Hi,
I am trying to create a simple DLL and a simple app that loads it
on Linux with end goal of having it work on MacOS.
Everything seems to work fine with DMD, but when I use LDC2 to
build the loader, I don't get the `shared static this()` and
`~this` called when I `dlopen()` and
Hi!
Consider this simplified program:
```
import std.stdio;
struct X {
void method(int x) {
writeln("method called");
}
}
void main() {
X x;
foreach (member; __traits(allMembers, X)) {
alias method = __traits(getMember, x, member);
method(1);
}
}
On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 12:25:20 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 12:12:56 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Is it prepackaged on Ubuntu?
Do you mean the package golang-go?
Most likely it is that one, but also, very likely to be outdated.
You can download the latest
On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 11:27:05 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 11:07:14 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Any reason why you left Go's `gc` out?
What do you mean by `gc`?
Is `gc` a checker or checker flag to some compiler?
Can't find any relevant hits for hit the web.
On Thursday, 17 October 2019 at 17:05:14 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 16 March 2019 at 21:23:18 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
https://github.com/nordlow/compiler-benchmark
Just added support for V (vlang.io), Zig and Julia.
Very interesting - thanks for this!
Any reason why you left Go's
On Saturday, 6 April 2019 at 09:12:40 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.085.1, ♥ to the 14 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html
This point release fixes a few issues over 2.085.0, see the
changelog for more details.
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.085.1.html
-Martin
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 00:11:10 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 23:29:45 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 22:10:14 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 17:36:31 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 January
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 22:51:15 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
What platform are you on?
Linux x64
Anyone has any idea how to build with LDC and -fxray-instrument?
I am running LDC 1.13 on Linux (x64)
The XRay section is in the binary, and the compiler-rt is linked
in, but when I run the binary with
XRAY_OPTIONS="patch_premain=true verbosity=1" in the environment,
and I get nothing. No
Hi!
To my surprise, std.digest.MurmurHash3 doesn't work in CTFE.
Would it be hard to have it explicit in the documentation if a
particular Phobos symbol works in CTFE? Maybe it could be manual,
and vote-based, to avoid building infrastructure around it.
Also, MurmurHash3 only outputs 32-bit
On Tuesday, 16 October 2018 at 13:09:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/15/18 4:36 PM, Márcio Martins wrote:
[...]
Hm... didn't realize that. It seems to me like an odd
limitation, but I can see how it's ambiguous.
The solution is to double-template:
template incx(Args...)
{
On Tuesday, 16 October 2018 at 02:13:21 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/15/2018 01:36 PM, Márcio Martins wrote:
> Considering that the declaration is legal, and that the
template
> parameter deduction works when Args.length == 0, but stops
working when
> Args.length > 0.
For deduction to work,
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 16:46:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/15/18 12:40 PM, Márcio Martins wrote:
import std.stdio;
void incx(T, Args...)(ref T t) {
++t.x;
}
static struct Test(T) {
T x;
}
void main() {
Test!uint t;
t.incx(); // works
import std.stdio;
void incx(T, Args...)(ref T t) {
++t.x;
}
static struct Test(T) {
T x;
}
void main() {
Test!uint t;
t.incx(); // works
t.incx!(); // works
incx(t);// works
t.incx!(1, 2, 3); // what?
incx(t, 1, 2, 3); // what?
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 14:07:19 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Start of the two week process, folks.
Code: https://github.com/s-ludwig/std_data_json
Docs: http://s-ludwig.github.io/std_data_json/
Atila
Sorry for the late ping, but it's been 3 years - what has
happened to this? Has it been
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 16:44:31 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
What, exactly do you want to do with them? Using them is
well-supported, but creating them is more iffy.
Create/load/unload. I want to create a hot-reload workflow of
smaller components of my projects, since compilation times
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 21:42:25 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
If they're pure C, you can use dpp:
https://github.com/atilaneves/dpp
Even if you want to work with the bindings, not just call the C
functions, you can use the intermediate files that dpp creates.
It works with pretty much
Hi y'all!
If you'd be so kind and help me out here with a few
questions/opinions:
I would like to generate decent D bindings for
https://github.com/libuv/libuv with as little pain as possible.
What are you guys using these days to generate bindings? I
remember trying Dstep a few years
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 15:24:03 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 19:08:45 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Hi!
I am getting this error when compiling my code as a static
library.
It works fine as an executable. I have no idea what's
happening.
Has someone seen
Hi!
I am getting this error when compiling my code as a static
library.
It works fine as an executable. I have no idea what's happening.
Has someone seen something like this before? What could be
different?
