On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:50:38 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 19:34:38 UTC, Kapps wrote:
D can actually do a rather good job of runtime reflection. I
made a runtime reflection module
(https://shardsoft.com/stash/projects/SHARD/repos/shardtools/browse/source/ShardTools/Re
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 01:46:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
indentation rules. All it can do, and indeed all is *does* do,
is blindly assume that the indentation as presented is correct
and adheres to the universal style. If something is indented
wrong, there is no enforcement, only bug
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 05:25:15 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 04:52 +, Rikki Cattermole via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
I've been working on Cmsed/Dvorm/Dakka specifically in the
mind of a rather (major) web service. Haven't started it yet,
but poss
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 23:09:42 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The name like "walkLength" was chosen (by you?), instead of a
more natural name like "length" (or even a nice, short, clean,
readable, handy and easer to write name like "len" as in
Python) to underline that walkLength could be O(n).
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 04:52 +, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
> I've been working on Cmsed/Dvorm/Dakka specifically in the mind
> of a rather (major) web service. Haven't started it yet, but
> possibly next semester.
> I'm of the opinion that we all need to work together to get
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:42:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have a friend who has switched to vibe.d after being Erlang
Cowboy devoted user for years. Trying to convince him to write
an article about it but no luck so far :( Reason to switch in
two words : "static typing".
Yes, static typin
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:19:15 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Go has gained much of it's traction from provably and
consistently
producing simpler, faster and more reliable systems that C,
C++, Python,
etc. and getting articles about the success out there.
Python is simp
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:32:37 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 04:12 +, Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
Yea, I wrote my version several years ago (IIRC 2009 or early
2010) and since then D has grown as has my knowledge of it. I
kinda wa
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:19:15 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
I can just get stuff done in D in a fraction of a time it
takes to do even less in RoR.
This is the stuff marketing campaigns are m
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:12:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 03:20:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
We should probably work together on this sort of stuff! As we
seem to have similar ideas
Yea, I wrote my version several years ago (IIRC 2009 or early
2010) a
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 04:12 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
> Yea, I wrote my version several years ago (IIRC 2009 or early
> 2010) and since then D has grown as has my knowledge of it. I
> kinda want to write a web.d 2.0 that cleans everything up but eh
> I have a lot of thing
It may be a good time to repeat, we need a marketing manager for
D!
Somebody really really needs to focus on getting us out there.
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 04:10:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 02:43:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:41:19 UTC, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
> I can just get stuff done in D in a fraction of a time it takes
> to do even less in RoR.
This is the stuff marketing campaigns are made from. As well as
informing the cabal that is this mailing list, there needs to b
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 03:20:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
We should probably work together on this sort of stuff! As we
seem to have similar ideas
Yea, I wrote my version several years ago (IIRC 2009 or early
2010) and since then D has grown as has my knowledge of it. I
kinda want
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 02:43:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:41:19 UTC, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I
don't know how to persuade him! How can D be us
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 22:51:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/29/14, 12:49 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are
actually
ort
On 4/29/14, 4:09 PM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrei
The name like "walkLength" was chosen (by you?), instead of a more
natural name like "length" (or even a nice, short, cle
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 03:09:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 02:43:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
All I'm saying is, if you ever not want to write ajax code
again, Cmsed is your friend [1].
My web.d does some javascript generation too.
D:
import arsd.web;
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 02:43:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
All I'm saying is, if you ever not want to write ajax code
again, Cmsed is your friend [1].
My web.d does some javascript generation too.
D:
import arsd.web;
class Foo : ApiProvider {
export int add(int a, int b) { return
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:41:19 UTC, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I
don't know how to persuade him! How can D be used to greatly
assist an HTML5/JavaScript web developer? I decided to
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 01:38:46 UTC, Narrator wrote:
The unbelievable amount of time and energy that's been spent
discussing the smallest syntax, you would think that D would,
at the very least, have better looking function signatures, but
it doesn't.
auto zip(Ranges...)(Ranges ranges
On 4/29/2014 3:48 PM, JN wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Show him forum.dlang.org (written in D) and point out that modern
HTML5/JS sites are freaking horrid.
forum.dlang.org is written in HTML/JS too.
Anything on the web involves HTML, the differen
On 4/29/2014 1:05 PM, Brian Rogoff wrote:
The argument is roughly like this: if we accept that it would be a good
thing if there was a universal indentation/code formatting standard that
everyone followed (like gofmt for Go) then punctuation is redundant and
the remaining question is whether the
On 4/29/2014 9:38 PM, Narrator wrote:
fn map<'r, B>(self, f: |A|: 'r -> B) -> Map<'r, A, B, Self>
That looks like line noise.
