Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-27 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 27 December 2018 at 08:25:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 02:13 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] Wow, you've really gone off the deep end now. First you lie that I presented no data, then when called out, start claiming defamation and talk

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-26 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 26 December 2018 at 09:34:48 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 05:07 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] I wrote. I have never called anyone any name or insult in anything I wrote. I have used a pejorative for a type of argument that was being used

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-26 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 26 December 2018 at 16:56:17 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 09:45 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] Wtf are you talking about? I've never emailed you in my life. If you mean in this forum thread, quote what you think is "personal abus

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-26 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 26 December 2018 at 09:34:48 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 05:07 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] I wrote. I have never called anyone any name or insult in anything I wrote. I have used a pejorative for a type of argument that was being used

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-25 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 at 23:09:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/25/2018 10:54 AM, Joakim wrote: [...] It's fine that you disagree with others, and it's ok when you insult me, but when you insult others it's time to stop. It's not clear what you're referring to, since you quote

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-25 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 at 11:27:29 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 at 05:01:43 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Monday, 24 December 2018 at 22:22:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: The 0.1% of the community that attend seem to like it, the vast majority don't, or at least

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-25 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 December 2018 at 07:10:46 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: On 25/12/2018 6:01 PM, Joakim wrote: See my responses to Nicholas above, I don't think the Android port merits a talk. By the same standards I apply to others' talks above, I don't think my work merits a talk either. ;) A

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-24 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 24 December 2018 at 22:22:08 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 12/24/18 2:44 AM, Joakim wrote: On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 22:36:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: Huh? It's their decision, not yours. Even if the decision has no reason at all, it's still theirs. What is the

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
u think we should be going in e.g. w.r.t mobile/ARM/AArch64. I thought about submitting that as a topic last year, but it's better done on the forum, as I've been doing. On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 15:32:41 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:05, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 10:07:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/22/2018 10:20 PM, Joakim wrote: Honestly, yours are routinely the worst presentations at DConf. Your strength as a presenter is when you dig deeply into a bunch of technical detail or present some new technical paradigm,

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 09:51:58 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 08:08:59 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 06:54:26 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Others have cited Rust and Go. I shall cite Python, Ruby, Groovy, Java, Kotlin, Clojure, Haskell, all

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 09:36:19 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2018-12-23 at 08:08 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] This questioning of iOS is so removed from reality that it makes me question if you are qualified to comment on this matter at all. iOS

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 23 December 2018 at 06:54:26 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Sat, 2018-12-22 at 13:46 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: […] Given that this conference format is dying off, is there any explanation for why the D team wants to continue this antiquated ritual? https

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 22:13:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 12/22/2018 6:26 AM, Atila Neves wrote: If you don't like conferences you don't have to go. I for one am excited about being in London in May. Please don't sour it for other who think/feel like I do. That's right. And

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 17:36:08 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 16:57:10 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 16:35:27 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote: Also I don't think this is the right place for this discussion. If you feel that we indeed need

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 17:13:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 16:57:10 UTC, Joakim wrote: I'm not trying to discuss it with you or the community. I'm asking the D team who're making this decision why it's being made, despite all the reasoning in that

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 16:35:27 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 15:11:10 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 14:26:29 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 13:46:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 14:26:29 UTC, Atila Neves wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 13:46:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 12:18:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The egregious waste of time and resources of this DConf format strongly signals that D is not a

Re: DConf 2019: Shepherd's Pie Edition

2018-12-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 December 2018 at 12:18:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Thanks to Symmetry Investments, DConf is heading to London! We're still ironing out the details, but I've been sitting on this for weeks and, now that we have a venue, I just can't keep quiet about it any longer. I've updated

Re: LDC 1.13.0

2018-12-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 15:57:25 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce LDC 1.13: * Based on D 2.083.1. * The Windows packages are now fully self-sufficient, i.e., a Visual Studio/C++ Build Tools installation isn't required anymore. * Substantial debug info improvements. * New

Re: Liran Zvibel of WekaIO on using D to Create the World’s Fastest File System

2018-12-09 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 19:59:46 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 09:04:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: #4 on HackerNews front page! https://news.ycombinator.com/ 33 points at the moment! Now one of the top-voted links on the front page of HN. I'd just like to

Re: I've just released Vasaro

2018-12-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 at 20:45:07 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote: Hi! I've just released the first version of vasaro. It's a simple program I wrote to create 3d printable vases. It's written in D (of course). It uses derelict-gl, derelict-sdl and gtkd. It should work on linux, macOS and

