On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 08:04:37 UTC, MGW wrote:
QtE5 - gained further development. The new mechanism of
operation with memory
is realized that allowed will get rid of crash of applications
in case of completion.
The summary code amount increases all the time. New classes
from Qt are
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:48:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/8/2017 1:36 PM, Joakim wrote:
You don't want to own up to the fact that
Please refrain from berating others here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 03:54:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/10/2017 3:28 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 16:09:48 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
please don't answer messages which are possibly spam.
Try this by not answering to this thread.
Ok! +1 ;)
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 07:38:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/12/2017 10:25 PM, Tony wrote:
>>> "Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
I've been assuming that if it says "dumped", the core is dumped.
> I am on Ubuntu 16.04. Thanks, I didn't know that "producing a
core file"
> was
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 07:38:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It is. If you search for "where is core file ubuntu" you will
hit the output of 'man core', as well as answers like the
following, which explains that the file may be under
/var/cache/abrt:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 06:25:20 UTC, Tony wrote:
I am on Ubuntu 16.04. Thanks, I didn't know that "producing a
core file" was configurable, and it appears that it isn't.
ok. that's because Ubuntu is not (by default) setup for
developers.
But you can enable core dump for your
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17972
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
a bit less *snorting* and maybe you'd
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:49:29 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 06:25:20 UTC, Tony wrote:
I am on Ubuntu 16.04. Thanks, I didn't know that "producing a
core file" was configurable, and it appears that it isn't.
ok. that's because Ubuntu is not (by default) setup
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:20:51 UTC, Aurelien Fredouelle
wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that it is not possible to use minElement on an array
of const objects:
class A
{
int val;
}
const(A) doStuff(const(A)[] v)
{
import std.algorithm.searching : minElement;
return
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'm not sure why you're picking out my comments from arguments
I had with Ola and Tony days ago at the end of all this, but we
had OT conversations about OS market share where I felt they
were repeatedly making the same mistake.
Unqual!Element seed = r.front;
alias MapType = Unqual!(typeof(mapFun(CommonElement.init)));
This looks like a job for std.typecons.Rebindable!(const A)
instead of Unqual!(const A) which is used currently. I am
surprised that this is the first time anyone has run into this.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 02:35:11 UTC, Brian wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 15:57:19 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.6. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.076.1.
* Experimental
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 18:27:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 05/18/2017 11:18 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I just got around to watching Eduard Staniloiu's talk at DConf
[1]
about the collections library he was working on. One thing
seemed
odd, in that Eduard seems to be saying that the
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:33:08 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and jumping
to Apple,
Hi all,
It seems that it is not possible to use minElement on an array of
const objects:
class A
{
int val;
}
const(A) doStuff(const(A)[] v)
{
import std.algorithm.searching : minElement;
return v.minElement!"a.val";
}
This gets the following compiler error:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:51:33 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
That's it little fella let it all out...
*passes codebaby a tissue*
really?
you think that was a useful contribution?
who are you anyway?
One of Jerry's 'other' accounts perhaps?
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:56:05 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1185516
*snort* scientific yeah.. he called you names, so you called
him names, so he called you names.. every child in the
playground knows that game.
A bit less *snorting* and perhaps you'd
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
that just works for most everyone else. And yes you hate
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:11:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
At my job, I put together a database migration tool for our
services. It scans for resources in your JAR file with an
appropriate path, interprets them as SQL scripts, and applies
them to the database if it hasn't been done
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to be harassed to know what if feels like.
That was my objective.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:14:32 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:47:46 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 00:41:32 UTC, Jerry wrote:
harassing people isn't defending your argument.
Yeah...it's not nice...being harassed..is it.
You have to
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 10:26:57 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I accurately characterized the tenor of their problem
Uhm… «accurately» ?? LOL!! 8'D
generalize and point that out, ie he _was_ confused in the
points he was making.
