El 06/03/2010 14:53, Rein A escribió:
Hello Jose,
I always set the sound card volume, the modulation, that when changing the
volume setting, the output of the transmitter will follow in a linear fashion.
This is very important in particular for WSPR and WSPR-QSO modes.
73 Rein W6SZ
I do
Hello Jose,
I always set the sound card volume , the modulation, that when changing the
volume setting , the output of the transmitter will follow in a linear fashion.
This is very important in particuar for WSPR and WSPR-QSO modes.
73 Rein W6SZ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A.
In WSPR it sometimes happens that stations are spotted +50Hz and -50Hz their
dial frequency.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
While harmonics from modes like PSK31 are common, I have never seen a JT65A
signal generate what you describe. Interesting.
Andy
QRT now
73 la5vna Steinar
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I am running a 5W JT65A beacon at 5310 Khz + 1270Hz USB
this evening, with start at 1830 UTC.
The transceiver is a modified ICOM IC-718 and the
antenna is a w3dzz (80, 40 an 20m) tuned with a LDG AT-100Pro Autotuner.
Try to
http://hflink.com/jt65/
JT65A HF Frequencies
VFO FREQ
- 28076.0 kHz USB
- 24920.0 kHz USB
- 21076.0 kHz USB
-
18102.0 kHz USB
* 14076.0 kHz USB
* 10139.0 kHz USB
- 7036.0 kHz USB
- 7039.0 kHz USB
- 7076.0 kHz USB
-
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave dco...@... wrote:
Does anyone use JT65A on 17 or 30 meters, and if so, what frequency is used
on both?
Tnx es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the 80 meter jt65A contact tonight. Most use 10.139 for jt65a but it
is crowded with Winlink,
To tell the truth most of that year and a half was spent trying to figure out
who transmits first and who transmits second, and that it can be either or but
not not the same. That and trying to figure out how to set their computer
clocks over the internet was a tough nut to crack. They
In this case I'm fairly certain they're not false decodes. I finished
a JT65A QSO with KD5JGA on 80m 18 minutes prior to what you saw. He
started calling CQ again afterwards.
-Dan, AE9K
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives
FALSE CQs. . The 1 0 after the
:18 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: JT65A - gotaway
In this case I'm fairly certain they're not false decodes. I finished
a JT65A QSO with KD5JGA on 80m 18 minutes prior to what you saw. He
started calling CQ again afterwards.
-Dan, AE9K
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one
Pese al ajuste del reloj, las señales empìezan a aparecer en la
cascada en cualquier momento y no en el punto del cambio de minuto
como debería ser.
He did adjust the clock, but signals are starting ramdomly, not at minute
boundaries.
I guess the clock adjustment went wrong.
, December 11, 2007 6:05 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: JT65A : DESDE URUGUAY CON PROBLEMAS
Pese al ajuste del reloj, las señales empìezan a aparecer en la
cascada en cualquier momento y no en el punto del cambio de minuto
como debería ser.
He did adjust
Robert,
The reason that radio amateurs discussing automatic operation would use
the term is primarily because that is the term used under Part 97. On
the other hand Part 97 does not reference the word unattended.
We need to insure we are talking the same language, and not substitute
It would seem that automatic is a word that provokes un-helpful
discussion. Since no meaningful discussion can be held without shared terms
and meanings, maybe we could consider the following definitions rather than
using the nebulous and diverse automatic:
Unattended: Cases where there is no
Bonnie if you are always this untrustworthy, i better remove the link to
your homepage from mine:
/- 1. It has an AUTOMATIC button. /
Which button is that? I must be blind, I have conducted more that 1500
QSO whith WSJT in various modes, and have never had a glimpse of such a
button...
/- 2.
expeditionradio wrote:
JT65a is certainly an automatic mode. It is as automatic as any other
automatic system. It perfectly fits the definitions of automatic in
both the strictest sense and in many other ways, figuratively,
literally and as used in RF communications:
It sounds like a
OZ1PIF/5Q2M, Peter wrote:
/- 1. It has an AUTOMATIC button. /
Which button is that? I must be blind,
Hi Peter,
The JT65A automatic button is the button labeled:
AUTO IS ON
You can easily see the Auto button in this image,
it is red color:
http://www.obriensweb.com/image15.jpg
JT65A is a
Not at all. It is a mode where humans must decide if a QSO is valid.
EME ops are certainly picky about this. It is meant for EME, it was not
created as another automatic box. Of course, it has proven useful for
extreme HF DX as well, which is not as extreme as EME may prove to be.
