On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 22:59:24 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
(...)
1. The font is much thinner than on dlang.org main site
PR: https://github.com/dlang/dub-registry/pull/156
3. Clicking the top-left dub logo directs to
"http://code.dlang.org/packages/"; which is 404.
PR: https://github.com
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
(...)
The new site is cool, except a few annoyances:
1. The font is much thinner than on dlang.org main site
(font-weight set to 300 for no good reason), and thus much harder
to read. Using #333 for text color instead of pure black
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 09:30:25 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 09:23:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Chris:
The flavicon is still the old one and appears in search
engine results.
For some reason, favicons are cached aggressively. It has been
update
On 2016-05-24 08:42, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Since fetching dependencies usually saturates the network connection,
that wouldn't save much time (or do you just mean fetching the package
recipes in parallel?).
No, I mean fetching the full package in parallel.
But because it also requires full dep
Am 24.05.2016 um 08:24 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2016-05-23 17:40, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Oh, okay, misunderstood that. The basic protocol is very simple:
GET /packages/index.json
Yields a JSON array with all package names
GET /packages/[package].json
Returns a JSON object with general informat
On 2016-05-23 17:40, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Oh, okay, misunderstood that. The basic protocol is very simple:
GET /packages/index.json
Yields a JSON array with all package names
GET /packages/[package].json
Returns a JSON object with general information about a package,
including all available ver
On 2016-05-23 12:38, qznc wrote:
Mixing fonts is hard. Both fonts must have the same size, but also the
same x-height [0], which is the height of lowercase letters like x. This
can be seen very clearly with inline code like "contain a
dub.json" at the page you linked to. Zoom in (Ctrl+) and
you
On 2016-05-23 10:04, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Okay, removed the old "Courier New" reference and both are rendered the
same now.
Looks better now.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 23.05.2016 um 17:55 schrieb Luís Marques:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
In preparation to that, it also received a thorough optical overhaul.
The newly designed logo (which has appeared in some other spots
already) has been integrated on the package registry, and
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:40 +0200, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
> Oh, okay, misunderstood that. The basic protocol is very simple:
My fault, I rushed my original email and didn't set out the problem
properly.
> GET /packages/index.json
> Yields a JSON array with all package
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
In preparation to that, it also received a thorough optical
overhaul. The newly designed logo (which has appeared in some
other spots already) has been integrated on the package
registry, and the site style has been adjusted to fit the
Am 23.05.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Dicebot:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 15:13:56 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
My need is two write a Python program that queries the running Dub
repository. So I am guessing this is an HTTP-based protocol.
I guess I will have to read the Dub code and deduce/infer/guess th
Am 23.05.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce:
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 15:19 +0200, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
Am 23.05.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-
announce:
Hi,
Is the Dub API published anywhere. I propose to write a dmd/
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 15:13:56 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
My need is two write a Python program that queries the running
Dub repository. So I am guessing this is an HTTP-based protocol.
I guess I will have to read the Dub code and deduce/infer/guess
the necessary protocol. Not a problem, bu
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 21:19:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Nice work, looking forward to seeing dub be part of the dmd
package, hope the same can be done for ldc.
This can't happen soon enough!
When doing client work, it will be easier to push D as a solution
if the explanations for builds have
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 15:19 +0200, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> Am 23.05.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-
> announce:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is the Dub API published anywhere. I propose to write a dmd/ldc/gdc
> > subtool so that dependency management based on th
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 15:19 +0200, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Online docs are still on the TODO list, but you can do
>
> dub fetch dub
> dub run dub -b ddox
>
> And it will start up a local HTTP server on http://127.0.0.1:8080/
> with
> the API documentati
Am 23.05.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce:
Hi,
Is the Dub API published anywhere. I propose to write a dmd/ldc/gdc
subtool so that dependency management based on the Dub repository is
provided for SCons D builds.
Online docs are still on the TODO list, but you ca
Am 23.05.2016 um 15:02 schrieb Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce:
Is there an ordering to the entries on the page?
Apologies if the ordering algorithm is obvious, I am having a relative
brain-dead day today.
You can click the column headers at the top. The default ordering is by
lates
Hi,
Is the Dub API published anywhere. I propose to write a dmd/ldc/gdc
subtool so that dependency management based on the Dub repository is
provided for SCons D builds.
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585
Is there an ordering to the entries on the page?
Apologies if the ordering algorithm is obvious, I am having a relative
brain-dead day today.
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win.
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Chris:
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 09:23:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Chris:
The flavicon is still the old one and appears in search engine results.
For some reason, favicons are cached aggressively. It has been
updated, but it's hard
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 06:33:15 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The styling of [1] is a bit inconsistent. The styling for
inline code, i.e. , seem to have bigger font than both
the regular text and the larger code blocks, .
[1] http://code.dlang.org/package-format?lang=json
Mixing fonts is har
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 09:23:45 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Chris:
The flavicon is still the old one and appears in search engine
results.
For some reason, favicons are cached aggressively. It has been
updated, but it's hard to get the browsers pick it up.
I t
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Chris:
The flavicon is still the old one and appears in search engine results.
For some reason, favicons are cached aggressively. It has been updated,
but it's hard to get the browsers pick it up.
On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 08:04:51 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 23.05.2016 um 09:01 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2016-05-23 08:52, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
On which browser/OS?
On OS X using Safari, Chrome or Firefox.
I've now removed the border/background color,
I think the background and borde
Am 23.05.2016 um 09:01 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2016-05-23 08:52, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
On which browser/OS?
On OS X using Safari, Chrome or Firefox.
I've now removed the border/background color,
I think the background and border looked fine.
It looked out of place on non-Mac systems. O
On 2016-05-23 09:06, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Pushed now, didn't notice that the push failed due to out-of-date local
branch.
It looks correct now, thanks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Am 23.05.2016 um 09:03 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2016-05-23 08:52, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Fixed: #772 instead of #722
Not pushed?
Pushed now, didn't notice that the push failed due to out-of-date local
branch.
On 2016-05-23 08:52, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Fixed: #772 instead of #722
Not pushed?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2016-05-23 08:52, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
On which browser/OS?
On OS X using Safari, Chrome or Firefox.
I've now removed the border/background color,
I think the background and border looked fine.
but the font size looks fine for me on Linux.
Using Firefox:
The inline code has font siz
Am 23.05.2016 um 08:33 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
The styling of [1] is a bit inconsistent. The styling for inline code,
i.e. , seem to have bigger font than both the regular text and the
larger code blocks, .
On which browser/OS? I've now removed the border/background color, but
the font size lo
On 2016-05-22 21:36, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
This version marks the final milestone before the 1.0.0 release, which
is scheduled for mid-June. The API has been cleaned up and will be kept
backwards compatible throughout 1.x.x (0.9.25->1.0.0 may still have some
breaking changes). Beginning with versio
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
This version marks the final milestone before the 1.0.0
release, which is scheduled for mid-June. The API has been
cleaned up and will be kept backwards compatible throughout
1.x.x (0.9.25->1.0.0 may still have some breaking changes).
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
registry, and the site style has been adjusted to fit the
general dlang.org design (thanks to Sebastian Wilzbach!).
Hi. Is possible change font to something more readable?
For example, like font on http://dlang.org
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:36:39 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
This version marks the final milestone before the 1.0.0
release, which is scheduled for mid-June. The API has been
cleaned up and will be kept backwards compatible throughout
1.x.x (0.9.25->1.0.0 may still have some breaking changes).
36 matches
Mail list logo
