NoOp wrote:
Why is it that security advisories such as this:
https://www.libreoffice.org/advisories/CVE-2012-0037/
are not posted on the user or announce lists?
The only way I found out about this was via a Redhat bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791296
[Bug 791296 -
NoOp wrote:
On 03/22/2012 06:31 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
NoOp wrote:
It would be nice if someone 'official' (ala TDF) could post the
CVE-2012-0037 notice on both the user and announce lists.
It is now reported on the blog post.
Well just how many users are subscribed
Olav Dahlum wrote:
2012/2/15 Shawn Sumin shawn.su...@gmail.com
Will LibreOffice ever have a similar program like MS Outlook?
i.e. Calendar, Tasks, Contacts and Mail
The components was thrown out of StarOffice in its time, so putting them
back won't be feasible. But as other people
yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
On 08/02/12 10:54, Pedro wrote:
Hi all
I just read the UX thread/sequence of emails where it was decided
that the
universal Save icon (in any program, any OS) represented by a floppy
disk
would be replaced by another icon.
I'm shocked that a Discuss topic where 54
donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Pedro,
My mistake then. I didn't read deeply enough into the thread.
I still submit that none of these open source projects and their products
compete in the sense of meaningful market share. With MS-Office dominating
so thoroughly the only thing that makes
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2012-01-24 15:48:
Voting is a measure of traceable membership participation/activity.
Otherwise we can get spammed on untraceable votes to send us where we
don't want LibCon to happen.
by that, we would exclude a large amount of
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
we have received two proposals for this years' LibreOffice Conference
- thank you very much for your applications!
My proposal for the voting process is as follows:
- I would like to make the proposals public immediately, by uploading
them to the wiki, and
1920...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2012 13:46, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Trivial to do; and the UX people I've talked to ask to do it. All we
need is for someone to submit a patch we can merge that has the updated
tango icons overwriting the save / saveas
M Robinson wrote:
SNIP
I haven't heard of Delete/Eraser that works as well on SSDs as
traditional hard drives. That said USB will be the most common storage
media soon enough. Who saves to CDs at work?
I don't think the icon is a big deal, the whole interface is dated, I
pitched a Firefox
Paul wrote:
Does Libre office have a stand alone PDF application? ie - does Libre provide the PDF editor by itself without all the other features in the 200 MB download - is it possible to install only the PDF tool without all the other features ?
All responses appreciated. Thanks, Paula
Olav Dahlum wrote:
On 28/11/11 13:13, Pedro wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote
Google should do a version of Office based on the
OOo/LibO code base and embed ads and search links, make it available
freely
and brand it Google Office. Given their brand strength and marketing,
that
would probably do
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
thanks a lot to everyone for their great and creative contribution to
the discussion, which I consider really fruitful. Even if I didn't
reply to every message, I read them all.
It is already rather clear, that there is a real overwhelming support
for
Ken Springer wrote:
Hi, Larry,On 7/31/11 2:28 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:Please fix your quote
attribution. It is almost impossible to pick
out your comments in this mess.I would if I knew how And *if* it was
easy to do for just the
LO messages. I'm not happy with the way TB 5.0
Andy Brown wrote:
Robert Derman wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
e-letter wrote:
It is difficult to understand why a business
would waste time trying to use LO; if a customer uses m$, the supplier
might as well do so also and consider the m$ price as a cost of
conducting
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
e-letter wrote:
It is difficult to understand why a business
would waste time trying to use LO; if a customer uses m$, the supplier
might as well do so also and consider the m$ price as a cost of
conducting business.