I would
Roger,
The real thing that gets in my craw about JT65 is the 60 second
continuous transmissions for each QSO segment. On HF, this could
surely be reduced to 30 seconds or less. I've yet to have really weak
ones reply that would have needed the long decode period. I
understand the need for
Hello Bonnie,
Not sure I proved anything :)
If I fall asleep on my keyer is that an unattended CW mode?
If I leave my vox on and background noise keys the xmitter is that
an attended SSB mode?
What is at issue is *intentional* automatic modes, not my cat
stepping on the ptt.
JT65 is not an
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
JT65 is not an automatic or semi-automatic mode in any sense of the
definition.
Bill,
JT65a is certainly an automatic mode.
It is as automatic as any other automatic system.
It perfectly fits the definitions of automatic in both the strictest
sense and in many other
*confused look*
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
JT65 is not an automatic or semi-automatic mode in any sense of
the
definition.
Bill,
JT65a is certainly an automatic mode.
It is as automatic as any other automatic
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
I would be hard pressed to
fit JT modes into any definition of unattended, semi-automatic
or automatic operation.
Hi Bill,
You proved my point that what we now consider just a normal feature of
software or radio operation, is something that we once considered
automatic
You've missed the point entirely. From what several JT65 users
reported, these automatic capabilities are there to assist an
operator who sees the decoded receiver output and would not initiate
transmission if the frequency were in use. The station is not running
unattended.
Does writing case
Thanks, David. I was just responding to Bonnie's assertion that some
JT65 stations operate unattended. I guess her claim was incorrect.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same is true for
WSJT features an auto checkbox, which, when enabled, automatically
switches to the next message in sequence, after each over. The transmit
times for both stations are defined and are on odd/even minute
boundaries.
From the documentation at http://2yf444 (select the English PDF)
Auto:
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any over
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any over
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Exactly , Bill. Winwarbler , Multipsk, and otehr software packages allow a
user to program beacons of varying digital modes. I can set my CQ message
to repeat every 60 seconds. This is not unattended modes that we are
talking about when mentioning PACTOR.
Andy K3UK
On 9/24/07, Bill McLaughlin
WinWarbler's repeat macro is limited to a maximum of 25 repetitions
with listening intervals of no more than 15 seconds between
repetitions. It thus cannot be used for unattended beaconing.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Yes, I can see how JT65A is great when signals are weak, but almost all
JT65A contacts here in Europe are between EU stations.
I have seen the occasional JA station, and one or two ZS stations, but
trying to get to work them is almost impossible due to the number of
stations that call
Phil,
One of the columns shown in the WSJT main window (where signals are
decoded) is DF. This stands for delta frequency and displays how
many Hz +/- you must tune to be exactly on top of the decoded station.
As for logging RST, I always use OOO. It's weird for HF, yes, but is
the standard
Hello Brian and the group,
I am new to this group as well, and also have a couple of queries of my
own
First, some comments regarding the observations of Brian K3KO:
I am also a little puzzled as to the worthiness of JT65A on 20m. Most of the
few contacts I have had have also been
In the message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dated Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:39:15PM +0100,
pcooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what about LoTW submissions?
How do you get LoTW to handle JT65A?
Just use JT65 for the mode field.
https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/faq#modes
// Kenji Rikitake, JJ1BDX(/3)
Let me play devil's advocate.
Regarding HF JT65A operation in practice in the presence of the usual
atmospherics.
If I can't hear a signal, chances are near zero that it will be found
tuning about the band by looking at the waterfalls. One almost needs
to sked such difficult paths. You have to
but the nature of the WSJT software is that it will decode signls within a
600 Hz range. So, unlike many other modes, even if you are off frequency
and not able to hear anything...it will decode.
Andy
On 5/30/07, Brian A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me play devil's advocate.
Regarding
Hi,
The appeal of JT65 is multi-faceted...works great deep into the noise
so I can work stations as meager as more own at some distance. Also
the freq tolerance, as you mentioned.
It is automated so a double right click on another call sets things
in motion - sit back and watch!
Socially it
Double-click the trace you want decoded.
Then double click another one. Works fine.
Since the exchange isn't more than 7 characters on either side (3 for
count and class, space, 3 for section) it looks like it would work
plenty well for FD contesting.
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:08:17 -0400, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can type anything you want in the TX1 to TX6
-I think that is a great idea.
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be beneficial for stations calling CQ to transmit on even
minutes
(TX first) , while stations answering CQ's use odd minutes (TX
second) ???
Jus wonderin ..
The codebase appears to be GPL
Yes, the source is there, but it's a mix of phyton, fortran and C.
