On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 11:45:37 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
One important thing about Ninja is that it will perform
split-builds by default, so if you change something, only the
changed piece needs to be recompiled. I *think* dub can do that
too, but for some reason it never does it
On 12.03.2017 13:09, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
preliminary support for VS 2017 (no VC project integration yet)
VC project integration is now also available in VS 2017. Check out
https://github.com/dlang/visuald/releases/download/v0.44.2/VisualD-v0.44.2.exe
which also includes some bug fixes.
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
[…]
In the past few days I added support for D (all three major
compilers) to the Meson build system, with some great results-
[…]
I hope you find this as useful as I do :-)
[…]
Yes, I do , it's great.
Currently though there
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 07:59:46 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 12.03.2017 13:09, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
preliminary support for VS 2017 (no VC project integration yet)
VC project integration is now also available in VS 2017. Check
out
Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
it. Thank you, Symantec!
Something that just popped into my head:
You've said that you've
Now #1 on r/programming subreddit!
On 4/7/2017 3:57 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
You've said that you've avoided ever looking at other compiler's code to avoid
legal trouble. Is that problem gone now?
No, unless the other compiler is Boost as well.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 22:57:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't know that. I just
assumed LDC would have gone with a clang-style inline assembler
(does clang even have inline asm?).
LDC supports both DMD-style asm {} blocks as well as LLVM's
native inline
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 19:37:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
From what I've seen, the fact that we use it so heavily in the
D community is abnormal
AFAIK the reasons it was chosen were
1. It's as close to public domain as you can get in international
law
2. It's on all of the "Accepted
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 19:37:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, April 07, 2017 08:14:40 Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Well,
On 07/04/2017 10:03 PM, WhatMeWorry wrote:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
I've been coding in D for years now but was unaware
On Friday, April 07, 2017 08:14:40 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
>
> Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
> it. Thank you, Symantec!
Well, this is certainly great news.
Does this make dmd the only
On Friday, April 07, 2017 20:02:52 Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 19:37:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > From what I've seen, the fact that we use it so heavily in the
> > D community is abnormal
>
> AFAIK the reasons it was chosen were
>
> 1. It's
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
I've been coding in D for years now but was unaware of this
issue. Could someone give this
On 4/7/2017 12:02 PM, Radu wrote:
Also, big up for the whole community as there is a big positive vibe around the
news and nobody is complaining about basic stuff missing line website, docs,
infrastructure etc.
Yes, it's the most positive response to us I've ever seen on HN, by far.
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 10:38:36PM +0100, rikki cattermole via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 10:03 PM, WhatMeWorry wrote:
[...]
> > I've been coding in D for years now but was unaware of this issue.
> > Could someone give this licensing neophyte an explanation and some
> >
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Something that just popped into my head:
You've said that you've avoided ever looking at
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Excellent, good work.
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 19:08:59 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
Last week I was at this year's GUADEC conference and listened
to a very interesting talk on the Meson build system[2] which
is designed for very fast builds and as a much more modern
replacement for Automake with a simple
On 4/7/2017 3:22 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Just to clarify for people not usually frequenting these circles: LDC does
support DMD-style inline assembly, but we use a different implementation.
Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't know that. I just assumed LDC would have
gone with a
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
A great step forward for the language!
A huge thank you to everyone who made this happen.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Congrats, this is a great result!
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Great news! By 2027, we should no longer hear objections to D
based on the backend license.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
<3
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 18:51 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> […]
> So now the campaign begins to get DMD formally packaged by Debian and
> Fedora.
>
> Having DMD packaged as well as LDC and GDC will be a great thing for
> marketing of D.
We also need GDC in Fedora.
--
Russel.
Wow, congratulations, and a big thank you to those who made it
happen.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
That is really good news!
One less shackle preventing users from adopting :D (and if I am
not
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Glorious day for D and Dlangers.
Congrats Walter for the tenacity and thanks Symantec for
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
That was nice of Symantec to finally grant your request. Will
this mean more work put into
On 4/7/2017 9:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/07/2017 12:01 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/6419py/the_official_d_compiler_is_now_free_as_in_freedom/
Thanks, someone also put it on hackernews - found it by browsing for "new"
threads. --
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 08:14 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
>
> Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
> relicense it.
> Thank you, Symantec!
So now the campaign begins to get DMD formally packaged by Debian
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:14:40AM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
>
> Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
> relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Hooray!! Finally!!!
Never thought I'd see this day,
Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
it. Thank you, Symantec!
i don't even know what to say... thank you! i didn't even hoped that this
will happen. what a glorious day today.
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Good news. Question:
Does this apply from now or can the previous DMD releases also be
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense it.
Thank you, Symantec!
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Question: will this 'fix' be backported to existing stable
releases? Or will it just apply
On 04/07/2017 12:01 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Reddit:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Congratulations Walter! This is marvellous news :-)
On 4/7/2017 8:25 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Question: will this 'fix' be backported to existing stable releases? Or will it
just apply going forward?
I ask because it could make a difference to what is legally possible to package
for e.g. Linux distros, etc.
It applies to all of it!
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Reddit:
Note that this also resolves the long-standing legal issue with D's inline
assembler being backend licensed, and so not portable to gdc/ldc.
On 4/7/2017 2:04 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
MIT almost equal though.
I suspect that the reason MIT came up with their own license is so they could
call it the "MIT License". Branding, ya know.
Walter Bright wrote:
Note that this also resolves the long-standing legal issue with D's
inline assembler being backend licensed, and so not portable to gdc/ldc.
yay!
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 21:49:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Note that this also resolves the long-standing legal issue with
D's inline assembler being backend licensed, and so not
portable to gdc/ldc.
Just to clarify for people not usually frequenting these circles:
LDC does support
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Congrats! That's a big win, and you deserve all the merits!
Enjoy the moment!
---
Paolo
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
This is brilliant! Fantastic!
With all those forks of dmd now well underway, can I please
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:14:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Very good news and a solid accomplishment for being on top of
Hacker News (as of writing
Am Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:14:40 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright :
> https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
>
> Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to
> relicense it. Thank you, Symantec!
Great news! Maybe someone could notify http://phoronix.com .
On 4/7/2017 1:28 PM, Ulrich Küttler wrote:
With all those forks of dmd now well underway, can I please reserve the name
'dork'? ;)
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
(Hey, I'm feeling pretty good today!)
On 4/7/2017 2:54 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
My question should have been more specific: will we see the patch changing the
license in the source code applied to existing stable release branches?
I'd really appreciate it if we could get such a patch applied at least to the
current stable
On 07/04/2017 4:14 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/6680
Yes, this is for real! Symantec has given their permission to relicense
it. Thank you, Symantec!
Hip hip hooray!
I'm gonna go get some cake in a cup!
On 4/7/2017 1:02 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
AFAIK the reasons it was chosen were
1. It's as close to public domain as you can get in international law
Yes.
2. It's on all of the "Accepted OSS Licenses" lists that major corps have
because of Boost itself being used in those companies. If your
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 15:35:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It applies to all of it!
Cool :-)
My question should have been more specific: will we see the patch
changing the license in the source code applied to existing
stable release branches?
I'd really appreciate it if we could get
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 22:02:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'll defer to Martin Nowak on what to do about that.
It would help for those who need this for specific versions to
let Martin know which ones.
Great, thanks -- I'll follow up with Martin on slack.
54 matches
Mail list logo