sequence sending just call and grid
for one minute and see what happens on HF.
Remember the WSJT modes were meant for EME, MS and weak signal
VHF/UHFanything else is a bonus.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good work Leigh, I
that because it is not conversational, it
allows people to make contacts without having to converse with people
like me :)
In context, it is the tool of choice for me on MS and EMEthat it
can even be functional on HF is a side benefit.
As for the other modes, keep experimenting...
73
Bill
Hi Howard,
Congrats!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, All.
I've been playing with this mode and making piece meal contacts as
it were while learning. Mostly, I've been receiving.
I know the thing works, but there's
All,
Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But on HF
is is of little value and will only lead to false decodes and stations
answering you when you haven't transmitted.
Decode menu, JT65, check No deep search
Hope this helps..
73
Bill N9DSJ
search using call3.txt is great for EME,
with known precautions. On HF it is less useful. Perhaps running -30
db S/N of HF with a dedicated HF call3.txt file it might be
entertaining.food for thought.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John GM4SLV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don't believe it happened.
Would need to see it myself.
Opps, I did see it happen
Good going Tony and Al.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Managned to work Al, XE2AT on JT65 with 5mw this
evening on 20 meters. All was using a 40
Thanks. How close must the time be maintained in case I want to do
some hilltopping away from the internet? Bill K6ACJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Lot's of stations calling on JT65 without setting
their PC clocks. Not having your time set
Sorry, but I've looked around and cannot ID the mode I hear on 3577 and
7076, very slow tones, about 1 second each? Any help please ??
Bill k6acj psk31, mfsk, Olivia, etc
Hi,
Also go to the decode psuedo-button and disble deepsearch
options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will
speed up the decodes...
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc
With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little
margin!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20
meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem
there was some room to go
Well done! Congratulations...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Juan Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Andrew anda John:
Oh. Sorry by delay in the answer, but today I was involved in a
local
special Radio Chidrens Event, a kind of field-day to show how
the
radio
In WSJT, F5 key is your friend!
RO means you received the OOO
it is a shorthand roger for the OOO report...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony, I got confused when trying to explain, maybe you will be
better. Can
you explain whch steps
Glad I have never ever done that! (and if you believe that..)
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Not sure what that was about -- could be that he
forgot to click the next message -- it happens
).
Tony
Pardon my ignorance but what does this subject line mean?
Bill-W4BSG
Hi Bill,
Not ignorance at all, it is not very intuitive!
It means (basically) that Tony heard WD4KPD calling CQ DX in JT65 mode
on 14.076.
file ID (time based): 001000
sync: 5
strength: -11 db
time offset: -0.2 (in seconds)
freq offset: 277 (in Hz)
sync width: 3
message type: normal (*)
hence
(high confidence) deep search decode.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I suspect it was a false decode since 0413 UTC is the middle of
the afternoon in Japan. Probably was KA7BJP calling me.
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio
with; the usual watering holes are 3.580, 7.070
and 14.070 USB. Listen alot, ask questions and have fun!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Dan here KD7UFF in CN77 Forks, WA I got my Gereral ticket on
3/31/07
and just got my Tigertronics
watering holes are 3.580, 7.070
and 14.070 USB. Listen alot, ask questions and have fun!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Dan here KD7UFF in CN77 Forks, WA I got my Gereral ticket on
3/31/07
and just got my Tigertronics SL-1
A tribute to my Big 15 Wattson an 80 meter antenna :(
says alot about the mode
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
andrewobrie@ wrote:
Good contact Tony. Let me see
Hi Tony,
Good to see alot of MS/EME guys on HFthe use of JT65 on HF should
also prompt more vhf MS/EME activity... if it was easy anyone (even a
Caveman) could do it!
Jerry (KC0HLN) is one we need to get on HF :)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED
That's correct. Alabama Navy MARS for some years now, and many other states
both Army and Navy use MT-63 for net traffic. It is far superior to any other
method we've found.
Bill
KB4IJ
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday
. When things
get too bad for voice communication, 500 Hz will still generally get through.
Bill
KB4IJ
- Original Message -
From: kv9u
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Alabama MARS has changed to MT63
Bill
Echo...
No need for everyone to be on the same exact freq..spread out abit.
200 Hz is usually enough. You can work multiple qso's at the same
time if you watch the DF...but not if everyone is one the same freq
during the same sequence..
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Hi Les,
you were -15 to -21 db here but decoded well on my 80 meter antenna.
N5SIX heard you better on his 8ft wire :)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Keppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
i need a vk/zl and a s.america for wac
3.576
seen both usb and lsb used..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any idea what frequency is used for 80m JT65a?
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent
Hi Andy,
Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for
some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known
conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that...
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh! What are you talking about, Andy?
{snipped}
I blame Joe Taylor.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi Danny,
Seems ok; select a mode then hit the monitor buttonscreen will
be black until you go into monitor mode...
