On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 18:43:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/29/2016 7:39 AM, bearophile wrote:
[...]
Nice to see you back, bearophile!
I don't why but I thought that Bearophile and Ketmar were the
same person. Anyway, is good to see he's coming back.
JohnCK.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:34:15 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I guess you mean GUI not IDE?
Yes GUI... my fault, thanks!
JohnCK.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 06:39:54 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:21:51 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
[snip]
For tooling, I suggest a
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:02:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 15:45:09 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
That does not reflect the incredibly dull day-to-day army life.
I don't think we should read *too* much into the words.
Whether we call them collaborators
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 18:37:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:31:50 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
...
And please don't waste your time answering this.
So you are basically in favour of censorship? Which is an
authoritarian mode of leadership. Thus you don't
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 18:17:09 UTC, André wrote:
...
http://dlang-tour.steinsoft.net
...
Any kind of feedback is highly appreciated, of course.
This is very neat and I think this is a thing this will be very
good for newcomers.
PS: On the index page "after page 1" there is a huge
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 at 16:38:19 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
// a.d
module a;
extern(C++, ns) {
void fooa();
void bar();
}
// b.d
module b;
extern(C++, ns) {
void foob();
}
void bar();
// main.d
import a, b;
void main() {
fooa(); // ok
foob(); // ok
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 10:20:13 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
... you can provide detailed suggestions in how things can be
improved...
So far so good for me. The only thing that's bothering me a bit
is the light gray color used on the "Quoted text", I think it
should be a little
And by the way, one more thing, after posting a comment the site
refresh 3x, I don't remember the text, but something like:
(sending the text, waiting/processing, text sent), the entire
process here takes like 3 ~ 5 seconds.
Why is that? can't we hide that information and save 2 refreshs?
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:11:49 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I'm not sure what you're suggesting...
Well, why it doesn't works like any other forum, where you post a
message and after that sent back to the topic.
Currently after posting a message the page refreshs 3 times, with
3
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 15:55:01 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
That's because this website is not really a forum, in reality
it is a web newsreader (NNTP gateway).
http://forum.dlang.org/help#about
I know that, I just thought that those messages/refreshs could be
handled in the
On Monday, 18 January 2016 at 16:11:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Nothing changed in this regard since the last iteration.
Alright and finally (Before you get tired) I was looking the new
DLANG.org and it's very nice. The only small thing I saw is the:
"Latest announcements" and "Active
On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 at 06:01:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
http://beta.forum.dlang.org/
https://github.com/CyberShadow/DFeed/pull/51
I think that top bar where is written "Forum" with down arrow
should be position = fixed in favor of good browsing.
JohnCK.
On Sunday, 10 January 2016 at 21:18:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I echo this, and would add a further point that you should have
tested all sub-domains before uploading. Release archive is
not looking well.
http://downloads.dlang.org/
Wow. Man I don't want to be too harsh, but that was
First of all, the site looks better than the old version.
Congratulations and now the criticism:
I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings. But look the DMD's Image
compared to GDC and LDC: http://i.imgur.com/TrnuxcB.jpg
Really looks like a joke. I would say this seems more like 90's
but I
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 10:40:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
D rose again from 23th to 21th!
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
The rating is now more than 1% same as many other languages in
the ~15+ range.
Explore the history here:
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 15:32:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/05/2016 10:15 AM, bachmeier wrote:
There are some critical technical differences:
- There is one person making the decision.
Not technical. -- Andrei
Indeed but on the other hand is impacting the technical stuff.
On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 18:09:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Is the recent http://wiki.dlang.org/Contributing_to_dlang.org
along the lines of what you need? What other sort of
documentation would you find useful?
I took a look at that link, and you know what would be (at least
for
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 23:16:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A few follow-up questions, all serious:
Fair enough... but most of the points you're asking they already
have been discussed all over the forums, and some in this topic,
like those exposed by Adam.
Like I said currently
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 23:16:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A few follow-up questions, all serious:
Sorry, I just forgot an important thing. Somewhere in the
beginning of this topic, you had advised Adam to put his efforts
into another thing, right?