Re: Liran Zvibel of WekaIO on using D to Create the World’s Fastest File System

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 09:04:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: #4 on HackerNews front page! https://news.ycombinator.com/ 33 points at the moment! Now one of the top-voted links on the front page of HN. I'd just like to point out that Andrei put Liran and I together to do this

D is in GCC 9 proggit thread

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
For those who missed it: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/a30hg9/gcc_9_adds_frontend_support_for_the_d_programming/

Re: Interview with Liran Zvibel of WekaIO

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 13:30:21 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 08:02:21 UTC, M.M. wrote: On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 at 14:21:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: [...] Interesting read. I am new to dlang, and after reading the post, I asked myself: the company liked

Re: Interview with Liran Zvibel of WekaIO

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 08:02:21 UTC, M.M. wrote: On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 at 14:21:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim interviewed Liran for the D Blog about their file system, Matrix, and their use of D. Thanks to Joakim for putting it together, and to Liran for taking the time to

Re: Liran Zvibel of WekaIO on using D to Create the World’s Fastest File System

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 09:04:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: #4 on HackerNews front page! https://news.ycombinator.com/ 33 points at the moment! It's on lobste.rs now too: https://lobste.rs/t/d Thanks, Atila!

Re: Liran Zvibel of WekaIO on using D to Create the World’s Fastest File System

2018-12-05 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 09:04:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: #4 on HackerNews front page! https://news.ycombinator.com/ 33 points at the moment! Fantastic, I want to get more commercial uses like this highlighted on the blog- started another interview now with a financial/ML firm

Re: Interview with Liran Zvibel of WekaIO

2018-12-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 at 06:50:13 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 at 17:15:44 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 at 14:21:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Great to see this finally up! I agree with the only proggit comment though: the title is not

Re: Interview with Liran Zvibel of WekaIO

2018-12-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 at 14:21:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim interviewed Liran for the D Blog about their file system, Matrix, and their use of D. Thanks to Joakim for putting it together, and to Liran for taking the time to participate! Blog:

Re: LDC 1.13.0-beta2

2018-11-29 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 16:54:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 16:36:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 01:25:53PM +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 at 10:43:55 UTC, kinke wrote: > Glad to annou

Re: D compilation is too slow and I am forking the compiler

2018-11-27 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 16:42:40 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 16:21:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: I agree that it was a risky title, as many who don't know D will simply see it and go, "Yet another slow compiler, eh, I'll pass" and not click on the link. Whereas others

Re: D compilation is too slow and I am forking the compiler

2018-11-26 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 26 November 2018 at 16:00:36 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 04:48:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 at 20:51:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Unfortunately, you're right. The title will leave the impression "D is slow at

Re: LDC 1.13.0-beta2

2018-11-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 16:36:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 01:25:53PM +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 at 10:43:55 UTC, kinke wrote: > Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.13: > > * Based on

Re: LDC 1.13.0-beta2

2018-11-22 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 at 10:43:55 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the second beta for LDC 1.13: * Based on D 2.083.0+ (yesterday's DMD stable). * The Windows packages are now fully self-sufficient, i.e., a Visual Studio/C++ Build Tools installation isn't required anymore. *

Re: DMD backend now in D

2018-11-13 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 at 20:42:00 UTC, Temtaime wrote: On Monday, 12 November 2018 at 02:37:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 11/11/2018 3:58 PM, Mike Franklin wrote: This is a significant milestone.  Congratulations, Walter! Many people helped out with this, too. There are still a few

Re: DIP 1015--Deprecation of Implicit Conversion of Int. & Char. Literals to bool--Formal Assement

2018-11-12 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 12 November 2018 at 17:25:15 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote: On Monday, 12 November 2018 at 16:39:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Walter and Andrei take the position that this is incorrect the wrong way to view a bool. Unfortunately you did not include their justification for this position

Re: The New Fundraising Campaign

2018-11-10 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 10 November 2018 at 16:09:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I've just published a new blog post describing our new fundraising campaign. TL;DR: We want to pay a Pull Request Manager to thin out the pull request queues and coordinate between relevant parties on newer pull requests so they

Re: Profiling DMD's Compilation Time with dmdprof

2018-11-08 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 08:29:28 UTC, Manu wrote: On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:10 AM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via > Digitalmars-d-announce &g

Re: Backend nearly entirely converted to D

2018-11-08 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 21:40:58 UTC, welkam wrote: On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 14:39:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: I don't know why you think that would matter: I'm using the same compilers to build each DMD version and comparing the build times as the backend was translated to D