This is the error:
/usr/include/dmd/druntime/import/core/stdc/stdint.d(159,26):
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 09:43:28 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
Got it! Thanks!
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 09:26:48 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/23/2018 11:21 AM, Márcio Martins wrote:
Hi, recently we tried to upgrade DMD from 2.078.3 to 2.080 and
found an unexpected semantic change.
Consider this program:
import std.traits;
enum X { Y = "z" };
alias T = typeof(X.Y);
Hi, recently we tried to upgrade DMD from 2.078.3 to 2.080 and
found an unexpected semantic change.
Consider this program:
import std.traits;
enum X { Y = "z" };
alias T = typeof(X.Y);
pragma(msg, is(T == enum));
pragma(msg, isSomeString!T);
void main() {}`
Output in DMD <= 2.078.3:
true
On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 at 08:48:15 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Being the final public release on the 0.7.x branch, this
version on DMD 2.068.2 up to DMD 2.080.0 and LDC 1.9.0. It
includes some major fixes and improvements backported from the
0.8.x branch. Since this marks the last 0.7.x
Hi!
How do I get past this?
static struct X {
int x;
private enum T = 1;
private alias M = string;
}
foreach (Member; __traits(allMembers, X)) {
pragma(msg, __traits(getProtection, __traits(getMember, X,
Member)));
}
Output:
public
private
c.d(1084): Error:
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 12:54:33 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 23 October 2017 at 12:41:09 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
What is everyone doing to get proper file name and line number
info for callstacks with DMD?
addr2line just gives me ??:0
What OS, etc?
Linux 64-bit (Ubuntu
What is everyone doing to get proper file name and line number
info for callstacks with DMD?
addr2line just gives me ??:0
I was curious if anyone has tried implementing the GC mark phase
with SIMD instrs?
If so, what were the results, and why didn't it get accepted?
At first thought, it seems like a simple project that could
improve performance of big-memory programs by a significant
margin, right?
On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 18:08:12 UTC, aberba wrote:
I wanted strip_tags() for sanitization in vibe.d and I set out
for algorithms on how to do it and came across this JavaScript
library at
https://github.com/ericnorris/striptags/blob/master/src/striptags.js which is quite popular judging
Anyone has a binding readily available that I can use?
code.dlang.org is down, so I can't check there - I am in a hurry!
:)
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 12:36:35 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 22:49:12 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.072.1.
http://dlang.org/download.html
This point release fixes a few issues over 2.072.0, see the
changelog for more details.
On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 07:46:24 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 12:54:12 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
First beta for the 2.072.1 point release.
This version resolves a number of regressions and bugs in the
2.072.0 release.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
On Thursday, 3 November 2016 at 13:11:41 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/2/16 12:14 PM, Márcio Martins wrote:
[...]
You are not the only one:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/nv85ou$gi5$1...@digitalmars.com
Note, I wholly disagree with the idea that hashOf(arr) hashes
the pointer and
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 at 19:49:24 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2016-11-02 17:30, Márcio Martins wrote:
Can we get a getMember and a getOverloads that won't check for
visibility or anything else?
__traits appears really powerful, but every-time I try to use
it for
anything other than
Can we get a getMember and a getOverloads that won't check for
visibility or anything else?
__traits appears really powerful, but every-time I try to use it
for anything other than a toy example or very simple
serialization, it seems like everything falls apart due to some
detail... and I
There are 2 hashOf() definitions, one in object.d and one in
core.internal.hash.d
If you include core.internal.hash, you cannot call hashOf()
anymore, because it conflicts with the implicit import in
object.d, this is annoying in itself...
The bigger issue though, is that they have different
Consider this snippet:
struct X {
int foo(Args...)(Args args) if (Args.length > 1) { return
Args.length; }
int foo() { return 0; }
int foo(int y) { return 1; }
alias Name = string;
int field_;
}
void listMembers(T)(ref T x) {
foreach (Member; __traits(derivedMembers, T)) {
Forgive me if this is not the best place for this sort of posts,
but we are looking for experienced developers willing to learn D
to join our development team in Amsterdam. We are a fast-growing
travel e-commerce startup focused on themed vacation packages.
You'll be part of our small and
On Monday, 30 May 2016 at 09:28:29 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 05/29/2016 10:40 PM, qznc wrote:
bool string_cmp_opt(immutable(ubyte)[] x, immutable(ubyte)[]
y) {
Having "string" in the function name may be a bit misleading.
This doesn't have any special functionality for
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 17:02:50 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 2 May 2016 at 16:47:13 UTC, Márcio Martins wrote:
with 2.070.2:
real0m9.775s
user0m9.036s
sys 0m0.700s
with 2.071.0:
real0m45.011s
user0m41.760s
sys 0m3.144s
Wow, that's pretty awful.
