In data 06 ottobre 2010 alle ore 08:39:47, Gianluca Turconi
gianl...@letturefantastiche.com ha scritto:
I'm subscribed to that list, but I haven't seen any news. Nor that list
is listed on TDF main website.
Errata corrige: it's listed under Contact but not under LibreOffice
section.
--
Hi,
Von: Gianluca Turconi gianl...@letturefantastiche.com
An: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Can such new lists be announced in the announce list too?
I'm subscribed to that list, but I haven't seen any news.
whatever happened .. I sent it to announce:
And now I have to eat humble pie and apologise profusely. I did a search back
over the marketing list and the announcement is there on the 28th posted by
Varun. I don't know how I missed it and now I feel like such an idiot
Thorsten, Charles and Christoph, please accept abject apologies. I
In data sabato 2 ottobre 2010 19:00:20, Italo Vignoli ha scritto:
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Was the Office suffix a mandatory requirement for marketing reasons?
Of course not, but most of the people involved in the project since the
first day felt that office was stressing the continuity
Valter Mura wrote:
Those that were in the loop are part of the group of founding members:
there has not been any deliberate process for bringing in friends. We
have all earned - if I can use this term - the right to belong to the
group based on merit and contribution.
I agree with you
On 2010-10-05 10:15 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Seriously, it is cute, catchy and fluffy! It looks like it will be
adopted by everyone just be the sheer fact of usage or common practice.
LibO (a.k.a LibreOffice)
Too bad none of the main libo domains (I checked .com/org) are available.
..
--
Best
Hi Andy!
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 17:03 -0700 schrieb Andy Brown:
On Mon Oct 04 2010 16:29:37 GMT-0700 (PDT) Christoph Noack wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 16:10 -0700 schrieb Andy Brown:
On Mon Oct 04 2010 15:12:06 GMT-0700 (PDT) Christoph Noack wrote:
Martin, from Oracle, was
Good evening Graham!
Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 19:24 +1300 schrieb Graham Lauder:
Thorsten, Charles and Christoph, please accept abject apologies. I
shall now go hide in a hole somewheres.
Oh, please do not :-) I owe you a lot of respect to state this here,
really. Vice versa, please
In data martedì 5 ottobre 2010 18:04:26, Italo Vignoli ha scritto:
--cut--
You know, OOo is really huge, and TDF will not be a foundation like many
others, because it will be a baby with the size of an adult.
What I can suggest at the moment is to watch carefully the progress, and
jump on
On Tue Oct 05 2010 14:10:26 GMT-0700 (PDT) Christoph Noack wrote:
Hi Andy!
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 17:03 -0700 schrieb Andy Brown:
On Mon Oct 04 2010 16:29:37 GMT-0700 (PDT) Christoph Noack wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 16:10 -0700 schrieb Andy Brown:
On Mon Oct 04 2010 15:12:06
Hi Friedrich, hi Andy!
Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Indeed :-) But then we have to ask Graham, whether he is so kind to
tell us where to find Martin's mail.
I think Andy expects - like I do - that Oracle one of the big
companies
worldwide is able
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:47 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
Just what I said, the message only repeats the same statement. Again
no name or reference to where the full statement can be found.
Who made the statement? What is their position at Oracle? Anyone can
make a statement but how much
Quoting Christoph Noack christoph.no...@documentfoundation.org:
Good evening Graham!
Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 19:24 +1300 schrieb Graham Lauder:
Thorsten, Charles and Christoph, please accept abject apologies. I
shall now go hide in a hole somewheres.
Oh, please do not :-) I owe you a
For what it is worth -- my2c
LibreOffice
Very well expresses the concept of what is being achieved,
from the development and adminsitratoin point of view.
From an end users perspective ...
Well, in International or other English, and possibly some other
Germanic/Nordic languages, it is a bit
As I understand it, most of the development team of OOo jumped ship to
set up LibO in anticipation of Oracle making unacceptable changes to the
OOo concept. I don't know how many they are, but I'd be surprised if
they're over 30, and as far as I and most users are concerned, they
own the
On 2010-10-04 3:45 AM, James Wilde wrote:
But the point is, the 30 or whatever developers have been planning this
for some time. They didn't launch LibO after a beer last Friday, and
they, for better or worse, chose LibreOffice as the name.
