On Saturday, 21 October 2017 at 08:14:01 UTC, vondes wrote:
How we can use it in https://mobile-phone-tracker.org mobile
recorder on Android?
That doesn't look like a very ethical program.
How we can use it in https://mobile-phone-tracker.org mobile
recorder on Android?
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 17:55:43 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Note BTW, the C headers are included in the distribution, and
those are NOT boost licensed. I'm not a lawyer, so I have no
idea the compatibility implications between the two.
Thanks for the heads up, they've now
On 9/13/17 11:48 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 15:15:11 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Shouldn't the bindings be licensed identical to the actual library code?
The library code isn't being distributed, so I don't think it matters.
Technically no. You can let
On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 15:15:11 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Shouldn't the bindings be licensed identical to the actual
library code?
The library code isn't being distributed, so I don't think it
matters.
On 9/13/17 12:27 AM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 17:30:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
We solved the issue **in less than 24 hours**:
https://github.com/nomad-software/x11/blob/master/LICENSE
Most of the "code owners" agreed to change the license.
The list of pseudo has
On Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 17:30:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 12:36:50 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 17:54:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
Contributors to DUB package nomad-software/x11
nomad-software
weltensturm
Geod24
MartinNowak
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 12:36:50 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 17:54:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
Contributors to DUB package nomad-software/x11
nomad-software
weltensturm
Geod24
MartinNowak
BBasile
rikkimax
Additionally, contributors to Deimos/libX11
On 11/09/2017 2:58 PM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 13:41:39 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Needs more work but...
https://github.com/Devisualization/spew/tree/master/src/utils/cf/spew/bindings/x11
yeah.
Have you created this binding yourself w/o using of Deimos code?
On Monday, 11 September 2017 at 13:41:39 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Needs more work but...
https://github.com/Devisualization/spew/tree/master/src/utils/cf/spew/bindings/x11 yeah.
Have you created this binding yourself w/o using of Deimos code?
On 11/09/2017 1:36 PM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 17:54:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
Contributors to DUB package nomad-software/x11
nomad-software
weltensturm
Geod24
MartinNowak
BBasile
rikkimax
Additionally, contributors to Deimos/libX11
growlercab
bioinfornatics
On Monday, 4 September 2017 at 17:54:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
Contributors to DUB package nomad-software/x11
nomad-software
weltensturm
Geod24
MartinNowak
BBasile
rikkimax
Additionally, contributors to Deimos/libX11
growlercab
bioinfornatics
skilion
CyberShadow
Faianca
Flamaros
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 10:14:02 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 10:05:18 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
Unlike LGPL for which you can create closed source apps if
library is linked dynamically, the only way to use derelict
binding with LGPL license is GPL compatible
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 10:05:18 UTC, Vadim Lopatin
wrote:
Unlike LGPL for which you can create closed source apps if
library is linked dynamically, the only way to use derelict
binding with LGPL license is GPL compatible license for your
application.
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 09:23:33 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
My question, is there a legal way to change the current
license to Boost or MIT or something like? Because this
particular developer wanted to use it in a project
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
My question, is there a legal way to change the current license
to Boost or MIT or something like? Because this particular
developer wanted to use it in a project where LGPL was
incompatible.
[1]:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 06:43:45 UTC, Brad Roberts
wrote:
On 9/5/2017 10:19 PM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'll also note that if a developer uses GPL software on the
server, he doesn't have to give any source to users who access
apps on the server remotely. For example, Google
On 9/5/2017 10:19 PM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'll also note that if a developer uses GPL software on the server, he
doesn't have to give any source to users who access apps on the server
remotely. For example, Google uses a linux kernel with proprietary
modifications on a million
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 22:25:57 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
If you go with a BSD or Boost license, you're maximizing who
can use your software, but you have no guarantees that any
improvements will be made available, whereas the (L)GPL does
guarantee that those improvements will be
On Tuesday, September 05, 2017 18:23:00 jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 18:12:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> > But LGPL and GPL are very different licenses. Also, while I
> > don't have time to participate in yet another debate on the
> > topic, the GPL does not in
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 18:12:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
...the GPL does not in any way restrict users. Using GPL code
means you promise *not* to impose restrictions...
Reading things like this is much more humorous when you have a
solid background in logic and contradiction. As for
On 9/4/2017 10:54 AM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
That said, I don't know if the Oracle v. Google case and its precedent that
APIs are copyrightable impact this common understanding. After all, it was
commonly understood prior to that case that that copyright applies to
implementations, not
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 18:23:00 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
However, if you use GPL code in a project and want to
distribute it, then you also have to license that project as
GPL.
Which just means your users also promise not to put restrictions
on their users.
It is like the 13th amendment
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 18:12:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
But LGPL and GPL are very different licenses. Also, while I
don't have time to participate in yet another debate on the
topic, the GPL does not in any way restrict users. Using GPL
code means you promise *not* to impose
On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 16:32:47 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to
add dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes
and as such it's being used
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to add
dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes and
as such it's being used in many projects. (Also, in the
following years dub support was added
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:51:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to
add dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes
and as such it's being used in
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 16:10:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to add
dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes and
as such it's being used in many projects. (Also, in the
following years dub support was added
Hi,
A few years ago I forked the Deimos X11 bindings[1] repo to add
dub support. Since then my repo[2] has received bug fixes and as
such it's being used in many projects. (Also, in the following
years dub support was added to the Deimos repo too.) I had a
question from a developer as to the
29 matches
Mail list logo
