On 1/21/15 1:39 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/21/2015 8:23 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
this simply not work.
Neither does Windows Moviemaker. It hung again on me.
Just FYI iMovie works just fine ;)
and not worth it.
WMM is over a decade old, and it still hangs doing something as
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 08:41:47 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I wonder why software companies still make it impossible to
submit bug reports. For example, google:
submit windows movie maker bug report
Click on Reporting and solving computer problems - Windows:
On 1/22/15 12:03 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/22/2015 4:44 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But I am surprised MS does not have some way to get reasonable paid
support for
their software. Apple gives you 1 year free software/hardware support
when you
buy a Mac. I can fully understand not
On 1/22/2015 4:44 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But I am surprised MS does not have some way to get reasonable paid support for
their software. Apple gives you 1 year free software/hardware support when you
buy a Mac. I can fully understand not offering Free support. Not everyone is a
Walter
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:39:14 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Why even ship such a product you have no intention of fixing bugs for? It's a
net negative for one's image.
ah, that's a different question! i don't know why they still shipping
it instead of
On 1/21/15 10:45 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/21/2015 7:40 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
there's plenty of video processing software in the free world.
About 10 years ago, I needed to edit a movie. I downloaded about 10
different video editors. Every one would hang, crash, go berserk,
On 1/21/2015 8:23 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
this simply not work.
Neither does Windows Moviemaker. It hung again on me.
and not worth it.
WMM is over a decade old, and it still hangs doing something as simple as
trimming off the start and the end. And not rarely, either. It does
On 1/21/2015 7:40 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
there's plenty of video processing software in the free world.
About 10 years ago, I needed to edit a movie. I downloaded about 10 different
video editors. Every one would hang, crash, go berserk, generate corrupt files,
etc. I didn't do
On 1/21/2015 10:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/21/15 10:45 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
It left such bad taste I was unwilling to try it again until recently.
I'm disgusted that the problems remain. How hard can it be?
10 years is a long time -- Andrei
Right, which is why I'm disgusted
On 1/21/2015 11:03 AM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'll note, for what it's worth, that there's open bug reports against D that are
almost 9 years old... oldest open bug was filed in May of 2006. Some of them
fairly fundamental.
All software has bugs. But trimming a video is the
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:45:26AM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/21/2015 7:40 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
there's plenty of video processing software in the free world.
About 10 years ago, I needed to edit a movie. I downloaded about 10
different video editors. Every
On 1/21/2015 10:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/21/15 10:45 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/21/2015 7:40 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
there's plenty of video processing software in the free world.
About 10 years ago, I needed to edit a movie. I downloaded about 10
On 1/21/15 1:14 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 08:41:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/21/2015 12:19 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Emacs D-Mode will only improve if people provide bug reports and
fixes. A number of people are doing this for their pain
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:40:48 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I find this utterly baffling. Why make it so difficult to report a bug?
Microsoft has always been like this, the only way I've ever been able to
submit
a bug report was if I had a friend
regular expression search FunctionName.*\{ or FunctionName.*$\s*\{
depending on brace style
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC,
On 1/21/2015 1:14 AM, Joakim wrote:
Probably because Microsoft has so many millions of users that their bug tracker
would be awash with noise. Google allows anybody with a google account to post
bugs or comment on them for Chrome and Android, which has led to a ton of noise
on their public bug
On 1/21/2015 12:59 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Whereas for Emacs D-Mode you rock up to
https://github.com/Emacs-D-Mode-Maintainers/Emacs-D-Mode/issues
and post. There is no guarantee of action though since there is no-one
paid to do support, it's all volunteer activity. However
Whereas for Emacs D-Mode you rock up to
https://github.com/Emacs-D-Mode-Maintainers/Emacs-D-Mode/issues
and post. There is no guarantee of action though since there is no-one
paid to do support, it's all volunteer activity. However a number of
people do hack on the ELisp and fix things.