The unbelievable amount of time and energy that's been spent
discussing the smallest syntax, you would think that D would, at
the very least, have better looking function signatures, but it
doesn't.
auto zip(Ranges...)(Ranges ranges) if (Ranges.length &&
allSatisfy!(isInputRange, Ranges));
au
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:53:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
foreach(i; TypeTuple!(0,1,2))
{
writeln(xy2[0][i]);
}
}
Thank you,John Colvin,
It works very good.
Frank.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:38:07 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/29/2014 10:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's
On 4/29/2014 4:08 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
I've updated the DIP page to include documentation of the change to the language
grammar.
thanks!
Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrei
The name like "walkLength" was chosen (by you?), instead of a
more natural name like "length" (or even a nice, short, clean,
readable, handy and easer to write
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 01:18:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is the new grammar?
LinkageAttribute:
'extern' '(' identifier '++'? (',' identifier)? ')'
You can also have N.M
I've updated the DIP page to include documentation of the change
to the language grammar.
On 4/29/14, 12:49 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are actually
orthogonal
to the DIP.
Yes!
This is a biggie. KISS etc. -- Andrei
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrie
On 4/29/14, 11:08 AM, bearophile wrote:
In Phobos there are awkward names like walkLength
Love it. -- Andrei
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:06:59 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm curious to why you think D is more productive and easier to
use.
A lot of things, mostly focusing around having the compiler to
help refactor with confidence (the importance of this really
can't be understated) and having li
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 03:09:32 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 17:53:18 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
Hi all,
I am doing some updates to the C back end of my binding, and I
wanted to know what it would entail to be able to distribute
implib along with my CMake things.
On 04/29/2014 10:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's its
anti-hijacking feature.
Try it and see!
I agree!
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 20:33:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Not really. It is reasonable to expect that when Framework1 and
Framework2 each import 4th party Vec, that they do it with an
import rather than inlining Vec's declarations.
Vectors are not the best example since one library might
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:43 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Because the compiler would now issue an error for that, it's its
anti-hijacking feature.
Try it and see!
I agree! that was my central point, which Timon seemed to
On 4/29/2014 1:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
With "graphics::g(physics::f(…))" this would not have been an issue.
It does occur to me that two C++ symbols in the same namespace may be regarded
as the same by the lookup code. That may be a reasonable e
On 4/29/2014 1:23 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:48:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd do your example as:
vec.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
framework1.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,gra
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 19:48:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd do your example as:
vec.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
framework1.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
import vec;
extern(C++,graphics){ void g(vec4 …) … }
Yes, but that requires th
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:52:01 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 4/29/2014 9:13 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But what happens when you add another import that conflicts?
module foo;
void func() {}
module prog; // updated
import bar;
import foo;
void main(){
foo.func(); // now calls foo
On 4/29/2014 9:13 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But what happens when you add another import that conflicts?
module foo;
void func() {}
module prog; // updated
import bar;
import foo;
void main(){
foo.func(); // now calls foo.func, and not bar.func as it originally did,
right?
}
So by
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:28:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Show him forum.dlang.org (written in D) and point out that
modern HTML5/JS sites are freaking horrid.
forum.dlang.org is written in HTML/JS too.
On 4/29/2014 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
as the DIP _does not actually introduce any new lookup rules_
[...]
In particular, any problems you find with symbol lookup are actually orthogonal
to the DIP.
Yes!
On 4/29/2014 2:01 AM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad"
" wrote:
framework1.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
extern(C++,physics){ vec4 f(vec4 …) … }
framework2.d:
extern(C++,veclib){ struct … vec4 …; }
extern(C++,graphics){ void g(vec4 …) … }
application1.d:
import framework1;
import framework2;
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 20:04 +0200, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
> I was already doing RoR back in 1999, but it was with our own in-house
> TCL Apache/IIS module in a Portuguese startup, far far away from Silicon
> Valley and loosely based in AOL Server concepts.
[…]
> We already had A
On 2014-04-29 17:27, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers.
I'm curious to why you think D is more productive and easier to use.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:55:11 -0400
Etienne via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> That's funny b/c most people say RoR made them love web development.
> If the D community could organize itself the same way RoR is around
> web dev, I doubt any other web scripting language could pursue
> existence.
no, please
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:41:17 +
James via Digitalmars-d wrote:
just show him vibe.d. it's what node.js wants to be, but failed. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:08:59 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:46:11 -0400, bearophile
What do you think are the reasons I suggested the enhancement for?
To make people write code the way you like? :)
Honestly, it's like you require someone to call a f
Steven Schveighoffer:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:46:11 -0400, bearophile
What do you think are the reasons I suggested the enhancement
for?
