Hi D
I'm working on a bit of code that handles selecting one *.front
from multiple range-ish objects. It's a select-or-drop algorithm
for a data streaming service, the details aren't important.
The algorithm takes a range of something I'll call
"PriorityRange" objects. PriorityRange
Thanks for your answers guys!
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 02:01:28AM +, Jack via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> in C/C++ you have void* and C#'s object, to create a variable to hold
> a genetic type. So in C# you can do:
>
> class A {
> object foo;
> }
>
> and
>
> var a = new A();
> a.foo
On Saturday, 6 February 2021 at 02:01:28 UTC, Jack wrote:
in C/C++ you have void* and C#'s object, to create a variable
to hold a genetic type. So in C# you can do:
class A {
object foo;
}
and
var a = new A();
a.foo = any class...;
does D have something like this or template parameters
in C/C++ you have void* and C#'s object, to create a variable to
hold a genetic type. So in C# you can do:
class A {
object foo;
}
and
var a = new A();
a.foo = any class...;
does D have something like this or template parameters are used
instead of?
That's a fantastic answer! Thank you. I was not aware that
initializers were always compile time, that was the missing piece
in my understanding.
It's a shame that I can't use the nicer (IMO) syntax, but the
reasoning is sound.
nt outside a function is a compile time
thing.
Is this intended?
Yes, it is a frequent thing to surprise people though. The
reference there is part of the object but it points to the same
default thing because of how that was made.
Constructors are actually run at runtime, but in
ld expect one for each instance of B. The field is not marked
static.
Is this intended? My gut reaction is the compiler is memoising
"new A" because purity is inferred, but doesn't that contradict
the meaning of "new Class" which should always yield an object
with it's own
On Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 07:46:20 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 November 2020 at 10:50:12 UTC, frame wrote:
I found the "bug". It was caused by a debug {} statement
within a struct method. I assume that the debug symbol is just
incompatible called from the DLL context.
On Wednesday, 18 November 2020 at 10:50:12 UTC, frame wrote:
I found the "bug". It was caused by a debug {} statement within
a struct method. I assume that the debug symbol is just
incompatible called from the DLL context.
Were the DLL and main program built in different modes
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 22:22:42 UTC, frame wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 21:58:44 UTC, Jack wrote:
What is the function prototype like and how are you declaring
that struct?
The struct is very simple, it contains:
I found the "bug". It was caused by a debug {} statement
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 21:58:44 UTC, Jack wrote:
What is the function prototype like and how are you declaring
that struct?
The struct is very simple, it contains:
struct S {
SysTime a;
ulong b;
double c;
ubyte[] d;
string e;
}
And I tried:
bool foo(S[] params);
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 21:31:44 UTC, frame wrote:
I have a DLL in D-code which returns an object and want to pass
a struct S[] to a member function of that object. The first
element is passed correctly, the rest is just garbage. In fact
the next item is just a single byte with value
I have a DLL in D-code which returns an object and want to pass a
struct S[] to a member function of that object. The first element
is passed correctly, the rest is just garbage. In fact the next
item is just a single byte with value 0x11 following some 0x00.
It doesn't matter if I'm using S
and produces only a
single object file for the final executable. Separate compilation only
happens if you invoke the compiler separately for each source file or
group of source files.
If the `-c` flag is passed, the compiler will produce one object file
for each source file. If the `-c` flag
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:42:55AM -0800, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> -i is a useful feature:
>
> https://dlang.org/dmd-linux.html
>
> Does dmd compile auto-included files separately? Does it generate
> temporary object files? If so, where does it write t
-i is a useful feature:
https://dlang.org/dmd-linux.html
Does dmd compile auto-included files separately? Does it generate
temporary object files? If so, where does it write the files? Would -i
cause race conditions on the file system?
Thank you,
Ali
On Monday, 26 October 2020 at 21:57:18 UTC, Not A Rectangle wrote:
Is this possible to do?
Only if you know the type ahead of time, then you can cast it.
Normally you'd probably just know an interface or base class it
implements then you can cast to that, with the exact derived type
being
Hi everyone,
Say i have a TypeInfo_Class representing a custom type, and i
want a new instance of this class with its custom type, is there
a way to do that?
I am aware that TypeInfo_Class has the methods create() and
factory(), both of which return a new object of the type Object.
I have
Thank you!
..
Qaz qaz;
qaz.method(); // ???
}
How to call alias "method" on object "qaz"?
https://dlang.org/spec/traits.html#child
The resulting code would be:
__traits(child, qaz, method)(/*arguments go here*/);
--
Simen
as "method" on object "qaz"?
