What's the best source of DConf videos at the moment? Are there
are any edited versions released?
I'd like to share some of my favourite talks.
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 22:39:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 22:11:53 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I can think of many variants of for this. What about
{ yes, // 1 chance
no, // 0 chance
likely, // > 1/2 chance
unlikely, // < 1/2 chance
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 18:47:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 05/24/2016 02:03 PM, Thiez wrote:
Does the
experience help someone getting a job in the industry?
Probably not, again with the same caveat. I speculate
experience with one of the other CSS scripting engines would
also
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:53:17 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
With UTF-8 problems happened on a massive scale in LAMP setups:
mysql used latin1 as a default encoding and almost everything
worked fine.
^ latin-1 with Swedish collation rules.
And even if you set the encoding to "utf8", almost
On Friday, 6 May 2016 at 14:53:15 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Other places would certainly be interesting (e.g. Japan or
Australia), and we definitely have devs in such places, but I
don't know if we have enough likely attendees in such areas to
make them make sense, since picking somewhere
To add to the list, here are a couple of other online judges that
explicitly support D:
http://www.spoj.com/
http://judge.u-aizu.ac.jp/onlinejudge/
Of course, if you use a language-agnostic platform like Code Jam,
you can do what you like. Project Euler (maths-oriented) and the
Matasano
On Wednesday, 13 July 2016 at 10:02:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
«Undefined» simply means that such code is not part of the
specified language, as in, it is no longer the language
covered. The optimizer is an implementation detail, the
optimizer is not allowed to change the semantics of
On Monday, 11 July 2016 at 22:09:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/10/2016 10:07 PM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
[Snip stuff about Scheme]
Scheme is a really nice, elegant language that's fun to hack
with, but at the end of the day, if people were writing Nginx, or
the Windows kernel, or HFT
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 13:45:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/6/16 6:40 AM, sarn wrote:
What's the best source of DConf videos at the moment? Are
there are any
edited versions released?
I'd like to share some of my favourite talks.
They are starting to arrive!
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 22:35:03 UTC, qznc wrote:
However, I'm not sure if "finding reviewers" is the bottleneck?
Not everything applies because Google doesn't host its repo on
Github (obviously), but code ownership works very well there. It
helps avoid the bystander effect, and
I do consulting based in Sydney. Feel free to contact me if you
ever need any more help.
s...@theartofmachinery.com
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 01:53:21 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Pragma msg can only print compiletime constants.
While __ctfeWriteln can print state while doing CTFE.
Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. Just to check, it prints to
standard error, right?
Also, the issue of non-deterministic
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 00:04:16 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I recently implemented __ctfeWriteln.
Sounds like pragma msg. How does it compare?
https://dlang.org/spec/pragma.html#msg
On Thursday, 15 September 2016 at 10:13:47 UTC, cym13 wrote:
DoS by collision attack are a form of preimage. The idea is to
generate intentional collisions to force heavy computations on
serveur side. It only works if finding collisions many
collisions for the same hash is cheap which is
On Sunday, 9 October 2016 at 20:33:29 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Something coming to mind is the idea of making a small
algorithm to be used with other already existing encryption
functions to extend the blocksize of encryption with minimal
complexity growth. In theory this would extend a
On Wednesday, 26 October 2016 at 10:48:34 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
On a more controversial note, I sometimes replace nested blocks
of conditionals and loops with flat spaghetti code and goto
with verbose labels. There are situations where you can explain
straight forward what needs to be done
On Monday, 10 October 2016 at 09:54:32 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
The largest portion would be that much like a hash, one small
change will change the entire thing rather than a smaller
portion (with the original blocksize). The multiple
re-arranging and encryption steps is to ensure small
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:58:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I was thinking it would be handy if tuples had a way to access
a field by name at runtime. E.g.:
Tuple!(int, "a", double, "b") t;
string x = condition ? "a" : "b";
double v = t.get!string(x, 3.14);
The get method takes the
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 16:12:38 UTC, D.Rex wrote:
A D port of the Linux Kernel?
https://github.com/whatsthisnow/ProjectD
Any thoughts on the project?
Depends on how strictly you want to reimplement GNU/Linux, or
whether something Posix-y is enough.
Anyway, a D "libc" would be
On Saturday, 10 December 2016 at 22:55:22 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
It's always a bit weird when people talk about "resources" as a
unification of memory, files, sockets, etc. My programs exist
to fill memory and then push bits of memory around. At least
99% of my "resource" usage is heap
On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 02:27:02 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
If it's elidable, it's as good as a bug in the program. Must be
either a compile-time error or a special case. -- Andrei
I can't see it ending well to make it this kind of special case.
