On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 20:34:50 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:41:16 UTC, JN wrote:
Some code will break, sure, but it's a mechanical change that
should be possible to apply by some tool.
Who will run this tool? Who's gonna merge the PRs created with
this
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 20:25:54 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
When I originally started with D, I thought non-ASCII
identifiers with Unicode was a good idea. I've since slowly
become less and less enthusiastic about it.
First off, D source text simply must (and does) fully support
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:59:42 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
If there was a contingent of Japanese or Chinese users doing
that then surely they would speak up here or in Bugzilla to
advocate for this feature?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/piwvbtetcwyxlaloc...@forum.dlang.org
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 13:55:02 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
AFAIK if you port D1 code the only problem is with
immutable(char)[] instead of string, and the only thing to know
is that immutable(T) and T implicitely convert to const(T).
A lot of D1 code was 32-bit only, so there will
On 23/09/18 04:29, sarn wrote:
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 00:18:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I have seen Japanese D code before on twitter, but cannot find it now
(surely because the search engines also share this bias).
You can find a lot more Japanese D code on this blogging platform:
On 09/21/2018 04:18 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> Well, for example, with a Chinese company, they may very well find
> forced English identifiers to be an annoyance.
Fully aggreed but as far as I know, Turkish companies use English in
source code.
Turkish alphabet is Latin based where dotted
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19260
ki...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ki...@gmx.net
--- Comment #1 from
On 09/22/2018 09:27 AM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
> Logographic writing systems. There is one logographic writing system
> still in common use, and it's the standard writing system for Chinese
> and Japanese.
I had the misconception of each Chinese character meaning a word until I
read "The
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 23:17:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
A: Wait. Using emojis as identifiers is not a good idea?
B: Yes.
A: But the cool kids are doing it:
https://codepen.io/andresgalante/pen/jbGqXj
It's not like we have a lot of good fonts (I know only one), and
even fewer of them are
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 10:51:52 UTC, braboar wrote:
I am going to play with serial port read/write, so I fetched
serial-port. After that, I wrote simple program:
auto port_name = "/dev/ttyUSB1";
auto reader = new SerialPort(port_name);
reader.dataBits(DataBits.data8);
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 11:18:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Hence, non-Unicode is unacceptable in Turkish code
You even contributed to
http://code.google.com/p/trileri/source/browse/trunk/tr/yazi.d
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 06:53:21 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 23/09/18 04:29, sarn wrote:
You can find a lot more Japanese D code on this blogging
platform:
https://qiita.com/tags/dlang
Here's the most recent post to save you a click:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 13:22:03 UTC, new wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 10:53:25 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 09:42:48 UTC, Jonathan
Marler wrote:
I'd be interested to hear/read about the features that some
developers don't like with D2.
I'm
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 13:55:02 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
A lot of things are objectively better like build systems,
ecosystems, stability, meta-programming, CTFE, OPTLINK,
Phobos...
I wouldn't say meta-programming and CTFE are 'objectively'
better. It could be argued that such
After looking at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaA3HPgowwY
and
std.experimental.allocator.building_blocks.segregator.Segregator
I wonder if
Segregator.allocate()
is missing an important optimization on calls to
someSegregatorInstance.make!T()
where the choice of selecting the
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:04:41 UTC, Henrik wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 15:45:09 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 15:25:32 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...]
Yeah there's been alot of discussion around it over the years,
which is why I put this
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14064
wolframw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 21:15:17 UTC, FromAnotherPlanet
wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:34:47 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:30:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/20/2018 10:11 PM, mate wrote:
Note that the build can be done at compile time
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:34:47 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2018 at 06:30:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/20/2018 10:11 PM, mate wrote:
Note that the build can be done at compile time because the
metaprogramming capabilities of the language are not limited
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:51:48 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote:
Can the SPA code be released as a separate module for
WebAssembly web app development?
Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was
just the
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 17:53:32 UTC, Suliman wrote:
What do you think of the struct approach compared to a
traditional jsx/virtual-dom?
jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you
framework Vue-style it will be perfect!
Being a Vue user for three years now, I
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 17:53:32 UTC, Suliman wrote:
What do you think of the struct approach compared to a
traditional jsx/virtual-dom?
jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you
framework Vue-style it will be perfect!
The reason I made this wasm experiment was not
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 08:52:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Honestly, I was horrified to find out that emojis were even in
Unicode. It makes no sense whatsover. Emojis are supposed to be
sequences of characters that can be interepreted as images.
Treating them like Unicode
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19261
Issue ID: 19261
Summary: Cmdline option to enumerate builtin versions
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
On 9/23/2018 9:52 AM, aliak wrote:
Not seeing identifiers in languages you don't program in or can read in is
expected.
On the other hand, I've been programming for 40 years. I've customized my C++
compiler to emit error messages in various languages:
What do you think of the struct approach compared to a
traditional jsx/virtual-dom?
jsx is sucks. Look at Vue.js way, if you will able to fo you
framework Vue-style it will be perfect!
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 19:51:48 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 14:54:29 UTC, aberba wrote:
[...]
Currently the whole thing is not so developer-friendly, it was
just the easiest way for me to get it up and running.
[...]
Vladimir mentioned that
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 18:36:11 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Vladimir mentioned that there's a Musl port to wasm, have you
tried it?
My knowledge of the intersection of Musl and WASM is that Musl is
used as the libc in Emscripten (and, as extension, in Dscripten),
and Emscripten/Dscripten can
Has there been any progress on Project Blizzard?
Is there some working code available other than the snippets
proposed at Alexandru's talk on DConf 2018?
I'm also curious why the allocation in the following code fails
with exit code -11 with both dmd and ldc on Ubuntu 18.04 x64:
import
On 9/22/2018 6:01 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
For better or worse, English is the international language of science and
engineering, and that includes programming.
In the earlier days of D, I put on the web pages a google widget what would
automatically translate the page into any language
I met a blind programmer at a conference back in the 80's, and had a long talk
with her and how she did it. I was amazed. Ever since, I've wanted to ensure
products I've worked on were accessible to the blind.
It's one thing to follow guidelines, it's another to have someone who relies on
a
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 21:12:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
D supports Unicode in identifiers because C and C++ do, and we
want to be able to interoperate with them. Extending Unicode
identifier support off into other directions, especially ones
that break such interoperability, is just
On 9/23/2018 3:23 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
Okay, that's why you previously selected C99 as the standard for what characters
to allow. Do you want to update to match C11? It's been out for the better part
of a decade, after all.
I wasn't aware it changed in C11.
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 21:12:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
D supports Unicode in identifiers because C and C++ do, and we
want to be able to interoperate with them. Extending Unicode
identifier support off into other directions, especially ones
that break such interoperability, is just
On 9/23/2018 6:06 PM, Dennis wrote:
Have you changed your mind since?
D the language is well suited to the development of Unicode apps. D source code
is another matter.
On 23/09/18 15:38, sarn wrote:
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 06:53:21 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 23/09/18 04:29, sarn wrote:
You can find a lot more Japanese D code on this blogging platform:
https://qiita.com/tags/dlang
Here's the most recent post to save you a click:
On Sunday, 23 September 2018 at 22:07:36 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I met a blind programmer at a conference back in the 80's, and
had a long talk with her and how she did it. I was amazed. Ever
since, I've wanted to ensure products I've worked on were
accessible to the blind.
It's one thing
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 03:16:50 UTC, Bauss wrote:
like the use of b tags on the front page, they should be
replaced by strong tags
The two usages of are part of the presentation, not content.
Their use is correct.
On Monday, 24 September 2018 at 01:39:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/23/2018 3:23 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
Okay, that's why you previously selected C99 as the standard
for what characters to allow. Do you want to update to match
C11? It's been out for the better part of a decade, after
39 matches
Mail list logo