So imagine this with: D vs C++
On Wednesday, 30 December 2015 at 23:05:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
This huge friction has killed my desire to contribute to Phobos
before and it looks like it is again.
the difference is this time, I have my own fork so the
community doesn't have to lose out.
Please keep the good work.
On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 22:10:14 UTC, Jason Jeffory
wrote:
kinda useless since the left column essentially is quickly
accessed.
I second that. So to go to the main page, you need to scroll down
and use the links below... called: "D Home".
And it's so weird, because you have a "Big
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 05:14:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Worth noting that this design modifies the logo, which Walter
vetoed during the previous redesign.
I don't want to be harsh with Walter, but I think he should
minding with language design.
You know... look that all
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:07:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:01:16 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
Unfortunately it's buggy, like for example in 1024x768px it
doesn't looks good:
Yeah, the header wraps on my computer on 1280 too, but these
are mild bugs that can be
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 14:46:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 13:58:30 UTC, anonymous wrote:
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this
before investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily,
I'm not so reasonable ;)
On Sunday, 20 December 2015 at 23:20:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
...But how will it fair showing the entire language or library
reference list items?
I think the "Library Reference" link would be there, but the
"List of Items" NOT. It should have a different page for the list
or it will be a
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
... I'm making it available [3] now...
[3] http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
Can we see this without sign in?
JohnCK.
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 23:11:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I changed the permissions, does it work now?
Now it's working! Well... it's clean, but of course needs more
polishing, like taking out a few border colors for example, but
another thing that I liked was the buttons on top.
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 18:55:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...It could also do:
k.d(1):k.foo(int a, string b)
^^^++
k.d(2):k.foo(string b)
^^
I prefer this way than using colors.
And by the way, this thread should
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 01:17:26 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 00:43:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
... I find the online forum interface klunky and inefficient
to use (though most would disagree),
One thing that bothers me sometimes is the waste of space, as
you can
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 23:30:46 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 20:08:32 UTC, Anon wrote:
On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 20:04:44 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
My feedback: add the ability to edit posts in the forum
You can't edit email.
Maybe I can answer your
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 00:43:11 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
... I find the online forum interface klunky and inefficient to
use (though most would disagree),
One thing that bothers me sometimes is the waste of space, as
you can see in this SS, there are 2 versions, the original with
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 20:54:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm not so sure...
Like they say: "A father will never agree that his child is ugly!"
:)
John.
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 21:06:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/16/2015 03:59 PM, JohnCK wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 20:54:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm not so sure...
Like they say: "A father will never agree that his child is
ugly!"
To me it seems he's
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 21:30:32 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I don't think anybody is questioning the value of ddoc as a
*documentation generator*. The issue here is whether it has the
same value as a *website programming language*. Very different
things.
That I agree!
JohnCK.
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 21:18:43 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 21:06:48 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/16/2015 03:59 PM, JohnCK wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 20:54:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm not so sure...
Like they say: "A father
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 21:17:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 20:59:46 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 20:54:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm not so sure...
Like they say: "A father will never agree that his child is
ugly!"
:)
On Saturday, 12 December 2015 at 07:13:37 UTC, Ozan wrote:
... Where they group CSS, TeX, Matlab, XSlt and other similar
together with C, Java and D. (!?)
Yes, there is a lot of garbage, but you need to filter them too!
:)
Come on,... for a language with no big company behind, I would
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 12:00:41 UTC, Ozan wrote:
the TIOBE Index for December 2015 lists D in rank 23.
You know what: for a language that is about 14 years old I was
expecting more by now.
I think D maybe lost it momentum, because for what I've been
seeing, C++ for example is
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 14:39:10 UTC, wobbles wrote:
Don't believe everything you read on the internets! :)
I don't but go tell this to every user. :)
Matheus.
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 14:51:19 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...
But the age thing is kinda misleading because D has gone
through several major iterations and hasn't had a concerted
marketing effort
...
Well maybe, but you know, C# is about 15 years old and it's in
fifth place. Yes, I
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 15:29:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 15:05:34 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 14:39:10 UTC, wobbles wrote:
Don't believe everything you read on the internets! :)
I don't but go tell this to every user. :)
I
42 matches
Mail list logo