To make people write code the way you like? :)
Honestly, it's like you require someone to call a function like:
T foo(T)(T t){return t;}
Just so you can se
Am 29.04.2014 19:45, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
On 4/29/2014 11:55 AM, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D
On 4/29/14, 10:18 AM, Kenji Hara via Digitalmars-d wrote:
In future release, non-static const or immutable field will be made an
instance field.
struct S
{
immutable int x = 1;
}
static assert(S.sizeof == int.sizeof); // will succeed in the future
So current "implicit static" behavior is
On 4/29/2014 11:55 AM, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster out of the box than
hello
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 17:11:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:09:01 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452
brought up a matter I'd forgotten - struct fields that are
immutable and have ini
In future release, non-static const or immutable field will be made an
instance field.
struct S
{
immutable int x = 1;
}
static assert(S.sizeof == int.sizeof); // will succeed in the future
So current "implicit static" behavior is now deprecated.
Related:
http://dlang.org/changelog#staticf
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:09:01 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452 brought up a
matter I'd forgotten - struct fields that are immutable and have
initializer are deprecated.
Why?
I think possibly it has to do with
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:01:44 UTC, logicchains wrote:
As someone who only occasionally uses D and Python, I just
wanted to add as a datapoint that I find the D compilers an
order of magnitude more agreeable than the Python interpreter.
The thought that anybody could actually enjoy signi
A recent discussion
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3452 brought up a
matter I'd forgotten - struct fields that are immutable and have
initializer are deprecated.
Why?
Andrei
This is a compiler bug.
When template parameter C is deduced from the call handler(safeCallback),
the default argument `= "hunter2" should be stripped from the deduced
function pointer type.
Then, the call callback("John"); in handler template function body should
fail to compile always, because
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:55:13 UTC, Etienne wrote:
That's funny b/c most people say RoR made them love web
development.
That's probably because they went into it with very little
experience with the alternatives. I was spoiled by my web.d and
friends, as well as knowing how to use a re
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:52:04 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Instead of the ugly and bug-prone mess of "read(fd, &size,
sizeof(int));" I have used something nicer. "tryRead!uint"
tries to read an uint, and returns a Nullable!uint. The "Maybe"
is a function currently missing in Phobos
(https://
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:55:11AM -0400, Etienne via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
> >really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
> >course, a dynamic site in D ru
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:38:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = "hunter2")
{
writefln("The password is: '%s'", pass);
};
I'm sorry, but can you explain how this lets an attacker learn
anything
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:51:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
For closures for arrays and dicts.
I don't understand
I used the wrong term, I meant list comprehensions. The most
important feature in Python for me. I find it very powerful in
combination with tuples, lists and dicts.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:03:02 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/29/2014 05:52 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am not familiar with the rules.
Perhaps you can just outline for me:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
foo.func(); // works?
}
I
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 15:17:10 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-04-29 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know
how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an
HTML5/
On 04/29/2014 05:52 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am not familiar with the rules.
Perhaps you can just outline for me:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
foo.func(); // works?
}
If this works, then we have a problem.
It does work. Wha
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:47:28 -0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/29/2014 02:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
That is what the DIP says:
"Declarations in the namespace can be accessed without qualification in
the enclosing scope if there is no ambiguity. Ambiguity issues can be
resolved by adding
On 2014-04-29 11:27 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me really,
really miss the high productivity and ease of use D offers. (And, of
course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster out of the box than
hello world served by Rails, zero effort in o
On 04/29/2014 02:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
That is what the DIP says:
"Declarations in the namespace can be accessed without qualification in
the enclosing scope if there is no ambiguity. Ambiguity issues can be
resolved by adding the namespace qualifier"
Which then proceeds to show t
On 04/29/2014 01:34 PM, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Building on this knowledge:
module foo;
void func();
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import foo;
import bar;
void main()
{
// Seems like it's ambiguous between foo.func and bar.foo.func.
foo.f
On 4/29/2014 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an HTML5/JavaScript
web developer? I decided to go here to get some goo
I recently started a Ruby on Rails job and using it makes me
really, really miss the high productivity and ease of use D
offers. (And, of course, a dynamic site in D runs about 3x faster
out of the box than hello world served by Rails, zero effort in
optimization. And "rake test", just shoot me
On 2014-04-29 10:41 AM, James wrote:
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to collaborate
with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I don't know how to
persuade him! How can D be used to greatly assist an HTML5/JavaScript
web developer? I decided to go here to get some go
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 14:53:48 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
I'd say, for a math-oriented language starting position 1 is
more meaningful than starting offset 0, the latter is an idiom
for system programming language, the former better corresponds
to mathematical formalism.
An argument for zero-
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 22:31:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
What's the good of having all arrays always start from index 1
(this is different from Ada, where you can choose the indexing
range and type)?
