On 20 February 2018 at 19:32, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 6:00 PM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> I'm a bit tired of being a bad guy for unknowingly committing a crime
>> by using my email client in the default and completely normal way ;)
>
>
> We'll forgive you if you show up at DCo
On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 05:53:31 Basile B. via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 00:04:16 UTC, Andrei
>
> Alexandrescu wrote:
> > I've been long bothered that the builtin .tupleof and our own
> > abstractions Fields and RepresentationTypeTuple in std.traits -
> > all o
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 00:04:16 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I've been long bothered that the builtin .tupleof and our own
abstractions Fields and RepresentationTypeTuple in std.traits -
all omit the essential information of field offsets. That makes
types that use align() to have
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 at 17:49:33 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
What do people think of adding an argument to DMD to add
library search paths? Currently the only way I know how to do
this would be via linker-specific flags, i.e.
GCC: -L-L/usr/lib
MSVC: -L-libpath:C:\mylibs
OPTLINK: -L+C:\
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 19:51:54 Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 7:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 19:20:27 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On 2/20/2018 4:26 PM, Manu wrote:
> >>> I shouldn't have your
On 02/20/2018 07:34 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/18/18 4:52 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 19:37:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 2/17/18 9:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/17/2018 09:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I found this also works
On 2/20/2018 7:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 19:20:27 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 2/20/2018 4:26 PM, Manu wrote:
I shouldn't have your email
address in the reply-to header (as Jonathan has noted multiple times).
I do that delibera
On 2/20/2018 6:00 PM, Manu wrote:
Hey Brad; is it possible to strip out the HTML copy from emails before
distribution?
I'm a bit tired of being a bad guy for unknowingly committing a crime
by using my email client in the default and completely normal way ;)
Yes, mailman can filter messages and
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 19:20:27 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 4:26 PM, Manu wrote:
> > I shouldn't have your email
> > address in the reply-to header (as Jonathan has noted multiple times).
>
> I do that deliberately as a service to those who wish to contact me
> pri
On 2/20/2018 5:09 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
Jonathan alerted me to the issue a couple days ago and I've been looking into
this today. It's due to a behavior change between versions of mailman used on
the old (being a relative term.. been a few months now) mail server and the
current mail server.
On 2/20/2018 4:32 PM, Manu wrote:
It's configurable... what seems to happen though, is that occasionally
my setting resets.
Perhaps google updates gmail and it resets some settings like that? I
dunno. I don't notice when the setting resets, but Walter does.
I notice because the Thunderbird news
On 2/20/2018 6:00 PM, Manu wrote:
I'm a bit tired of being a bad guy for unknowingly committing a crime
by using my email client in the default and completely normal way ;)
We'll forgive you if you show up at DConf so I can buy you a good Bavarian beer!
On 2/20/2018 4:26 PM, Manu wrote:
I shouldn't have your email
address in the reply-to header (as Jonathan has noted multiple times).
I do that deliberately as a service to those who wish to contact me privately
about something I posted, which happens now and then.
I subscribe to the mailin
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 21:31:03 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
https://github.com/Syniurge/Calypso now allows catch C++
exceptions from D handlers (on OSX and linux at least)
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I'm piecewise migrating one of my old C++ pr
On Tuesday, 6 February 2018 at 17:49:33 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
What do people think of adding an argument to DMD to add
library search paths? Currently the only way I know how to do
this would be via linker-specific flags, i.e.
GCC: -L-L/usr/lib
MSVC: -L-libpath:C:\mylibs
OPTLINK: -L+C:\
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 15:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
dmd -X spits out the json file with a list of functions and
classes and other stuff. Then you can just filter that.
'dmd -X' looks like the perfect solution for my need. thanks.