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK Guys Ive gotten hung up from the git go here on setting this
thing up.
Went
Hello Rick,
Try MT63 under heavy QRN conditions; alot of downsides but for
bucking qrn/qrm have found this about the bestCHIP modes also
seem to do well in high qrn environmentsboth are wide bandwidth
(relatively) so this may well be a part of it all..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hello Jeff,
Congratulations on the upgrade. for BPSK31 your best bets are to poke
arounnd 3.580, 7.070 or 14.070 - that is where the bulk of activity
is depending upon conditions and time of day.
73 and good luck!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jeffnjr484 [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Joe,
my guess (and indeed it is a guess) is 4 or 5 baud DominoEX or one of
the JT65 (A,B,or C) modes...hard drive on the computer died so cannot
play it back to decode it until I get it all up and running
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL
Odd,
Posted this once and see mutiple instances of it --- believe the same
thing is being observed on other Yahoo groups but apologies in any case,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Joe,
{snipped}
Excellent !! This is the logical answer to most of the Emcomm
spectrum preemption and interference problems! Thanks.
At 07:56 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
Proposal: Non-Disaster Automatic Ops on 60M Only
Let's petition the FCC to restrict all automatic
mode ops to 60M except when specifically
within the
automatic stations segment) then don't whine when you get a toe bit
off.
This would still be a good solution. 1/3 the band for narrow museum
modes. 1/3 for voice modes and 1/3 for modern progressive modes with
no rules or bandwidth limits and let technology rule.
73
Bill - WA7NWP
need to take that into account...suspect we work from
different perspectives (who doesn't?) but no need to let that impact
the goal...
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought we decided somebody else said that? (HI
I can do a sked :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Serocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
{snipped}
TRY to find someone on any rant on a digital mode.
{end snip}
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
I thought you said, Kill all the lawyers, guess that does not
include the ARRL legal staff..
Prohibitions are fairly simple; and no, that is not the same
as permissions :)
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
{snipped
band modes are exploding.
Not that having a place for museum modes is bad -- we just shouldn't
hold on to them at the expense of the future.
I'm assuming everybody here does know that 6 meters is encompassed by BPL..
73
Bill - WA7NWP
To be argumentative, this quote was from the play Henry VI, believe
Dick the Butcher made it. He also wanted to execute all those that
could read or write. Shakespeare apprenticed for a law firm and do
not think he would wish for my family to be deprived of income thru
death :)
Also doubt
bandwidth.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there is work presently being done to advance HF data
communications, I thought it would be good to start a dialogue
here about the advantages of PSK signals on HF, over some
Well, was on the internet very early...mostly only .edu and .mil
domains back thenhence I listened and tuned around alot on the
radio :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Warriner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What did Ham Radio do before the Internet E-Mail?
Hi Andy,
I have not tried it (even on VHF); but curious as to why it is not
legal. Is it speed and/or bandwidth?
Thanks in advance,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder to the USA based hams , this mode is not considered
Or the 2400 Baud option :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill:
I have not tried it (even on VHF); but curious
as to why it is not
legal. Is it speed and/or bandwidth?
Was just reading the docs and noticed it's 2000
baud!
Tony - KT2Q
I do not believe so, they use MIL-STD-188-141A
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't the HF-LINK folks been using this mode for over 5 years?
John. K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED
wince at doing so at home); is the bottom
line that -141A is legal in the US but -110 is not?
Thanks in advance,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John K8OCL wrote:
Haven't the HF-LINK folks been using this mode for over 5 years
from
MUF (although slow). All seem a compromise, but they all provide
ARQ... a trade-off in speed versus bandwidth..
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm I missing something - I don't seen to have a problem with
HF
packet
hour in the fall.
Bill Ragsdale K6KN
ham (BWPH?), with commercial alternatives to serve the
same purpose.
73
Bill M9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After looking at the winlink position report page there must
be 50 or so hams at sea. Now why in the world would anyone not
want them
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snipped...shows I had a bad day at work when I cannot type my call
correctly and then fail to proof-read]
73
Bill M9DSJ
Actually my ticket reads n9dsj
a digital
mode on 80 in the evening without a more narrow filter would make things
even more miserable.
73
Bill N9DSj
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I agee with Danny and don't quite get what Leigh is saying.
Dave's question is an interesting one
independant of ALE; more like PAX/PAX2 on
steroids (and hence wider, like people on steroids :)
ARQ FAE works quite well, had numerous qso today using that mode but
still cringe abit on using a 2000 Hz wide signal for data modes...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
to matter alot
moreslower AGC seems to de-blur the received print and reduce
screen noise.
Interesting question though.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Noise reduction on my old rig never did much. Now I have a new rig
Hi Andy,
Well many cringe on hearing me, regardless of mode...at least ARQ FAE
is more narrow than the umpteen ssb signals that abound. Is
interesting conceptually.