I'd say, for a math-oriented language starting position 1 is more
meaningful than starting
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 19:34:38 UTC, Kapps wrote:
D can actually do a rather good job of runtime reflection. I
made a runtime reflection module
(https://shardsoft.com/stash/projects/SHARD/repos/shardtools/browse/source/ShardTools/Reflection.d
/ https://shardsoft.com/docs/ShardTools/Reflect
I have a friend that is a web developer. I, however want to
collaborate with him, so I am trying to get him to learn D. I
don't know how to persuade him! How can D be used to greatly
assist an HTML5/JavaScript web developer? I decided to go here to
get some good answers. How can D be used to i
I started using D2 about a year ago. Now all projects make to D2
along with the GUI QtE (Qt bindings own production).
http://qte.ucoz.ru/index/screenshots/0-6
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 13:05:34 UTC, Chris wrote:
As opposed to the fascist intransigence of the Python
interpreter with its ridiculous indent-mania. Maybe you are
only referring to static vs. dynamic typing. Be it a compiler
or an interpreter, they are all inherently stubborn and fond of
Though, here size of data_array is known at compile time, so the
analyzer is sure that it can complain without risk of a false
positive. In real code knowing the size of array is not that easy.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:28:07 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Principally there are a large number of users and installation
and there
is a wealth of support for different user bases from sys admins
to
quants. Python is a relatively small language that is easy to
learn.
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:31:11 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Don't forget dictionary comprehensions and set comprehensions.
Yes, I use dict comprehensions a lot too. I have never used set
comprehensions.
And definitely don't forget generator expressions.
Actually, I d
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:56:18 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
No, he means that WormNAT2 is written in D1 and doesn't used
Vibe.d
Vibe.d is D2 only.
Thanks for the clarification :). It seems my English is a bit
rusty.
John Colvin:
Any reason why this needs language support? I haven't tried it,
but I can't see why it can't be trivially done in a library.
I don't yet know the answer. I have to think more about the
topic, and to try to implement something in library code. And
then I can judge (a bit) if the
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:00:11 -0400, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 2014-04-28 20:50, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4/28/2014 7:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Consider this code:
module foo;
void func() {}
module bar;
extern(C) func();
module prog;
import foo;
Through Reddit I've found a nice blog post, "Using Static
Analysis And Clang To Find Heartbleed":
http://blog.trailofbits.com/2014/04/27/using-static-analysis-and-clang-to-find-heartbleed/
The part about the range analysis is nice:
Ranges of symbol values:
conj_$2{int} : { [-2147483648, -2],
On 2014-04-28 21:06, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4/28/2014 2:00 PM, Simen Kjærås via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I believe Steven expects things to work this way:
module bar;
extern(C++, foo) void func();
module prog;
import bar;
void main()
{
foo.func(); // Calls bar.func (or i
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 10:51 +, via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
> I used the wrong term, I meant list comprehensions. The most
> important feature in Python for me. I find it very powerful in
> combination with tuples, lists and dicts.
Don't forget dictionary comprehensions and set comprehension
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 18:07 +, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
> What features does python, as a language (syntactical preferences
> aside), actually have to recommend it over D (assuming drepl* or
> similar became full-featured)? This is definitely not a
> rhetorical question, it c
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 11:04:38 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
My bet is that D users will be able to produce the same sort of
quick-fix libraries. The newsgroups are dominated by
systems-type people and there is a serious emphasis on
super-low-cost abstractions, but in my opinion D is a more th
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:51:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:45:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Libraries.
not part of the language (unless you count the standard
library. I don't see anything particularly special about
python's standard library).
Hmm… I th
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:45:54 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Libraries.
not part of the language (unless you count the standard
library. I don't see anything particularly special about
python's standard library).
Hmm… I think that for Python, Ruby and Perl, the libraries and
the ecosystems t
-
import std.traits;
import std.stdio;
void handler(C)(C callback)
{
callback("John");
}
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = "hunter2")
{
writefln("The password is: '%s'", pass);
};
handler(safeCallback);
someOtherFunc();
}
void some
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 08:42:53 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 01:21:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 18:36:59 UTC, Radu wrote:
Every time I read anything related to STUN/TURN, it becomes
obvious that these technologies were designed by some
co
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 09:23:03 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,erveryone,
type Tuple!(int,int,int,string) can write[],but can't read[];
module main;
import std.stdio,std.typecons,std.conv;
void main(string[] argv)
{
alias Tuple!(int,int,string) tuple2;
alias Tuple!(int,int
Andrea Fontana:
If I'm right, index should be a compile-time value.
Right. Because tuples in general don't contain N values of the
same type (as in your case), so the compiler has to know
statically the index to compute their position efficiently.
Further similar questions are better asked
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