On 9/28/20 7:11 AM, Ruby The Roobster wrote:
For example:
class test {}
class T {
auto c = new test();
}
Any way to tell if an object of type test is a member of object T? I
don't want to use the name of the member variable. I just want to know
if this works in general.
Why am I asking
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 14:36:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
There's the `parent` trait. You can wrap it like this:
``
then is (hasParent!f) legal code?
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 14:23:12 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 14:22:34 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
I meant User Defined types. not UDAs. Anyways, the whole thing
is me trying to find a hacky workaround that allows something
similar to multiple alias
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 14:09:07 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Can you re-write this as actual valid D code, but with the
implementation of the function stubbed out? I still don't
understand what your function is supposed to take as its
input(s), or what "parent object is a member var
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 14:22:34 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
I meant User Defined types. not UDAs. Anyways, the whole thing
is me trying to find a hacky workaround that allows something
similar to multiple alias this declarations(because multiple of
these are not possible). And for
, and it would help clarify.
Okay. Here is an example.
class Test {
this.is_in_aggregate
}
I want a function that returns true when the parent object is a
member variable of an aggregate type(UDA)
Can you re-write this as actual valid D code, but with the
implementation of the function stubbed out
{
this.is_in_aggregate
}
I want a function that returns true when the parent object is a
member variable of an aggregate type(UDA)
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 11:11:13 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
For example:
class test {}
class T {
auto c = new test();
}
Any way to tell if an object of type test is a member of object
T? I don't want to use the name of the member variable. I just
want to know if this works
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 11:40:40 UTC, k2aj wrote:
pragma(msg, hasFieldOfType!(T, int)); //false
pragma(msg, hasFieldOfType!(T, test)); //true
Not exactly what I meant. I more of meant is there a way to check
if a test object is a member variable, not if it is in a
particular class.
On Monday, 28 September 2020 at 11:11:13 UTC, Ruby The Roobster
wrote:
For example:
class test {}
class T {
auto c = new test();
}
Any way to tell if an object of type test is a member of object
T? I don't want to use the name of the member variable. I just
want to know if this works
For example:
class test {}
class T {
auto c = new test();
}
Any way to tell if an object of type test is a member of object
T? I don't want to use the name of the member variable. I just
want to know if this works in general.
Why am I asking this? Because I need it to develop this Multiple
On Thursday, 21 April 2016 at 11:53:13 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 12:32:48 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is there a way to shallow copy an object when the type is
known? I cant seem to figure out if there is a standard way. I
can't just implement a copy function for the class, I
On Tuesday, 25 August 2020 at 01:44:16 UTC, mw wrote:
I just tried, using -m32:
/mnt/c/project/dlang/dmd-2.093.1/windows/bin/sc.ini
[Environment]
DFLAGS="-I%@P%\..\..\src\phobos"
"-I%@P%\..\..\src\druntime\import" "-d" "-m32"
at least that error is gone, and I was able to build:
filling up lol
I just completely deleted that `packages` dir, and the
/.dub dir and also the app.sln file; then I start
from scratch:
dub.exe generate visuald
But I got the exact same build error: corrupt MS Coff object.
I think it's showhow caused by the build process itself, maybe
just
that `packages` dir, and the
/.dub dir and also the app.sln file; then I start from
scratch:
dub.exe generate visuald
But I got the exact same build error: corrupt MS Coff object.
I think it's showhow caused by the build process itself, maybe
just inside the unit-threaded-1.0.4 package, any suggestions
On Tuesday, 25 August 2020 at 01:08:49 UTC, mw wrote:
Is it safe to just delete all the:
yup. I have to do this every other week on my work box to keep
its hard drive from filling up lol
On Tuesday, 25 August 2020 at 00:56:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Might help to just delete the old directories and let it
redownload and recompile fresh with all the new settings.
Is it safe to just delete all the:
C:\Users...\AppData\Local\dub\packages\
and run `dub upgrade` again to
On Tuesday, 25 August 2020 at 00:41:27 UTC, mw wrote:
How to fix this Coff object issues?
there's two library formats: coff and omf. omf is the old one
that dmd assumes without arguments. coff is the new one with `dmd
-m32mscoff` or `dmd -m64`.