For example, one day someone
On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 10:27:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks Yuxuan, sorry for missing this. Can we have this peer
reviewed by 1-2 crypto experts? Thanks! -- Andrei
By API, unpredictableSeed() only returns a 32b uint and will
never meet crypto standards. Beware of anyone who
PSA: please don't feed the trolls.
On Monday, 6 March 2017 at 10:12:09 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Excuse me if I'm asking a trivial question. Why not just seed
it from /dev/urandom? (or equivalent on non-Linux platforms. I
know at least Windows has an equivalent).
Shachar
One reason is that /dev/urandom isn't always
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 15:32:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 11:10:54 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
I started to learn programming (BASIC) with an traditional
home computer in the 80's
(Schneider/Amstrad CPC6128).
The best thing was, you only needed to switch it
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 at 19:32:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Worth a look: https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1781. This
moves comparison code away from tedious runtime-introspected
routines to nice templates. -- Andrei
Great news :)
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 at 02:53:18 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
I'd very much like to hear your thoughts on this, good/bad, if
it already was proposed, anything. If it's found feasible, I
could start a DIP. Destroy, please.
I don't have comments about the syntax, but I did want this
On Friday, 11 August 2017 at 13:06:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
How would you do it if you were using vibe.d?
Depends on who wants it built. I do consulting, so let me answer
that way.
"I don't want to think about ops and scalability and availability
at all!"
Then you'll have to pay a premium
On Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 00:16:50 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We have types that cannot be named (Voldemort types), types
that have no type (void), I suppose that types that cannot
exist will fill out the edge cases of the menagerie.
I assume there is a standard jargon for this - does anyone
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 14:44:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1012 is titled "Attributes".
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1012.md
Like others in this thread have said, it needs more rationale.
The rationale only mentions one actual problem: attributes can't
be undone
On Tuesday, 20 June 2017 at 17:30:43 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
You can write a linker wrapper that will do the analysis you
want, remove unneeded sections, stub symbols etc, see basic
technique at
https://theartofmachinery.com/2016/12/18/d_without_runtime.html
I keep meaning to write an update to
On Saturday, 24 June 2017 at 22:15:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hello, does anyone have traces of allocations from real
applications? Looking for the sequence of calls to malloc,
realloc, and free, e.g.:
0 malloc 128
1 malloc 8192
2 malloc 32
3 free 1
...
Thanks,
Andrei
On *nix
On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 21:38:41 UTC, captaindet wrote:
string a = |q{
firstLine();
if (cond) {
secondLine()
}
};
you could write your own string processing function according
to your needs
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
Therefore, and because of brackets, you can distinguish f(1, 2)
from f([1, 2]).
But in f([1, 2]), it's ambiguous (just by parsing) whether [1, 2]
is a tuple literal or a dynamic array literal.
You'd need to use a prefix or
On Sunday, 15 October 2017 at 15:19:21 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 23:20:26 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
Therefore, and because of brackets, you can distinguish f(1,
2) from f([1, 2]).
But in f([1, 2]), it's
On Friday, 29 September 2017 at 09:56:17 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Friday, 29 September 2017 at 09:12:54 UTC, Don Clugston
wrote:
Guess what this prints
My guess is it prints "1".
By "guess" I mean it, I did not test! Anyway reminds me a lot
of very badly used gotos.
Yeah, it's a lot like
On Thursday, 5 October 2017 at 15:23:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
I think I can state the opinion of many D users here: I don't
mind whether it will be curly braces or round parentheses - the
important thing is that we will be able to use it in the
foreseeable future :)
All my +1s. Let's leave syntax
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 22:17:05 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/22/2017 5:45 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
1. All OS calls with timing requirements use non-floating
point to represent how long to sleep. After all a CPU uses
discrete math, and the timing implementation is no
On Monday, 20 November 2017 at 09:41:16 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 20 November 2017 at 09:15:15 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 11/17/17 17:31, Indigo wrote:
What is your reasoning for coming to the US? You might want
to rethink
this as America is collapsing.
This is news to me, and I
On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 10:10:29 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Checking for types at runtime is a code smell in OOP. Sometimes
necessary, especially if doing multiple dispatch, but never
done gladly. There's already a way to dispatch on type: virtual
functions.
