Hi Sophie, Thorsten,
Sophie Gautier skrev 2010-10-09 19:26:
Concerning the TCM, I've worked on specifications for a new tool that
is being develop and will be integrated to QUASTe. The current
infrastructure for TCM is far too complicated and mix administrative
tasks and user tasks. Also, we
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
Per Eriksson, what do you need on the server to run QATrack?
I don'tspeak for Per, but until I maintained it QATrack was a rather
standard LAMP application and, as far as I could see,this is still the
case. But Andre' already clarified that
Hi Thorsten,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
3.3.
First of all, this is what we currently have:
* a
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier skrev 2010-10-09 19:26:
I volunteer to work on this if you need me and also
to produce the test cases relative to the new features.
Also, we should not miss the power of the NLC on this testing tasks,
if we organize a simple and powerful workflow with a localization
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of we
really need it
I actually believe that these are fundamental tools to assess quality of
a build, and that insufficient testing could mean that
Hi Nguyen Vu Hung, *,
hope this is the correct appellation..
first of all: I'm not involved in Software development and neither in
QA *therefore* I'm answering here. :o))
Nguyen Vu Hung schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
[snip]
VLC TestTool is a great tool to assure the quality of the branches
and releases. It helps avoiding regressions and makes the repetitive
tasks for us.
Hi Caio, all,
yeah, I
Hi,
as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
3.3.
First of all, this is what we currently have:
* a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs QA
discussion there):
Le 07/10/2010 10:25, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Hi,
as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
3.3.
First of all, this is what we currently have:
* a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs QA
Hi Thorsten, *,
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
3.3.
First of all, this is what we currently have:
stretched
* a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs QA
Hi Thorsten, *
Am 07.10.2010 10:25, schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
fashion, and add tools as we go (and decide that we need them) - I
know that the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens skrev 2010-10-07 10:25:
Hi,
as we start to ramp up more infrastructure, I'd like to make
you think about what's crucially needed to do QA for LibreOffice
3.3.
First of all, this is what we currently have:
* a LibreOffice technical list (I'd like to have devs
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote (07-10-10 14:04)
I think we need something like TCM to manage manual tests of localisation.
I know that Sophie is/was working on a new version of TCM.
She should have some good ideas in this matter.
Experience in Dutch NLC (where TCM is not used that much):
People
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
fashion
As I understood from an earlier message of yours, LibreOffice 3.3 will
be heavily based on OOo 3.3 and I thus agree with the lightweight testing.
the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like
Andrea Pescetti, 07-10-2010 19:46:
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
fashion
As I understood from an earlier message of yours, LibreOffice 3.3 will
be heavily based on OOo 3.3 and I thus agree with the lightweight
testing.
+1
the
15 matches
Mail list logo
