The mutex isn't more "global", it's more "local" (although,
this will make it shared).
Yes shared, this is what I meant by global :) Thanks, it's
clearer now.
On 1/17/21 6:54 PM, ludo wrote:
Yes alright. I think the dev made a design mistake because he called
synchronized( OpenAL.mutex ) when it should be more of a global, non
OpenAL specific, mutex. I mean in the code there were things like
(pseudo-code)
---
System {
private int[] buffer
Thanks, as explained I am indeed porting old code.
No on the AA (as noted above). The mutex *is* created on
demand. Every Object can have a mutex, and it's only created
when you synchronize it for the first time.
Yes alright. I think the dev made a design mistake because he
called
On 1/6/21 12:05 PM, ludo wrote:
I read in the documentation
"Static constructors are used to initialize static class members with
values that cannot be computed at compile time"
I try to understand the design of the following code:
---
class OpenAL
{
static string[int] ALErrorLookup;
On Friday, 15 January 2021 at 16:04:02 UTC, ludo wrote:
I believe so. I've never used OpenAL so it may have additional
restrictions with multithreading, but from a simple "This
function is only ever executed on one thread at a time", your
above suggestions should work.
Apologies for the late
I believe so. I've never used OpenAL so it may have additional
restrictions with multithreading, but from a simple "This
function is only ever executed on one thread at a time", your
above suggestions should work.
Apologies for the late reply.
No worry and thank you. I found the low-lock
On Tuesday, 12 January 2021 at 11:28:12 UTC, ludo wrote:
Ok, I agree that ends up being a kind of strange singleton. But
yes it was D v1 code. Do we agree that the following
multi-threaded singleton pattern is the proper way as of today.
It looks fine to me. The D wiki has the following
NOTE : the entire code we are talking about is in the tiny url in
my previous post.
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 01:55:07 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 17:05:02 UTC, ludo wrote:
...
Using a static class like this seems to mostly be a design
decision.
So in
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 01:55:07 UTC, SealabJaster wrote:
...
And on a side note, I don't believe this code is working as the
author intends.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but `static` variables in D
arethread-local, so a `static Object mutex` wouldn't actually be
visible
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 17:05:02 UTC, ludo wrote:
...
Using a static class like this seems to mostly be a design
decision.
i.e. instead of using something like
```
openalGetMutex();
// OR
OpenAL openal = ...;
openal.getMutex();
// OR I guess even this
g_openal.getMutex();
```
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 17:05:02 UTC, ludo wrote:
I read in the documentation
"Static constructors are used to initialize static class
members with values that cannot be computed at compile time"
[...]
Since this is not the complete code it's a bit hard to know, but
I'd guess this
This means the windows sample code that comes with DMD in the samples
folder has to be updated, that's where I took the template from.
Thanks.
On 11/23/10, Simen kjaeraas simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic n...@none.none wrote:
maintest.def:
EXETYPE NT
SUBSYSTEM WINDOWS
Ok I've filed a bug report and the fix:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5268
On 11/24/10, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
This means the windows sample code that comes with DMD in the samples
folder has to be updated, that's where I took the template from.
Andrej Mitrovic n...@none.none wrote:
maintest.def:
EXETYPE NT
SUBSYSTEM WINDOWS
maintest.d:
http://pastebin.com/3c4CKDG1
Compiled with DMD 2.050:
dmd maintest.d maintest.def
The output in the log file is Lenght: 0. The static constructor is
never called when using WinMain.
But if I use
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:23:12 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
The static constructor is never called when using WinMain.
Make sure you use newest DMD, I think in 2.048 or 49 there was bug that
module constructors were not called.
15 matches
Mail list logo