I've seen plenty of small, medium and large
Laurence Jeloudev wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if Libreoffice would implement an auto save feature in
os x lion and full screen app support, or maybe an auto save feature
that is similar but it can also be Implemented in other operating
systems like ubuntu or windows where the user does not have
Ian Lynch wrote:
On 5 July 2011 21:58, Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com wrote:
e-letter wrote:
As far as the request for the ability to download individual
components of LO, this should not be enabled. The whole concept of the
predecessor staroffice product was to provide
e-letter wrote:
As far as the request for the ability to download individual
components of LO, this should not be enabled. The whole concept of the
predecessor staroffice product was to provide various functionalities
in terms of word-processing, spreadsheets, drawing, etc. and this
should be
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final
versions
Simon Cropper wrote:
On 05/07/11 09:07, Robert Derman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF
Ian Lynch wrote:
On 2 July 2011 23:22, Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com wrote:
Keith Curtis wrote:
The problem with building a reader is that it would be about the same size
as LibreOffice. OpenDocument is very different from PDF. For those who
can't
install LO
Keith Curtis wrote:
The problem with building a reader is that it would be about the same size
as LibreOffice. OpenDocument is very different from PDF. For those who can't
install LO, they probably can't install the reader either.
Perhaps separating the modules of LO so that users could
Sean White wrote:
I dont thinks thats normal somehow, i have been using Adobe Reader for years
and have NEVER had it come past 200MB.
Back to discussion, what's with all the PDF hate.
Actually I don't hate PDF, I use it frequently and as such I am glad
that OOo and LO have the capability of
Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote:
Hi Robert,
2011/6/25 Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com:
This could eventually destroy ODF as a viable world standard if at some
point some software company or organization comes up with a popular program
(example Microsoft) that embeds fonts so
to click on a sub file and then go up to the folder you want.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Derman [mailto:robert.der...@pressenter.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:55
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] New LibreOffice Reader Eliminates Need for PDF
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT),
plino pedl...@gmail.com a écrit :
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Now, as for humility, claiming in an assured and definitive way
that ODF will lose if it
does not embed fonts is not exactly humble either.
I didn't
in the right direction again in
the transition from reader 9 to reader 10, and dumping some unnecessary
crap.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Derman [mailto:robert.der...@pressenter.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 21:24
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] New
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
On 2011-06-25, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/25/2011 02:09 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
I see font embedding as a way to make interoperation easier, and not to
achieve faithful representation. I think a major goal is to have ODF
being used on several
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 18:01, Nuno J. Silva a écrit :
On 2011-06-24, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-24 13:13, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello,
Le Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:48:54 -0700 (PDT),
plinopedl...@gmail.com a écrit :
I really hope that revision 1.2 allows for font embedding in
On 24/06/2011 03:59, Marc Paré wrote: The initial use of the
LibreOffice Reader would be just a plain reader, the challenge after
this would be to try to build as much document fidelity into it as
possible. Again, with the hopes to rival .pdf fidelity. Maybe once all
the devs put their heads
Fernand Vanrie wrote:
Cor ,
I know all this tricks, but its still sending as attachments , i want
a simple way to send a email with a message in the body
Thanks
Fernand
I would like this also, the auto corrector of LO makes it much faster to
write emails than T-Bird or any other email
plino wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
So, let me state and restate this : ODF will not embed fonts in the
1.2, 1.3, nor in the future, because the format is not meant to focus on
faithful layout rendering. Instead, PDF is meant that. ODF focuses on
office document exchanges.
As long as
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Samuel,
Samuel M wrote (23-06-11 17:06)
Why should'nt TDF go ahead and employ one of the former OOo
developers or someone else from the community? I think there would be
much interest from users and companys to pay for fixing bugs /
implementing new features.
Employing
Simon Phipps wrote:
On 23 Jun 2011, at 23:32, Marc Paré wrote:
I think it was mentioned that there were at one point over 100 million LibreOffice/OOo
users. If we were to develop our own LibreOffice Reader we would already have
100 million potential users for our product. Not only that,
Varun Mittal wrote:
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than diversifying
right now into PDF reader. Also no point inventing the wheel again when
there are several open source pdf readers available which we can integrate
instead of developing one of our own.
I am
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Ignoring the repetition on who is entitled to source code and how they are told
about it, I would like to know the answers to some very specific, tangible
matters closer to home. My
I have a few observations to make, as to future changes/improvements.
I for one am very reluctant to frequently upgrade any major software
application that must be downloaded and replaced in its entirety,
particularly if there is not a published list of the improvements in
the new
Augustine Souza wrote:
On 6/15/11, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org wrote:
...