Have you
On Sunday, 10 April 2016 at 20:18:28 UTC, Lewis wrote:
On Thursday, 7 April 2016 at 07:44:48 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 22:43:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.071.0.
I read somewhere recently about performance regressions in
DMD. Were these related the
On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 15:02:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 13:31:17 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Could we maybe create a quick informative survey,
(surveymonkey?), so we can get a glimpse of why people like D
and what they believe would improve their
On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 20:15:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/26/16 2:32 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Yup. The basic problem of getting this stuff into phobos are
the
architectural problems discussed in that talk. Unlike uniform
distribution (which is straightforward to
On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 01:53:51 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2016 4:35 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
And since DMD is
something like twice as fast as LDC, there's at least some
argument in
favor of keeping it around.
When I meet someone new who says they settled on D in their
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 21:09:15 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
It is not quite ready to post in Announce,
but I would like to inform you that I am planing to open-source
my native-sqlite database driver. (well currently it just reads
them).
However it works fully at CTFE.
so if
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 20:18:14 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 22:57:20 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
[…]
On a completely unrelated note, you aren't by any chance the
Márcio Martins who is giving a talk at ETH in a couple of days,
are you?
— David
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 22:33:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 February 2016 at 22:23, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
[...]
Actually, I'm sure this is a great way to let bugs in. There's
no saying what could happen if you switch compiler
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 15:36:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 14:23:12 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I agree, but I don't see why this would have to change. It
shouldn't change. Frontend development could happen on DMD as
the *reference* compiler.
And
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 13:23:34 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Which of these advantages cannot be taken advantage of today?
I suppose if you combine the feature sets of all compilers you
will to some degree be able to get the best of all worlds. But
the compiler *representing*
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 12:22:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/17/2016 09:28 PM, rsw0x wrote:
I'm curious where Andrei stands on this issue, IIRC he was
upset at one
point that dmd could not be redistributed properly on linux
distros.
We'd love dmd's backend to have a more
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 12:05:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 11:41:26 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 10:45:54 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I suppose it's a lot easier to address the compilation speed
issue in LDC/GDC, than to
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 06:57:01 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 22:57:20 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I was reading the other thread "Speed kills" and was wondering
if there is any practical reason why DMD is the official
compiler?
Currently, newcomers come
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 10:16:40 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 00:35:01 UTC, Chris Wright
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:57:20 +, Márcio Martins wrote:
I was reading the other thread "Speed kills" and was
wondering if there is any practical reason why DMD is
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 00:06:10 UTC, Xinok wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 at 22:57:20 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
I was reading the other thread "Speed kills" and was wondering
if there is any practical reason why DMD is the official
compiler?
...
I pretty much asked this
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 00:35:01 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:57:20 +, Márcio Martins wrote:
I was reading the other thread "Speed kills" and was wondering
if there is any practical reason why DMD is the official
compiler?
Walter Bright is the lead developer,
I was reading the other thread "Speed kills" and was wondering if
there is any practical reason why DMD is the official compiler?
Currently, newcomers come expecting their algorithm from rosetta
code to run faster in D than their current language, but then it
seems like it's actually slower.
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 07:23:26 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 06:57:39 UTC, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Dne 11.2.2016 v 01:20 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
napsal(a):
IMO it is a denial of reality to put them in three separate
repositories since they are so
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 11:47:23 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 10:55:12 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Is there a practical reason why they are not in the same repo?
No, other than trying to put them into one would grind
everything to a halt for a while
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 14:19:13 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/10/16 6:30 PM, Márcio Martins wrote:
I decided to try a couple ideas in druntime and followed this
http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Fetch_dmd_from_GitHub
OK, I added this section:
I decided to try a couple ideas in druntime and followed this
http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Fetch_dmd_from_GitHub
Everything went fast and smooth - I have a custom built dmd
version.
Bootstrapping and building dmd was suspiciously fast - took
around 15 secs maybe, if I
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 21:49:24 UTC, Matt Elkins wrote:
I've been experiencing some odd behavior, where it would appear
that a struct's destructor is being called before the object's
lifetime expires. More likely I am misunderstanding something
about the lifetime rules for structs. I
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 15:01:44 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 6 February 2016 at 13:36:32 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
[...]
`@(mylib.ignore)` should work. You could open an enhancement
request to enable the paren-less syntax.
Thanks, that does work indeed and is not that
I came across an issue with UDAs and was wondering if there
really is no way or if I just missed something...
Basically, my library has an @ignore UDA, which conflicts with
vibe.d's vibe.data.serialization.