Re: Profiling DMD's Compilation Time with dmdprof

2018-11-08 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:54:56 UTC, Manu wrote: On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 06:08:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: > It was definitely about 4 seconds not too long ago, a few > years at

Re: Profiling DMD's Compilation Time with dmdprof

2018-11-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 07:41:58 UTC, Manu wrote: On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:30 PM Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via > Digitalmars-d-announce &g

Re: Profiling DMD's Compilation Time with dmdprof

2018-11-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 8 November 2018 at 04:16:44 UTC, Manu wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...] "Indeed, a clean build of DMD itself (about 170’000 lines of D and 120’000 lines of C/C++) takes no longer than 4 seconds to build on a

Re: Backend nearly entirely converted to D

2018-11-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 15:12:13 UTC, Dukc wrote: On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 14:39:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: I don't know why you think that would matter: I'm using the same compilers to build each DMD version and comparing the build times as the backend was translated to D.

Re: Backend nearly entirely converted to D

2018-11-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 11:22:13 UTC, Dukc wrote: On Wednesday, 7 November 2018 at 08:31:21 UTC, Joakim wrote: I just benchmarked building the last couple versions of DMD, when most of the backend was converted to D, by building them with the latest DMD 2.083.0 official release and

Re: Backend nearly entirely converted to D

2018-11-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 22:12:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: With the recent merging of the last of the big files machobj.d: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8911 I'm happy to say we're over the hump in converting the backend to D! Great! Although I wish it didn't have to be you

Re: Lost in Translation: Encapsulation

2018-11-06 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 15:14:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Last week, inspired by another discussion in these forums about D's private-to-the-module form of encapsulation, I spent a few hours putting a new article together for the blog. Ali, Joakim, Nicholas helped me get it in shape.

Re: LDC 1.13.0-beta1

2018-11-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 2 November 2018 at 21:04:13 UTC, kinke wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.13: * Based on D 2.083.0. * The Windows packages are now fully self-sufficient, i.e., a Visual Studio/C++ Build Tools installation isn't required anymore. * Substantial debug info improvements

Re: smile.amazon.com Promotion

2018-10-31 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 at 03:18:44 UTC, SealabJaster wrote: On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 16:40:20 UTC, FooledDonor wrote: On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 16:01:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: One of the easiest ways to support the D Language Foundation is using smile.amazon.com when you make a

Re: Add D front-end, libphobos library, and D2 testsuite... to GCC

2018-10-30 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 29 October 2018 at 09:57:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 10/28/2018 8:43 PM, Mike Parker wrote: Congratulations are in order for Iain Buclaw. His efforts have been rewarded in a big way. Last Friday, he got the greenlight to move forward with submitting his changes into GCC:

Re: New Initiative for Donations

2018-10-27 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 26 October 2018 at 17:20:08 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:19:29 +, Joakim wrote: On Friday, 26 October 2018 at 05:47:05 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:38:08 +, Joakim wrote: As with D, sometimes the new _is_ better, so perhaps you

Re: New Initiative for Donations

2018-10-26 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 26 October 2018 at 05:47:05 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 02:38:08 +, Joakim wrote: As with D, sometimes the new _is_ better, so perhaps you shouldn't assume old is better either. There's no assuming going on. Cryptocurrencies are worse than credit cards for

Re: New Initiative for Donations

2018-10-25 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 at 22:35:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 10:25:17 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 10:18:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 24 October 2018 at 10:12:50 UTC, Joakim wrote: Any effort underway to take

Re: shared - i need it to be useful

2018-10-21 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:22:19 UTC, Manu wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote: >> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit >>

Re: Interesting Observation from JAXLondon

2018-10-20 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 01:12:44 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: On 10/12/18 4:05 AM, Vijay Nayar wrote: But the D community has also been very receptive of changes to the language The community is. I don't feel like it's been true of the leadership for some years now (and I

Re: Need help with setting up LDC to cross-compile to Android/ARM

2018-10-20 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
36PM +0000, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 21:23:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > I'm trying to follow the instructions on this page: > > https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android [...] On a side note, the last section on that page mentions not knowing how t

Re: Need help with setting up LDC to cross-compile to Android/ARM

2018-10-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 20:50:36 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 21:23:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: I'm trying to follow the instructions on this page: https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android [...] Hmm, that's weird: can you extract the full compiler

Re: Need help with setting up LDC to cross-compile to Android/ARM

2018-10-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 21:23:21 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: I'm trying to follow the instructions on this page: https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android [...] Hmm, that's weird: can you extract the full compiler command for that file? For example, if you use Ninja, by