End users do not care about
who's right, who's wrong, who's been slighted, who is more pure, etc. They
just care about products and technologies that are going to meet their
needs.
Painting quite a
Greg Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 13:40, Pieter E. Zanstra pie...@zanstra.eu wrote:
As an interested user I see a lot of noise passing by on this topic. I must
say I am totally unimpressed. What counts for me is reality, not dreaming in
the cloud. I was used to getting no response
Florian Effenberger wrote:
First TDF Advisory Board members demonstrate wide corporate support
for LibreOffice
Strong backing for a truly free and vendor-neutral office suite
The Document Foundation provides solid grounds to build upon
The Document Foundation today announced the first members
Simon Brouwer wrote:
Op 9-6-2011 16:32, Simon Phipps schreef:
On 9 Jun 2011, at 12:12, Simon Brouwer wrote:
Hi Jim, all,
Jim Jagielski schreef:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 8 Jun 2011, at 23:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
Volker Merschmann wrote:
Hi,
2011/6/9 Simon Brouwer simon.o...@xs4all.nl:
Suppose Oracle had considered donating the OpenOffice.org trademarks and
copyrights to TDF. How could it be the recipient of such a donation if it
didn't exist as a legal entity?
I'm feeling it's the hundredth
Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 6/7/11 3:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I agree... My going over it was simply to indicate areas which
I *think* (again, I have no idea, nor do a *want* to know) may
have been reasons Oracle declined, since that seems a point
that people are extremely curious about.
Andy Brown wrote:
I seem to be really missing something in all this talk about the
transfer of OOo.
1: What would TDF do with the code? At this point in time LibO is way
ahead of OOo in features and code clean up, from the patches flying in
the dev list.
2: What would TDF do with the
Marc Paré wrote:
Ahem .., or we could just ignore our ASF lurkers, keep working on our
great product, let OOo go unsupported and gather dust as it was in
Oracle's hands.
We have a truly community oriented and supported product with great
licenses as opposed to a restrictive ASF product. We
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Thanks for announcing this. Maybe we should also know if you have to be
there in person or can you participate remotely?
the event is planned on-site. Maybe we can get some remote
connection involved, but primarily, it is for hacking
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi all,
especially those of You receiving mails as digest are requested to
report.
Some people reported not beeing able getting text of the mail to be
quoted in the Editor area.
e-letter reported this for gmail,
NoOp wrote:
On 05/19/2011 05:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
Appearantly that is no longer the case. It is promanently mentioned as
of
sophie wrote:
Gianluca,
On 15/05/2011 11:44, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Hi Sophie,
sophie wrote:
the system could be a bug tracker with a less technical UI than BZ, but
I think a wiki with a good template could be enough. Why do you say
dispersive?
Because you have to navigate *a lot* through
Olivier Hallot wrote:
Em 04-05-2011 13:11, M Henri Day escreveu:
2011/5/4 Olivier Hallotolivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org
Thanks Mike for the tip
As I see, this character U+2204, does not exist in Opensymbol font,
used by
Math by default. At least not in the displayed characters of
snip
And I found another couple of similarly completely uncategorized forums.
The forums at http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ look much
more promising, but are not these two products expected to diverge
more and more? In my understanding LibreOffice is a new project that
Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 04/22/2011 05:33 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jon
Hamkinshamk...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote:
There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could
have a LibO spell checker
Jaime R. Garza wrote:
I have some doubts as to whether the two products will diverge now that
Oracle has decided to end its involvement with OpenOffice.org . I suspect
that at some point rather than let OOo just whither and die it will merge
with The Document Foundation and the
Jon Hamkins wrote:
On 04/24/2011 01:36 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
I have said this a number of times, and that at least the English
version is sadly deficient in compound words, at least the one in OOo
3.11 which I am still using because I am reluctant to give up the
personal dictionary to which
hardware expert, but not a software expert, at least no
more than most end users, but perhaps this is something where someone
like me might just be able to help. Robert Derman
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more
Kevin André wrote:
Calc seems to autocorrect a small letter to a capital letter after a dot
character.
