Hi,
Simon Phipps wrote on 2011-08-22 21:29:
I'm not sure about "binding" as I think "explained" is actually an assertive
word, but sure, that's fine too. I was just trying to be concise!
I'm not a native speaker, so you have much more insight into the English
language than I do. ;-)
So, the current proposal would be:
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of
their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks
in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also
subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our
trademark policy.
Alex, how does that sound from a legal point of view? Is it strong enough?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
