On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:53:35 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
In fact these are extracted from the git logs... You need to make sure
you commit new code with a correct full name and email address.
Right; but of course, perhaps we can fix this for the past by adding
some exceptions: any
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:35:36 +0100, Samuel Mehrbrodt
s.mehrbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now, will there be an official statement from the LibreOffice leaders
about a name change?
Should there be? As far as I know did no developer suggest or actively
discuss any name change. If it should be
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:52:16 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote:
Hello everyone,
I found out in LWN (http://lwn.net/Articles/414051/) that the LO team
was working on The crufty old virtual object system - deprecated for
ten years - is being removed.
From what I understand, that means
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:44:22 -0800, Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
On 11/29/2010 07:11 AM, Phil Hibbs wrote:
Google Docs (and possibly other ODF implementations such as KOffice)
compatability is also an issue. Are there ongoing efforts to get
Google Docs to be more compatible with
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:52:25 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Try the other download page
http://www.test.libreoffice.org/download/
BTW, any chance to sqitch to to that very soon? It shouldn't hard to
replicate the static content that we have there right now and it would
modifying/improving the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:30:45 -0600, Frank Esposito wrote:
Does anyone know if the toolbar Icons will be changed in future releases?
If you submit icons for that, yes. This is a meritocracy now :).
Sebastian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:26:07 +0100, Peter Lairo peterla...@gmail.com wrote:
No application should be so arrogant as to start-up with the OS
per default.
Then you will be delighted to hear that it has been effectively turned
off in Linux by default, if I overheard it correctly.
It seems OO
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:02:11 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Does such a system also prevent false representation, i.e. someone
passing themselves off as another member ? With a userid and password
combo, this is much harder to do, it seems (notwithstanding one's
computer being hacked and
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:24:00 +1100, Sean White runicpala...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the things i LOVE about open source software is the ability for me to
ask someone else to code something or port something that i cant do myself.
So my solution to your problem of incompatible extensions is to
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:16:53 +0200, Marwan Gedeon mar...@zaradoustra.com
wrote:
I'm sorry if asking this here is inappropriate, I couldn't find the
answer in FAQ, neither another mailing list dedicated for that purpose:
what is the proper place/people to resort to, in order to report/resolve
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:42:25 +0100, Florian Reisinger reisi...@live.at wrote:
I am very sorry, if I disturb you, but is there a download link for the new
Theme and may I help to make it a little bit better? ( if possible)
No need to be sorry:
The artwork is here (browsable):
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:43:49 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
I envision a *simple* web app which allows me to
a) upload an .odt, .doc, or .docx document and
b) chose whether it causes 1) crashes or 2) document conversion problems
c) allow to add a comment
If I may?
I envision a *simple* web app which allows me to
a) upload an .odt, .doc, or .docx document and
b) chose whether it causes 1) crashes or 2) document conversion problems
c) allow to add a comment (it crashes for this document, but only when
using font X)
d) optionally add an email
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:12:19 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Now that a non-SC member replied, I can't hold back either: I wouldn't
be that sceptical :)
Well - nothing against giving appropriate credit - but the question is
what does he think is appropriate?
We can always propose and ask. :).
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:14:32 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
I'm not sure if the feature freeze for 3.3 has already been declared,
but is there any chance of getting this feature added for 3.3?
I am pretty sure that there won't be any changes like that going into
the 3.3 branch anymore, as even the
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:10:42 +, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
So what happens next? Should the suggestion for LO mobile version
remain in the mailing list archive until the proposals structure is
created? Is any member of the decision-making entity able to say now
whether this proposal
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:55:35 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Here's the result of our discussions with respect to the Community
bylaws so far.
Can we add some blurb in the long run on what the benefits/rights of members
are?
:-). Such as voting for a board of directors etc.
Sebastian
--
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:14:50 -0400, Steven Shelton wrote:
However, LibO crashes constantly on my Windows XP box. I tried to use
it for a bit to test it, and the crashes were so frequent it was
entirely unusable.
Frames with captions by any chance? In that case you will like beta3.
Sebastian
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:01:47 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
+10 - Find/Replace was a frustrating exercise for me until I found this
extension many months ago. It absolutely should *replace* the current
implementation.
1) Could someone please identify the source? It seems LGPG license but
when
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:32:54 +0100, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
Then the Web site needs updating. It still says: Be advised that the
current beta might replace your OpenOffice.org installation.
Not anymore, thanks for the heads up.
Sebastian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:08:46 +0100, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote:
And I fully agree - just dropping java just for the sake of it is a
very, very bad idea.
Right, but being able to build with --disable-java (which doesn't work
at the moment) should be a worthwhile
http://libreoffice.org/credits.html contains contributions to the TDF
wiki. However it is only able to retrieve the wiki usernames. If you
want to see you own full name there, you can enter it on this page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
All that is being used now is
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:34:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
The more interesting thing to me is - why would you want to remove the
PDF Import ? or the Presenter Console ?
Because I don't like that additional complexity in the UI? (Just an
example) There are valid reasons why I would want to
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:44:31 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Who had the bright idea to require the non-removable extensions in
LibreOffice? This, IMO, is totally uncalled for. This is a great way
to lose users.
While I agree that there should be no non-removable extensions by
default, the tone
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:52:20 +0200, leif leiflod...@gmail.com wrote:
Many large installations are very irritated about the registration
screen. The DisableFirstStartWisard solves some of the problem *but* its
version dependant.
IMHO we should remove the *registration* completely. We are not
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:10:24 -0400, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
In my view, the registrations process for LibO is quite an important tool.
Too late, I asked and it is already gone :).
I realize the power of statistics, but it is annoying and very uncommon
at least for Linux applications
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:23:13 +0200, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
There are discussions on this list about UI redesign. Even if this is
a good goal on the mid/long term, there are lots of things that can be
done *immediately* to build a better user experience: change default
toolbars and
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:26:03 -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:16 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
but we need some special care for the research
world that has been completely left out by OOo these past years.
Interesting, so would that mean more emphasis on Calc (charting)
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:17:47 -0400, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
If there is so much time wasted dealing with non-subscribers, then we
need to re-evaluate our lists and take a close look at what we are doing
wrong. Our LibO suite is so popular that so many new users call on us
for
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:40:31 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I am appalled at the level of hostility and contempt being expressed by
a few people regarding the support of ordinary users -- our customers.
While I agree that organizing good user support is important, I feel
that most of the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:04:05 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
you need to write to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
On that matter, can't we filter out mails with subject unsubscribe and
redirect them to discuss+unsubscribe dynamically? Even I failed to
unsubscribe from this list
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:39:29 +0200, Gianluca Turconi
m...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
I see: The Document Foundation (members: Charles-H. Schulz, Google,
whoever-you-want) with its steering committee/council;
While it seem you and others see: The Document Foundation + Google +
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:37:02 +0200, Gianluca Turconi
m...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
I've read that post, but I think you're reiterating an old misconception
by confusing the Document Foundation with the wider LibreOffice Community.
Fully agree. Compare the OpenStreetMap Foundation. They
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:25:52 -0400, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
wrote:
Best would be to find some way to integrate a decent forum platform with
a decent mail list manager...
The nabble forums are rather easy to integrate in a website and provide
seamless integration with a
34 matches
Mail list logo