But a dot character does not always mean the end of a sentence; in this case
it was used for an abbreviation. And sadly there is no way to undo a wrong
autocorrection: pressing undo will revert
://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile
2011/2/20 Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com:
One of the reasons, perhaps the main reason I have not upgraded to LO from
OpenOffice 3.1 yet is that I dread having to go through the process of
adding over a thousand compound words to the spellcheck
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
You can copy and paste it here,of course :-)
That would be good, since I would like to see it too.
Charles.
Le 26 févr. 2011, 5:25 PM, Howard Barr how...@weceikaiwa.com a écrit :
On 27/02/2011 00:54, Italo Vignoli wrote: Any chance of getting a copy
of such
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
On 2/23/11 12:25 AM, Valter Mura wrote:
In data giovedì 13 gennaio 2011 22:53:59, Fabián Rodríguez ha scritto:
On 11-01-12 11:35 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011/01/12 8:49 AM Mirek M. wrote:
2011/1/12 Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
Why not license it
One of the reasons, perhaps the main reason I have not upgraded to LO
from OpenOffice 3.1 yet is that I dread having to go through the process
of adding over a thousand compound words to the spellcheck dictionary.
This dictionary has almost NO compound words in it! Does anyone know if
this
adept techlists - kazar wrote:
On 2/12/11 2:04 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Just so you all know, 4 GB of DDR3 RAM can now be purchased for $36.
on the internet. In historical terms, that is indeed dirt cheap.
My point here is that any new computers being built are unlikely to have
less than 2
Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 4:09pm -0500 Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-02-11 3:35 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
How the quickstarter works is have use gobs of memory effectively
sitting idle. That doesn't work. Many of us in the computing,
engineering, physics, and chemical fields *use*
Alan Reeve wrote:
On 09/02/2011 12:05, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-02-09 6:12 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
As to your bug correction request, you would be better off filing a bug
report at freedesktop.org, which is where TDF has decided that all such
reports should be filed, or even better
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 09/02/11 16:31, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
Alex there is an article regarding the 20 things about OOo which could
be improved if someone has a subscription to linuxformat.co.uk they
could download the pd of the article. it would be a great one to follow
and make
Michael Wheatland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Case in point - Michael's work on Drupal would have provided integrated
mail list forums nabble so that any user could use their tool of
choice, and all would be interconnected, not
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
besides email people want a calendar as well as a to do list as well
functionality wise, which Thunderbird seems to lack.
On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Ian Lynch wrote:
On 1 January 2011 18:43, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
Why waste time and effort on this when there are other perfectly valid
alternatives?
Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
I think it's good to change the names of the Applications so that they
describe what each application does. LibreOffice is the brand which
will be known and names of the applications should help to find the
application you want to use. I would also suggest to translate
NoOp wrote:
On 12/17/2010 05:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice
changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble
proposal:
Write
Spread
Present
Draw
Formula
Base
This is critical when attempting to
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-14 9:38 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
The thread is discussing the possibility of name changes to some of
the modules: Writer, Impress, Calc, Draw, Base, Math.
I don't think they are suggesting a name change for LibreOffice in
this case.
Oh, ok, good... sorry
NoOp wrote:
On 11/30/2010 02:43 AM, plino wrote:
The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
The current packages (including in the smallest option
NoOp wrote:
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
...
Of these two options, I would prefer being offered the menu AFTER
having downloaded the LO suite. The reason for this: some users may
find that downloading the suite took a longer than the anticipated
Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:30:32PM -0600, Robert Derman wrote:
...snip
I use Writer a minimum of 1 hour every day, weekends included,
probably an average of 3 hours a day. I don't use any of the other
components at all. As far as I
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-11-26 15:16, Robert Derman a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-11-25 14:44, Robert Derman a écrit :
With all the discussion of the size of the download package and the
difficulty of including things like manuals I suddenly realized that
perhaps we are going about
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-11-25 14:44, Robert Derman a écrit :
With all the discussion of the size of the download package and the
difficulty of including things like manuals I suddenly realized that
perhaps we are going about this thing entirely wrong! Perhaps what we
should do is offer
With all the discussion of the size of the download package and the
difficulty of including things like manuals I suddenly realized that
perhaps we are going about this thing entirely wrong! Perhaps what we
should do is offer a CHOICE of several download packages, not just one
take it or
Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-11-23 15:36, Robert Derman a écrit :
I have said this in the OOo discuss list, and I think it bears repeating
here. One of the biggest problems causing the need for users especially
new ones to need help is the lack of a good users manual. The OOo
documentation site
Andy Brown wrote:
On Tue Nov 23 2010 12:36:35 GMT-0800 (PST) Robert Derman wrote:
Assuming that it is, I think the primary users manual should focus on
Writer, with just one chapter on each of the other modules, and a
pointer to where to download a more extensive manual on each. Where
I
jonathon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2010 09:15 PM, James Wilde wrote:
...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? And
only then?
