On Tuesday, 18 March 2014 at 16:06:41 UTC, Sociomantic wrote:
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welt.de%2Fwirtschaft%2Fwebwelt%2Farticle125913260%2FBriten-kaufen-Berliner-Start-up-fuer-200-Millionen.html
damn.
was gonna apply for
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 23:49:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
As some of you may already know, monarch_dodra and I have spent
quite a lot of time over the last year discussing the state of
std.random. To cut a long story short, there are significant
problems that ari
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Thanks for pointing me to the bug report; I'd forgotten that
this was an open issue :-)
In Bugzilla probably there are many bug reports/enhancement
requests about std.random, so I suggest you to read them. Some of
them can be useful, while other are probably already
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:15:22 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:05:20 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Not really. There's still usable functionality in there for
all architectures (although I'm not sure how practically
useful).
Just to expand o
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:39:43 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Note: I meant a simple but very fast function that generates
just one value in [0.0, 1.0] (not a range).
There will be both. :-)
Off the top of my head I'm not sure whether the interval will be
[0.0, 1.0], [0.0, 1.0) or whether it
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
No, but it's planned. Jerro wrote quite a nice one in the
course of his work on the Ziggurat algorithm, and I'm sure he'd
be happy for me to adapt it accordingly.
Note: I meant a simple but very fast function that generates just
one value in [0.0, 1.0] (not a range)
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:09:51 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Please don't use stuttering names like
"std.random2.randomShuffle". "std.random2.shuffle" is enough.
I don't object to rewriting the names if there's a valid case for
it, but it does seem to me to be important to try and match as
m
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:09:51 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you have a simple but very fast function that generates
uniforms in [0.0, 1.0]? :-)
No, but it's planned. Jerro wrote quite a nice one in the course
of his work on the Ziggurat algorithm, and I'm sure he'd be happy
for me to ad
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 00:05:20 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Not really. There's still usable functionality in there for
all architectures (although I'm not sure how practically
useful).
Just to expand on that remark: my impression is that individual
random devices are inevitab
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 23:58:36 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Out of interest but, shouldn't in the device module have a
static assert(0, "Not implemented yet") type of deal with the
version(Posix) block?
Not really. There's still usable functionality in there for all
architectures (a
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Few first comments:
* std.random2.adaptor, random "adaptors" such as
randomShuffle,
randomSample, etc.
Please don't use stuttering names like
"std.random2.randomShuffle". "std.random2.shuffle" is enough.
My own feeling is that ultimately it is a responsib
Out of interest but, shouldn't in the device module have a static
assert(0, "Not implemented yet") type of deal with the
version(Posix) block?
Hello all,
As some of you may already know, monarch_dodra and I have spent
quite a lot of time over the last year discussing the state of
std.random. To cut a long story short, there are significant
problems that arise because the current RNGs are value types
rather than reference types. We
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:50:09 -0400, Mike Parker wrote:
On 3/19/2014 7:56 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:59:26 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Just to be clear, we're talking about this, right?
http://www.aloftsiliconvalley.com/
Yep, that is where we gathered af
On 22 February 2014 03:23, Manu wrote:
> On 22 February 2014 01:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>>
>> Last year, at the conference, after the sessions everyone met up at the
>> Aloft hotel near Facebook's HQ to have passionate and fruitful discussions
>> about D and I think a lot of good came out
15 matches
Mail list logo