All
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 20:30 +, Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
Which editor do you use? I use emacs. It has some quirks. The
D-Mode doesn't work very well (I end up using Notepad++ when
working on phobos/druntime), but I can use it on every platform
and over a remote tty
On 1/21/2015 12:19 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Emacs D-Mode will only improve if people provide bug reports and
fixes. A number of people are doing this for their pain points. If the
Emacs D-Mode is substandard for you, can you at least submit issues
presenting the problems.
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 08:41:47 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/21/2015 12:19 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The Emacs D-Mode will only improve if people provide bug
reports and
fixes. A number of people are doing this for their pain
points. If the
Emacs D-Mode is
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 20:51:03 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may
On 1/19/15 8:35 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void function foo () { ... }
foo();
do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace in
declaration. i borrowed that habit from some Oberon code
decades ago, and it serves me well since then.
Hmm,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:35:16 -0300
Ary Borenszweig via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:49:47 +
MattCoder via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void function foo () { ... }
foo();
do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace in
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles
On 1/20/2015 12:30 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Which editor do you use?
https://github.com/DigitalMars/me
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:28:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. Search Again is a single button press. It really has
never occurred to me
that this might be a problem needing a solution.
I admit that I've never gotten in to using an IDE. I
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:30:00 +
Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:28:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. Search Again is a single button press. It really has
never occurred to
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
Regular Expression Search for
FunctionName.*\n\s*\{
or
FunctionName.*\{
depending on brace style being used.
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 01:35:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D
without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:06:40 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but deprecated).
What developers think..
That why not is a not a good enough reason to do it.
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 00:13:37 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It never
occurred to me that this was not doable :-)
On 1/19/2015 2:51 PM, ponce wrote:
Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already read it
visually and it is easier to port C code to D.
Bingo. It's designed to be an easy transition for people used to programming in
C, C++ and Java.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:25:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion
begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
On 1/19/15 3:43 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 7:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
On 1/19/15 7:54 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:17:08PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an
IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It
never occurred
On 1/19/2015 5:35 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:12:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Tel maître, tel valet. -- Andrei
Will ruby now park cars ?
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:18:34 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Ok I see your arguments, indeed, breaking masss of code isn't
good (even with deprecated flag).
So leave it as is (it is TOO LATE to change this)
Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already
read it visually
On 1/19/15 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without
an IDE?
Running `dscanner --help` prints this:
--declaration | -d symbolName [sourceFiles sourceDirectories]
Find the location where symbolName is declared.
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 01:35:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig
wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D
without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been
On 1/19/2015 7:20 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes. Search Again is a single button press. It really has never occurred to me
that this might be a problem needing a solution.
I admit that I've never gotten in to using an IDE. I still have complaints about
the programmer's editor I use, but they
On 1/19/2015 1:23 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I'm not familiar enough
with the syntax grammar to say for sure whether or not this would make it easier
to parse the language.
This idea is not going to make the parsing any better.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:49:41 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 6:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion
begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 22:54:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I abandon D and switch to Ruby. -- Andrei
You should make a front page announcement.
On 20/01/2015 1:17 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:49 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
I do a text search for the name of the function.
I've been programming in C, C++, and D for 30 years without an IDE. It
never
On 1/20/2015 7:49 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
It works, but if you stop following that convention you are lost.
So... how do you search for a function definition in D without an IDE?
Case-insensitive search on funcname( usually works for me.
On Monday, January 19, 2015 16:18:25 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 1/19/2015 2:51 PM, ponce wrote:
Current syntax is akin to C and C++, it means many people already read it
visually and it is easier to port C code to D.
Bingo. It's designed to be an easy transition for people
On Monday, January 19, 2015 20:51:02 Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version
Ok I see your arguments, indeed, breaking masss of code isn't
good (even with deprecated flag).
So leave it as is (it is TOO LATE to change this)
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but deprecated).
What developers think..
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:06:40 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but deprecated).
What developers think..
I have a feeling you might get some strong opposition to this
idea *Brace
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow--with compatability
of old
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 20:51:03 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow--with
compatability of old syntad (C like where typeOfResult is
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:02 +
Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. def of func. e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) - typeOfResult;
easier to
63 matches
Mail list logo
