Re: https everywhere

2014-02-22 Thread Rikki Cattermole
On Saturday, 22 February 2014 at 06:59:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Perhaps so. Although FWIW, there's also a *lot* of average-joe users (I personally know far too many) who flat-out *refuse* to read any word that ever appears on their screen. These

Re: https everywhere

2014-02-22 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/22/2014 12:43 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: This. And since the site isn't dynamic and doesn't transmit private data the advantage of self-signed cert is highly dubious ;) There isn't any private data on the site, it's just getting on the https everywhere bandwagon.

Re: https everywhere

2014-02-22 Thread Dmitry Olshansky
22-Feb-2014 13:12, Walter Bright пишет: On 2/22/2014 12:43 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: This. And since the site isn't dynamic and doesn't transmit private data the advantage of self-signed cert is highly dubious ;) There isn't any private data on the site, it's just getting on the https

DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Sönke Ludwig
A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual: - Finally properly obeys the difference between target types library, staticLibrary, dynamicLibrary and sourceLibrary. By default, each library type dependency is now build as a static library.

Re: https everywhere

2014-02-22 Thread Sönke Ludwig
Am 21.02.2014 21:34, schrieb Walter Bright: dlang.org and dconf.org now support https, https://dlang.org https://dconf.org Note that this is a self-signed certificate, and so when you first access it you'll get a dire warning from your browser. When the certificate discussion is settled, it

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread simendsjo
On 02/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual: (...) Thanks for what looks like a great release! The second feature planned is first class support for Dustmite - (...) Mostly welcomed. Dustmite is really

Re: Dgame 0.3.2

2014-02-22 Thread Namespace
On a side note, the author in the code is Stewart but it is still me :). It is my middle name, which the auto-header vim script grabs from the login. Yes that I have also seen. Otherwise, I would have used your github name. :) Cheers, ed (stewart) I just saw it up on the website, very cool,

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Mike Parker
On 2/22/2014 6:44 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual: Great job! Thanks for all the work you're putting into this.

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Puming
Thanks for the great work! On Saturday, 22 February 2014 at 09:44:48 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Dicebot
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/dub/

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Paulo Pinto
Am 22.02.2014 10:44, schrieb Sönke Ludwig: A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual: - Finally properly obeys the difference between target types library, staticLibrary, dynamicLibrary and sourceLibrary. By default, each library type

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Paulo Pinto
Am 22.02.2014 10:44, schrieb Sönke Ludwig: A new final release is ready. This one took a bit longer and has more changes than usual: - Finally properly obeys the difference between target types library, staticLibrary, dynamicLibrary and sourceLibrary. By default, each library type

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Jordi Sayol
Congratulations for this new dub release. Already uploaded new dub deb packages for this release at http://d-apt.sourceforge.net/ -- Jordi Sayol

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread Sönke Ludwig
Am 22.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Paulo Pinto: Am 22.02.2014 10:44, schrieb Sönke Ludwig: The Windows installer seems not to like being installed via UAC as the Administrator gets the PATH configured, not the user that started the installer. -- Paulo Going by the installer script, it should

Re: DUB 0.9.21

2014-02-22 Thread extrawurst
On Saturday, 22 February 2014 at 12:07:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 22.02.2014 12:24, schrieb Paulo Pinto: Am 22.02.2014 10:44, schrieb Sönke Ludwig: The Windows installer seems not to like being installed via UAC as the Administrator gets the PATH configured, not the user that started the