I would guess one of those libs was built
I got this error, when build with
VisualD-v1.0.1-dmd-2.093.1-ldc2-1.23.0.exe
dmd:
lib\unit-threaded_property.lib: Error: corrupt MS Coff object
module
obj\debug\dummy\dummy\dummy\dummy\dummy\dummy\unit-threaded_property\..\..\..\..\..\..\Users...\AppData\Local\dub\packages\unit-threaded
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 at 10:53:19 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 18:15:25 UTC, tirithen wrote:
[...]
Passing anything besides int/double/bool between JS and wasm is
hard work.
[...]
Thanks for a really good explanation, passing pointers over the
structs
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 18:15:25 UTC, tirithen wrote:
Anyone that has something similar working with struct objects?
Passing anything besides int/double/bool between JS and wasm is
hard work.
Currently the ABI generated by LDC is so that arguments besides
int/double/bool (and
I'm experimenting with generating wasm files with ldc2 but I'm
having problems when trying to pass JavaScript Objects and
receive them as structs and the other way around.
I found this super nice getting started guide that works fine for
basic types like double and so on
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 09:48:57 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Since you're using classes, one way is to use a common base
class or an interface. But assuming "parent" is the owner of
the Sprite instance, you might eliminate the dependency on the
parent and have it update the Sprite's position
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 09:27:46 UTC, Tim wrote:
Hi all, I'm a little new to D and I'm wondering how I can store
a reference to the calling object. I want to create a reference
to an object's parent so that each time I go to update the
sprite, it is able to grab its position from
On Saturday, 23 May 2020 at 09:27:46 UTC, Tim wrote:
Hi all, I'm a little new to D and I'm wondering how I can store
a reference to the calling object. I want to create a reference
to an object's parent so that each time I go to update the
sprite, it is able to grab its position from
23.05.2020 12:27, Tim пишет:
class Sprite{
/// Postional components of the sprite
int* x, y;
SDL_Surface* image_surface;
auto parent;
this(const char* path, auto parent){
writeln(*x);
this.parent = parent;
}
void update(){
// Copy
Hi all, I'm a little new to D and I'm wondering how I can store a
reference to the calling object. I want to create a reference to
an object's parent so that each time I go to update the sprite,
it is able to grab its position from the parent.
So if I have:
class Sprite{
/// Postional
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 15:19:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 15:05:56 UTC, wjoe wrote:
But didn't like the string part and that's when I introduced
the alias fn because I figured maybe it's possible to do
something like:
factory.dispatch!(Bitmap.load)(handle,
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 15:05:56 UTC, wjoe wrote:
But didn't like the string part and that's when I introduced
the alias fn because I figured maybe it's possible to do
something like:
factory.dispatch!(Bitmap.load)(handle, path);
and get the Bitmap part from that alias and hence save the
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 14:14:04 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 14:05:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Adam's way doesn't work either, because the call doesn't use
the alias, but just instantiates opDispatch with the new name!'
oh yikes, how did I not notice that?!
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 13:55:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/6/20 6:51 AM, wjoe wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 18:33:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 14:24:33 UTC, wjoe wrote:
[...]
template opDispatch(string name) {
auto opDispatch(T,
On 3/6/20 9:42 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
alias opdispatch(T) = other_name!(name, T);
And obviously, this should be opDispatch with a capital D !
-Steve
On 3/6/20 9:14 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 14:05:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Adam's way doesn't work either, because the call doesn't use the
alias, but just instantiates opDispatch with the new name!'
oh yikes, how did I not notice that?!
so yeah just kinda
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 14:05:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Adam's way doesn't work either, because the call doesn't use
the alias, but just instantiates opDispatch with the new name!'
oh yikes, how did I not notice that?!
so yeah just kinda screwed. I'd probably suggest at tis point
On 3/6/20 8:55 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Instantiate!(f.opDispatch!fname, Bitmap)("path/to/wallpaper.png")
I realized, this doesn't work. Because f.opDispatch is a `this` call,
but is not called that way in this case.
Adam's way doesn't work either, because the call doesn't use the
On 3/6/20 6:51 AM, wjoe wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 18:33:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 14:24:33 UTC, wjoe wrote:
[...]
template opDispatch(string name) {
auto opDispatch(T, Args...)(Args args) {
...
}
}
[...]
NOTE: opDispatch suppresses
On Friday, 6 March 2020 at 11:51:54 UTC, wjoe wrote:
I don't understand this error message. Which type can't be
resolved?
I don't know. It works if you rename the inner one but it
doesn't like eponymous templates like this. I suspect either the
spec subtly doesn't allow it or a compiler
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 18:33:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 14:24:33 UTC, wjoe wrote:
[...]
template opDispatch(string name) {
auto opDispatch(T, Args...)(Args args) {
...