Atila
More on that:
On Friday, 27 April 2018 at 04:06:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
One of the items on my bucket list is to write a "CS Theory for
Programmers" book that actually fills in all this stuff, along
with going easy on the math-theory syntax that you can't
realistically expect programmers
(I'm referring to Scott's 2014 DConf talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAWA1DuvCnQ)
I was actually preparing a DIP about this when Manu posted to the
forums about his own related problems with C++ interop.
I traced a bug in some of my D code to my own misunderstanding of
how D's
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 13:12:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/22/18 9:59 PM, sarn wrote:
* Some code uses __dtor as a way to manually run cleanup code
on an object that will be used again. Putting this cleanup
code into a normal method will cause fewer headaches.
Using __dtor
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 19:28:28 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 01:59:50 UTC, sarn wrote:
The one other usage of these low-level destructor facilities
is checking if a type is a plain old data struct. This is an
important special case for some code, but everyone
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 02:13:13 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
I would consider the current state with classes a bug.
So ticket please, it should not require a DIP to change
(although Walter may disagree).
Unfortunately, the way __dtor and __xdtor work for classes can't
be changed
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 15:43:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Coincidentally, this JUST changed due to a different reason:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/2178
Please file an enhancement request.
I still think it could be better, so I added a further issue:
:18:46 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 23 May 2018 at 15:47, sarn via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 at 02:13:13 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
I would consider the current state with classes a bug.
So ticket please, it should not require a DIP to change
(al
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 21:01:16 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 20:08:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/120
Feedback would be very appreciated.
I was under the impression that Andrei's ProtoObject was
supposed to remedy that:
Just had a thought: attributes are inferred for templates, so
maybe the ProtoObject could have a templated empty destructor. I
don't think this would work with the existing destructor
implementation, but it least it could be possible.
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 20:13:47 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
How is __vdtor is going to be called, via destroy or via
directly?
Code using destroy() can still use destroy(). Otherwise, __vdtor
would be callable in the same way that __dtor and __xdtor are.
The plan is to have a better, safer,
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 07:52:43 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I understand that.
Sorry, not for nothing, but you obviously don't. For starters,
if you were familiar with the key derivation tools available
24hrs ago, you wouldn't have come up with PBKDF2 on PBKDF2. I
suggest slowing down a
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 22:53:03 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Interesting... You don't mind me asking your assistance on
writing DIP on this? I have one set up already, and I needed
help as
1.) This is my first time writing a DIP
2.) I don't know what main course of action to take regarding
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 21:11:42 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 18:55:41 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
And see this talk for a demonstration of the benefits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=endKC3fDxqs
Mike
Can you actually reply to me instead of saying "read/watch
this"?
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 10:27:45 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
struct cryptoHeader {
ubyte hdrVersion; // The version of the header
ubyte encAlg; // The encryption algorithm used
ubyte hashAlg; // The hash algorithm used
uint kdfIters; // The number of PBKDF2
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 02:25:20 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I like it. But it does require more space. We need three salts
and three lengths in the header. One for the PBKDF2 KDK, one
for the MAC key, and one for the encryption key.
HKDF-Expand doesn't need a salt. You just need one salt to
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 22:27:52 UTC, sarn wrote:
I've been thinking this through a bit, and here's what I've got
so far:
Here's a tweak that should be implementable without any language
changes:
Instead of trying to detect an empty destructor, we use a UDA on
the class --- call it
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:44:40 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I don't know what's happening with this DIP, but I've recently
encountered a real-world problem for which there is no
palatable workaround that this DIP would likely solve:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 09:55:56 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
TypeInfo has become my nemesis. I've been trying to replace
runtime hooks that depend on TypeInfo with templates that can
get their information at compile-time, but I'm running into all
sorts of problems. e.g. Did you know
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 06:22:02 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 05/27/2018 08:52 PM, sarn wrote:
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 02:25:20 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I like it. But it does require more space. We need three
salts and three lengths in the header. One for the PBKDF2
KDK, one for the MAC
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 16:00:37 UTC, Mario Silva wrote:
Any tips on how to code in a way that minimizes both
compilation times and memory consumption when compiling?
Here are my tips. I'd love to hear more from others.
* Try to reduce imports. E.g., say you use a lot of stuff from
On Friday, 27 April 2018 at 00:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Actually, Turing-complete *does* mean it can do anything...
well, anything that can be done by a machine, that is.
