, I agree that the implementation for Turbo Pascal was good
for the hardware it ran on.
For final, override, abstract, and synchronized attributes, I'm trying to
relax the limitation in:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2091
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4714
Kenji Hara
2015-06-03 13:47 GMT+09:00 ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14645
Issue ID: 14645
Summary: Russian Wikipedia page on D needs a total revision
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14645
dennis.m.ritc...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dennis.m.ritc...@mail.ru
--
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