}
}
[...]
NOTE: opDispatch suppresses internal compile errors, it will
eply:)
I don't need an alias at all. I was trying to figure something
out with opDispatch first but something like __traits(getMember,
obj, name)(args); never occurred to me. Awesome!
The handle knows whether or not it's valid and where to find the
object and it only makes sense in the context
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 14:46:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/5/20 9:24 AM, wjoe wrote:
but how can I call fn in the context of an object instance?
You could do it with delegates. But it's ugly:
import std.stdio;
class C
{
void foo() { writeln("Yup");}
}
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 14:24:33 UTC, wjoe wrote:
Implement this for free functions i would do something like this
void dispatch(alias fn, ARGS...)(Handle handle, ARGS args)
Why do you need an `alias fn` like that?
My suggestion would be to just use the `opDispatch` magic method
that
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 18:10:11 UTC, Martin Brezel wrote:
Unfortunately the documentation page for core.thread is
currently not available.
the official docs are lame, use my fork doc website instead:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/core.thread.html
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 at 03:04:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
You can also not use `spawn` and instead give `new Thread` a
try from core.thread.
Thanks for the hint, I didn't notice core.thread at all. I will
definitely try it out.
Unfortunately the documentation page for core.thread is
On 3/5/20 9:24 AM, wjoe wrote:
but how can I call fn in the context of an object instance?
You could do it with delegates. But it's ugly:
import std.stdio;
class C
{
void foo() { writeln("Yup");}
}
void main()
{
alias f = C.foo;
auto c = new C;
void del
Consider a Factory that creates instances of various different
resource object instances, all of which have a common interface,
and returns a handle to them.
class Factory
{
struct Handle{}
Handle create(R: Resource, ARGS...)(ARGS args)
{
auto r = new R(args
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 at 23:37:00 UTC, Martin Brezel wrote:
The documentation for spawn() states: "all arguments to fn must
either be shared or immutable or have no pointer indirection."
The easiest thing to do is to just cast
import std.concurrency;
import std.socket;
void main() {
I want to create a Client, which receives and handles received
data in background while the Client can send via the same socket.
My first idea was something like this:
class Client {
private Socket socket;
private Tid receiverTid;
this(Socket socket) {
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 11:28:11 UTC, Mitacha wrote:
I've a const struct object and I'd like to make a mutable copy
of it.
Struct definition contains string and an array of structs.
```
struct A {
string a;
B[] b;
}
struct B {
string a;
string b;
}
```
As far as I can
I've a const struct object and I'd like to make a mutable copy of
it.
Struct definition contains string and an array of structs.
```
struct A {
string a;
B[] b;
}
struct B {
string a;
string b;
}
```
As far as I can tell copy constructor isn't generated for struct
`A` because
On 2/6/20 10:11 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote
b.step(); // virtual call, calls B.step
I meant, calls A.step;
-Steve
. So the a.B syntax
is not necessary.
To illustrate further:
A a = new A; // note, instances by default are null, you need to new them
B b = a; // implicit cast
assert(a is b); // they are the same object
b.step(); // virtual call, calls B.step
assert(a.a != 0); // note, protected allows access
On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 12:37:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 12:15:17 UTC, Mihail Lorenko
wrote:
B* b;
A pointer to a class is a rare thing in B since they are
already automatic references. Just use `B b;` and ten `b = a`
will just work.
Thanks
On Thursday, 6 February 2020 at 12:15:17 UTC, Mihail Lorenko
wrote:
B* b;
A pointer to a class is a rare thing in B since they are already
automatic references. Just use `B b;` and ten `b = a` will just
work.
Hello!
Interested in a question.
Object "A" inherited object "B". And you need to return the
object link "B". Is this possible in this language? Here is an
example:
class B
{
protected int a;
public void step() {};
}
class A : B
{
public over
On Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 12:02:00 UTC, kinke wrote:
That's the library you need. You may have messed things up by
installing a non-dev package from Fedora (!).
Fortunately it's written in red at YAST, because it's not from
the official repos. I can easily find it to get rid of it when I
On Thursday, 15 August 2019 at 11:28:35 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> https://software.opensuse.org/package/zlib-devel-static
An error when installing, apparently internal.
That's the library you need. You may have messed things up by
installing a non-dev package from Fedora (!).
