On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:16:21 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 21:50:32 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Note that this doesn't play well with regular [1] value types
becuase e.g. you don't have control over the synthesized
bit-blit for this(this) and so you can't
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:16:21 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 21:50:32 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Note that this doesn't play well with regular [1] value types
becuase e.g. you don't have control over the synthesized
bit-blit for this(this) and so you can't
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 09:09:42 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:19 AM, SrMordred via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 14:09:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16403
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86_64 |All
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17672
Issue ID: 17672
Summary: Example from std.format throws exceptions
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 07:40:35 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 22:35:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The issue isn't the object being destroyed. It's what it
refers to via its member variables. For instance, what if an
object were to remove itself from
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 21:50:32 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Note that this doesn't play well with regular [1] value types
becuase e.g. you don't have control over the synthesized
bit-blit for this(this) and so you can't assume that structs
with a single pointer member are
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 20:59:03 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Not necessarily - the reference counted smart pointer doesn't
have to be `shared` itself to have a `shared` payload.
Yes, but it can be done either way. It's actually what Jack is
trying to do: make stdout shared and reference
On Thursday, 13 July 2017 at 12:45:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Guys,
The following code compiles now and runs in very reasonable time
even for unreasonable repeat-counts.
string repeatString(string s, uint repeatCount)
{
char[] result;
uint sLength = cast(uint) s.length;
Hello, all.
Is it possible to pass cli args to rdmd eval-program?
F.e. if I try:
rdmd --eval="args.writeln" -- 123
then: Cannot have both --eval and a program file ('123')
In perl it's possible:
perl -e'print join ",", @ARGV' 123 234
# 123,234
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:19 AM, SrMordred via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 14:09:32 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 09:09:40 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 07:48:28 UTC, Danni Coy
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 12:56:38 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
That's exactly what I was opposing in the other post. These
handles are opaque and never change their value. Within the
Dlang language barrier they can be immutable and as such,
implicitly shared.
Given transitivity of immutability
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17668
Nikolay (unDEFER) Krivchenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Nikolay (unDEFER) Krivchenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 07:19:03 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
version 2.067 that still had the C++ frontend took more than
100 seconds. I think if the backend is translated to D,
building the compiler will take not more than 2 seconds.
To put it in perspective, building gcc with only C and
On 7/20/2017 12:19 AM, Patrick Schluter wrote:
version 2.067 that still had the C++ frontend took more than 100 seconds. I
think if the backend is translated to D, building the compiler will take not
more than 2 seconds.
To put it in perspective, building gcc with only C and C++ support takes
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17671
Issue ID: 17671
Summary: std.format example is not compiles
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17670
Issue ID: 17670
Summary: Std.bitmanip module has no (runnable) examples
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 22:35:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
The issue isn't the object being destroyed. It's what it refers
to via its member variables. For instance, what if an object
were to remove itself from a shared list when it's destroyed
(e.g. because it's an observer in the
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 19:34:44 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 15:36:22 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[...]
Wow, dmd builds in 12 seconds on a single linux/x64 core, can't
wait to see what that time is when the backend is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17668
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17667
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo