Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-23 Thread Martin Nowak
On 01/21/2014 02:48 AM, David Nadlinger wrote: I completely missed the review/voting, sorry, though mine would have been a no too, for the in my opinion inappropriate use of string mixins in the API. If you find yourself to be needing to stringify a passed in type for use in a string mixin, you

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-22 Thread Xavier Bigand
Le 22/01/2014 08:43, Jacob Carlborg a écrit : On 2014-01-21 21:10, Xavier Bigand wrote: We use std.signals on DQuick, signals are critical for a GUI system, but there is no advanced GUI library written completely in D for the moment. For the moment DQuick still have a long way to do before

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-21 Thread Xavier Bigand
Le 21/01/2014 00:51, Adam Wilson a écrit : On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert jfanati...@gmx.at wrote: Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to be very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old std.signals. Thanks again! Best regards,

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-21 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-01-21 21:10, Xavier Bigand wrote: We use std.signals on DQuick, signals are critical for a GUI system, but there is no advanced GUI library written completely in D for the moment. For the moment DQuick still have a long way to do before really needing something better. What does the

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-20 Thread Dicebot
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-20 Thread Robert
Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to be very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old std.signals. Thanks again! Best regards, Robert On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:51:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote: On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC,

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-20 Thread David Nadlinger
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:51:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Less than 10 hours are left. I completely missed the review/voting, sorry, though mine would have been a no too, for the in my opinion inappropriate use of string mixins in the API. If you find yourself to be needing to stringify a

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-16 Thread Rory McGuire
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: We can, of course, now open the debate as to whether the Oxford Comma should be used. ;-) And does English mean American English, Canadian English, Australian English, South African English, New Zealand English, or

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-16 Thread ilya-stromberg
On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 15:59:20 UTC, qznc wrote: On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 07:46:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: yada yada yada I just created a wiki page to document requirements. Hopefully, this helps people to decide on their vote and not to forget aspects.

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-16 Thread Dicebot
Thanks for helping to keep voting threads clean from off-topic discussions.

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-16 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 1/15/14 11:35 AM, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:42 -0500, John J wrote: […] Uses complete english sentences with correct syntax, grammar, and punctuation. Please capitalize the e in english. We can, of course, now open the debate as to whether the Oxford Comma should be

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-15 Thread Denis Shelomovskij
06.01.2014 13:11, Dicebot пишет: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to proceed with

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-15 Thread qznc
On Wednesday, 15 January 2014 at 07:46:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: yada yada yada I just created a wiki page to document requirements. Hopefully, this helps people to decide on their vote and not to forget aspects. http://wiki.dlang.org/Phobos_Quality Should this be linked from

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-15 Thread robert
I am opposed to merging std.signal in its current form. It is not at the level of documentation and implementation quality needed for new Phobos modules. * Documentation has numerous mistakes, omissions, disfluencies, and colloquialisms that seriously decrease credibility of the library.

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-15 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:42 -0500, John J wrote: […] Uses complete english sentences with correct syntax, grammar, and punctuation. Please capitalize the e in english. We can, of course, now open the debate as to whether the Oxford Comma should be used. ;-) And does English mean American

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-14 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-13 Thread Dicebot
To everyone: please consider replying in linked discussion thread if you don't feel like you are going to vote for any reason. So far activity is rather low and I think I will need some feedback to determine if it is because of low demand or for some other reasons.

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-13 Thread Dicebot
On Monday, 13 January 2014 at 17:36:22 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote: On 2014-01-13 13:50:09 +, Dicebot said: To everyone: please consider replying in linked discussion thread if you don't feel like you are going to vote for any reason. Don't understand what you mean... How about

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-13 Thread Robert M. Münch
On 2014-01-13 13:50:09 +, Dicebot said: To everyone: please consider replying in linked discussion thread if you don't feel like you are going to vote for any reason. Don't understand what you mean... How about explaining how to vote if it's not here, or there, ... keep things simple

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-11 Thread Damian Day
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-10 Thread Robert M. Münch
On 2014-01-06 09:11:07 +, Dicebot said: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-07 Thread Robert
Just a little update: More recent and prettier documentation can be found at: https://vhios.dyndns.org/dlang.org/web/phobos-prerelease/std_signal.html The pull request for phobos can be found here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1833/files Best regards, Robert

std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-06 Thread Dicebot
Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to proceed with final voting at that moment but

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-06 Thread ilya-stromberg
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it

Re: std.signal : voting has begun

2014-01-06 Thread Jakob Ovrum
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote: Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos proposal (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpc...@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org). It have not received much feedback and I was a it