Investigated this matter further. The most likely reason seems to
be that the required library -zlib- (Yes, ld.gold was getting the
arguments in correct form despite what I said. Sorry.) is
installed only in dynamic form (.so), but ld.gold finds only
static libraries (.a). Not 100% sure yet,
Taking the LDC2 invocation and removing `-lz` and `-lresolv`
seems to work around the problem. A bad long-term solution though.
On Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 02:47:11 UTC, ?boing? wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 12:39:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 11:41:25 UTC, kinke wrote:
LDC definitely doesn't add that. zlib shouldn't be necessary,
as Phobos contains an (IIRC, outdated) version of it.
On Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 02:47:11 UTC, ?boing? wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 12:39:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 11:41:25 UTC, kinke wrote:
LDC definitely doesn't add that. zlib shouldn't be necessary,
as Phobos contains an (IIRC, outdated) version of it.
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 12:39:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 11:41:25 UTC, kinke wrote:
LDC definitely doesn't add that. zlib shouldn't be necessary,
as Phobos contains an (IIRC, outdated) version of it. Anyway,
you should be able to please the linker by installing a
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 11:41:25 UTC, kinke wrote:
LDC definitely doesn't add that. zlib shouldn't be necessary,
as Phobos contains an (IIRC, outdated) version of it. Anyway,
you should be able to please the linker by installing a zlib
package, such as `zlib1g` on Debian/Ubuntu.
On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 at 11:25:29 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I did notice that according to the above, `-lz` argument
apparently is due to an attempt by dub or ldc to pass `-z` to
the linker, but I'm just not getting ideas of how to
troubleshoot that further. Any ideas?
LDC definitely doesn't add
On Monday, 22 July 2019 at 21:34:18 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote:
It seems that I've to write my own function that searches in
the given object's classinfo.interfaces since I couldn't find
anything related in Phobos.
Do you mean...?
interface I {}
class C : I {}
void main()
{
C c1;
On 23/07/2019 9:34 AM, solidstate1991 wrote:
It seems that I've to write my own function that searches in the given
object's classinfo.interfaces since I couldn't find anything related in
Phobos.
if (Foo foo = cast(Bar)bar) {
}
It seems that I've to write my own function that searches in the
given object's classinfo.interfaces since I couldn't find
anything related in Phobos.
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 at 08:03:30 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
I want to be able to do things like:
---
bool isSame(Object a, Object b) { return a is b; }
interface SomeInterface { int whatever(); }
bool failsToCompile(SomeInterface a, SomeInterface b) { return
isSame(a, b); }
---
Error
I want to be able to do things like:
---
bool isSame(Object a, Object b) { return a is b; }
interface SomeInterface { int whatever(); }
bool failsToCompile(SomeInterface a, SomeInterface b) { return
isSame(a, b); }
---
Error: function isSame(Object a, Object b) is not callable using
On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 at 12:11:47 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
hunt-cache current version use template implemention adapter
changes.
I want use Interface to define Adapter, this master code unable
to comple.
How to do it? D programming language design flaws?
```bash
git clone
On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 at 12:11:47 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
hunt-cache current version use template implemention adapter
changes.
I want use Interface to define Adapter, this master code unable
to comple.
How to do it? D programming language design flaws?
```bash
git clone
hunt-cache current version use template implemention adapter
changes.
I want use Interface to define Adapter, this master code unable
to comple.
How to do it? D programming language design flaws?
```bash
git clone https://github.com/huntlabs/hunt-cache
cd hunt-cache/example
dub run -v
...
change gwlib buildtype to sourceLibrary solves the problem, but
it should work for static or shared library.
On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 at 05:04:54 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 at 02:42:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Object.factory is pretty unreliable and has few supporters
among the developers. I wouldn't suggest relying on it and
instead building your own factory functions.
oh,
On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 at 02:42:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Object.factory is pretty unreliable and has few supporters
among the developers. I wouldn't suggest relying on it and
instead building your own factory functions.
oh, that's bad news, but the hibernated library is using this
Object.factory is pretty unreliable and has few supporters among
the developers. I wouldn't suggest relying on it and instead
building your own factory functions.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 14:24:30 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 14:16:44 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 09:25:51 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
yeah, I made a typo mistake in the forum post, but the code in
github repo is really with no typo problem.
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 14:16:44 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 09:25:51 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
class NSconf
{
String name;
...
}
Does this class have a non-default constructor?
yes, I didn't provide constructor, as Class will have a
On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 at 09:25:51 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
class NSconf
{
String name;
...
}
Does this class have a non-default constructor?
301 - 400 of 1432 matches
Mail list logo