[OT] Android

2018-10-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 19:37:24 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:09:42PM +, Patrick Schluter via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...] I often have the impression that a lot of things are going slower than necessary because a mentality where the perfect is in the way of

Re: Interfacing D with C: Arrays Part 1

2018-10-18 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 15:20:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I had intended to publish the next GC series post early this month, but after many revisions and discussions with a couple of reviewers, I've decided to put it on hold until something gets worked out about the conflation of

Re: shared - i need it to be useful

2018-10-17 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 23:12:48 UTC, Manu wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:15 PM Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 19:25:33 UTC, Manu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:05 PM Stanislav Blinov via > Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> On Wednesday,

Re: Interesting Observation from JAXLondon

2018-10-12 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 12 October 2018 at 07:13:33 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 13:00 +, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] Suggestions? My guess is that the reason they've heard of those languages is because their developers were writing small projects using Go and Rust, but

Re: Interesting Observation from JAXLondon

2018-10-11 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 12:22:19 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote: On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 11:50:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 07:58:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: This was supposed to come to this list not the learn list. On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 07:57 +0100, Russel

Re: Interesting Observation from JAXLondon

2018-10-11 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 07:58:39 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: This was supposed to come to this list not the learn list. On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 07:57 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: It seems that in the modern world of Cloud and Kubernetes, and the charging model of the Cloud vendors, that the

Re: Iain Buclaw at GNU Tools Cauldron 2018

2018-10-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 7 October 2018 at 15:41:43 UTC, greentea wrote: Date: September 7 to 9, 2018. Location: Manchester, UK GDC - D front-end GCC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXRJJ_lrSxE Thanks for the link, just watched the whole video. The first half-hour sets the standard as an intro to the

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 10:02:28 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 08:06 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] The link in my OP links to a guy who maintained a spreadsheet of Apple-related conferences as evidence. He lists several that went away and says nothing

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:54:29 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:06:24 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:53:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: [...] Did anybody pay attention to the live talks either? ;) That's the real comparison. Anyway, the

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:12:03 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 18:46 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] I don't doubt that some are like you and prefer viewing live, but given how conferences keep dying off and online tech talks are booming, you're

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 17:51:00 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 17:26 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] At least look at the first two bullet points in my post responding to Adam, because you're missing the entire point of my suggestions, which is that certain

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 17:13:51 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 16:21:45 UTC, Joakim wrote: Like most of the responses in this thread, I have no idea why you're stumping for in-person interaction, when all my suggestions were geared around having _more

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 11:48:06 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 06:26:30 UTC, Joakim wrote: I'm sure some thought and planning is now going into the next DConf, so I'd like to make sure people are aware that the conference format that DConf uses is dying off, as

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 01:28:37 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: On 10/2/18 4:34 AM, Joakim wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:39:14 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: On 10/1/18 11:26 PM, Joakim wrote: [snip] I disagree. It is not clear what you disagree with, since almost nothing you say has

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 16:10:20 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 15:42:20 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 15:03:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: That is what Joakim is talking about - changing the main event to be more like the after-hours stuff

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 15:03:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: That is what Joakim is talking about - changing the main event to be more like the after-hours stuff everyone loves so much, to actually use all the time to maximize the potential of in-person time. I'm talking about growing

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 14:49:31 UTC, bachmeier wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 06:26:30 UTC, Joakim wrote: "Once the videos are all up, set up weekend meetups in several cities [all over the world], where a few livestreamed talks may talk place if some speakers don't want to spend

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 10:37:44 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 06:26:30 UTC, Joakim wrote: [...] As I'm sure has been said before, if it were just the talks it probably wouldn't be worth it. But conferences are sooo much more than just the talks.

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:39:14 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote: On 10/1/18 11:26 PM, Joakim wrote: [snip] I disagree. It is not clear what you disagree with, since almost nothing you say has any bearing on my original post. To summarize, I suggest changing the currently talk-driven DConf

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 08:21:11 UTC, maarten van damme wrote: While I have never attended dconf itself, conferences itself usually aren't about the talks but about the people you meet and get to interact with. Since this thread is about replacing the outdated DConf format with two

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 08:08:38 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 07:32:58 UTC, Joakim wrote: Thank you for making clear that the real reason you and some others like the current format is because you want to have a fun "vacation"- as I pointed out in that

Re: Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 07:14:54 UTC, bauss wrote: On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 06:26:30 UTC, Joakim wrote: [...] I highly disagree with this. I love conferences and meetups. It's good socially and a conference is not 100% just about the topic it hosts. I think you didn't read