If both mine and vibe's module are imported, DMD will fail with a
very
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 14:28:05 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Ok I'll bite: it doesn't matter.
This DIP is additive. The problem with D is not that we don't
have stuff in there, is most of the stuff in there are half
backed. Adding more half baked things in there only makes
things worse.
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 13:54:56 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 13:30:47 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
If I am reading the code right, the number of dimensions must
always be known at compile time, right?
Not necessarily. The dimensions for this slice are
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 07:45:14 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 22:39:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 21:43:35 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
[...]
Agreed
1. First paragraph was replaced by your variant.
2. Binary
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 at 08:39:26 UTC, Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
wrote:
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 17:32:05 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 17:06:48 UTC, Jean-Yves
Vion-Dury wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 15:25:04 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
[...]
FYI, I
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 14:40:12 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
When I do the following:
auto mysql = new Mysql("localhost", 3306, "mt", "",
"verwaltung");
auto rows = mysql.query("select field from my_table limit 50");
foreach(row;rows){
writeln(row["field"]);}
// second time same
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 17:06:48 UTC, Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 15:25:04 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
[...]
FYI, I just installed the 2.069 version, and now I'm unable to
compile some modules, getting the same "Error: out of memory".
I isolated a tiny
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 00:43:50 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/06/2015 06:41 AM, Márcio Martins wrote:
> auto m = (a > b) * a + 15;
> auto c = a.choose(a > b)^^2;
What do those operations do? Are you thinking of a special
meaning for '>', perhaps common in numerical computations,
which
I am writing a generic numerical array struct, and I can't find a
way to do element-wise comparison operators.
What I had envisioned was something like the following, assuming
a, b, c and m are array-like, and all operations return arrays.
auto m = (a > b) * a + 15;
auto c = a.choose(a >
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 at 01:08:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 17:52:23 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
If host machine is x64 bit windows try setting large address
aware bit on the executable (there are tools to do that IRC),
would allow it to eat up to ~4
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 11:29:32 UTC, TheFlyingFiddle
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 10:41:52 UTC, tired_eyes wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 10:33:30 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Ruby:
a = 1
b = 4
puts "The number #{a} is less than #{b}"
PHP:
$a = 1;
$b = 4;
echo "The
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 10:13:46 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 19:31 +, Márcio Martins via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I have been running some MCMC simulations in Python and it's
hard
to cope with how unbelievably slow it is.
Takes me almost a minute to run a few
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 23:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Rust has a nice way to download at
https://www.rust-lang.org/downloads.html for Posix:
$ curl -sSf https://static.rust-lang.org/rustup.sh | sh -s --
The method is simple and transparent. An optional
--channel=beta or
On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 at 04:43:18 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
...
I agree completely. Please NO! What's wrong with the current
system? It seems to work just fine for me.
Well, you already use D so obviously it works good enough for
you. However, there might be a million people out there that
I have been running some MCMC simulations in Python and it's hard
to cope with how unbelievably slow it is.
Takes me almost a minute to run a few hundred thousand samples on
my laptop whereas I can run the same simulation with a million
samples in under 100ms, on my phone with JavaScript on a
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:50:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.069.0.
http://dlang.org/download.html
http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/
This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and
comes with even more rangified phobos functions,
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 02:37:18 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
I've been playing around with perf and my web server and found
that the bottleneck is by far the math module of Botan:
https://github.com/etcimon/botan/blob/master/source/botan/math/mp/mp_core.d
[...]
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 09:44:00 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 02:25:21 UTC, Yaser wrote:
Are there any critical frameworks or libraries that are
holding you back in fully investing in D? Obviously I think D
is an awesome language, but some frameworks/libraries hold me
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 10:23:25 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 04:19:58 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 14:26:35 UTC, Chris wrote:
I really don't like blog posts that have overly broad titles
when the subject matter is technical. I
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 13:12:35 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 12:14:56 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 11:53:28 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2015 at 23:23:05 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Today I launched a very
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 09:49:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2015 at 23:23:05 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Today I launched a very tiny and humble blog, with the first
post being about D. It's likely all posts will be about D in
the end...
[...]
this is what
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 11:53:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2015 at 23:23:05 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
Today I launched a very tiny and humble blog, with the first
post being about D. It's likely all posts will be about D in
the end...
You can reach it
On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 10:02:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
"A common problem in game programming and how D solved it"
That indeed sounds more appealing for a general audience.
Thanks Chris!
Today I launched a very tiny and humble blog, with the first post
being about D. It's likely all posts will be about D in the end...
You can reach it http://www.mmartins.me
I want to get better at writing, as I have barely ever written
anything other than code, and my name... I noticed there
86 matches
Mail list logo
