On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 16:50:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yes, please add ctfeWriteln().
ctfeWriteln has it's own set of problems.
I resurrected a PR for it a while back.
And somewhere along the lines it broke again.
newCTFE's debugging facilities which will come later this year,
will provide
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 15:16:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/9/17 10:49 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
If I'd had to worry about an interface to runtime code I'd be
a little
unhappy.
I kind of remember you saying at dconf2016 "If only CTFE could
write to the filesystem, I could fully sup
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 06:30:54PM +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> > At least in terms of i/o printing to the console or whatnot, it
> > would be cool to be able to do so at compile-time just directly with
> > writeln. As of now, a CTFE function c
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
At least in terms of i/o printing to the console or whatnot, it would be
cool to be able to do so at compile-time just directly with writeln. As
of now, a CTFE function can't call writeln, and it also can't pragma(msg,
...) because it has to be written as a runtime
On 6/9/17 10:49 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 12:15:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
[it] can use the *actual* i/o routines [at compile-time] you would
use at runtime is pretty impressive.
Stefan would have a field day with this power :)
Infact I think this would scale
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 12:15:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[it] can use the *actual* i/o routines [at compile-time] you
would use at runtime is pretty impressive.
Stefan would have a field day with this power :)
-Steve
Infact I think this would scale pretty badly.
I do not want to
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 12:15:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Stefan would have a field day with this power :)
I think he would certainly appreciate an improved ability to
debug CTFE code.
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 12:15:50 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/7/17 5:47 PM, John Carter wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Seems like you have inspired people...
http://blog.zdsmith.com/posts
On 6/7/17 5:47 PM, John Carter wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Seems like you have inspired people...
http://blog.zdsmith.com/posts/compiletime-sort-in-nim.html
That is kind of neat. While I can
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 01:34:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 19:07:50 UTC, cym13 wrote:
Seeing that the one and only D example in the nim article is a
broken one (using static instead of enum or static immutable
for 'b') we should have started with a correct example
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 01:34:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 19:07:50 UTC, cym13 wrote:
Seeing that the one and only D example in the nim article is a
broken one (using static instead of enum or static immutable
for 'b') we should have started with a correct example
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 19:07:50 UTC, cym13 wrote:
Seeing that the one and only D example in the nim article is a
broken one (using static instead of enum or static immutable
for 'b') we should have started with a correct example before
showing the broken one... Good to know for next tim
On 06/08/2017 09:07 PM, cym13 wrote:
Seeing that the one and only D example in the nim article is a broken
one (using static instead of enum or static immutable for 'b') we should
have started with a correct example before showing the broken one...
Good to know for next time.
Broken? It works
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 21:47:58 UTC, John Carter wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Seems like you have inspired people...
http://blog.zdsmith.com/posts/compiletime-sort-in-nim.html
Seeing that
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 at 01:08:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 17:54:05 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Very nice post!
Thanks! If it gets half as many page views as yours did, I'll
be happy. Yours is the most-viewed post on the blog -- over
1000 views more than #2 (my GC
On Thursday, June 08, 2017 01:08:42 Jon Degenhardt via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> I was surprised as well, pleasantly of course. Using a simple
> example may have helped. Personally, I'm not bothered by the
> specific instances of negative feedback on Reddit. It's hard to
> write a post that
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 20:59:50 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 at 01:08:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 17:54:05 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Very nice post!
Thanks! If it gets half as many page views as yours did, I'll
be happy. Yours is the most-viewe
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 21:47:58 UTC, John Carter wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Seems like you have inspired people...
http://blog.zdsmith.com/posts/compiletime-sort-in-nim.html
We should
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Seems like you have inspired people...
http://blog.zdsmith.com/posts/compiletime-sort-in-nim.html
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 at 01:08:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 17:54:05 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Very nice post!
Thanks! If it gets half as many page views as yours did, I'll
be happy. Yours is the most-viewed post on the blog -- over
1000 views more than #2 (my GC
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 21:35:54 UTC, Seb wrote:
This is a great article, Mike!
Thanks!
At the end I expected a reference to D's great template
constraints [1], maybe it's still worth adding sth. like this
to show how amazingly useful CTFE is?
It's a good idea! I don't think I'll and ch
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 17:54:05 UTC, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Very nice post!
Thanks! If it gets half as many page views as yours did, I'll be
happy. Yours is the most-viewed post on the blog -- over 1000
views more than #2 (my GC post), and 5,000 more than #3 (A New
Import Idiom).
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
mpile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6fefdg/compiletime_sort_in_d/
Very nice post!
It's also on Hacker News under "Compile-Time Sort in D".
On Monday, 5 June 2017 at 14:23:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's
compile-time features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who
helped out with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
The crowd-edited (?) blog post exploring some of D's compile-time
features is now live. Thanks again to everyone who helped out
with it.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2017/06/05/compile-time-sort-in-d/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6fefdg/compiletime_sort_in_d/
28 matches
Mail list logo