On 20 February 2018 at 17:09, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 4:53 PM, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 00:32:54 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 February 2018 at 02:05, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
>>> wrote:
Now, the do
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:40:16 UTC, bauss wrote:
I should probably have put an example usage to show how it's
used:
This makes we want to go back and program in C again ;-)
(but thanks for taking the time to demo/explain)
On 2/20/2018 4:53 PM, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 00:32:54 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 20 February 2018 at 02:05, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Now, the double-posting with both text and html is another matter
entirely
but if the NG really doesn't
want
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 00:32:54 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 20 February 2018 at 02:05, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now, the double-posting with both text and html is another
matter entirely
but if the NG really doesn't
want the html version of the email, it would be easy for
On 20 February 2018 at 02:05, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> Now, the double-posting with both text and html is another matter entirely
> and certainly something that's the fault of the e-mail client. I don't know
> how configurable that is with gmail though. Webmail tends to want t
On 20 February 2018 at 01:23, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> It's annoying because I do not know if he intended to send me private email
> or intended it to be public on the forum. It doesn't sound like he intended
> to send these private emails, making it a problem with his client. I
On 19 February 2018 at 21:16, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> On 02/19/2018 03:52 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Feb. 2018 10:25 pm, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d" <
>> digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/2018 7:52 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
>>
>>>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:08:37PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Does gmail even have an NNTP client?
>
> He wrote: "Apparently gmail has a new trick... reply to thread ==
> reply-all."
AFAIK, Google Groups has an NNTP interface
On 2/20/2018 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Does gmail even have an NNTP client?
He wrote: "Apparently gmail has a new trick... reply to thread == reply-all."
On 2/20/2018 6:23 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
P.S. yes, Walter, I created a bugzilla for this :)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18380
You da man, Steve! :-)
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 15:08:04 aberba via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:10:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Hmm. I'm glad its available in dub. Not helpful to those not
> using dub though. Beginners too.
Well, ideally, std.json would be replaced
https://github.com/Syniurge/Calypso now allows catch C++ exceptions
from D handlers (on OSX and linux at least)
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> I'm piecewise migrating one of my old C++ projects to D, and one of the
> major issues right now is exception han
I'm piecewise migrating one of my old C++ projects to D, and one of the
major issues right now is exception handling.
What's the state of C++ exception support right now? Is it safe for a D
function (called from C++ code) to throw an exception, and have the
stack unwind through the C++ call stack
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 18:41:08 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 18:33:23 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
@timotheecour and I came up with a solution to a common
problem:
How to represent multiple files in a forum post?
... and now it's available on run.dlang.io:
https
see https://forum.dlang.org/post/p3bdp1$2b4e$1...@digitalmars.com [Tuple DIP]
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:01 AM, valmat via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> Hi there!
> I just started learn D.
> First it is greatful language.
> But unfortunatly it doesn't have variable destructuring syntax.
> Like this:
> `
Hi there!
I just started learn D.
First it is greatful language.
But unfortunatly it doesn't have variable destructuring syntax.
Like this:
```
auto x,y,z = tuple(26, "hi", 'a');
auto x,y,z = [1,2,3];
auto x,y,z = anyRange;
```
Because it is convenient i wrote my own implementation of this
opport
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 18:33:23 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
@timotheecour and I came up with a solution to a common problem:
How to represent multiple files in a forum post?
... and now it's available on run.dlang.io:
https://run.dlang.io/is/ZHm2Xe
This means that it can be used
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:27:08 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option
to output a list of functions. (I don't really expect many will
warm to that idea.)
Does anyone know of any tool that could do such a thing?
I just want of a list
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
A lot of dynamic languages do too
def foo(): # python
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:10:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Hmm. I'm glad its available in dub. Not helpful to those not
using dub though. Beginners too.
On 2/18/18 3:01 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, February 18, 2018 19:42:07 Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d wrote:
There are hundreds of lines I need to molest to make the
compiler shut up. I won't type another line of code on my
colour library until this noise is gone... I will not mainta
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:15:57 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 13:04:42 psychoticRabbit via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
>
> wrote:
> > fn string creater() pure {
> >
> > return "void func() {}";
> >
> > }
> >
> > so now I'm just looking for lines that begin with fn. the
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 13:39:17 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why. Ther
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why. There are plenty of functions, classes and
structs that simply
psychoticRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
So the point is moot.
ok. I've come around... and the point reall is moot.
