On 10/24/2013 10:28 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 October 2013 at 06:33:04 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
That works! Thanks.
cool. If you need anything more in this, let me know (feel free to email
me directly too destructiona...@gmail.com ) and i'll see what I can do.
That is great!
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:11:53 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:06:48 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Code:
import std.stdio;
struct A {
public:
int[4] val;
alias val this;
}
void main()
{
A a;
a.destroy();
}
On Sunday, 20 October 2013 at 08:13:35 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
I am learning D and itching to create some small tools
(basically Windows executables) for our internal use, but any
tool I think of creating also needs some support for SQL
Server! So my question is:
1). Does D has any support
On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 18:28:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In that case, it should be written like this:
...
command.prepare();
scope(exit) command.releaseStatement();
ulong rowsAffected;
foreach ...
This is exactly the kind of situation scope
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 08:07:02 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 18:28:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In that case, it should be written like this:
...
command.prepare();
scope(exit) command.releaseStatement();
ulong rowsAffected;
is there a way to tell whether we're running inside a try/catch block, as
well as the type T expected by the catch(T) block (and perhaps also
file/line info) ?
use case:
i'd like to customize my exception handler so that if I'm not running in a
try/catch block, then I will pause instead of
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 07:29:16 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Because this solution does not work anymore with dmd 2.064
beta: Are there any other tips and tricks?
File regression and write to dmd beta mail list. It is clearly
lack of extra constraint on `T : U[n]` overload (it should
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 11:10:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 07:29:16 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Because this solution does not work anymore with dmd 2.064
beta: Are there any other tips and tricks?
File regression and write to dmd beta mail list. It is clearly
lack of
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 12:09:34 UTC, Namespace wrote:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/bug-1134...@http.d.puremagic.com%2Fissues%2F
K, I have sent a mail to beta list pointing to it. IMHO `destroy`
constraints need to be much more strict as destroying only part
of object via `alias this`
I strictly believe any unittest enhancing library must be built
on top of existing unittest blocks using __traits(getUnittest)
and be 100% compatible with normal `-unittest` mode
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:04:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I strictly believe any unittest enhancing library must be built
on top of existing unittest blocks using __traits(getUnittest)
and be 100% compatible with normal `-unittest` mode
I don't disagree. What exactly does that mean and what
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:23:46 UTC, Daniel Davidson wrote:
What I'm missing, and apparently others in the original thread,
is a way to run tests selectively. It is difficult to do with
unittest because they are not named. If there were a way to
annotate the test and pull them out that
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:30:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You can completely re-implement default test by using runtime
hook http://wiki.dlang.org/Runtime_Hooks (_d_unittest should
do AFAIK)
*default test runner
On 10/25/2013 04:12 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
the stack would already be unwinded and there'd be no way to go back
in time
to the point where the relevant exception got thrown.
Another spot is the constructor of the exception. We print the stack
contents by libunwind in a C++ project.
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 14:14:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This will work starting with 2.064:
module a;
import std.stdio;
struct ID
{
string data;
}
@ID(one)
unittest
{
writeln(1);
}
@ID(two)
unittest
{
writeln(2);
}
void main()
{
import std.typetuple;
alias tests =
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 13:04:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I strictly believe any unittest enhancing library must be built
on top of existing unittest blocks using __traits(getUnittest)
and be 100% compatible with normal `-unittest` mode
I agree, this should be easy to implement. In my unit
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 15:55:11 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
For information how to implement your own unit test handler see
the bottom of the report module here:
https://github.com/nomad-software/dunit
From there you can selectively run tests based on some outside
criteria. I think
Just noticed something interesting in the std.allocator source,
right at the very bottom. An EOF and some code? Does the compiler
stop at the EOF? If so why add code beyond that? Also
version(none), eh?
https://github.com/andralex/phobos/blob/allocator/std/allocator.d#L4071
What's going on
For information how to implement your own unit test handler see
the bottom of the report module here:
https://github.com/nomad-software/dunit
From there you can selectively run tests based on some outside
criteria. I think the new trait will open up further
possibilities too.
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 16:03:24 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Just noticed something interesting in the std.allocator source,
right at the very bottom. An EOF and some code? Does the
compiler stop at the EOF? If so why add code beyond that? Also
version(none), eh?
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 14:14:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This will work starting with 2.064:
Ok. I'll keep pressing. Here is an updated version:
http://pastebin.com/g6FWsTkr
The idea is to be able to just import ut, annotate as you have
described and get unit tests run. I want to mixin
Shouldn't this code work? Looking at the arithmetic conversions section
of http://dlang.org/type.html, point 4.1 makes me think that I shouldn't
be getting the error since they are the same type.
void main()
{
ushort v1 = 1;
ushort v2 = 1;
ushort v3 = v1 + v2;
}
test.d(5): Error:
On 10/25/2013 11:45 AM, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Shouldn't this code work? Looking at the arithmetic conversions section
of http://dlang.org/type.html, point 4.1 makes me think that I shouldn't
be getting the error since they are the same type.
void main()
{
ushort v1 = 1;
ushort
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:51:03 -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/25/2013 11:45 AM, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
Shouldn't this code work? Looking at the arithmetic conversions section
of http://dlang.org/type.html, point 4.1 makes me think that I
shouldn't be getting the error since they are the
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 16:43:23 UTC, Daniel Davidson wrote:
On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 14:14:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This will work starting with 2.064:
Ok. I'll keep pressing. Here is an updated version:
http://pastebin.com/g6FWsTkr
The idea is to be able to just import ut,
25 matches
Mail list logo