I am never confused, but this is dlang.org, I've seen worse…
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I'm old and don't give a shit .
Perhaps it's all that *snorting*...that stuff will do that to you.
Go see your local doctor, cause I believe there's something you
can take..to get it all flowing again...
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and liverpool? just bunch of little kiddies kicking around a
ball.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:46:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Considering you kept ignoring my evidence of Android and
jumping to Apple, I'd say that it was perfectly accurate.
Oh well, I'm focusing on what I am interested in… Anyway, it is
rather obvious that subjective ad-hominem statements in
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 20:22:21 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Hmmm, i get home to find eight messages from codebaby, he sees
sockpuppets everywhere, snapping at every bit of bait I laid...
says he'll ignore my whole comment and then replys to it
another two times, LOL, a full on meltdown
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:26:20 UTC, balddenimhero wrote:
In the course of writing a minimal example I removed more than
necessary in the previous pastebin (the passed IntOrder has not
even been used). Thus here is the corrected one:
https://pastebin.com/SKae08GT. I'm trying to port
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:25:32 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
That turned me off. Despite everything I hate about D, I keep
coming back to it for the "Modeling Power" and "Modern
Convenience". No other language that I'm aware of can complete
with D on those two merits.
...
Mike
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 13:24:45 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 12:40:49 UTC, Vino wrote:
[...]
The problem is
subdirTotalGB = ((reduce!((a,b) => a + b)(SdFiles)) / 1024 /
1024 / 1024);
with reduce you need to give it a seed (an initial value to
start
Thanks for this post. Please also consider creating a Wiki page
as that's more easily accessible for posterity (and editable)
than a forum post here.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
"D has @property functions, which are methods that
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 04:31:43 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
He mentions D, a bit dismissively.
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7724=1#comment-1912717
"[snip]...Then came the day we discovered that a person we
incautiously gave commit privileges to had fucked up the games’s
AI core. It
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 23:30:18 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
A DIP is necessary for all language changes. In this case a
short and well-argued DIP seems to be the ticket. Walter and I
spoke and such a proposal has a good chance to be successful.
Subject issues:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
An interesting project.
Some good points made too.
As someone new to D, I think this point stood out the most(for
me):
"C++, Rust, and D
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 01:01:16 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
An interesting project.
Some good points made too.
As someone new to D, I
Is there an easy way to get the string representation of an
array, as would be printed by writeln(), but captured in a string?
He mentions D, a bit dismissively.
http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=7724=1#comment-1912717
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:12:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:03:17 UTC, helxi wrote:
In this program, casting using to does not work as intended
(returning 23/11) on the struct. However, calling opCast
directly seems to do the job. Why is that?
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 05:20:39 UTC, codephantom wrote:
I just saw this about the new 'damnit' operator, for C# 8.
https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/556
The principle is a good one - by default you cannot dereference
something that can be null, you get a compiler error
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12064
Basile B. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--- Comment #2 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17980
Issue ID: 17980
Summary: deprecated overridden function gives wrong message
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 13:02:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 10:12:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
All it does is take the expression
x ? x : y
and make it
x ?: y
Yes, that is an issue because it means that typos no longer are
caught. E.g. if you
On Monday, November 13, 2017 12:40:39 bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:12:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:03:17 UTC, helxi wrote:
> >> In this program, casting using to does not work as intended
> >> (returning 23/11) on
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 11:25:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-08-28 08:31, Nemanja Boric wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2017 at 06:27:20 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/vibe-core
http://code.dlang.org/packages/libasync
In addition, to avoid polling, it's
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2525
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17586
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17585
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 12:15:26 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
Unqual!Element seed = r.front;
alias MapType = Unqual!(typeof(mapFun(CommonElement.init)));
This looks like a job for std.typecons.Rebindable!(const A)
instead of Unqual!(const A) which is used currently. I am
surprised that
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:50:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
I wish I was young again. I used to love arguing about
pointless crap, i couldn't resit it, mac vs pc, risc vs cisc,
sony vs nintendo, utd vs liverpool
utd and
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:39:07 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:34:00 UTC, realdonaldtrump
wrote:
Lol now I know ur full of it cause real football is only found
in America.
