http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6426
Summary: Internal error with function-nested alias
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
Summary: Templated ctor cannot set immutable member variables
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
--- Comment #27 from Kenji Hara 2011-08-02 06:39:43 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #26)
Thanks for your reply.
I have two claims.
1. D language specification already implicitly allow automatic tuple expansion.
a) Alias this allows an impl
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4749
simendsjo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simend...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from si
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6428
Summary: Inconsistent implement in std.array.replaceFirst
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6428
--- Comment #1 from Heromyth 2011-08-02 07:01:13 PDT ---
I have a patch:
--- array.dSun Jul 10 13:19:30 2011
+++ array-new.dTue Aug 02 21:58:12 2011
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@
auto app = appender!R1();
app.put(subject[0 .. subject
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6429
Summary: Nested function error in reduce
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Ph
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6428
klickverbot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@klickverbot.at
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4460
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2011-08-02 12:45:15
PDT ---
Okay. It looks like immutable constructors only apply to when the struct or
class itself that you're constructing is immutable. So, this should definitely
compile. And it does on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5790
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|x86 |All
--- Comment #5 from kenn...@gma
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6430
Summary: Overloaded auto-return functions each with a nested
aggregate of the same name are conflated
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
St
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6102
--- Comment #2 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-08-02
19:41:01 PDT ---
The string import files are already in the .deps file, they're just marked
"file" instead of "import". (At least in 2.054 anyway.)
The .deps entries marked "binary", "config" and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6431
Summary: [RDMD] Modifying a library doesn't trigger a rebuild
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6102
--- Comment #3 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-08-02
22:34:06 PDT ---
Pull request fixing this issue:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/pull/6
That fixes the issue for "file" (ie string imports), "binary" and "config".
Fixing it for
17 matches
Mail list logo