Please don't do a DConf 2018, consider alternatives

2018-10-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
I'm sure some thought and planning is now going into the next DConf, so I'd like to make sure people are aware that the conference format that DConf uses is dying off, as explained here: https://marco.org/2018/01/17/end-of-conference-era There was a discussion about this in a previous forum

Re: Funny way to crash dmd and brick the whole computer

2018-10-01 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 11:58:25 UTC, Zardoz wrote: CTE fib : module fib_cte; import std.stdio; long fib(long n) { if (n <= 1) return 1; return fib(n - 1) + fib(n - 2); } static immutable valueFib = fib(46); void main() { writeln(valueFib); } I tried it on Android with LDC,

Re: DlangUI and android

2018-09-24 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 09:19:52 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote: Is there an emulator that can run the apks? Android emulator does not work, I suppose, because it isn't java. Complains about a missing classes.dex file. It isn't clear what you're trying to do: you're trying to run a D apk

Re: Webassembly TodoMVC

2018-09-23 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:51:48 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote: [...] Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was just the easiest way for me to get it up and running. [...] Vladimir mentioned that

Re: Updating D beyond Unicode 2.0

2018-09-21 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 20:25:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: When I originally started with D, I thought non-ASCII identifiers with Unicode was a good idea. I've since slowly become less and less enthusiastic about it. First off, D source text simply must (and does) fully support

Re: Jai compiles 80,000 lines of code in under a second

2018-09-20 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 00:47:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Of course, D can also take ages to compile one line of code. It all depends on that that line is doing... ctfe and templates are slow. C or Java style code compiling in D is very fast. I was going to say this too, ie how much

dub auto-tester

2018-09-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 04:16:41 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 02:51:52 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 01:27:20 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: Not on dlang.org anywhere, but I built a crude version of this. Results are available

Re: LLVM 7.0.0 no mention of D anymore

2018-09-19 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote: http://releases.llvm.org/7.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-7 no mention of D anymore :( http://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#external-open-source-projects-using-llvm-6

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-18 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 18:06:37 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 07:53:31 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 22:27:41 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 15:47:14 UTC, Joakim wrote: Not sure why that matters if you

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-18 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 22:27:41 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote: On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 15:47:14 UTC, Joakim wrote: Not sure why that matters if you agree with Kay that HTML is an abortion? :) I actually think it's great that mobile is killing off the web, as the Comscore usage

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-17 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 15:41:41 UTC, tide wrote: On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 15:11:42 UTC, Joakim wrote: I say that almost 30% drop in PC sales over the last 7 years is mostly due to the rise of mobile. I think a large part of it is that PCs got fast enough for most people about

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-16 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 10:25:30 UTC, Dave Jones wrote: On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 04:47:11 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 01:03:27 UTC, Dave Jones wrote: I know a lot of people who did, which explains the 28% drop in PC sales since they peaked in 2011, the

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-15 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 at 01:03:27 UTC, Dave Jones wrote: On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 15:25:55 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 09:23:24 UTC, Dave Jones wrote: On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 22:56:31 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at

Re: A Brief Intro to the SAoC Projects

2018-09-15 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 15 September 2018 at 07:47:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I've posted to the blog a brief introduction to the projects that were selected for the Symmetry Autumn of Code. As the event goes on, I hope to provide more details about the projects and the individuals working on them. The

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-15 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 09:23:24 UTC, Dave Jones wrote: On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 22:56:31 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 22:41:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: On 09/10/2018 11:13 PM, tide wrote: On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 13:43:46 UTC,

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-14 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 16:53:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 14 September 2018 at 09:51, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 22:41:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 12 September 2018 at 10:09, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: I think their model of having

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-14 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 22:41:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 12 September 2018 at 10:09, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: I think their model of having an open ISA with proprietary extensions will inevitably win out for hardware, just as a similar model has basically won already

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-13 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 22:41:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: On 09/10/2018 11:13 PM, tide wrote: On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 13:43:46 UTC, Joakim wrote: That's why PC sales keep dropping while mobile sales are now 6-7X that per year: This shouldn't be misunderstood

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-12 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 15:38:36 UTC, Joakim wrote: the world is right now? It's not IBM, Apple, Whoops, meant to write Intel here, but wrote Apple again. :D

Re: Mobile is the new PC and AArch64 is the new x64

2018-09-12 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 06:41:38 UTC, Gambler wrote: On 9/10/2018 9:43 AM, Joakim wrote: Yes, I know, these devices won't replace your quad-core Xeon workstation with 32-64 GBs of RAM anytime soon, but most people don't need anywhere near that level of compute. That's why PC sales

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >