On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 09:11:44 UTC, ketmar wrote:
because Business Developers wants it that way. they are...
well... Doing Business, and they wants someone to maintain all
the libraries they are using. for free, of course. and what can
be better than to offload this burden to
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 21:49:00 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
So what is your suggested course of action to correct this PR
problem?
I have provided several:
* As stated the D its focusing the wrong group of developers
* Too much old baggage and regressions because of it
* Too much
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/4etdnc/free_pascal_is_very_super_mega_ultra_underrated/
Ignore the part about Pascal and read the Post by matthieum:
I have, for my company, been part of a group in charge of
exploring the criteria for the inclusion of new languages in
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 23:01:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 20:49:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
was a complicated language, 99 of them would say no. If you
ask 100 Python programmers, 99 would probably say yes.
Yes, but objectively speaking I'd say modern Python
Here are a few more "basics" that are unneeded or confusing. Lets
not even talk about the more advanced features like inout, ...
/-/
* auto: Static typed language yet we fall back on the compiler to
figure out what is being assigned. Can just as well have a
interpreter language. It only
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 15:56:16 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
You will get 9 packages listed. Which should I take?
If you click on everyone, you will realize, that some of them
are forks of other.
And the version number of mysql-native at the top, just
recently increased so strong,
On Thursday, 8 February 2018 at 03:36:17 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
But really who is selling D to anyone? We are very far from
that stage right now. Did someone sell D to Microsoft COM
team, Remedy or to Weka? Nope. People who had earned the
authority to decide became aware of the language
For a dying platform as so many advocate here, it seems to be
doing fairly well.
Maybe i am too old but the whole dying platform gig has been
doing all the way to Windows ME and Vista and 8 and ...
The reality is, for any user that wants to be productive Windows
is hard to beat. The only
On Friday, 27 October 2017 at 05:20:05 UTC, codephantom wrote:
That's it!
I've had enough!
4 hours wasted!
Please try getting some editors going for D on Windows like
Visual Studio Code or Atom. That time wasted will skyrocket even
more when you run into one of the many issues.
Linux
On Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 12:36:40 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
However, if you need Visual Studio installed, then that takes
like a half an hour.
And a gig of space, just because D needs a small part of it. That
is why people do not want to install VS. Why install a competing
language studio,
10 matches
Mail list logo