With their cute little helmets. I love it.
We don't need no helmets over here.
I need a priority queue of integers whose elements are not
ordered by the default `opCmp` but some delegate.
The following gist illustrates the problem I'm having:
https://run.dlang.io/gist/92876b2c4d8c77cdc68f1ca61e7e8e44?compiler=dmd
The `Foo` class is supposed to wrap a binary heap (to be
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 14:44:55 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
The commenting out case can be prevented by making ?: an actual
operator, so ?/**/: would be an error.
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
(Also I think it's regressive to argue invalid code becoming
valid is a good reason to
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 10:12:32 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
I don't want to open a new forum thread for this, but if you
guys have more experience with ddox can you please explain me
how does it work?
There's two modes of operation for ddox: using dmd -D -X to
generate a json file, then
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
These recent articles also mention D or talk about some similar
features:
http://videocortex.io/2017/Bestiary/
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16253
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/f730d230f5ee56efea465f8f32b1ecb49e4542cf
Fixed Issue 16253 - BitmappedBlock allocator not
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16253
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 17:00:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
But no plans to add meta-programming or type system support for
memory?
Hm, the github page says «Zig has no macros and no
metaprogramming», but their homepage says «Generic data
structures and functions» and
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:12:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
have looked at D features:
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C-D%2C-and-Rust%3F
On 11/10/17 5:12 AM, RazvanN wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 at 14:21:52 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/8/17 10:45 PM, Andrey wrote:
I just added to dub.json this:
"-ddoxFilterArgs": [
"--min-protection=Public"
]
i.e. without --only-documented option, in this way ddox will
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 14:38:35 UTC, balddenimhero wrote:
I need a priority queue of integers whose elements are not
ordered by the default `opCmp` but some delegate.
The following gist illustrates the problem I'm having:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 13:43:20 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 20:14:17 UTC, Meta wrote:
The functionality is probably a good idea, but a library
solution is doable today without any acrobatics.
Show me a library solution that works fine with IDE completion
(so
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/04cbf312a91c20ccddf029b5de8215edaf7a6f7e
Fix Issue 15637 - Region allocator assert failure when
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:11:45 UTC, Ali wrote:
I think HAA seems like where many people are looking at the
moment
I am not convinced that this will make a dent in C or C++
popularity or usage
but, yet, it will be a sizable niche that C or C++ will not
dominate
But how is that
Hi all,
Tomorrow November 14th, we will have our next Munich meetup. This
time Seb and Stefan will give an introductory talk about
templates and CTFE. After Andrei's awesome talk last month, we
are happy to welcome new members of our group joining the regular
meetups.
As usual before and
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 19:58:29 UTC, Michael V. Franklin
wrote:
Interesting feature. So is the executable linked to an
installed instance of LDC/LLVM to make this happen, or is there
some limited compiler embedded in the executable or Druntime?
More details about the implementation
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
[...]
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:43:13 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
Hi all,
Tomorrow November 14th, we will have our next Munich meetup.
This time Seb and Stefan will give an introductory talk about
templates and CTFE. After Andrei's awesome talk last month, we
are happy to welcome new members
Hi,
I tried googling and didn't find anything.
I have thread doing a time-intensive search and I want its
results printed to a second console while the main console
displays what I already have writing.
Thanks.
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 19:04:16 UTC, Ivan Butygin wrote:
You need to explicitly compile `@dynamicCompile` functions
before using any of them.
Interesting feature. So is the executable linked to an installed
instance of LDC/LLVM to make this happen, or is there some
limited compiler
Main part of this feature is a new UDA `@dynamicCompile`.
You can mark with this attribute any function (including class
methods and lambdas) and compilation and optimization of this
function will be deferred to runtime.