Saw you on 80 also but condx between us seemed less than optimum...am
sure another night will bode better.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Does the kernel AX25 packet stack work with Puppy? If so, any how-to pages
for setting it up?
Thanks,
Bill - WA7NWP
On 3/2/07, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! I already use Puppy Linux for everything, office,
Internet, GPS, etc. and now a simple-to-install Ham
digital app.
commute both going and coming home from work due to weather, so
not at my best (if there is a best)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I give: conditions are terrible, around 0100z 80 was great ,
listening to some nets on 80 and copying
Hi Dan,
Here is a link to the MIL-STD-188-141A/ALE channels. The root webpage
gives alot of information as to what MIL-STD-188-141A/ALE is and does..
http://www.hflink.com/channels/
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, n0ziz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is 141a? What
Steve,
I noticed the same behaviour here using test versions 24_02_20 and
25_02_20; reverted back to 19_02_20.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Hajducek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Bad news as soon as MultiPSK 25-02 receives an ARQ FAE linking call
You, EA2AFR and KQ6XA were very solid here on all modes - also CO2JA
abit later...ice did a number on my antenna so was in monitor mode
only. Antenna is back up so will try 80 meters later...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
EA2AFR
robust Olivia but faster.. a trade-off.
BPSK31 is the most popular but one of the less robust modes
available. Think is will all sort out in due timealot
of obscure modes like PSKAM10 have their place.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Leigh,
No protocol/technical reason...not sure there is a need as MFSK already
does thatif there is an upside to Olivia sending pics versus MFSK
it could be implimented.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any
Hi,
I *have* to use HP-UX at work so I avoid it and anything that reminds
me of it at home; but think your only real choice would be Fldigi
See http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html
Others that use Unix/Linux might offer other options...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
there was RTTY QRM on the freq we were using. Suspect the
exception Windows errors are my issue and will try to see what is
going on.
Again thanks for all your efforts...the ARQ FAE and UNPROTO modes are
most interesting!
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker
Also copied alot of data frames from you tonight on 3.587 +1500 HZ
AF, USBnice signal Jose.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I found him on 14109.5 kHz dial QRG + 1500 Hz AF, USB.
Jose, CO2JA
Hi John,
It worked really well despite me being a moron! Sorry to cut it short
due to work looming soon. Copied you and VE5TLW fine once I sorted
things outARQ FAE is most interesting!
thanks again,
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
no problem as i said I have a toll free here anywhere in North
America so can walk u thru it sigs not real strong... but it is
a
great mode, Terry and I were fooling with this earlier today
/ALE...still looking for a place I feel
comfortable placing a 2000 Hz wide digital signal uponno issues
trying that on 10/6/3, but of course noone will hear me there.
Anxious to try it though; I sense alot of work went into it by
Patrick.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio
All,
I did not realize the controversial nature of this topic; I seriously
was trying to have the question answered while trying to (seemingly
poorly) tip-toe around that known peripheral issues that seem to
always inspire ire. Lesson learned and I will comment no further on
this.
73,
Bill
to ignore its own bandplan and
also continue to transmit without even the illusion of listening?
Re-reading this it seems like a slam but that is not my intent; I am
actually quite curious as to the mind-set behind this all
73
Bill N9DSJ
for propogation are looking for a frequency to beacon...
the ARRL has it in the bandplan but the FCC does not have it in the
regs.
73 and be well, thanks for your comments,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill, it is a question many have asked
Hello Rick,
As of today unattended Propnet operations on 160 meters (at least in
the US) has ceased.
73 and be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turned out that the PSK31 station was a Propnet station:
4www.PropNET.org
w2aaamo:(fn0
the hidden transmitter syndrome. I operate
only using BPSK31 on Propnet, but others use AX.25 on 10/6/2 and
above and believe BPSK63 was also coded into the software but have
not seen others using it
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi Rick,
Just FYI; you and Dave (K3GAU) were solid copy on DoiminoEX on 160
tonight despite me using my 80 meter antenna. Actually seemed best
using 22 baud with FEC...one or two static crash hits, but overall
impressive considering my antenna limitations on 160 meters.
73
Bill N9DSJ
that Olivia can decode signals in
the mudother times I swear at it...one night on a VHF path only
PSKAM10 or JT65B would get through; guess that what makes it all fun.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
Yes, busy night tonight
than our ASCII attempts hi
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just wondering if anybody here knows anything about high speed
Morse. Seems like it was used in the 1940s, maybe earlier and
later, sending Morse at speeds of 500
hits under less than ideal conditions (as one would
expect). It remains my mode of preference for 80 meters due to its
robust nature and bandwidth (although MFSK16 and Olivia have their
virtues).