No, it means there's some *abstract mapping* between what a thing
can do and what any Turing machine can do. That
On Thursday, 26 April 2018 at 03:04:55 UTC, A. Nicholi wrote:
I am not sure if this is possible though
I think you've got the technical answer already (just don't link
in phobos2) but I'll add my 2c that Phobosless programming isn't
just possible but realistically doable. It's a shame to go
On Saturday, 28 April 2018 at 10:36:03 UTC, A. Nicholi wrote:
Right. So there isn’t anything in core.* that would be in
libphobos, only D runtime? And std.* depends on both, that is
correct? Just want to be sure there aren’t edge cases or
exceptions, it would be a handy rule of thumb.
That's
On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 18:30:17 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
Instead of doing that silly dance, alias should simply take
values as well.
Also, using "enum" for manifest constants makes sense for people
familiar with C idiom, but often confuses people coming from
different languages.
On Sunday, 7 January 2018 at 15:40:36 UTC, H3XT3CH wrote:
I need it for windows and linux but primary for windows
On *nix this is traditionally called a "core dump". A quick
search will get you lots of tutorials. Most distros today
disable core dumps with ulimit. Run "help ulimit" and
On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 23:55:00 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
If anyone is interested in the type of work that goes on in my
group at eBay, take a look at this blog post by one of my
colleagues:
https://www.ebayinc.com/stories/blogs/tech/making-e-commerce-search-faster/
It describes a
On Wednesday, 18 July 2018 at 12:03:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
Therefore it shouldn't compile at all, but
rcstring("ä")[].split("|")
or
rcstring("ä").byCodePoint.split("|")
+1 to requiring an explicit byCodeUnit or whatever.
For every "obvious" way to interpret a string as a range, you
On Monday, 9 July 2018 at 01:19:28 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
In the context of your blog post at
https://theartofmachinery.com/2018/05/27/cpp_classes_in_betterc.html, I'm wondering if the changes in 2.081 help matters at all: I'm wondering if any of the changes in 2.081 improves the situation
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 09:36:03 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
Since tail-const (more correctly called head-mutable) was
mentioned here lately (in the 'I closed a very old bug!'[1]
thread), I've been racking my brain to figure out what needs
doing to make a viable solution.
Have you seen
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 21:20:22 UTC, Henrik wrote:
Does anyone know if D is using the vtable implementation for
virtual functions just like most C++ compilers? If yes, can
someone explain the advantages of this strategy? A function
pointer in C is regarded as expensive because of missing
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 12:49:40 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
If you know enough D maybe you can implement your own virtual
functions on top of D structs. It seems no one has made it yet.
When I wrote Xanthe a year ago, I rolled my own classes using
alias this and explicit vtables:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 04:37:08 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Nice! I was thinking about something almost exactly like this
recently since 2.079.0 has features to further decouple the
language from the runtime. It would be nice to read a blog
post about this technique.
Mike
I didn't
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:56:27 UTC, Henrik wrote:
why do I have to put the @nogc on the constructor and
destructor separately?
You can make things slightly better by putting @nogc in the
struct itself:
struct S
{
@nogc:
void member1()
{
}
void member2()
{
}
}
But,
This feels like a long shot, but I figure it's worth a try.
I'll be at the Sydney C++ Meetup this Thursday (and other
Thursdays, no promises). If anyone lurking here is in Sydney and
wants to talk about D with someone, come say hi. (I'm the guy
with long brown hair and should be easy to
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:46:08 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
We could possibly do what the europeans were considering with a
quarterly meet up (btw what happened to that?).
I'd be up for an occasional event like that.
Maybe it's easier to start with an online event (Google Hangouts
or
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 22:07:24 UTC, sarn wrote:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 04:37:08 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Nice! I was thinking about something almost exactly like this
recently since 2.079.0 has features to further decouple the
language from the runtime. It would be nice to read
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 00:22:52 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I'm curious about this comment in the code:
Unfortunately, "protected" doesn't work, so a lot of members
end up being public. This seems to just be an oversight in
the language, so maybe it will change in future versions of D.
On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 at 01:10:45 UTC, finalpatch wrote:
I will be presenting the second talk there, so should be even
easier to spot.
The one about template metaprogramming? Nice, I'm looking
forward to that one.
On Thursday, 28 June 2018 at 16:24:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I continue to use SCons for my D projects. For dub
dependencies, I just create a fake empty dub project with
declared dependencies and run that separately for refreshing
dependencies, but the actual compiling and linking is handled
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 16:34:37 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 13:59:48 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 27/09/18 16:38, aliak wrote:
The point was that being able to use non-English in code is
demonstrably both helpful and useful to people. Norwegian
happens to
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 11:37:10 UTC, Dukc wrote:
It's easy to miss a part of a post sometimes.
That's very true, and it's always good to give people the benefit
of the doubt. But most people are able to post constructively
here without
* Abrasively and condescendingly declaring
On Friday, 28 September 2018 at 16:39:14 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
What are you guys using these days to generate bindings?
Writing them by hand is easy if the library doesn't use the
preprocessor much. I often do that for simple jobs.
dpp supports preprocessor directives (because it
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 12:37:09 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
But aren't some (many?) Chinese/Japanese characters
representing whole words?
-Steve
Kind of hair-splitting, but it's more accurate to say that some
Chinese/Japanese words can be written with one character. Like
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 00:18:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I have seen Japanese D code before on twitter, but cannot find
it now (surely because the search engines also share this bias).
You can find a lot more Japanese D code on this blogging platform:
https://qiita.com/tags/dlang
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 06:53:21 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 23/09/18 04:29, sarn wrote:
You can find a lot more Japanese D code on this blogging
platform:
https://qiita.com/tags/dlang
Here's the most recent post to save you a click:
On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 00:17:34 UTC, brian wrote:
3) pre- or post-pend the salt to the password entered
(apparently there is a difference??)
Sorry to revive an old thread, but I wrote a blog post about this
question:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 20:12:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/12/2016 4:27 PM, Jason White wrote:
I don't understand this dependency-phobia.
It's the "first 5 minutes" thing. Every hiccup there costs us
maybe half the people who just want to try it out.
...
The makefiles, especially
On Saturday, 16 January 2016 at 21:22:15 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
Is it possible to create a function that returns Type like
typeof() does? Something such as:
Type returnInt(){
return int;
}
A type itself isn't a runtime value. I think the closest thing
is a TypeInfo object:
Yeah, there's a lot more stuff I could have talked about, but I
think I'll leave it for other posts.
About testing, I think the way protection works in D (i.e.,
private members are accessible within the same file) is
important, too. I was a bit suspicious of that feature when I
first looked
D's implementation of functional purity supports "weak" purity -
functions that can mutate arguments but are otherwise
traditionally pure.
I wrote a post about some of the practical benefits of this kind
of purity:
On Monday, 28 March 2016 at 09:59:12 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 28.03.2016 03:44, sarn wrote:
https://theartofmachinery.com/2016/03/28/dirtying_pure_functions_can_be_useful.html
From there:
Well, you can get the usual (“strong”) purity guarantee just
by making all pointer or reference type
On Tuesday, 3 May 2016 at 03:10:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Jet lagged as I am, I'll be at breakfast at Hotel Ibis at
630am. Come and join me!
Damn, I got there at 7:30. Anyone else still around?
(I don't use Twitter.)
On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 at 14:04:55 UTC, Seb wrote:
D is entirely driven by highly motivated volunteers. (this will
change soon with the new D foundation)
I for one welcome our new D Foundation overlords.
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 01:08:19 UTC, Emil wrote:
is it possible to intercept the STDOUT or STDERR and capture
the output into a variable ?
some pseudocode to explain what I mean
string[] output_buffer;
stdout.capture_to(output_buffer);
writeln("test 1"); # not printed
On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 22:26:58 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Is it ok to memcpy/memmove a struct in D?
Quote from here:
https://dlang.org/spec/garbage.html
"Do not have pointers in a struct instance that point back to
the same instance. The trouble with this is if the instance
gets moved in
On Monday, 23 January 2017 at 12:13:30 UTC, albert-j wrote:
Well it is actually ODE solver from Numerical recipes
(originally in C++) that I am trying to do in D. Code
translation seems very straightforward. Maybe there's someone
around who has done that already? There's not much object
On Saturday, 18 February 2017 at 21:09:20 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Also, some threads online mention that if we do turn off GC,
some of the core std libraries may not fully work. Is this
presumption also correct?
Yes. Whenever a std function returns a new string or some such
it's going to be
On Saturday, 18 February 2017 at 20:15:55 UTC, timmyjose wrote:
Hello folks,
Hi :)
2. I am more interested in learning D as a pure systems
programming language so that I can develop my own tools (not
looking to develop an OS, just some grep-scale tools to start
off with). In that regard, I
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 15:12:28 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Module-level and static variables all get put in the
executable. So, declaring a static array like that is going to
take up space. A dynamic array would do the same thing if you
gave it a value of that size. The same thing
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 at 07:41:36 UTC, Christian Köstlin
wrote:
As I understand the only difference between assert and enforce
is, that
assert is not compiled into releases?
Thanks!
Christian
Pretty much so. The intention is that assert means something
that's supposed to be true
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