Not easy to see trough, or to build it.
btw the intel fortran compiler is free for 30 days ...
Hi,
Also go to the decode psuedo-button and disble deepsearch
options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will
speed up the decodes...
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc
With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually
When monitoring JT65A I decoded
CQ N4WO EL88 1 and 0
What is the 1 and zero?
Also what is the meaning of the # and * I see in the decoded lines?
Dan
Hi Dan and fellow JT65 fans
You ask a very good question as understanding the meaning of these
symbols is at the heart of digging deep
Not hearing you or anyone else on 18.102, and apparently nobody
hearing me either. Good condx here with almost no noise.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andy and the gang,
I have some static because of snowing, and the
Hi,
What about trying 30m ? I am sending cq on 10.147 USB now.
73 de la5vna Steinar
Dave wrote:
Not hearing you or anyone else on 18.102, and apparently nobody
hearing me either. Good condx here with almost no noise.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
The RTTY has left 20M and it is very quite now. I am on 14.076 along
with many others.
Darrel VE7CUS
On 8-Apr-07, at 8:59 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi,
What about trying 30m ? I am sending cq on 10.147 USB now.
73 de la5vna Steinar
Dave wrote:
Not hearing you or anyone else on
Sorry, Steiner, but not hearing you there either. I have an S-5
noise level right there, though, plus the usual packet stations.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi,
What about trying 30m ? I am sending cq on 10.147 USB now.
73 de la5vna Steinar
Dave wrote:
Not hearing you or
OK , I got ZS6BUN on 30m now :) :) :)
LA5VNA Steinar
Darrel Smith wrote:
The RTTY has left 20M and it is very quite now. I am on 14.076 along
with many others.
Darrel VE7CUS
On 8-Apr-07, at 8:59 AM, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi,
What about trying 30m ? I
Chris Danis wrote:
On 4/4/07, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are all those DIAL frequencies?
Jose,
Yeah, dial frequencies. Audio frequencies typically used for JT65 (at
least in every QSO I've seen/worked) have been around 1200Hz.
best 73,
-chris N2YYZ
RGRthanks !
Alan,
The software contains no reference to HF and the listed bands are 6M
and above. Use of it on HF has started within the past couple of
weeks. The JT65A is the mode that people are using on HF, not the
other modes in WSJT.
7076 LSB
7076 USB
18102 USB
24910 USB
10147 USB
14076 USB
Are
Andy,
Are all those DIAL frequencies?
Jose, CO2JA
--
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
Alan,
The software contains no reference to HF and the listed bands are 6M
and above. Use of it on HF has started within the past couple of
weeks. The JT65A is the mode that people are using on HF, not the
On 4/4/07, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are all those DIAL frequencies?
Jose,
Yeah, dial frequencies. Audio frequencies typically used for JT65 (at
least in every QSO I've seen/worked) have been around 1200Hz.
best 73,
-chris N2YYZ
On 4/4/07, Chris Danis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, dial frequencies. Audio frequencies typically used for JT65 (at
least in every QSO I've seen/worked) have been around 1200Hz.
I should add (sent that a little too soon) that JT65 is the easiest
mode to tune I've ever seen: the software
and...
JT65 transmits messages using 65-tone frequency-shift keying at 2.7
baud. The lowest tone at 1270.5 Hz is used to establish time and
frequency synchronization; it is switched on for half of the time,
according to a pseudo-random on-off pattern. The remaining tone
intervals carry the
-I agree David, and think that us digital folks can help the WSJT
folks usually up on VHF/IHF to adopt our convention of using USB on
all bands.
Great going on the contients you have worked!
Andy K3UK
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Yes Howard the DL heard you and was calling back from his JO52 grid
square. You'll be shocked with this mode, convinced the signal is too
weak to decode and then see a completed sequence pop up on you screen
To copy, just highlight then control C and past as control V
Andy K3UK
-- In
Hi Andy
I made some Throb QSOs yesterday.
The synchronization and tuning was critical,
but it was comfortable after once locking.
My QRG was Dial:14,075kHz(USB) AF:1500Hz with RS-ID.
73 Hisami 7L4IOU
I'm not sure if it is coincidence or not but I have heard a lot of
Throb activity today on
This web page might help discover activity
http://www.chris.org/cgi-bin/jt65talkrote:
Andy K3UK
I am on 14.076 in JT65A and received CQ VE3FGU FN04 right now.
LA5VNA Steinar
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I have acquire the software and have mode JT65A working with my rig.
57 matches
Mail list logo
