(sorry if this comes in twice, my email server had problems earlier
today)Reply-To: M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net
Greetings,
the subject says it all. I have already searched online, and am
looking at the manual but apparently (maybe I used the wrong terms) it
is not easy to find CURRENT
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 08:16:25 AM +0100, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
99% percent , changes comes and will come from incompatiliteis in de API.
for now this is OK, small changes from version to version, but
nothing who not can been repaired or handled with the code( basic)
itself
I knew that. The
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 18:02:43 PM +1100, Laurence Jeloudev wrote:
ODF formats are still not implemented to a point where consumers
can forget about what software they are using.
and this is exactly what the signature of the OP, as well as the
actual, original topic of this thread, is about:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 20:17:49 PM +1100, Laurence Jeloudev wrote:
The concept is a great idea.
But what if you encounter a person with a mac computer.
that's the whole point. Both of ODF in general, and, I assume, of
Boudi. His signature is only about formats, it never mentions specific
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 07:04:03 AM +0100, Mike Hall wrote:
I don't know whether or not Thunderbird filtering supports list-id
etc, though a quick Google search seemed to imply not.
According to this page it does:
http://legroom.net/howto/thunderbird
HTH,
Marco
http://mfioretti.com
--
Personally speaking, the sooner list prefixes are removed, the better,
but no problem if they remain. In fact, the real reason why I replied
is that I am curious about this:
This would be helpful in several ways, like DKIM and other e-mail
signing tools don't break, plus it looks much better in
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 18:12:34 PM +0100, Mike Hall
(mike.h...@onepoyle.net) wrote:
The main cost is not the licence, for which in any case large
organisations generally pay very little per desktop. It's user
support that is costly, ie overall cost of ownership.
Mike,
I have a question about
(sorry if this is a duplicate, my mail server had problems earlier
today)
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 15:16:35 PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier
(lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
1. Why are unsubscribed posts even allowed? It would
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 11:35:24 AM +, Gordon Burgess-Parker
(gbpli...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 31/12/10 10:32, M. Fioretti wrote:
wrong. Mine (mutt) doesn't for example,
Then I would plonk you immediately. How do you not see that that is
TOTALLY ARROGANT?
Uh??? In that part of your message
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 19:58:41 PM +0100, Italo Vignoli
(italo.vign...@gmail.com) wrote:
OOXML has been cleared from copyright and patent issues by Microsoft
itself before entering into the standardization process, as this is
a pre-condition of ISO standards. In addition, all Microsoft
document
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 10:07:30 AM +, Gordon Burgess-Parker
(gbpli...@gmail.com) wrote:
None of you get the point, do you.
1. It is arrogant to return a document in a format different to that
which was sent to you.
arrogant my foot. If somebody smokes in my face it is not arrogant to
tell
Efficient support, explain fragmentation, put ODF first:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2010/11/three-things-to-not-forget-to-make-libreoffice-and-odf-succeed/
Marco
--
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 08:57:45 AM -0800, plino (pedl...@gmail.com) wrote:
I do agree that volunteer-friendly user support is the key for the
success of any Open Source project. However, in my opinion e-mail
and mailing lists are obsolete and ineffective tools.
The problem I describe did not
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 13:24:39 PM +0100, Gordon Burgess-Parker
(gbpli...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 23/10/2010 11:09, RL MacGregor wrote:
If I might be so bold, I hope that neither ever have an interface
like the current offering from redmond! I have to use it at Uni
I'm very surprised you HAVE
B. Byfield's view of the situation:
http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/The-Cold-War-Between-OpenOffice.org-and-LibreOffice
--
MS Office like cocaine?
http://stop.zona-m.net/node/198
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 12:00:56 PM +0200, Charles-H. Schulz
(charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org) wrote:
On the other hand, I and others do not tolerate being fired by
Oracle. Resigning is one thing, being kicked out is another one.
Resigning is a logical consequence of our actions that will
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 23:50:27 PM -0500, Alexandro Colorado
(j...@openoffice.org) wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 10:33:00 AM -0500, Eduardo Moreno (
emor...@tokonhu.com) wrote:
When will we see the integration
Hi folks,
maybe this is a very stupid question or just a very naive one, but I
assure you that it is in good faith. Is this decision a surprise for
anybody?
Me, I've been seriously asking myself since september 28, every time I
saw some of the TDF founders posting around with an @openoffice.org
in the future.
thanks,
M. Fioretti
http://stop.zona-m.net
(1) the intrinsical *validity* of the reasons that caused the creation
of TDF are a totally separate issue, at least for me!
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 17:26:10 PM +0100, Zaphod Feeblejocks (zapho...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Greetings, friends.
Have a look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP0MM5sZbUcfeature=player_embedded
Looks like Microsoft are getting scared - why else would they go to the
hassle of FUDding OOo?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 10:33:00 AM -0500, Eduardo Moreno (emor...@tokonhu.com)
wrote:
When will we see the integration of OpenOffice.org with other Oracle
products? I have not read about OpenOffice.org / Primavera, Export
to ODF from Oracle ERP, etc.
I don't know anything about Oracle ERP.
21 matches
Mail list logo