We're never going to get nearer than 10%
On Monday 04 Oct 2010 23:06:39 Italo Vignoli wrote:
James Wilde wrote:
As I understand it, most of the development team of OOo jumped ship to
set up LibO in anticipation of Oracle making unacceptable changes to the
OOo concept. I don't know how many they are, but I'd be surprised if
James Wilde wrote:
As I understand it, most of the development team of OOo jumped ship to
set up LibO in anticipation of Oracle making unacceptable changes to the
OOo concept. I don't know how many they are, but I'd be surprised if
they're over 30, and as far as I and most users are
Graham Lauder wrote:
We don't own anything. We have simply started the process, and we have
tried to push it forward putting all our enthusiasm and energies behind
i
I'm sorry, if it's offlist, then for the majority of community members it
's
secret. That may not seem that way to you, but
On 2010-10-04 12:18 AM, Drew Jensen wrote:
It seems that people at the conference made decisions that affected
all of us an with not so much as a by your leave to most of us.
Not sure who you mean by 'us', but the principles in the newly
established organization that will become the Foundation
Graham Lauder wrote:
What info are you missing?
Most I've probably worked out and that stuff I haven't, I made up using
educated guesswork.
Oracle made an interim response, do we have link to that somewhere.
Martin, from Oracle, was linking to this article:
http://tinyurl.com/36u3ksn
Hi Jean!
Thanks for pointing that out ...
Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 08:02 +1000 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 23:36 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Graham Lauder wrote:
Oracle made an interim response, do we have link to that somewhere.
Martin, from Oracle,
On 10/04/2010 10:41 AM, Graham Lauder wrote:
I'm sorry, if it's offlist, then for the majority of community members
it's secret.
Anybody who has paid attention to OOo Project issues over the last
decade, would have known that key developers, and other influential
people in the OOo community
On 10/04/2010 03:43 PM, Carlos Rocha wrote:
and the good, old, and beautiful OOo.
Oracle has named their product Oracle OpenOffice, with the abbreviation
of OOO. One consequence of that act is that Oracle has poisoned both the
OOo and OpenOffice.org brand names.
jonathon
--
No human will see
It's unfortunate that this thread has morphed into a criticism of the
key workers to whom we all owe so much.
I posted earlier only in the spirit of contributing my opinion (which is
based on thirty years of observation of project successes and failures)
that the name chosen will be less
On Oct 2, 2010, at 12:25 , Mirek M. wrote:
Hi Christian,
2010/10/2 Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.comlohmaier%2booofut...@googlemail.com
Hi Mirek, *,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really excited about the project, but I'm a bit
Hi all
I don't like the name LibreOffice.
But I don't think the time is right for a new name yet.
The community behind the office suite have to be established both
concerning the existing office suites based on OpenOffice.org - do they
become a part of this or will the be on the sideline.
Hello all,
I'm afraid that although we're still waiting for Oracle's position on the
trademark, we already have had a full competition and vote on the name.
And we also found out, that names are never a very consensual thing. So
we'll stick to this one, unless Oracle agrees to give the
In data 02 ottobre 2010 alle ore 15:18:15, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org ha scritto:
I'm afraid that although we're still waiting for Oracle's position on the
trademark, we already have had a full competition and vote on the name.
And we also found out, that names
I like the name a lot! Give me Liberty, or give me Death! or Vive la
Liberté! I think it sums up my feelings towards the never-ending
treadmill of buying new builds of M$ Office each year, or being at the
mercy or Orkill (Oracle).
- Andor
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 09:19 -0400, Gianluca Turconi
I don't like the name LibreOffice.
as an USER i wont take name as a BIG plus point.
if we consider MS Office is a nice name but i wont fit for my requirements.
FREEDOM
Features
HCI
Stability
Awareness
Documentation
Localization
Support (including bug fixing)
Add-ons/Extensions
are the most
Hi all,
Also a very difficult thing is to find a good name that is not already
registered or trademarked as, unfortunately, most of the names are.
I don't like LibreOffice either, but we went public with that name and
I think the users will get confused if we change the name again.
Just my five
Il 02/10/2010 18.31, Italo Vignoli ha scritto:
Many of them (I remember UniversalOffice and PureOffice, but many
others, hundreds of them). The main problems were trademarks and domain
names already registered somewhere in the world, which would generate
problems.
Was the Office suffix a
Hi Mirek, *,
Mirek M. schrieb:
2010/10/2 Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.comlohmaier%2booofut...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really excited about the project, but I'm a bit concerned
about the name. What concerns me is
34 matches
Mail list logo