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option to output a
list of functions. (I don't really expect many w
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
So the point is moot.
ok. I've come around... and the point reall is moot.
so.. in that case..another idea...how about a compiler option to
output a list of functions. (I don't really expect many will warm
to that idea.)
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 07:54:49 UTC, Suliman wrote:
I like D, but sometimes it's look like for me too complicated.
Go have a lot of fans even it not simple, but primitive. But
some D futures make it very hard to learning.
Small list by me:
1. mixins
2. inout
3. too many attributes like:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:55:31 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
fn string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
so now I'm just looking for lines that begin with fn. the mixin
doesn't matter.
oh... I think I might have misunderstood your point ... due to
not understanding
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:45:25 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
string creater() pure {
return "void func() {}";
}
mixin(creator());
That is why. There are plenty of functions, classes and structs
that simply won't exist in the form of syntax until you execute
CTFE.
I think I
On 20/02/2018 12:35 PM, psychoRabbit wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
You need a fully implemented frontend to get anything proper in terms
of parsing for D.
We're not talking about syntax highlighting here.
So the point is moot.
Why is the point (
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 12:18:47 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
You need a fully implemented frontend to get anything proper in
terms of parsing for D.
We're not talking about syntax highlighting here.
So the point is moot.
Why is the point (about being able to more easily find function
On 2/18/18 4:52 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 19:37:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/17/18 9:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/17/2018 09:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I found this also works:
static foreach(alias x; S.tupleof)
{
writeln(x
On 2/19/18 6:18 AM, Nathan S. wrote:
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 12:49:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/16/2018 10:10 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
Could use the name for the field as well. At the minimum useful for
debugging purposes.
That would be tricky because fields are decomp
On 20/02/2018 12:15 PM, psychoticRabbit wrote:
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given compilers in
many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else seems to have an annot
I've noticed that Go and Rust annotate functions.
func (in go)
fn (in rust)
I was kind of wondering why they made that choice, given
compilers in many languages do not.
Would this be a useful feature in D?
Everything else seems to have an annotation (e.g structs,
classes.) So why not functi
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 11:55:54 bauss via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 09:20:15 UTC, aberba wrote:
> > I've taken a close look at the Api and its looks good. Its been
> > around for a while. Why is it not yet in phobos?
> >
> > https://code.dlang.org/packages/std_da
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 09:20:15 UTC, aberba wrote:
I've taken a close look at the Api and its looks good. Its been
around for a while. Why is it not yet in phobos?
https://code.dlang.org/packages/std_data_json
As far as I remember it's because Andrei isn't satisfied with the
impleme
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 09:20:15 UTC, aberba wrote:
I've taken a close look at the Api and its looks good. Its been
around for a while. Why is it not yet in phobos?
https://code.dlang.org/packages/std_data_json
To add some context, it was proposed in 2015 for review [1] and
some ins
On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 01:19:55 UTC, psychoticRabbit
wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 16:04:11 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
Psychotic rabbit disturbed by programming related video.
In other news
don't poke the rabbit.
To keep positive mind you should try to increase your follow
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 01:23:32 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 2/19/2018 10:40 PM, Tobias Müller wrote:
> > Is he even using NNTP? Or maybe the mailing list Interface?
>
> He's using gmail's NNTP client. It's simply not possible for us to control
> it, any more than we can fix
I've taken a close look at the Api and its looks good. Its been
around for a while. Why is it not yet in phobos?
https://code.dlang.org/packages/std_data_json
On 2/19/2018 10:40 PM, Tobias Müller wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
>> On 02/19/2018 03:52 AM, Manu wrote:
>>> On 18 Feb. 2018 10:25 pm, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d" <
>>> digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2018 7:52 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Well, i
On Monday, 19 February 2018 at 12:29:12 UTC, Jayam wrote:
In production server, we need to run Dlang app as service.
The Heroku tour Seb wrote about above is one easy way to host a
serverside app (if that's what you're looking for). However,
serverside apps need someone sort of database so y
60 matches
Mail list logo