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Has anyone had any experience with the AOR digital voice modem ARD9000MK2?
I'm curious as to how well it works on hf ssb.
Bill S
this than I do...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may be a dumb question, but is there any way to do real time
communication with WSJT, in other words, have a keyboard to
keyboard
conversation?
73,
Rick, KV9U
Bill McLaughlin wrote
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the information in the help files from Multipsk:
1200 baud Packet = 1320 wpm
BPSK125 = 148 wpm capital and 204 wpm small letter average speed at
about -8 db S/N
Of course this assumes that both
B for 2 meters and mode C for 430 MHz and above... as
usual I may be dead wrong!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
getting interested in jt65 via hf. as all digital stuff i have ever
seen in us and eu has been usb
need to assume all *will* fail or be disabled. Any that
remain are icing on the cake but we cannot assume we get iced cake.
Plan for the worse case scenario and one will be set for any better
conditions beyond that..
73 es be well
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ
Bill,
What you have left is noisy HF.
So this is the time to try PSKMail. Its only (ONLY???) 200 WPM user
throughput but 100% error free and even under the very worst conditions, 25-50
WPM? What is WPM? Bytes per second is a fixed measure. Assuming 5
bytes plus a space that's 6 bytes
. Thanks for the prompt to look into Pskmail...guess I need to
dust off the Unix box (use it all the time at work so try to avoid it
at home).
Thanks again, 73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
As Rick said
all else fails..if only for their sake :)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In our area, if we lose power and the phone system, we likely will
lose
internet connectivity. Our EC looked into the situation in our
rural
area and found
of heart.
That is the truth. Not worth the effort for most folks in this era of
web portals and you-tubes.
73
Bill
Hi all,
on 3.5935 - AF 1500 - beaconing in 110 baud packet mode...
73
Bill N9DSJ
have so many lawyers, to debate (for fees) the
differences among shall be, will be ,to be and is.
Bill-W4BSG
At 01:36 AM 1/14/2007, you wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am *not* making it open source, only the decoding DLL's. The UI
will never
, the selective fading was an issuestill is; one of the
reasons 300 baud packet away from the MUF suffers so...
Be well, 73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back around the early 1980's, QST published a TU (Terminal Unit,
what we
used to use
to
the mode chages. Thanks for the entertainment!
73 and be well;
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ
on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried
Or hopefully both
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably some of our new upgraded people who have no idea that
contesting is disallowed on the WARC bands. They will find out in one
of two ways: They will give a nice letter from
months it was interesting; when it became a contest every weekend
it became a pain.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I worked the contest from Europe and in general the PSK frequencies
on 40m and 20m were left alone by the contesters. I
Hi Roger,
That coincides with what I saw. Was able to work digital modes on 40
meters during the day but suspect that was only possible as all the
juicy points-producing propagation was on 20 and 15 meters during
that time-frame.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J
.
I,too, like to look hams up at any time, and I use the cardfile for
Phone numbers, etc, so I like to open them quickly.
Works for me--Bill-W4BSG
At 04:16 AM 1/4/2007, you wrote:
Not exactly digital related but...
I frequently get interested in where a ham might be located or have
other reason
Dave,
Thanks to you and all the others..even though I only use Linux/Unix
offline, I do appreciate the work you and the others do to make
various digital modes available to many...(and Joe has a new call -
N8FQ )
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w1hkj [EMAIL PROTECTED
The solution I would propose is to purchase a new drive
Could try a Virtual PC disk image on the thumb drive. Then everyting
is installed there and it's a simple file to delete when you're done.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx
in several miles.
Good luck-Bill-W4BSG
At 02:41 PM 12/26/2006, you wrote:
My entry in to amateur radio was via 10 meters and the quest for DX, I
had no real interest in local communication. Over the years I have
had hams ask me to help them set-up their stations for digital mode
operation and have
that, in theory, actually listen before transmitting. Automatic
stations are a whole other discussion!
Be well and 73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You could host the last automatic digital QSO on 80m. If you ensure
that the frequency
could well be incorrect, the FCC made no provisions at all in
the omnibus ruling to address the total deletion of the semi-
automatic subband.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
97.221 limits 80m automatic operation with more than 500 hz
And to respond to my own post before I see it, I should learn to use
my reading glassesclearly it states less than 500 Hz...my
error...
Getting old is little fun but better than the alternatives, I guess.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED
Brad,
Think of it as a challenge/opportunitywe will all survive and the
sun will still rise. It will, however, be interesting times in the
Chinese sense of that phrase...
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brad Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
After reading umpteen
:
What would have to change to make what we do (Amateur Radio - digital)
interesting and relevant to the typical Jr High School computer
hobbiest? We can talk forever about A1C's and X0Z's but in 10 or 20
years it's going to be that Jr Hi generation that's doing what ever
is being done.
73
Bill
101 - 200 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
