Am Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:11:17 +0200
schrieb qznc q...@web.de:
The only-thread-local-garbage-collection of Rust is quite
interesting in my opinion. Since many-cores (e.g. Xeon Phi) are
coming, a stop-the-world garbage collector might become
unacceptable. If this is a good solution will be
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:11:18 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 07:04:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
As a language geek I think all might have their place.
Me too.
The only-thread-local-garbage-collection of Rust is quite
interesting in my opinion. Since many-cores (e.g. Xeon
On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 15:30:16 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:53:13 +0200
schrieb Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 20:47:19 UTC, Michael wrote:
Also 3 types of pointers scares me.
This actually doesn't scare me because it is kinda
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
It all depends what Mozilla and Samsung do with the language.
If you have powerful entities pushing a language down
developers throats, it will get used. That is how many
mainstream languages got where they are now.
--
Paulo
I
Am Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:53:13 +0200
schrieb Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 20:47:19 UTC, Michael wrote:
Also 3 types of pointers scares me.
This actually doesn't scare me because it is kinda useful for
certain situations. However, I don't think it
On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 15:30:16 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
They have compiler support which removes the syntactical noise
of
templates and makes them behave more natural.
Indeed. I don't mind the syntax (actually, I prefer RefCounted!T
to ~T or whatever symbol rust uses) but there's some
On 2013-06-21 14:11, qznc wrote:
Me too.
The only-thread-local-garbage-collection of Rust is quite interesting in
my opinion. Since many-cores (e.g. Xeon Phi) are coming, a
stop-the-world garbage collector might become unacceptable. If this is a
good solution will be seen (maybe). I certainly
On 6/21/13, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
The article is quite void of any real content. Still, it means
that D is gaining traction, which is always a good news !
Yeah, I was gonna say despite it being nice for D being mentioned,
nowadays these popular websites do nothing more than
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 14:59:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Adam D. Ruppe:
Is it just me or has Rust completely displaced Go as the go-to
'why D when we have X' thing on the reddit?
It seems like not even a full year ago, Rust was rarely
mentioned and all the versus hype was about Go.
Go
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 19:24:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 21:05:46 TommiT wrote:
Currently, I think they're discussing if it's possible to add
mutable external iterators to Rust, which doesn't seem
possible,
because the strong memory safety Rust has chosen
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 14:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Is it just me or has Rust completely displaced Go as the go-to
'why D when we have X' thing on the reddit?
It seems like not even a full year ago, Rust was rarely
mentioned and all the versus hype was about Go. Will Rust fade
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 10:10:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 14:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Is it just me or has Rust completely displaced Go as the go-to
'why D when we have X' thing on the reddit?
It seems like not even a full year ago, Rust was rarely
mentioned
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
If you have powerful entities pushing a language down
developers throats, it will get used. That is how many
mainstream languages got where they are now.
It will be used if its capabilities suit target domain. In other
words, no
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 07:04:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
As a language geek I think all might have their place.
Me too.
The only-thread-local-garbage-collection of Rust is quite
interesting in my opinion. Since many-cores (e.g. Xeon Phi) are
coming, a stop-the-world garbage collector
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:01:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
If you have powerful entities pushing a language down
developers throats, it will get used. That is how many
mainstream languages got where they are now.
It will be used if its
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:16:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:01:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This is why Microsoft killed C in their tooling. Unless they
change their mind, C++ will be the lowest you can get in
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:52:58 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:16:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:01:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
This is why Microsoft killed C in their tooling. Unless they
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 14:16:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:52:58 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:16:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:01:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 11:13:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 16:35, schrieb eles:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 14:16:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:52:58 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 13:16:07 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at 12:01:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 June 2013 at
On 6/21/2013 8:41 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
My first MS-DOS version was 3.3 :)
1.1 here!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gpyor/phoronix_d_language_still_showing_promise/
Andrei
Is it just me or has Rust completely displaced Go as the go-to
'why D when we have X' thing on the reddit?
It seems like not even a full year ago, Rust was rarely mentioned
and all the versus hype was about Go. Will Rust fade away from D
threads a year from now?
Adam D. Ruppe:
Is it just me or has Rust completely displaced Go as the go-to
'why D when we have X' thing on the reddit?
It seems like not even a full year ago, Rust was rarely
mentioned and all the versus hype was about Go.
Go now is not advertised as a system language, and I think it
The Rust comparisons should end. There is nothing to be gained
from it.
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 17:51:11 UTC, w0rp wrote:
The Rust comparisons should end. There is nothing to be gained
from it.
It was not the D supporters on the Reddit discussion who brought
Rust into the mix.
Although I agree with you that trashing another language,
whatever it may be
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 18:44:43 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 17:51:11 UTC, w0rp wrote:
The Rust comparisons should end. There is nothing to be gained
from it.
It was not the D supporters on the Reddit discussion who brought
Rust into the mix.
Although I
On Thursday, June 20, 2013 21:05:46 TommiT wrote:
Currently, I think they're discussing if it's possible to add
mutable external iterators to Rust, which doesn't seem possible,
because the strong memory safety Rust has chosen to operate
within is quite restrictive. And if you can't have
On 06/20/2013 12:05 PM, TommiT wrote:
no proper generic programming. I think that's a
pretty good argument against Rust at the moment, but who knows, maybe
they can figure it out.
Interestingly, I have heard the exact same thing about Go.
But I wouldn't go around bashing Rust, it seems a
From version to another version a changes are very huge in Rust
even in comparison with D.
Also 3 types of pointers scares me.
Version 1.0 promises be usable for wide public. Now on windows
it's very slow and buggy.
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 20:47:19 UTC, Michael wrote:
Also 3 types of pointers scares me.
This actually doesn't scare me because it is kinda useful for
certain situations. However, I don't think it needs to be built
into the language because library types can do the same kind of
thing.
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 11:29:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1gpyor/phoronix_d_language_still_showing_promise/
Andrei
The article is quite void of any real content. Still, it means
that D is gaining traction, which is always a good news !
31 matches
Mail list logo
