Visualisation is certainly not behind python's success in
bioinformatics, which predates ipython. If you look through
journals, very few of the figures are done in python (and none at
all in julia). It succeeded because it allows you to hack your
way through massive text files and it's not
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:28:11 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 18:04:58 UTC, george wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story over C# and F#
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 08:09:00 UTC, Andrew Brown wrote:
Visualisation is certainly not behind python's success in
bioinformatics, which predates ipython. If you look through
journals, very few of the figures are done in python (and none
at all in julia). It succeeded because it allows
As Andrew Brown pointed out, visualization is not behind
Pythons success. Its success lies in the fact that it's a
language you can hack away in easily.
Sounds right. I am not in the camp that says it is a killer for
D. It would just be nice to have both at least a passable
solution for
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 18:23:31 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:04 +, george via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 11:04:50 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
As Andrew Brown pointed out, visualization is not behind
Pythons success. Its success lies in the fact that it's a
language you can hack away in easily.
Sounds right. I am not in the camp that says it is a killer
for D. It
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 13:31:33 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 11:04:50 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
As Andrew Brown pointed out, visualization is not behind
Pythons success. Its success lies in the fact that it's a
language you can hack away in easily.
Sounds right. I
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 11:04:50 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
As Andrew Brown pointed out, visualization is not behind
Pythons success. Its success lies in the fact that it's a
language you can hack away in easily.
Sounds right. I am not in the camp that says it is a killer
for D. It
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 06:50:19 UTC, george wrote:
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/02/18/bioinformatics.btv098.full.pdf+html
and a feature
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 06:50:19 UTC, george wrote:
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/02/18/bioinformatics.btv098.full.pdf+html
and a feature
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story over C# and F# (alongside WPF for data
visualization) use cases.
--
Paulo
Though when it comes to open source bioinformatics
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:04 +, george via Digitalmars-d wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story over C# and F# (alongside WPF for data
visualization) use
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 18:04:58 UTC, george wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story over C# and F# (alongside WPF for data
visualization) use cases.
--
Paulo
On 3/29/15 11:50 PM, george wrote:
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/02/18/bioinformatics.btv098.full.pdf+html
and a feature
On 3/30/15 11:23 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:04 +, george via Digitalmars-d wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story over C#
My prejudice, based on training people in Python and C++ over
the last few years, is that Python and C++ have a very strong
position in the bioinformatics community, with the use of
IPython (now becoming Jupyter) increasing and solidifying the
Python position.
It's just possible there is a
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:09:35 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
clip
You're right about the lack of visualization being a shame. I
have been thinking about porting Bokeh bindings to D. There
isn't much too it on the server side - all you need to do is
build up the object model and
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 18:23:31 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:04 +, george via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
.NET actually already has a foothold in bioinformatics,
specially in user facing software and steering of reading
equipments and robots.
So D's needs a story
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:25:33 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:09:35 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
clip
You're right about the lack of visualization being a shame. I
have been thinking about porting Bokeh bindings to D. There
isn't much too it on the server
I did some image processing work with D and didn't find the
lack of specific D tools for visualization a big issue.
There is some advantage to being able to perform visualization
tasks in the same lanaguage as you do the data processing work,
but I wouldn't this this would be a major
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:55:37 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:25:33 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:09:35 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
clip
You're right about the lack of visualization being a shame. I
have been thinking about porting Bokeh
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 02:31:58 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 22:55:37 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:25:33 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 20:09:35 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
clip
You're right about the lack of
22 matches
Mail list logo