Unless there is a compatibility tag for extensions, the way that there
is for firefox,
Sean White wrote:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in
peoples minds that we are a separate project.
I couldn't
Alan C. Baird wrote:
Proposal for significantly enlarging LibreOffice's user base with
Screenwright(R)
14 November 2010 by Alan C. Baird, prizewinning writer and creator of the
Screenwright(R) screenplay formatter [winner of the Sun/OOo CIP award]
http://w.9TimeZones.com/avails.htm
jonathon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/2010 09:15 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
I have had to enter well over 1000 compound words into the dictionary,
If you did that as a user-created dictionary, it should be in
/user/3/wordbook, and as such, can
frazelle09 wrote:
i don't know if this is the correct forum for this but -- well first of all
-- good luck to all those who are participating and developing and helping!
This project needs to be a success!
And, we are using PCLinuxOS 2010 and they are using GOoo to install OOo. i
understand
Lee Hyde wrote:
Greetings All,
I'm just a humble end user, and frankly I have little-to-no knowledge of
software development but I was wondering whether there is a clear
separation between frontend and backend with LibreOffice. Such that it
would make it easy to essentially 'slot-in' a
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:55:19 +0100, Johannes Bausch wrote:
things concerning tables. We absolutely HAVE to make the user use the
stylesheet stuff, and it must be so easy that they start to use it on
one-paged documents.
Removing the font chooser, and font-size
e-letter wrote:
In terms of priorities, making LO the default for mobile (e.g.
android) is more important than windoze.
How quickly things change in the world of electronics. It wasn't that
long ago, that phones were one thing, and computers quite another.
--
Unsubscribe instructions:
Robert Derman wrote:
Peter Rodwell wrote:
Quoting T. J. Brumfield:
However, in developing countries Android tablets may be the most
accessible
and affordable computing platform of the future. It shouldn't be
ignored.
Agreed -- it certainly shouldn't be ignored, I just think that giving
T. J. Brumfield wrote:
There were several old, often commented on, and often requested bug fixes
and features that didn't receive much attention or weren't resolved with OOo
over the years.
For those who may not be aware of the reasons for the shift/fork, or for
those who don't care about
Peter Rodwell wrote:
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office
2010
instead of switching to OO/LO:
1. Complete file compatibility. I frequently handle
T. J. Brumfield wrote:
I'm moving this into another thread. Jonathon suggested that LibO fails at
accesibility requirements. Doing a few quick Google searches, it seems that
OOo and thusly LibO uses the Java Accessibility API to enable the use of
screen readers and braille devices. This is
plino wrote:
All the developers agree that we should use open source compilers, and
this will happen. But it's not ready for production yet, so probably
the next few versions for Windows will still be using the Microsoft
compilers. It depends on how many people volunteer to work on that.
Carlos Martinez wrote:
Robert Derman skrev 2010-10-29 21:59:
Jussi Silvonen wrote:
2010/10/29 RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com
Writer have a good tradition of tools that helps the build of complex
documents (styles, styles and more styles!).
What I would like to see instead of more direct
Jussi Silvonen wrote:
2010/10/29 RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com
Writer have a good tradition of tools that helps the build of complex
documents (styles, styles and more styles!).
What I would like to see instead of more direct formatting tools, is a
redesign of the way styles are defined to easy
93 matches
Mail list logo
