I've done a whole bunch of looking around, and I don't see any
mention of returning a dynamic array from a function. When I try
it though, it just returns the .length value of the array, rather
than the contents of the array. Does anyone know why this is, and
what I can do to make it behave
Thanks loads. I got it working using those modules.
~Sam
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 22:37:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
What code do you have now?
This is the basic function. It takes all those boolean arguments
and does things depending on them, and then takes any extra args
that getopt didn't parse and reads them into numbs. That code
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 23:09:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 22:51:17 UTC, Samwise wrote:
numbs[] = getInp(help, file, inp, args);
This is wrong, try just `numbs = getImp(...);`
numbs[] = xxx will copy stuff into the existing array, which is
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 02:48:45 UTC, James Buren wrote:
Import the source file containing the external function instead
of writing that prototype. It should compile then.
This seems like a workaround more than a permanent solution. It
would work, but still. I'm also not sure about
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 03:25:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 03:11:08 UTC, Samwise wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 02:48:45 UTC, James Buren
wrote:
Import the source file containing the external function
instead of writing that prototype. It should
Alright. For the sake of this argument, I'm going to post all the
stuff about a really tiny boring program that quite literally
does nothing, even though I found this issue when I was working
with a much larger project with more functions. Basically I'm
getting errors when I attempt to compile
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 03:51:50 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 03:37:46 UTC, Samwise wrote:
extern int getReturnCode() {
return 4;
}
still does not compile using the command from above. I may
very well be misunderstanding you though.
yep. *both*
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 04:25:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
extern(C), not simply extern. It turns off the name mangling.
But really, the proper thing to do is to drop the prototype and
import the module with the implementation. It's tge way modules
are intended to be used. Unless
On Sunday, 5 March 2017 at 01:54:22 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
I was getting the same problem and created on issue on this
project's repository
(https://github.com/ZILtoid1991/pixelperfectengine), which I
think (although I don't know) was the reason this thread was
created. Using the
On Wednesday, 18 January 2017 at 04:25:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
extern(C), not simply extern. It turns off the name mangling.
But really, the proper thing to do is to drop the prototype and
import the module with the implementation. It's tge way modules
are intended to be used. Unless
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 20:01:16 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...
Thanks loads. Thanks to this my next commit is going to have
quite a few improvements that clean up the engine code
considerably. I appreciate the help.
I'm really sure this is just a stupid mistake I made, but I can't
for the life of me figure out what is going on. Basically I'm
trying to assign a reference to an object to an array, and the
objects exist (an explicit destructor is writing lines at the end
of the program, when the objects are
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 13:43:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
In your code, I see one big mistake:
---
class TileRenderer
{
private Tile[] tiles;
/*...*/
}
class CTileRenderer : TileRenderer
{
private CTile[] tiles;
/*...*/
}
---
Those are two separate arrays! Stuff examined through
I'm also having another problem with this program that is
(sorta?) related. If you notice in my main (minus all the
comments...), the code creates two tiles, then updates the
renderer so that it renders those tiles. Then I create another
tile in the same place as one of the first ones (not
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 17:54:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 at 17:47:57 UTC, Samwise wrote:
The expected behavior for this is to just see "Different Text"
and "Other Text", instead of having any time to see just
"Text". However, it seems that the second update
16 matches
Mail list logo