Dynamic compiler will use instruction set available on host, so
On Friday, 10 November 2017 at 10:12:32 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
I don't want to open a new forum thread for this, but if you
guys have more experience with ddox can you please explain me
how does it work? I expected you can simply run ddox on a .d
file and it will output the documentation in some
On Monday, November 13, 2017 16:12:42 Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Probably a good sign that they mention D with C++ and Rust and
> have looked at D features:
>
> https://github.com/zig-lang/zig/wiki/Why-Zig-When-There-is-Already-CPP%2C->
> D%2C-and-Rust%3F
Glancing over what they say
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 13:37:20 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I explained why, the last time we put out a stable release for
FreeBSD, ldc 1.2, it only got 4 downloads:
http://www.somsubhra.com/github-release-stats/?username=ldc-developers=ldc
By comparison, the Win32 build got 282 downloads.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17980
Basile B. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17585
Basile B. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b2.t...@gmx.com
--- Comment #2
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17978
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|github HEAD gives wrong |github HEAD
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 09:27:10 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:11:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
At my job, I put together a database migration tool for our
services. It scans for resources in your JAR file with an
appropriate path, interprets them as SQL
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15140
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15140
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/b8d70b32fd4e6d7c936809a118b168bc68303dad
Fix Issue 15140 -
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 15:43:35 UTC, balddenimhero wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 14:38:35 UTC, balddenimhero
wrote:
I need a priority queue of integers whose elements are not
ordered by the default `opCmp` but some delegate.
The following gist illustrates the problem I'm
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 16:30:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Glancing over what they say there, it sounds like they're
trying to write a better version of C.
Yes http://ziglang.org/:
«Zig competes with C instead of depending on it. The Zig Standard
Library does not depend on libc.»
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
{
alias First = RDI;
alias Second = RSI;
//
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
no in naked mode you have to save and restore by hand.
Note that in Win64 even if not naked, you'll have to save/restore
some registers like XMMx with x >= 6.
Another question - how can I tell DMD to no generate the frame
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 11:55:59 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:02:14 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
Jesus Christ you big pair of fecking babys.
Nobody argued it wouldn't be better to have 64 bit out of the
box. They argued you were making a big deal out of something
On Monday, November 13, 2017 19:58:51 Enjoys Math via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried googling and didn't find anything.
>
> I have thread doing a time-intensive search and I want its
> results printed to a second console while the main console
> displays what I already have writing.
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:40:06 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
no in naked mode you have to save and restore by hand.
So how does one manually generate the .pdata and .xdata
sections?
Are you saying that this is what I
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 20:24:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, November 13, 2017 19:58:51 Enjoys Math via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hi,
I tried googling and didn't find anything.
I have thread doing a time-intensive search and I want its
results printed to a second console
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 19:15:01 UTC, bauss wrote:
Sounds like fun. I wish I could make it down to Germany, but
unfortunately I can't, especially not tomorrow with less than a
day in advance :p
Just join the meetup group, on the site we are much prompter.
Will there be any
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16398
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/a196f171f6cc0d6936d7b2d5fc4fc7e38b026514
fix issue 16398 - experimental allocators, add aligned
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 18:40:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
TBH I wonder if this is not worth a enhancement (or even a DIP)
to have in asm blocks a special alias syntax...
{
asm
{
version(...)
{
alias First = RDI;
alias Second = RSI;
On 11/11/17 2:32 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/11/17 12:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Trying to get one more meetup in before the holidays. Just a casual
meeting at the Street. Hope you can join us!
Switched to The Wednesday before Thanksgiving. Sorry for the adjustment,
but
On 11/13/2017 05:19 AM, Mark wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2017 at 18:27:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 05/18/2017 11:18 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
I just got around to watching Eduard Staniloiu's talk at DConf [1]
about the collections library he was working on. One thing seemed
odd, in
99 matches
Mail list logo