[steering-discuss] next SC call tomorrow

2011-08-23 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, this is just a short reminder that the next steering committee call will take place tomorrow, Wednesday, at 1600 UTC. Details are, as usual, in the wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Next_Call Florian -- Florian Effenberger

Re: [steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request

2011-08-23 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Simon Phipps wrote on 2011-08-22 21:29: I'm not sure about binding as I think explained is actually an assertive word, but sure, that's fine too. I was just trying to be concise! I'm not a native speaker, so you have much more insight into the English language than I do. ;-) So, the

[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi Florian, Alex, how does that sound from a legal point of view? Is it strong enough? Usage is explained in our trademark policy. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems?

[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Second thoughts, subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our trademark policy. better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to

Re: [steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request

2011-08-23 Thread Simon Phipps
On 23 Aug 2011, at 13:03, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Second thoughts, subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our trademark policy. better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. I agree

[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 23/08/11 15:25, Simon Phipps a écrit : Hi Simon, better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. I agree that's more precise English. I am a little concerned it's uncommon usage that those with English as a second language might consider difficult, and thus I prefer

[tdf-discuss] DK: 25, 000 hospital staff Copenhagen region to use open source office suite

2011-08-23 Thread Vitorio Furusho
Hi DK: 25,000 hospital staff Copenhagen region to use open source office suite http://www.osor.eu/news/dk-25-000-hospital-staff-copenhagen-region-to-use-open-source-office-suite* read more: http://www.computerworld.dk/art/118515 http://www.computerworld.dk/art/118467

[tdf-discuss] [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???

2011-08-23 Thread Sveinn í Felli
Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) -

Re: [tdf-discuss] [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???

2011-08-23 Thread Steve Edmonds
On 2011-08-24 08:47, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor

[tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???

2011-08-23 Thread NoOp
On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice